No 454 “En mi opinión” Agosto 10,
2013.
Editor Lázaro R González Miño ‘IN GOD WE TRUST” ,
|
So... Barack Obama Is Claiming He'll Shut The Government Down Unless ObamaCare Is Fully Funded... We Say, Tell Him To Bring It On. As a matter of fact, Senators Mike Lee, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, and nine other Senators have already sent a letter to Harry Reid saying that they will vote AGAINST ANY bill that contains funding for ObamaCare. [Emphasis Ours] But there's a problem... the GOP establishment isn't just running for cover, they're fighting Lee, Cruz, Paul and Rubio tooth-and-nail... they're actually telling lies to the American people... and some have even reversed their positions and have gone so far as to say that defunding ObamaCare is "stupid"... all to AVOID ACTUALLY DEFUNDING OBAMACARE... and we're not about to let them get away with it. Why? Rush Limbaugh said it best on Monday: "I don't think they were ever serious about repealing health care, the Republicans. I don't think they ever were. I think that it has been lip service from the get-go." And now that Lee, Cruz, Paul and Rubio have called their hand, cut through the lip-service, and put a proposal on the table that can actually stop ObamaCare... they're scrambling... they're trying to hoodwink you... they'll say anything... do anything... to give themselves political cover to avoid stopping ObamaCare. So we're going to put every Republican Member of the Senate on notice... stop the lies... stop the evasions... stop the surrenders... and do not authorize one thin dime for the implementation of ObamaCare... PERIOD.
Lies... Lies... And More Lies.
Washington insiders reacted with glee on Monday over the erroneous reports that Lee was backing down on his promise to defund ObamaCare... but it was all political spin. What Lee did was state an undeniable truth to Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday: "We all know that the government's going to get funded. The question is whether the government gets funded with ObamaCare or without it." Lee didn't back down. What Lee did was expose the scare tactic that was first used by Barack Obama, and is now being shamefully used by the Republican establishment, to the light of day. The truth of the matter is that no politician in Washington, including Barack Obama, will allow the government to go unfunded for any significant amount of time. Barack Obama knows it. Senators Lee, Cruz, Paul and Rubio know it. The GOP establishment knows it. And now that you know it, it's time to let them know that you refuse to allow them to use Obama's hollow threat of a government shutdown as political cover to betray you. Pay no heed to the scare tactics, the only question that remains, as Lee so aptly pointed out is "whether the government gets funded with ObamaCare or without it."
Speaking Of Lies... Here's Another One.
Some of you may have heard Karl Rove bloviate on the O'Reilly Factor on Monday that refusing to fund ObamaCare won't actually stop ObamaCare from being funded because"99% of the funding is mandatory and not discretionary." Rove isn't the only one spreading this tall-tale, but Limbaugh, quoting an article from the Heritage Foundation, set the record straight.
So
what's really behind this attempt to deceive the American people?
Limbaugh again: "Washington does not want it stopped, folks. Washington does not have a problem with ObamaCare. It's government, after all, and they like government." Well... we're going to make them stop it. It's time to draw a line in the sand, right here and right now.
Floyd Brownè Will Obama Bail Out 100 Cities?
By FLOYD BROWN, Chief Political Analyst The battle for bailout money is on. One side features the municipal bond holders. On the other are city pensioners, mostly senior citizens and even a few widows. Of course, Detroit is ground zero for the battle. As we all know, the city's liquidity crisis forced it into bankruptcy court. And everyone interested in government and big city finances is glued to reports from the court. Could the decisions made in Detroit set precedents for future cases? It's an important question, because more than 100 major cities are right behind Detroit. And anarchy could result if these cities don't get more cash. Click here to continue reading... The Western Center for Journalism is a 501©3 educational organization. Contributions are tax-deductible as allowed by IRS regulations. Personal and corporate contributions are allowed.
The
Center for Western Journalism
42104 N Venture Drive Suite B-122, Anthem, AZ 85086 (202) 370-6366 |
Cowardly Congressman Refuses Affidavit On Obama ID Fraud
Congressman
Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) bristles and unloads on Miki Booth, a constituent (and
friend of ours) asking about Obama’s fraudulent ID documents and irrefutable
evidence of forgery, as proven by Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s MCSO Cold Case Posse. http://www.westernjournalism.com/cowardly-congressman-refuses-affidavit-on-obama-id-fraud/
Alberto Perez è Mary Anastasia O´Grady no sólo es la periodista de habla inglesa que en
mi opinión demuestra un conocimiento extraordinario sobre Cuba y Latinoamérica,
pero es la única periodista americana que creo que tiene un conocimiento
comparable al de los medios de comunicación del exilio.
Esto es importante por el hecho de que
María Anastasia es una columnista en el Wall Street Journal, el
periódico de más circulación en los Estados Unidos, y en el extranjero, esto sin lugar a dudas ayuda a la causa cubana en círculos donde
la prensa izquierdista tergiversa las noticias y trata de idealizar
positivamente las figuras del comunismo cubano.
Un caso que es indicativo de esto es el
caso del mes pasado, cuando descubrieron a un carguero cubano con armas y
combustible de Corea del Norte.
Este caso como todos los que perjudica a
Cuba, queda relegado a páginas interiores por un día y después no se comenta
más. Ni siquiera en el exilio vimos darle la publicidad y la importancia que
este caso se merece.
