No 955 “En mi opinión” Mayo 21, 2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST” LAZARO R GONZALEZ MIñO EDITOR
Feds Must Raise Taxes 14% to
Avoid $40 Trillion Debt Disaster
AMENPER: Una Carta de Amor
Hoy recibí una carta de amor del Internal Renenue Service, poniéndome una
multa de $600.00 dólares por no haber pagados mis impuestos de la manera como
ellos arbitrariamente lo tiene estipulado.
Yo pagué todos mis impuestos antes del 15 de Abril del 2015, pero ellos
querían que lo hubiera pagado antes basado en un estimado de lo que gané en el
2013. Siempre esto me ha parecido arbitrario, y me resbalo un
poco, y hay veces que evado las consecuancias. Pero empezando el próximo Junio
voy a tener que pagar el estimado mensual sobre una cantidad que no he ganado
en el 2015 y que realmente no sé si ganaré, hasta a lo mejor me muero antes de
diciembre.
Pero mejor lo pago como me dicen este año para no pagar más multas, voy a
tener que mandarles carticas de amor con mi cariño todos los meses.
A ellos lo que le importa, precisamente es tener el dinero por delante por
si acaso.
Pago una cantidad de impuestos exorbitantes a mi manera de pensar, y una
cantidad inadecuadamente pequeña según la manera de pensar de
Obama. Pero sé que tengo que pagar impuestos, después de todo si los
pocos que pagamos impuestos tampoco lo vamos a pagar, la nación está muy
jodida.
Lo que me molesta es el uso que le dan a esos impuestos. Me molesta cuando
veo en una botica a esa zángana haciendo un cambalache de la receta del
medicaid por perfumes y aretes, me molesta cuando veo a un zángano haciendo
cambalache en el mercado de alimentos por cerveza y cigarros, y me molestas ver
esas leyes regulatorias absurdas que conjuntamente con el fraude crean un
déficit presupuestal creciente y eterno.
Aquí les voy a mencionar un ejemplo típico de lo que estoy hablando.
Este es una parte del discurso del senador John McCain en el senado
hablando sobre la proposición de conceder la autoridad al presidente para hacer
efectiva una ley sobre el pez gato.
Pueden verlo en el Wall Street Journal de hoy. Yo como dice
McCain, no me opongo a la conservación y a la inspección del pez gato, aunque
el consumo doméstico está limitado a los negros, y unos cuantos hicks, hay muy
pocos blancos que comen pez gato, y la exportación como en los otros productos
que se exportan, es suficiente con las inspecciones regulares del FDA
Esto es lo que dijo McCain en el senado sobre la nueva ley.
“Este programa del “Pez Gato”... es uno de
los más audaz y temerario programa proteccionista que se ha
presentado en el Senado de Estados Unidos. El propósito de la oficina del “Pez
Gato USDA” supuestamente es asegurarme de que el pez gato es seguro para el
consumo humano. Estoy a favor de garantizar que los consumidores
estadounidenses disfruten de un pez gato saludable aunque sea una pequeña
proporción de la nación la que gusta del pez gato. El problema es que el Food
and Drug Administration ya inspecciona todos los mariscos, incluyendo el pez
gago. El verdadero propósito del programa del pez gato es crear una barrera
comercial para proteger a un puñado de granjeros de pez gato en dos o tres
Estados meridionales.... Como resultado el USDA pronto contratará y entrenará a
unos 95 inspectores de pez gato para trabajar junto a la FDA como
inspectores en plantas procesadoras de pescados y mariscos en toda la nación.
Expertos dicen que podría tomar tanto como cinco a siete años para los
exportadores extranjeros de mariscos de toda clase para duplicar y ponerse al
día del nuevo programa del USDA, que daría a los granjeros de pez gatos y de
otros peces, moluscos y mariscos, un cierre de desventajoso para el mercado
americano de mariscos global. Establecer estas nuevas regulaciones para el de
gobierno tampoco es barato. Hasta la fecha el USDA ha gastado $ 20 millones
para establecer una oficina de pez gato sin que todavía se
haya inspeccionado un solo pez gato”.
Yo desde antes he cooperado con la preservación el pez
gato. Cuando estoy pescando y se me pega un asqueroso pez gato,
siempre lo boto de nuevo al agua, la verdad es que no me gusta ni verlos, mucho
menos comerlos.
Voy este fin de semana del Memorial Day a Naples, bueno no propiamente
Naples, pero a nuestro refugio familiar un poco más al oeste en el Rio
Estero. Si voy a pescar y se me pega un pez gato, lo vuelvo a tirar
al agua, pero antes le voy a dar un martillazo en la cabeza, porque, cabrón, ya
yo pagué por tu vida.
Ya que mi convicción cristiana no me permite hacer esto a los humanos que
escriben las regulaciones al menos puedo descargar mi frustración el este
pecado que no sabe el mismo que existe en el mundo.
Feds Must Raise Taxes 14% to Avoid $40 Trillion Debt Disaster
Decades of reckless
government spending and Fed money-printing are reaching the breaking
point. According to new calculations by the Committee for a Responsible
Federal Budget, the U.S. debt will more than double in the next 20 years – to a
staggering $40 trillion! So by the time today’s newborns enter college,
the amount of debt held by the United States government will equal the entire
U.S. economy! And since this debt level is utterly unsustainable, the
Feds must raise taxes a whopping 14% on every citizen in order to return to
historical debt levels. Regardless of whether they spike taxes or drown
us in debt, you have only one option to keep your savings & retirement from
vanishing.
The Road to National Insolvency
DAMON GELLER…
Driven by higher
interest costs, Social Security and Medicare for baby boomers, as well as tax
cuts in 2012, the federal debt held by the public is expected to hit $40
trillion in 2035, according to calculations by the Committee for a Responsible
Federal Budget, which were based on Congressional Budget Office estimates.
This estimate is a staggering $7 trillion higher than the forecast in
2009 when Obama took office. The debt is on pace to match the previous
record, set in 1946, of 106 percent of gross domestic product. In other
words, our debt will be bigger than our entire economy!
The simple fact is,
our economy isn’t growing fast enough to keep pace with the costs of caring for
the soaring ranks of the elderly. Plus, the discrepancy between spending
and revenue is estimated to widen in the next few decades due to reckless
government spending and the Fed’s easy money policy. What does the
government plan to do about this looming debt disaster? Well, in truth,
they have no plan. All government estimates show that debt and spending
will continue to increase – regardless of which party controls the White House
or Congress!
Since we know they’re
never going to cut spending, the only option is to raise taxes. How
much? Brace yourself. In order to bring the debt levels in line
with the historical percentage of GDP, the Feds must raise taxes by 14% on
every taxpayer in the nation! And if you think the next election is going
to change our course, think again. All government debt & spending
projections have been made regardless of which party controls our
government! Changes in party power never result in meaningful changes in
economic policy.
Debt Has Doomed the Nation & the Dollar
In January of 2001,
when Bush took office and Republicans controlled the Congress, the national
debt stood at $5.7 trillion. Within 8 years, the national debt had ballooned to
around $11 trillion – a doubling of U.S. debt in 8 years! Obama came into
office in 2009 promising hope and change. But did he really change anything in
terms of our debilitating national debt? Absolutely not. At the command of the
Federal Reserve, our national debt will skyrocket to around $25 trillion by the
time Obama leaves office. In short, the Fed will have increased the national
debt 5 times in the span of two presidencies — regardless of which party was in
power! The chart below shows the dramatic rise in U.S. debt since 2001:
Everyone knows you
can’t stockpile $25 trillion in debt without serious consequences. What serious
consequences? The chart below shows the alarming loss in value of the U.S.
dollar versus other currencies since 2001:
As you can see, the
U.S. Dollar lost 33% of its value versus other currencies since 2001!
Debt Has Skyrocketed Gold
As the Federal
Reserve drove up debt to record numbers, what happened to gold? The chart
below shows the tremendous increase in gold’s value since 2001:
As you can see, gold
increased over 5 TIMES in value since 2001! And this is including gold’s
correction in 2013. So not only has gold increased 5 times since 2001, it’s
once again a great value at these levels.
Where Are We Headed?
The U.S. Treasury
tells us that the U.S. debt will reach $28 trillion by 2018, regardless of
which party takes power in November or who wins the presidency in 2016! That’s
a staggering 58% increase in U.S. debt from where we are today. Why will this
happen? Because neither party has shown any serious commitment whatsoever to
reduce government spending. And this will only result in further destruction of
the U.S. dollar until the dollar finally collapses and ceases to be the world’s
reserve currency, just as ALL global currencies have failed throughout history.
And based upon
Treasury’s debt projections, here is where gold could be heading:
2015 US Debt = 21T |
Gold = $1,640/oz.
2016 US Debt = 22.7T | Gold = $2,210/oz.
2017 US Debt = 25.5T | Gold = $2,560/oz.
2018 US Debt = 28T | Gold = $3,000/oz.
2016 US Debt = 22.7T | Gold = $2,210/oz.
2017 US Debt = 25.5T | Gold = $2,560/oz.
2018 US Debt = 28T | Gold = $3,000/oz.
As the Fed rockets us
to $28 trillion in debt, these projections put gold at nearly $3000/oz. by
2018!