Realmente como cubanos tenemos que darle
las gracias a María Anastasia por su trabajo por la democracia y la lucha
contra el comunismo del siglo XXI
The Castro Brothers Get Caught in the
Act
News of arms shipments to North Korea rudely interrupts the happy
talk about reforms in Cuba.
By MARY ANASTASIA O'GRADY
The news that Cuba was caught smuggling fuel
and weaponry on a North Korean freighter through the Panama Canal surprised
many who have bought the line that the Castro regime is reforming and eager to
lose its reputation for criminality.
They are like the fabled frog that agrees to carry the scorpion on
his back across the water. When the scorpion stings the frog midstream, the
amphibian is confounded because it is clear that both will drown. But the
scorpion explains that what he did was inevitable because "it's my
nature."
The same goes for the Castro brothers. They are simply incapable
of containing their beastliness.
A handout picture provided by Cubadebate on February 24, 2013
shows Former Cuban President Fidel Castro (L), and his brother, Cuban President
Raul Castro (R), during a session of the Cuban National Assembly, in Havana,
Cuba.
To pretend otherwise is to deny that the Castros, who lobbied the
Soviets for nuclear war against the U.S. in 1962, are still dangerous. Yet
denial is in fashion in some newsrooms and in the cloakrooms on Capitol Hill,
which is why the weapons-smuggling story was so evanescent.
The scorpion nature of the Castros is hardly
news to Cubans. They are not permitted to use the Internet, to watch
independent news broadcasts, to earn dollars, to speak their minds, to send
their children to private school or to worship freely. Something as basic as
milk for children is hard to find.
Some Cubans who rebel languish for years in
dungeons. Others are now victims of a new method of repression that observers
call "catch and release." The Council of Human Rights Rapporteurs in
Cuba reported last week that "in the first six months of 2013 the Cuban
government political police made more than 1,000 arbitrary arrests for political
activity, the majority [of the arrests] violent and lasting on average between
12 and 24 hours." The council counts more than 70 political prisoners
serving multiple-year sentences.
Increased repression has accompanied recent
efforts to bring in more foreign exchange by attracting American visitors
through "educational" and "cultural" excursions that are
permitted by the U.S. under its long-standing embargo. The movements of these
visitors and their interaction with Cubans must be tightly controlled by the
dictatorship to ensure that they don't see too much of the real Cuba. They are
supposed to go away singing the praises of the happy communist paradise, and
many do.
A dictatorship is apparently an exotic
curiosity for well-to-do Americans. They are being herded through selected
parts of the country in large numbers to view firsthand what deprivation can
inspire.
This week the elite Phillips Exeter Academy
announced that it would join with Miss Porter's School "on a weeklong
exploration of the fascinating art and culture of Cuba." There was no
mention of whether the alumni from these prep schools would be visiting the
jails where nonconformists—including artists, musicians and the black
human-rights advocate Sonia Garro—reside. Nor was it clear whether they would
learn about the dual-currency regime in which the military government pockets
dollars from the visitors while it pays workers in almost worthless bits of
paper. Somehow I doubt it.
Now comes the news of the arms shipment
aboard the Chong Chon Gang headed for North Korea, a land of barbed-wire fences
and starvation, a regime so dangerous to world peace that even the dithering
United Nations Security Council, China included, agreed unanimously in March to
heightened sanctions against it.
The Cuban foreign ministry immediately claimed that the weaponry,
found hidden under 10 tons of sugar and undeclared, was obsolete and going
abroad for repair. But José Otero writes in the Panamanian daily La Prensa that
Panamanian officials found two MiG fighters and full tanks of jet fuel, along
with "a mid-air refueling plane, two vehicles for towing radars, a
rocket-launching platform, a radar antenna with platform and many cables"
in the ship's hold.
Experts say the story doesn't add up. Weapons
repairs are normally made by ordering parts and flying in technicians. What is
more, since everything was made in the Soviet Union, sending it to North Korea
doesn't make sense.
Former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe
tweeted on July 18 that a reliable source told him that part of the shipment
was destined for Ecuador. Colombian journalist Eduardo MacKenzie noted in an
online column last week that "seven other North Korean ships had made
trips to Cuba in the last four years with itineraries similar to the Chong Chon
Gang." A further mystery is what these ships may have brought to Cuba in
the first place.
All of this smells bad. Cuba wants to shake
off its international pariah status so that it can get World Bank and
InterAmerican Development Bank handouts and credit from U.S. banks, thereby avoiding
economic and political reform. Indoctrinating the girls at Miss Porter's School
is part of that effort. The arms-trafficking is, or should be, a wake-up call.
Write to O'Grady@wsj.com
Alberto Perez è Un joven Israel Hernández en Miami Beach
murió a consecuencias de un rayo taser de la policía cuando resistió arresto. y
se dio a la fuga.
¿Qué conclusiones sacamos de esta lamentable muerte?.
1.'La hermana dice que Hernández era un "skateborder" o
sea que patinaba en tablitas, y un artista de grafiti que quería "cambiar
el mundo a través de su arte".
Si traducimos esto es que era un vago que se pasaba el tiempo patinando
y pintando las paredes de los establecimientos, un vandalismo que costaba
dinero a los dueños de negocios que como todos los gastos tiene que pasar a los
consumidores.
El mundo que quería cambiar era el del orden y el respeto a la propiedad
ajena. quería cambiarlo a un mundo en que no hubiera ley que respetar en
que los delincuentes son los héroes y los guardadores del orden son los
villanos.