Rescue Your Savings & Retirement
We will be at $28
trillion in debt by 2018 according to the U.S. Treasury. And if we don’t change
course, we will hit $40 trillion in debt by the time today’s infants enter
college. The Fed will keep printing money and rates will stay in the
basement for as far as far the eye can see thanks to our massive debt and the
need to service it. The writing is on the wall. Upcoming elections will have
zero impact on the current trajectory of the price of gold, as gold is moving
much higher as the debt skyrockets. Gold is math and mathematics is a science.
Politics is not. So if you want a new party in government, vote. But if you
want to protect your savings & retirement, buy gold & silver.
(Call 800-226-8106 to
receive your free copy of Damon Geller’s popular book, “Defend Your Money
against Gov't Confiscation,” or fill in the form below)
AMENPER: Entrevista a
Snoop Dogg…
Estamos satisfechos por haber encontrado este video de una entrevista del
“brother” Snoop Dogg en You tube.
Cómo vemos a Hillary Clinton al frente de las encuestas, es interesante
conocer las personas que la apoyan, y las razones intelectuales para su apoyo.
Mucho se habló en la entrevista, pero no pudimos lograrla
conectar propiamente hasta las últimas preguntas. . Abajo se
encuentra una transcripción de la parte que pudimos ver hablando al brother
Snoop rodeado de bailarinas blancas en bikini.
COMIENZA LA TRANSCRIPCIÓN
Reportero: ¿Por quién votarás ?
Brother Snoop: Hillary Clinton. Es una gran mujer negra y nosotros
necesitamos negros en la casa blanca. Los negros tenemos una perspectiva
diferente para la nación.
Reportero: ¿Sabes que Hillary no es negra?
Brother Snoop: Ella es negra, porque me lo dijeron ella y Bill. ¿Por qué
mentirían a un hermano?
Reportero: Legalmente y biológicamente, tú no eres su hermano.
Brother Snoop: Estás empezando a molestarme.
Reportero: ¿Votará para camarada Sanders para las elecciones si los
demócratas lo nominaban en su lugar?
¿Brother Snoop: ¿Me estás insultando?
Reportero: Pero Sanders es otro candidato para la Presidencia y ha
declarado que es socialista.
Brother Snoop: ¿Qué me puede dar Sanders a mí?
Reportero: Buena lógica. ¿Votarías por cualquier otro candidato?
Brother Snoop: La elección está preparada para tener a Hillary de ganadora.
Necesito mi pago del gobierno, y no lo voy a [...]
FINAL DE LA TRANSCRIPCIÓN DE LA ENTREVISTA QUE SE CORTÓ.
No registramos el resto de la entrevista debido a mi computadora se
congeló.
AMENPER: Alto peligro de Cambio de Clima…
|
Es mi entendimiento que nuestro querido líder, Barack
Hussein Obama, ha decretado que el calentamiento Global se ha
convertido en el peligro más 'Grave' que amenaza nuestra su seguridad.
Obama advierte a cadetes de la guardia costera que la
mayor 'amenaza' de seguridad nacional es el cambio climático.
Tango algunas preguntas.
¿Alguien me puede decir Cuántas tropas nuestro querido
líder desplegará para atacar el calentamiento Global?
¿Podemos desplegar nuestro nuevo F-35 Strike Fighters
contra él?
¿Fue el calentamiento Global lo que solía atacar a los
rebeldes sirios? Parece que recuerdo mal, parece que nuestro querido líder
dibujó una línea roja y ordenó a Assad que no siguiera usando el arma del
calentamiento global para destruir los rebeldes y parece que ahora se ha dado
cuenta que Assad está usando esta arma secreta, que también la está usando
ISIS.
Pero parece que ahora Obama está usando su autoridad para
combatir el arma del calentamiento Global que es la causa de todos los
problemas del mundo
Nuestro líder usará la autoridad de declarar
las amenazas a nuestro colectivo, y el cambio de temperatura es un mal que
debe ser removido. El cambio climático será el tema de los próximos días de
odio el próximo enemigo que tenemos que derrotar.
Usted recibirá actualizaciones diarias en qué parte se
debe tomar para normalizar el mundo.
En vez de poner anuncios del nivel de peligro del
terrorismo, se pondrán avisos en todos los aeropuertos del nivel del peligro
del calentamiento global.
También habrá un proyecto de ley para el tipo de ropa
interior y prenda exterior caliente o fresca que tenemos que usar y a
traer con usted cuando sale a la calle de acuerdo con el nivel de cambio
climático. Si el congreso se opone nuestro máximo líder utilizará su pluma para
firmarlo.