No hablan de la asistencia a clase ni de los estudios que estaba
cursando. Un artista pinta
en un lienzo que le pertenece, o con el permiso de los propietarios en la pared
de un establecimiento, no pinta en la propiedad de otros sin su permiso. Esto no es un artista, es un
vandalizador.
2.'Que la policía
es brutal y asesina.
Lo peor es que a la policía no le importa la vida de los demás. (dijo la
hermana)
Si Israel no hubiera violado la ley, si Israel no se hubiera dado a la
fuga, si Israel hubiera estado en su casa estudiando, la policía no hubiera
tenido que actuar. Más de una docena de policías, tuvieron que perder horas
persiguiendo a
Israel. El que se dedica a
ser un oficial de la policía piensa en la comunidad. El pago de policía no está
de acuerdo con los riesgos que corre. Además se trata de un accidente, los
rayos tases son para hacer más fácil la detención, no se suponen que sean un
arma de fuego o un arma mortal. Si
alguien no tenía respeto a la vida de las demás personas era Israel que dañaba
las propiedades de otros, si alguien tiene la responsabilidad son los padres
que ahora quieren culpar a los que trataban de evitar un vandalismo.
El convertir los delincuentes en héroes y los que cuidan de la ley en
villanos, no puede traer más consecuencias que cada día la calidad de la
delincuencia se incrementará y que cada día menos personas escogerán el trabajo
de oficiales de la ley.
La conclusión a la que se hubiera llegado en la antigua cultura
americana, esto ha sucedido porque Israel era un delincuente. Que es el deber
de los padres el educar a sus hijos para que respetaran las leyes y no
sucedieran incidentes como este.
Pero la cultura americana ha cambiado como dice la hermana de Israel, él
quería cambiar el mundo, ya Israel no lo cambiará, pero hay muchos
Israeles que nos seguirán trantando de cambiar el mundo en que vivimos y
los valores tradicionales bajos los que hemos vivido en esta nación.
Washington Post Writer Wrong about Religion, America, and the Constitution Posted 3 Hours Ago by Gary
DeMar filed under Atheism, Congress, Constitution, Email Featured, History,
Islam, Morality, Politics1 Charles C. Hayne has written
“Dispelling the myth of a ‘Christian nation’” for the Washington Post. The article begins: “Culture
warriors, pseudo historians and opportunistic politicians have spent the last
several decades peddling the myth that America was founded as a ‘Christian
nation.’ “The propaganda appears to be working. “A majority of the American
people (51 percent) believes that the U.S. Constitution establishes a Christian
nation, according to the State of the First Amendment survey released last
month by the First Amendment Center. America existed as a nation long before
the Constitution was drafted and enacted into law. Every colony and state had
as its foundation the Christian religion, some more specific than others, from
the 1606 First Charter of Virginia and the 1643 Constitution of the New England
Confederation to the 1778 Constitution of the State of South Carolina and the
1776 Constitution which stated in Article 32 the following: “That no person who
shall deny the being of God, or the truth of the Protestant religion, or the
divine authority of the Old or New Testaments, or who shall hold religious
principles incompatible with the freedom and safety of the State, shall be
capable of holding any office or place of trust or profit in the civil
department within this State.” Hayne also writes: “Nowhere will you find [in
the Constitution] mention of God, Christ or any intention to found a Christian
nation.” In Article I, Section 7, Paragraph 2 of the Constitution, the
following is found: “If any bill shall not be returned by the President within
ten Days (Sundays excepted)….” Sundays were set aside as a day of rest for the
president because it was a distinctly Christian observance. If it was the
purpose of the Constitution to remove all things religious, then why include
this most particular Christian exception? Then there is this in Article 3: “No
Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses
to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.” The Wikipedia article
on Article 3 has this: “This rule was derived from an older English statute,
the Treason Act 1695.” The Treason Act got it from the Bible (Deut. 17:6;
19:15; Matt. 18:16; John 8:17; 2 Cor. 13:1; 1 Tim. 5:19; Heb. 10:28). Just
above George Washington’s signature, the following is found: “Done in
Convention, by the unanimous consent of the States present, the seventeenth day
of September, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty
seven.” The use of “Lord” is a reference to Jesus Christ. The 1797 date tells
us as much. Compare our Constitution to what the French did during their
revolutionary period. They started their calendar with the year one and
abolished the seven-day biblical week with a ten-day week. What about the “no
religious test” clause in Article VI? At one level, the “no religious test” was
designed to protect the states since some state constitutions required a
religious test for office holders. The federal Constitution did not change what
the states required. A national religious test would have been contentious
since the states would have lost their right to set their own religious
requirements. The First Amendment was designed to keep the national government
out of the religious affairs of the states: “Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
thereof. . .” Constitutional scholar Daniel Dreisbach writes: “[M]any delegates
to the state conventions were unwilling to grant the new national regime
authority to implement a practice (i.e. religious tests) that was common at the
state level precisely because they wanted to retain the state tests and they
feared a federal test might displace existing state tests.”[1] Luther
Martin (1748-1826) The no religious test clause was controversial in the 18th
century among those who saw the broader implications of its inclusion. Luther
Martin (1748–1826) of Maryland, in a lengthy letter to the Speaker of the House
of Delegates of Maryland, set forth his justification in leaving the
Constitutional convention and in refusing to sign the Constitution. He wrote:
“There were some members so unfashionable as to think that a belief in the
existence of a Deity and of a state of future rewards and punishments would be
some security for the good conduct of our rulers, and that, in a Christian
country, it would be at least decent to hold out some distinction between the
professors of Christianity and downright infidelity or paganism.”[2] Today, we
are paying a heavy price for a secularized government by those who assumed that
a vibrant 18th-century Christian worldview would be enough to maintain the
moral and political sanity of a nation more than 200 years hence. Many of
America's founders believed that Christian morality was shared by all Americans
regardless of faith, and that no particular religion was necessary for
maintaining that morality. They were wrong. Read more:
http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/08/washington-post-writer-wrong-about-religion-america-and-the-constitution/#ixzz2bUIt7EEw
Read more at http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/08/washington-post-writer-wrong-about-religion-america-and-the-constitution/#IDtdbArXftkGJ4Bp.99
Read more at http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/08/washington-post-writer-wrong-about-religion-america-and-the-constitution/#IDtdbArXftkGJ4Bp.99
Diego Quiros > CARTA ABIERTA AL PRESIDENTE BARACK HUSSEIN
OBAMA
Nosotros,
los que seguimos las enseñanzas de Cristo, estamos siendo atacados desde hace
algunos años.
¿Por
qué hemos permitido que los principios en que se ha basado la Nación
desde su independencia se hayan debilitado tanto? Washington, Lincoln,
Jefferson y otros patriotas fueron los hombres que establecieron a
América como una Nación bajo Dios.
Durante
la década de los años 60, surgió la Sra. Madelyn Murray, liberal e izquierdista
quien quiso obtener la ciudadanía soviética, la cual le fue denegada. Esta
señora fundó la asociación de americanos ateos y logro que la
Corte Suprema decidiera la eliminación de la oración en las escuelas públicas.
Años
después, el 22 de Enero de 1973, la Corte Suprema declara el aborto legal
.A esta petición también se sumaron izquierdistas y liberales. La
pionera en esta demanda fue Margaret Sanger, infiel y promiscua, editora
de un periódico titulado “La Mujer Rebelde” y cuyo lema era: sin Dios y sin
dueño, esta señora tuvo grandes simpatías por Hitler. Probablemente
gran parte de los participantes en estas demandas, ignoraban su
comienzo.
Ahora,
el Sr. Presidente plantea que los costos de la práctica
del aborto, además de los anticonceptivos y esterilizaciones tienen que ser
incluidos en los gastos de los seguros de salud pagados a los empleados de
centros religiosos. ¿Quién ha dicho que el resultado del acto sexual
entre un hombre y una mujer, es un problema de salud? Eso es un acto de placer
y de amor, fruto de una decisión personal. Esto no es una enfermedad.
Consideramos
que esta decisión no es solamente contra una institución, va mucho más allá,
esto es un ataque contra los valores morales y principios
religiosos la cual está protegida por la Constitución de
los Estados Unidos en la Declaración de la Carta Magna. ¿Es que La Corte
Suprema, para satisfacer los deseos del Sr. Presidente, también va a cambiar la
Declaración de la Carta de los Derechos Humanos?
Usted,
Sr. Presidente, esta complaciendo las exigencias ateas, totalitarias, usted
nuevamente está a favor de una minoría que demanda tratos especiales,
usted está abandonando lo fundamental y establecido para
unirse a los marxistas, liberales y ateos, cuya agenda va contra la base de
toda sociedad: la familia.
Usted,
Sr. Presidente, al igual que lo hizo el presidente Carter, está siendo
muy tolerante con los enemigos de este país.
Por
favor, recapacite y defienda nuestra cultura y respete nuestras LIBERTADES y
DERECHOS.
Diego
Quiros, Sr
Rand Paul: Hold Obama Accountable for Benghazi
Cover-up
Wednesday,
07 Aug 2013 04:44 PM By Sen. Rand Paul
Did Hillary Clinton tell
the truth? She appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in
January and testified that she had no knowledge of a CIA gun-running operation
in Benghazi.
Clinton’s exact words were, “You’ll have to direct that question to the agency that ran the annex,” and then she claimed that she did not know whether a gun-running operation was taking place.
In March, The New York Times reported that the CIA has been involved with secret shipments of weapons to Syria for over a year: “The airlift, which began on a small scale in early 2012 and continued intermittently through last fall, expanded into a steady and much heavier flow late last year, the data shows. It has grown to include more than 160 military cargo flights by Jordanian, Saudi, and Qatari military-style cargo planes landing at Esenboga Airport near Ankara, and, to a lesser degree, at other Turkish and Jordanian airports.”
CNN now reports that at least 35 American agents were in Benghazi and the CIA is doing everything possible to prevent them from testifying to Congress.
Did Clinton lie because the CIA program was classified? Is it OK to lie to Congress about classified programs?
President Obama's national intelligence director, James Clapper, lied to the Senate in March of this year when he testified that no American records were being collected by the NSA. He tried to explain his prevarication by saying that he responded in the least untruthful way he knew how because the program was classified.
It is a felony to lie to Congress. Individuals who lie to Congress can receive five to 10 years in prison. I know of no exception for lying about classified programs.
Clapper's lie has seriously damaged the credibility of the intelligence community. The NSA initially claimed that terrorist plots were stymied by the suspicionless searches of phone records. However, on closer questioning, it admits that each of the foiled plots really began with other intelligence, not from information unique to searching American phone records.
Even more important than the details of the spying scandal is whether or not officials from the executive branch will be allowed to lie to Congress without repercussions.
Much has been made of the altered talking points in the aftermath of the Benghazi assassinations, but I think almost everyone has fallen for the president's misdirection campaign. The altered talking points were never about trying to get anyone to believe that the attack was not perpetrated by terrorists. By its very nature the attack was an act of terrorism, and no thinking human ever doubted otherwise.