¡El gobierno está al mando, así que me siento a salvo!
AMENPER:
Reporte de Cambio Climático
Aviso Confirmado de Cambio Climático
Hechos nunca visto causados por el Cambio
Climático
Exodo
Mayo 26, 3015 A.C. Se están viendo
plagas que están siendo sufridas por el cambio climático confirmando las
palabras del profeta Obama, reportadas por la agencia noticiosa “Exodo”
1.-Aguas de los ríos se están convirtiendo en sangre según
la agencia noticiosa Exodus.(Ex. 7:19,20)
Esto
es lo que demuestra la equivocación de los que negaban al cambio climático que
decían que la sangre no llegaría al río.
2.-Ranas cubren la tierra de Egipto. (Ex. 8:5,6) Esto es lo que demuestra que Israel
ayudado por el cambio climático está invadiendo con ranas al pueblo Islámico.
3.-El polvo de la tierra se está convirtiendo en
piojos. (Ex. 8:16,17) Mitigado en parte por un producto llamado
Liendrex de Menper Distributors.
4.-Se nota un aumento en toda clase de moscas
molestísimas. (Ex. 8:24, 29) A eso se refiere el máximo líder que hay que
tomar medidas “por si las moscas”
5.-Epidemia de enfermedades y Peste sobre los
caballos, asnos, camellos, vacas y ovejas. (Ex. 9:3)
Esto
hace más grave el medio ambiento porque no se puede viajar en caballos, asnos o
camellos y hay que usar vehículos que contaminan con sus emisiones el ambiente.
6--Epidemias y pestes que a su vez, produce úlceras a los
humanos(Ex. 9:8-10) Como ven si hay peste quiere decir que esto
huele mal, hay que oír a nuestro profeta y obedecerle
7--Lluvias de Granizo mezclado con fuego. (Ex.
9:24) Ya saben si usan un paraguas no sirve porque
se quema.
8--Plagas de Langostas. (Ex. 10:12) se refiere a los insectos, que se comen
las plantas no a las que comemos y son tan caras.
9--Se presentan tinieblas por tres días tan
densas que pueden palparse. (Ex. 10:21) Y como debido al problema energético por el
cambio climático no hay luz eléctrica no hay manera de ver.
10.--De pronto se ha visto la muerte de los
primogénitos de toda casa que no estaba cubierta con la sangre de un cordero.
(Ex. 11:4,5) El problema es que con la epidemia y la peste
se acabaron los corderos.
Ahora a
los retrógrados republicanos que niegan los peligros del cambio climático, con
esta evidencia de estas 10 terribles plagas, nunca antes vista en el mundo por
causas del cambio climático, no les quedarán más remedio que aceptar que estamos
viviendo momento climático que si no tomamos medidas destruirá el mundo en un
futuro cercano.
AMENPER: El Cambio
Climático
Los militantes islámicos del ISIS capturan la antigua
ciudad Siria de Palmira el miércoles- Funcionarios sirios evacuaron ciudadanos
y trataron de impedir que caigan en manos terroristas invaluables antigüedades.
Los observadores de derechos humanos dijeron a la prensa asociada que las
fuerzas del gobierno se derrumbaron ante los ataques de ISIS y se retiraron de
la ciudad el miércoles en la tarde. El Wall Street Journal informó que
antes de huir, las fuerzas de defensa nacional evacuaron a civiles cuando
militantes estaban tomando el control de las zonas residenciales y se
establecieron en las ruinas cercanas de la ciudad.
Al tomar ISIS el control total de la ciudad, sería
segunda gran victoria del grupo en una semana, a tan sólo unos días después de
que militantes en Irak aseguraron la clave ciudad de Ramadi, capital de la
provincia de Anbar, causando miles de refugiados a huir al vecino Bagdad a sólo
70 millas de distancia.
Según la organización internacional para las
migraciones, más de 40.000 personas han sido desplazadas de Anbar desde el
viernes cuando los militantes comenzaron su ofensiva final para la ciudad.
Athal al-Fahdawi, un concejal de Anbar, dijo que miles
de refugiados que quedaron varados en tierra abierta por días, pudieron cruzar
un puente colgante sobre el río Eufrates y entrar en Bagdad.
Un estimado de 500 soldados y civiles fueron
asesinados en Ramadi después de ISIS tomó la ciudad con una onda bien
coordinada de carros bombas que allanó el camino para los
combatientes que lograron la victoria sobre las fuerzas iraquíes.