The misdirection campaign was always about the CIA annex and the gun-running operation. The administration feared an Iran-Contra-like scandal so close to the election. Many Republicans fell for the bait because they support arming the Islamic rebels in Syria.
As Fox News reported, “On the night of Sept. 11, in what would become his last known public meeting, Stevens met with the Turkish Consul General Ali Sait Akin, and escorted him out of the consulate front gate one hour before the assault began at approximately 9:35 p.m. local time.”
According to the Times of London, a Libyan ship "carrying the largest consignment of weapons for Syria … has docked in Turkey." The shipment reportedly weighed 400 tons and included SA-7 surface-to-air anti-craft missiles and rocket-propelled grenades.
A few months later, the Wall Street Journal reported that the State Department presence in Benghazi "provided diplomatic cover" for the now-exposed CIA annex.
Does anyone really believe that Hillary Clinton, said to be the leading supporter of arming the Islamic rebels, did not know of the CIA operation?
There is only one way to find out. Chairman Issa should depose Hillary Clinton and bring her back before the House Oversight committee. He should ask: Did you have any knowledge of the CIA gun-running operation in Benghazi?
And he should also ask: Did you have any conversations with military personnel about not sending reinforcements to Benghazi from Tripoli or elsewhere?
The American people have not forgotten about the Benghazi attacks and the innocent lives that were taken that day. We deserve real, honest answers from our president and his administration, not a cowardly misdirection campaign.
Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/rand-paul-hillary-benghazi/2013/08/07/id/519270?s=al&promo_code=14728-1#ixzz2bUMxq4Zr
Clinton’s exact words were, “You’ll have to direct that question to the agency that ran the annex,” and then she claimed that she did not know whether a gun-running operation was taking place.
In March, The New York Times reported that the CIA has been involved with secret shipments of weapons to Syria for over a year: “The airlift, which began on a small scale in early 2012 and continued intermittently through last fall, expanded into a steady and much heavier flow late last year, the data shows. It has grown to include more than 160 military cargo flights by Jordanian, Saudi, and Qatari military-style cargo planes landing at Esenboga Airport near Ankara, and, to a lesser degree, at other Turkish and Jordanian airports.”
CNN now reports that at least 35 American agents were in Benghazi and the CIA is doing everything possible to prevent them from testifying to Congress.
Did Clinton lie because the CIA program was classified? Is it OK to lie to Congress about classified programs?
President Obama's national intelligence director, James Clapper, lied to the Senate in March of this year when he testified that no American records were being collected by the NSA. He tried to explain his prevarication by saying that he responded in the least untruthful way he knew how because the program was classified.
It is a felony to lie to Congress. Individuals who lie to Congress can receive five to 10 years in prison. I know of no exception for lying about classified programs.
Clapper's lie has seriously damaged the credibility of the intelligence community. The NSA initially claimed that terrorist plots were stymied by the suspicionless searches of phone records. However, on closer questioning, it admits that each of the foiled plots really began with other intelligence, not from information unique to searching American phone records.
Even more important than the details of the spying scandal is whether or not officials from the executive branch will be allowed to lie to Congress without repercussions.
Much has been made of the altered talking points in the aftermath of the Benghazi assassinations, but I think almost everyone has fallen for the president's misdirection campaign. The altered talking points were never about trying to get anyone to believe that the attack was not perpetrated by terrorists. By its very nature the attack was an act of terrorism, and no thinking human ever doubted otherwise.
The misdirection campaign was always about the CIA annex and the gun-running operation. The administration feared an Iran-Contra-like scandal so close to the election. Many Republicans fell for the bait because they support arming the Islamic rebels in Syria.
As Fox News reported, “On the night of Sept. 11, in what would become his last known public meeting, Stevens met with the Turkish Consul General Ali Sait Akin, and escorted him out of the consulate front gate one hour before the assault began at approximately 9:35 p.m. local time.”
According to the Times of London, a Libyan ship "carrying the largest consignment of weapons for Syria … has docked in Turkey." The shipment reportedly weighed 400 tons and included SA-7 surface-to-air anti-craft missiles and rocket-propelled grenades.
A few months later, the Wall Street Journal reported that the State Department presence in Benghazi "provided diplomatic cover" for the now-exposed CIA annex.
Does anyone really believe that Hillary Clinton, said to be the leading supporter of arming the Islamic rebels, did not know of the CIA operation?
There is only one way to find out. Chairman Issa should depose Hillary Clinton and bring her back before the House Oversight committee. He should ask: Did you have any knowledge of the CIA gun-running operation in Benghazi?
And he should also ask: Did you have any conversations with military personnel about not sending reinforcements to Benghazi from Tripoli or elsewhere?
The American people have not forgotten about the Benghazi attacks and the innocent lives that were taken that day. We deserve real, honest answers from our president and his administration, not a cowardly misdirection campaign.
Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/rand-paul-hillary-benghazi/2013/08/07/id/519270?s=al&promo_code=14728-1#ixzz2bUMxq4Zr
Ricardo Samitierè¿Se Desplomara la economía En
Diciembre?
A quien creerle... Para ver los pronósticos... MALOS...
Esta película fue
filmada hace 82 años.
Después de que
vean este film, vean fotos de hoy y comparen estas con lo que ya existía en
1930. Los emplazo a que me digan cuantas ciudades de esa época en América
podían compararse con nuestra Habana. Limpieza, elegancia, progreso, alegría, y
un orden especial que quedó en el olvido.