Palmyra también sería una captura estratégica clave
para ISIS, permitiendo a los militantes avanzar a áreas controladas por el
gobierno de Damasco y la costa de Siria hacia el sur y suroeste. Palmyra
también se encuentra cerca de yacimientos de petróleo y gas importantes.
ISIS ha lanzado una serie de ataques en
sitios de importancia histórica y religiosa. A principios de este año ISIS
publicó un video que muestra a los militantes usando martillos y Taladros para
destruir los artefactos en el Museo de Mosul de Irak.
Expertos también han advertido que los militantes
clandestinamente usan artefactos iraquíes invaluables para la venta en el
mercado negro para financiar al ejército terrorista.
Mientras tanto, en Estados Unidos, el presidente habló
en un acto de graduación de cadetes de la guardia costera. Obama elaboró en
el discurso en New London, Connecticut, como tema
principal los riesgos a la seguridad nacional que presenta el cambio climático,
y que será su máxima prioridad de acción en los 19 meses que le quedan en el
cargo.
Hillary
Deliberately Caused Delay Of Email Release By Submitting Only Paper Copies.
|
Hillary Deliberately Caused Delay of Email Release by
Submitting Only Paper Copies
By Eileen McGann
Hillary Clinton ended her 37-day boycott of the press today when she
spent a few minutes claiming she wants her emails released by the State
Department ASAP.
But here’s the thing: the only reason that there’s been such a long
delay is that Hillary deliberately delivered the 550,000 emails in hard copies,
instead of in electronic files.
Why does that make a difference?
Because that meant every single one of the 550,000 pages has to be
manually scanned. And, to make it even harder, Hillary made sure that some of
the documents were copies on both sides. That took 5 weeks of 12 people working
full time to complete.
And Hillary knew that would create just one more obstacle and cause an
enormous delay.
She also knew that the paper files couldn’t be searched like electronic
files. And she didn’t want to make it easy to connect the dots.
So her fervent wish for the release of the documents is as phone as her
claims that she did nothing wrong when she set up her home-brew server and use
it for her official State Department documents.
She thinks we are all stupid and that we don’t get it. But we do:
Hillary set up her home server to circumvent the Freedom of Information Act,
she did just that, and once caught, she wiped her server clean and got rid of
everything she didn’t want us to see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stonegate Bank in Florida
opens bank account for Cuban govt
COMMENTSJoin the Discussion
Iran Just Slapped Obama In The Face With A
Nuclear Move That Ruins His Entire Plan
Despite Obama's
self-congratulatory rhetoric last month praising the framework...
So much for President
Obama’s heralded “framework” for a negotiated nuclear deal with Iran. Only six
weeks after Obama strode confidently into the Rose Garden to announce to the
world what he called “a good deal” resulting from “many months of tough,
principled diplomacy,” Iran has essentially blown up the president’s plan to
keep the Islamic regime from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
Despite Obama’s
self-congratulatory rhetoric last month praising the framework that included
the assertionthat “Iran has also
agreed to the most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime
ever negotiated for any nuclear program in history,” the Muslim nation’s
supreme leader has just firmly and flatly rejected that provision.
Advertisement
RELATED STORIES
·
Watch: Ted Cruz Fires Back
With This Perfect Response To Reporter’s Incessant Gay Rights Questions
Fox News reports on the move by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that basically cuts the
legs out from under Obama’s shaky stick-figure of a deal to prevent Iran’s
development of a nuke that could threaten Israel, Saudi Arabia, or even the
United States itself.
“Iran’s supreme
leader vowed Wednesday he will not allow international inspection of Iran’s
military sites or access to Iranian scientists under any nuclear agreement with
world powers,” reports Fox News.
This determined
defiance by the most powerful man in Iran not only runs counter to what Obama
announced in April; it also contradicts a fact sheet on the supposed accord
presented by the State Department. Secretary of State John Kerry is, of course,
one of the chief negotiators who have now launched yet another round of talks
in Vienna aimed a reaching a final deal. With this wrench hurled into the works
by Ayatollah Khamenei, the shape and substance of such a deal now appears to be
very much in doubt.
Advertisement
TRENDING STORIES
The Fox News report
quoted Khamenei as saying: “‘The impudent and brazen enemy expects that we
allow them talk to our scientists and researchers about a fundamental local
achievement but no such permission will be allowed…. No inspection of any military
site or interview with nuclear scientists will be allowed.'”
Verification of
Iran’s compliance with the requirements imposed by any negotiated nuclear deal
has been a key sticking point for critics of the Obama administration who claim
that the regime cannot be trusted. As Katie Pavlich observes in an article on Townhall:
Khamenei said today
weapons inspectors will not be allowed to monitor or visit nuclear facilities
to verify nuclear energy is being pursued for peaceful purposes. Further,
Iranian nuclear scientists will not be available for interviews, or what he
calls “foreign interrogation.”
Given the stunning
disconnect between what President Obama told America and the world in his
prepared statement on April 2nd, and the latest proclamation of “no
inspections” by Iran’s supreme leader, it would seem reasonable to assume that
one (or more) of the following is true:
1. In his Rose Garden
victory dance, Obama was projecting what he wanted to believe in order to score
political points,
2. Obama didn’t know what was really agreed to in the so-called “framework” for what he praised as “a good deal,”
3. The president’s naiveté about the true nature of the enemy was on full display, and/or
4. Obama lied.
2. Obama didn’t know what was really agreed to in the so-called “framework” for what he praised as “a good deal,”
3. The president’s naiveté about the true nature of the enemy was on full display, and/or
4. Obama lied.
Again, drawing from
the text of his now-discredited Rose Garden speech: “International inspectors
will have unprecedented access not only to Iranian nuclear facilities, but to
the entire supply chain that supports Iran’s nuclear program — from uranium
mills that provide the raw materials, to the centrifuge production and storage
facilities that support the program.”
CLINTON AIDS CHARITY WAS SHUT DOWN IN
MASSACHUSETTS
Operated
for years without IRS authorization as 'tax exempt' non-profit
JEROME R. CORSI. WND EXCLUSIVE
NEW YORK – Why does
the Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc., registered as an Arkansas non-profit
corporation, continue to list its principal business address in Massachusetts,
where its registration was revoked under a previous name, the Clinton Foundation
HIV/AIDS Initiative?
While the foundation has provided no explanation, after meticulous examination,
Wall Street financial analyst and investor Charles Ortel believes he can
demonstrate material irregularities in the state registrations and federal filings
of what today is known as the Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc., or CHAI.
“These irregularities
are of sufficient magnitude that if any of the 50 state attorneys general
should present the evidence to a federal district judge, I believe an injunction
would be ordered, shutting down the Clinton Foundation and placing the
organization in receivership,” he said.
Ortel has documented
the Clinton Foundation used the initial IRS tax-exempt determination letter
that was limited to raising funds for the Clinton presidential library to
actively solicit tax-exempt charitable donations to combat HIV/AIDS for some
eight years before applying for and receiving authorization for the new
purpose.
Ortel says: “The
public record of state and federal registrations are sufficient to justify a
federal judge firing the current board of directors in order to prevent
additional donors from being defrauded in what appears to an inurement scheme
designed to divert charitable funds to personal financial gain.”
Inurement is the
crime of personally enriching oneself from a non-profit organization, or taking
more from it than is contributed.
Ortel found that the
HIV/AIDS Initiative conducted “substantial and significant activities in
numerous countries, operating from a headquarters in Massachusetts in close
cooperation with at least one for-profit enterprise before it was officially
approved by the IRS as a tax-exempt organization.”
Tom Fitton, president
of Washington-based Judicial Watch told WND that Ortel is “raising questions
that scream out for further investigation.”
“What Ortel is
revealing has all the hallmarks of a shell game in which criminals structure
financial transactions to shield assets and confuse both regulators and the
general public regarding how they are getting money for charitable purposes but
keeping it for themselves personally,” Fitton said.
Attorney Cleta
Mitchell, a partner in the Washington-based law firm Foley & Lardner LLP,
concurred.
“The research that
Charles Ortel has conducted is extremely disturbing,” Mitchell told WND. “The
irregularities and false statements he has documented evidence a consistent
pattern of failure to comply with the laws that govern charitable
organizations.”
Mitchell is
well-known for representing several prominent tea party groups in their
litigation against the IRS for denying or delaying their applications for
tax-exempt status.
She said the problems
with the Clinton Foundation raised by Ortel “are matters of black letter state
and federal law.”
“I believe that one
or more state attorneys general should actively review whether or not the
Clinton Foundation in its various incarnations and filings has violated the
laws of their state,” Mitchell said.
Ortel writes in his
second report on the Clinton Foundation, an advance copy of which was shared
with WND, that a preliminary review of the pre-2010 Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS
activities – before an application was filed with the IRS to create the Clinton
Health Access Initiative as a corporate entity separate from the Clinton
Foundation – indicates that for approximately 90 months Bill Clinton, Ira
Magaziner, and other individuals associated with the Clintons were “engaged in
numerous foreign countries soliciting charitable contributions and grants whose
proceeds were supposed to flow into destitute nations ravaged by HIV/AIDS and
by other structural as well as local afflictions.”