Envíesela a un
amigo o muéstresela a sus hijos, para que se sientan orgullosos de su herencia
cubana.
AQUÍ >.>>>>>>
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=fEMYLkpYxX8
AQUÍ >.>>>>>>
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=fEMYLkpYxX8
Ricardo Samitier.
Is Obama at War? With the American People? /
A great Churchill quote
came to mind recently, and with all the “phony scandals” as a backdrop, I was
struck by an unsettling notion. Is Obama at War?
The Churchill buffs may
know where this is going, but for everyone else, here is the quote. “In
wartime, the truth is so precious that she must be attended by a bodyguard of
lies.”
In fact, even without
remembering those first two words, it was still clear that the bodyguard of
lies was intended to deceive his enemies, not his friends.
Looking at the handling
of the unrelenting scandals it is glaringly obvious that POTUS & Co. are
not telling the truth. Some of their evasions are even on literal life-or-death
issues.
Now think of the public
scrutiny his predecessor faced. For all of that, which of the “Bush lied,
people died” complaints resulted in torched Embassies, or the arming of
murderous drug cartels with Mexican civilian casualties numbering in the hundreds?
Scandals like NSA’s
billion-bullet shopping spree, privacy violations, email hacks, phone tracking,
or cudgeling political rivals with the IRS are emphatically NOT the S.O.P. of
any “free” society in peacetime. So I ask again.
Is Obama at war?
As Churchill knew, there
is no moral obligation to speak plainly to an enemy. WWII has amazingly
complex stories of the steps Allies took to deceive the Axis powers.
Who is being lied to?
Is it a rival nation in a Shooting War — or even a Cold War? It turns
out that Obama is sometimes more candid with rival nations than his
own. Remember his infamous “hot mic” moment with Russia? “After my
election I will have more flexibility.” And this is despite Russia’s
routine antagonism to American interests.
There is little doubt
what threats animated earlier Presidents. Sometimes it was a traditional
war. Others were — rightly or wrongly — committed in (relative) peacetime
to domestic threats like “War on Terror” or even “War on Drugs”.
So what rouses the Peace-Prize-President’s
animus? In ‘08, Gitmo was an abomination, and must be closed in a year
(per Executive Order). The “abomination” lingers on. But Eastern
Europe’s Missile Defense is gone!
Did the
Commander-In-Chief (does he understand that role?) stand up and denounce the
carnage at Fort Hood? The shooter calls himself “mujahideen”, does POTUS
call it Domestic Terror? No, it’s “workplace violence” effectively
denying the fallen of any honors they’d receive fighting that same ideology on
foreign soil.
When the cost of his
administration’s botched “Fast & Furious” program raised the Mexican
civilian death toll well into three digits, did this alleged “defender” of
immigrants and Hispanics do something about it? Yes, absolutely he did.
He invoked Executive Privilege in a boilerplate CYA move. Feel free
to take a moment and contrast his reaction to the Sandy Hook hand-wringing “if
even one child’s life can be saved, then we need to act.”
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/08/is-obama-at-war-with-the-american-people/#ZYtJ6VizFtowSVKW.99
‘OUTRAGEOUS’: IRS AGENT
STUNS MEMBERS OF CONGRESS WITH CLAIM ABOUT TARGETING SCANDAL
An unidentified IRS
agent told members Congress that the embattled tax agency is still targeting
conservative groups three months after the scandal came to light, according to testimony released Thursday by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.).
During closed-door testimony, the agent reportedly told members
of the committee that requests for tax-exempt status by Tea Party groups are
still being subjected to “secondary screening,” at least in his office.
When asked what he would do with an application from a Tea Party
group even if there was no evidence of political activity, the IRS agent
replied: “At this point I would send it to secondary screening, political
advocacy.”
“So you would treat a Tea Party group as a political advocacy
case even if there was no evidence of political activity on the application. Is
that right?” a committee investigator asked.
“Based on my current manager’s direction, uh-huh,” the agent
repeated.
The IRS official said the so-called “be on the lookout” or BOLO
list has been suspended, but no further direction on how to process
applications from conservative groups has been provided.
“If a political advocacy case came in today, I would give it —
or talk about it to my manager because right now we really don’t have any
direction or we haven’t had any for the last month and a half,” he said,
according to the testimony.
Camp called the allegations of continued political targeting by
the IRS “outrageous.”
Wednesday, August 1, 2013
Committee: Today, currently, how do you analyze advocacy cases.
If, for example, Tea Party of Arkansas came in today, how would you handle it?
IRS agent: Well, the BOLO list doesn’t exist anymore.
Committee: Sure.
IRS: If a political advocacy case came in today, I would give it
— or talk about it to my manager because right now we really don’t have any
direction or we haven’t had any for the last month and a half.
Committee: If you saw — I am asking this currently, if today if
a Tea Party case, a group — a case from a Tea Party group came in to your desk,
you reviewed the file and there was no evidence of political activity, would
you potentially approve that case? Is that something you would do?
IRS agent: At this point I would send it to secondary screening,
political advocacy.
Committee: So you would treat a Tea Party group as a political
advocacy case even if there was no evidence of political activity on the
application. Is that right?
IRS agent: Based on my current manager’s direction, uh-huh.
El origen de la palabra "Anfitrión"enviado
por Gustavo Rojas.
En la mitología griega, Anfitrión era el marido de Alcmena, la madre de Hércules. Mientras Anfitrión estaba en la guerra de Tebas, el dios Zeus se acostaba con Alcmena, noche tras noche, tras lo cual, ella quedó embarazada. Con el embarazo de Alcmena, se creó un gran alboroto porque, evidentemente, Anfitrión dudó de la fidelidad de su esposa. Al final todo fue aclarado por Zeus y entonces, Anfitrión se puso contento, por ser el marido de una mujer escogida por el dios Zeus para tener sexo.
En la mitología griega, Anfitrión era el marido de Alcmena, la madre de Hércules. Mientras Anfitrión estaba en la guerra de Tebas, el dios Zeus se acostaba con Alcmena, noche tras noche, tras lo cual, ella quedó embarazada. Con el embarazo de Alcmena, se creó un gran alboroto porque, evidentemente, Anfitrión dudó de la fidelidad de su esposa. Al final todo fue aclarado por Zeus y entonces, Anfitrión se puso contento, por ser el marido de una mujer escogida por el dios Zeus para tener sexo.
De aquellas noches de amor nació el semi-dios
Hércules. A partir de ese momento, el término "Anfitrión" pasó a
tener el sentido de "aquél que recibe en
su casa". Por lo tanto, Anfitrión es sinónimo de cornudo,tranquilo,
pendejo y feliz. Resumiendo: Cuando alguien le diga que
usted es un buen Anfitrión, mándelo a la mierda y por las dudas, esté
atento y vigile a su vieja, no vaya a ser que algún "Zeus" estéatendiéndola y
al rato, ande usted feliz de la vida manteniendo varios Herculit... perdón...
pequeños Hércules en su casa.
Demasiada cultura puede ser un problema.
Enviado
por Gustavo Rojas è Ya es Invierno ...sabes? El tiempo tiene su manera especial de moverse rápido y
tomarte desprevenido en el paso de los años. Parece solo ayer que era
joven, recién casado y embarcándome en mi nueva vida con mi pareja. Pero de
cierta forma parece que fue hace mucho tiempo y ahora pienso, ¿adónde se fueron
los años?
Sé que los he vivido todos. Tengo visiones de cómo fue
entonces y de todas mis esperanzas y sueños.
Pero, allí está el invierno de mi vida y "me agarra de sorpresa". ¿Cómo llegué aquí tan rápido? ¿dónde se fueron los años? ¿Adónde se fue mi juventud? Recuerdo bien haber visto gente mayor a través de los años y pensaba que aquellas personas mayores estaban muy lejos de mi y que ese invierno estaba tan , tan lejos que no me podía imaginar cómo sería.
Pero, allí está el invierno de mi vida y "me agarra de sorpresa". ¿Cómo llegué aquí tan rápido? ¿dónde se fueron los años? ¿Adónde se fue mi juventud? Recuerdo bien haber visto gente mayor a través de los años y pensaba que aquellas personas mayores estaban muy lejos de mi y que ese invierno estaba tan , tan lejos que no me podía imaginar cómo sería.
Pero aquí está, mis amigos están retirados y volviéndose
"grises", se mueven más lento y ahora veo a una persona mayor.
Algunos están en mejor forma, otros peor que yo, pero veo el gran cambio. No
como las que recuerdo que eran jóvenes y vibrantes, sino como yo, su edad se
empieza a mostrar y ahora somos aquellas personas mayores que solía ver y que
nunca pensé que sería.
Cada día ahora encuentro que solo el tomar una ducha es uno de los acontecimientos reales del dia! Y que tomar una siesta ya no es algo agradable como era, es algo obligatorio! Porque si no lo hago por mi propia voluntad, simplemente me quedo dormido donde esté sentado.
Así que ahora entro en esta nueva etapa de la vida sin preparación alguna para todos los dolores y achaques y la pérdida de fuerza o habilidad para ir y hacer todas las cosas que quisiera haber hecho pero que nunca hice!! Pero, por lo menos sé, que aunque el invierno ha llegado y que no estoy seguro cuánto va a durar, esto si sé que cuando se acabe en esta tierra, se acabó. Otra aventura empezará!
Si, tengo arrepentimientos. Hay cosas que hubiese querido no haber hecho, cosas que debí haber hecho; pero, de verdad, hay muchas cosas de las que estoy contento que hice. Así que, si todavía no estás en tu invierno, permíteme recordarte que estará aquí mucho más rápido de lo que piensas. Por tanto, cualquier cosa que quieras lograr en tu vida, por favor hazlo rápido. No lo pospongas por mucho tiempo. La vida se pasa rápido.
Haz todo lo que puedas hoy, porque nunca estarás seguro si ya es tu invierno o no. No tienes la promesa que verás todas las estaciones de tu vida, así que vive por el hoy y di todas las cosas que quieras, que tus seres queridos te recuerden con la esperanza que ellos lo aprecien y amen por todas las cosas que has hecho por ellos en los años pasados.
"La vida es un regalo que se te ha dado"
La forma en que la vives es un regalo para los que vienen después.
Haz de este viaje algo único y fantástico.
VIVE BIEN! Goza el día! Has algo agradable! Sé Feliz.
QUE TENGAS UN GRAN DIA!
Recuerda, "Lo real es la salud y no las piezas de oro y plata."
Finalmente, considera lo siguiente:
Cada día ahora encuentro que solo el tomar una ducha es uno de los acontecimientos reales del dia! Y que tomar una siesta ya no es algo agradable como era, es algo obligatorio! Porque si no lo hago por mi propia voluntad, simplemente me quedo dormido donde esté sentado.