Ortel said activities
of these individuals “under the mantle of the Clinton Foundation never were
fully, fairly, and comprehensively disclosed in the public domain as was, and
is, required by domestic and foreign laws.”
WND reported Monday that before Hillary
Clinton completed her first year as President Obama’s secretary of state in
2010, Ortel calculates $17 million went missing from Clinton Foundation
financial reports.
WND reported May 14 Ortel has concluded
that while Hillary Clinton was appointed to the board of directors of the
Clinton Foundation in 2013, after she had resigned as secretary of state, she
is complicit in what he has described as systematic financial fraud warranting
a criminal investigation. WND reported May 13 that Ortel found the
Clinton Foundation’s explanation for why it was divided into three, legally
separate tax-exempt organizations to be “misleading and false.” As WND reported May 12, based on Ortel’s
findings, a prominent lawyer and a top government watchdog in the nation’s
capital are calling for the Clinton Foundation to be shut down. In his first report, Ortel found what he
characterizes as an elaborate system devised by the Clintons to enrich
themselves through schemes such as skimming tens of millions of
dollars from U.N. levies imposed on airline travelers.
‘Tax exempt’ HIV/AIDS donations solicited in 2002
As WND reported, the Clinton
Foundation’s IRS determination letter dating back to the foundation’s creation
in 2001 is not archived on the Clinton Foundation website. The Clinton
Foundation’s 2002 IRS Form 990, Part III
filing lists the
organization’s “primary exempt purpose” in narrowly defined terms. It specifies
the Clinton Foundation was created “to design, construct, and initially endow a
presidential archival depository to house and preserve the books,
correspondence, documents, papers, pictures, and other memorability of
President Clinton.”
The Clinton Foundation website
clearly documents that the HIV/AIDS charity began in 2002, noting: “When the
Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) was founded in 2002, only 200,000
people were receiving treatment for HIV/AIDS in low and middle income
countries, with medicines that cost over $10,000 per person per year.”
The Clinton Foundation’s 2004
IRS Form 990, Part III expanded the
organization’s “primary exempt purpose” to include HIV/AIDS fundraising:
President Clinton
established the William J. Clinton Foundation (the foundation’s original name
in 2001) with the dual missions of constructing and endowing the Clinton
Presidential Center and Park in Little Rock, Arkansas and continuing the work
of his presidency to strengthen the capacity of people in the United States and
throughout the world to meet the challenges of global interdependence. To
advance the mission the foundation has developed programs and partnerships in
the following areas: economic empowerment; health security with an emphasis on
HIV/AIDS; racial, ethnic and religious reconciliation; leadership development
and citizen service.
Ortel traced the
origin of the idea to create CHAI to a conversation Bill Clinton had with
Nelson Mandela that Clinton relates in his 2007 bestselling book, “Giving: How
Each of Us Can Change the World.”
There, Clinton wrote:
After Nelson Mandela
and I closed the World AIDS conference in Barcelona in [July] 2002, Prime
Minister Denzil Douglas of St. Kitts and Nevis asked me to help the Caribbean
nations establish and fund systems for the prevention, care, and treatment of
HIV/AIDS. I agreed to do what I could, but with limited staffing in Harlem and
Little Rock and an already crowded list of commitments, I needed some help. I
called Ira Magaziner, who had spearheaded our efforts in healthcare and
e-commerce in the White House, and asked him to organize and lead the project.
In his second report,
Ortel concluded the AIDS work wasn’t tax exempt.
“While clearly a
laudable proposition, arresting lethal devastation of the scourge of HIV/AIDS
was certainly not a legally authorized tax-exempt purpose of the Clinton
Foundation by July 2002, according to public records that should tell the
complete story regarding a public charity.”
Ortel was able to
document that on Dec. 31, 2009, the Clinton Foundation filed with the IRS an
application to form a new tax-exempt organization called Clinton Health Access
Initiative Inc. that he terms “New CHAI” to distinguish it from the initiative
formed within the Clinton Foundation in 2002, which he terms “Old CHAI.”
Ortel reported,
however, that after extensive research on the Clinton Foundation website and
various government websites, he was able only to find for the document dated
Dec. 31, 2009, “an incomplete version of the application lacking attachments
that should have amplified answers to key questions.”
In March 2010, the
IRS apparently issued a new determination letter approving the New CHAI as a
separate tax-exempt organization, giving for the first time the Clinton
Foundation the authorization to extend tax-exempt status to donors to the
charity to combat HIV/AIDS.
What appears clear is
that the Clinton Foundation, despite lacking IRS authorization, told the public
from July 2002 through March 2010 that donations to the charity to combat
HIV/AIDS would be tax-exempt, in apparent disregard of IRS rules and
regulations.