Así que ahora entro en esta nueva etapa de la vida sin preparación alguna para todos los dolores y achaques y la pérdida de fuerza o habilidad para ir y hacer todas las cosas que quisiera haber hecho pero que nunca hice!! Pero, por lo menos sé, que aunque el invierno ha llegado y que no estoy seguro cuánto va a durar, esto si sé que cuando se acabe en esta tierra, se acabó. Otra aventura empezará!
Si, tengo arrepentimientos. Hay cosas que hubiese querido no haber hecho, cosas que debí haber hecho; pero, de verdad, hay muchas cosas de las que estoy contento que hice. Así que, si todavía no estás en tu invierno, permíteme recordarte que estará aquí mucho más rápido de lo que piensas. Por tanto, cualquier cosa que quieras lograr en tu vida, por favor hazlo rápido. No lo pospongas por mucho tiempo. La vida se pasa rápido.
Haz todo lo que puedas hoy, porque nunca estarás seguro si ya es tu invierno o no. No tienes la promesa que verás todas las estaciones de tu vida, así que vive por el hoy y di todas las cosas que quieras, que tus seres queridos te recuerden con la esperanza que ellos lo aprecien y amen por todas las cosas que has hecho por ellos en los años pasados.
"La vida es un regalo que se te ha dado"
La forma en que la vives es un regalo para los que vienen después.
Haz de este viaje algo único y fantástico.
VIVE BIEN! Goza el día! Has algo agradable! Sé Feliz.
QUE TENGAS UN GRAN DIA!
Recuerda, "Lo real es la salud y no las piezas de oro y plata."
Finalmente, considera lo siguiente:
Hoy día es el día en que serás el máximo de Viejo, pero lo
más joven que podrás ser.
Goza de tu día mientras dure.
Tus hijos se están convirtiendo en lo que tú eres, pero tus nietos son perfectos!
Salir a la calle es bueno, Regresar a la casa es mejor!
Te olvidas de los nombres, no importa; está bien porque otras personas se olvidan que siquiera te conocieron!
Las cosas que te importaban hacer, no te importan ahora, pero si te importa que no te "importe" que no las hagas más.
¿Duermes mejor en un sillón con la TV prendida, que en la cama? A esto se le llama "pre-dormir".
¿Extrañas los días cuando todo se trabajaba con solamente un interruptor de "prendido" y "apagado"?
Ahora tiendes a usar más las palabras: "qué" ..."dónde"
Lo que solían ser pecas, ahora son manchas del hígado.
Todo el mundo "susurra".
Tienes tres tallas de ropa en el ropero, dos de las cuales nunca las volverás a usar.
Pero lo Viejo es bueno en algunos casos: Viejas canciones, Viejas películas, y lo mejor de todo, VIEJOS AMIGOS!!
"Que estés bien, viejo amigo"!
Envíalo a otros Viejos amigos y deja que se rían porque estarán de acuerdo.
No es lo que reúnes, sino más bien lo que repartes lo que dice la clase de vida que has vivido.
Confieso que no soy el autor.
Goza de tu día mientras dure.
Tus hijos se están convirtiendo en lo que tú eres, pero tus nietos son perfectos!
Salir a la calle es bueno, Regresar a la casa es mejor!
Te olvidas de los nombres, no importa; está bien porque otras personas se olvidan que siquiera te conocieron!
Las cosas que te importaban hacer, no te importan ahora, pero si te importa que no te "importe" que no las hagas más.
¿Duermes mejor en un sillón con la TV prendida, que en la cama? A esto se le llama "pre-dormir".
¿Extrañas los días cuando todo se trabajaba con solamente un interruptor de "prendido" y "apagado"?
Ahora tiendes a usar más las palabras: "qué" ..."dónde"
Lo que solían ser pecas, ahora son manchas del hígado.
Todo el mundo "susurra".
Tienes tres tallas de ropa en el ropero, dos de las cuales nunca las volverás a usar.
Pero lo Viejo es bueno en algunos casos: Viejas canciones, Viejas películas, y lo mejor de todo, VIEJOS AMIGOS!!
"Que estés bien, viejo amigo"!
Envíalo a otros Viejos amigos y deja que se rían porque estarán de acuerdo.
No es lo que reúnes, sino más bien lo que repartes lo que dice la clase de vida que has vivido.
Confieso que no soy el autor.
HEY,
SHARPTON: Black Teen Strangles White 12yr. Old, Dumps Body In Recycling Bin,
Gets 17yrs [Another obama son or replica]
Little more than 10 feet
separated Justin Robinson from Autumn Pasquale’s father in an open Gloucester
County courtroom Wednesday morning when Robinson, now 16, pleaded guilty to
choking the pre-teen to death in October.
“He sat there and listened,”
said Doug Long, attorney and spokesman for Anthony Pasquale, Autumn’s father.
Days after Autumn, a Clayton
Middle School student, went missing, the 12-year-old’s body was discovered —
strangled — in a recycling container on an abandoned property next door to the
Robinsons’ home.
Justin Robinson, then 15, and
his 17-year-old brother Donte, were charged last fall with the girl’s murder.
Until Wednesday, all juvenile
court proceedings in the murder case had been conducted behind locked courtroom
doors. Donte Robinson’s charges are still pending in closed juvenile court in
Gloucester County.
“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”
“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE
TRUST’
No comments:
Post a Comment