No documentation of flow of AIDS money
The first filing to
incorporate the Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative, as it was then known,
occurred in 2004, at least two years after the Clinton Foundation began
soliciting and potentially receiving donations and grants in the United States
and from foreign sources for HIV/AIDS charitable work.
The documentation can
be found in a registration for a foreign corporation certificate that the
Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative filed with Massachusetts on March 25,
2004, noting that the corporation was organized under the laws of Arkansas, two
days earlier, on March 23, 2004.
The document said the
resident Massachusetts agent for the Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative was
Ira Magaziner, listed as the corporation’s chairman, with his residence at 200
Dudley Lane in Milton, Massachusetts, and the corporation’s office at 225 Water
Street in Quincy, Massachusetts.
In his second report,
Ortel said that while there are “numerous press releases and other accounts of
extensive global activity by the Clinton Foundation fighting HIV/AIDS from July
2002 onward, companion financial disclosures filed for 2002 and 2003 do not
explicitly document related inflows and outflows of the HIV/AIDS initiatives.”
“Filings from 2004
through 2009 start to disclose some aspects of these activities but certainly
do not constitute complete, full, and fair disclosure,” Ortel said. “Moreover,
Clinton Foundation filings from 2002 through 2009 do not explain how Ira Magaziner
and his for-profit business interests may have been compensated, or precisely
how Magaziner and the Clinton Foundation may have collaborated anywhere in the
world, at any time.”
From 1993 through
1998, Magaziner served as a senior
advisor to President Clinton for policy development at the White House, where he worked
with Hillary Clinton on the development of the President’s Health Reform
Initiative that became popularly known as “HillaryCare.”
The address at 225
Water Street that Magaziner used as the principal business address of the
Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative when filing in Massachusetts in March
2004 as a foreign corporation is the same address he used as the
principal office of Massachusetts-registered consulting firm, SJS Privacy Inc.,
which was registered in Massachusetts as a foreign corporation on Nov. 15,
2000.
In other words, the
Clinton Foundation did not establish a separate corporate structure, CHAI, to
solicit tax-exempt donations to combat HIV/AIDS until 2004, some two years
after the Clinton Foundation launched the HIV/AIDS initiative.
Massachusetts shuts down Clinton non-profit
On March 31, 2008,
Massachusetts issued an “involuntary revocation” of both the Clinton Foundation
HIV/AIDS Initiative and Magaziner’s SJS Privacy Inc., effectively shutting down
both corporations from doing business in Massachusetts.
Screen shots from the Massachusetts Corporate
Division’s registry document the
involuntary revocation of each corporation’s authorization to do business in
the state.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/clinton-aids-charity-was-shut-down-in-massachusetts/#y3vdsLTd6k8dl62W.99
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/clinton-aids-charity-was-shut-down-in-massachusetts/#y3vdsLTd6k8dl62W.99
The Darkest Clinton Connection Yet Just
Exposed, And One Sentence Hillary Said Makes It Worse
Toward a breathtaking new height of hypocrisy...
Considering what a
new report from Amnesty International has just revealed, one might say that
Hillary Clinton and her family charity appear to be reaching toward a
breathtaking new height of hypocrisy.
It wasn’t that long
ago that the former secretary of state spoke out strongly, decisively,
unequivocally against the use of torture by any government. Accepting an award
from the Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights in December of
last year, Mrs. Clinton declared, as ABC News reported: “Today we can say again in a loud and clear voice, the United
States should never condone or practice torture anywhere in the world.”
Advertisement
RELATED STORIES
·
Watch: Ted Cruz Fires Back
With This Perfect Response To Reporter’s Incessant Gay Rights Questions
However, what Hillary
says, and what her Clinton Foundation does, are clearly not in sync. Writing
for theWashington
Free Beacon, Andrew Stiles reports that a major donor to the Clinton Foundation
“regularly arrests dissidents and brutally tortures them.” That’s the startling
conclusion of a new report from Amnesty International about the routine human
rights abuses by the government of Morocco.
Amnesty International
secretary general Salil Shetty blasted the Moroccan government in a statement,
saying: “Morocco’s leaders portray the image of a liberal,
human-rights-friendly country. But as long as the threat of torture hangs over
detention and dissent that image will just be a mirage.”
Only last week, as The
Washington Post reported, Bill
Clinton hosted a lavish event for well-heeled world leaders in Morocco.
Operating under the banner of the Clinton Global Initiative, the glitzy
gathering brought together “foreign oligarchs and corporate titans,” some of
whom have been associated with questionable human rights practices — and many
of whom have been donors to Hillary’s presidential campaign.
Advertisement
No comments:
Post a Comment