No 714 “EN MI OPINIóN”
MARTES, Julio 29, 2014.
“IN GOD WE TRUS” Lázaro R
González Miño, Editor.
AMENPER: TIRANDO LA TOHALLA
ESTE EDITORIAL DE NEWSMAX HACE UN
SIMIL BOXISTICO DE LA ACTUALIDAD DEL MEDIO ORIENTE, Y NUNCA MÁS APROPÍADO QUE
ESTE CASO “HAMAS CONTRA LA SOGA, OBAMA KERRY AL
RESCATE. NUNCA EL SIMIL PUGILISTICO DE TIRAR LA TOHALLA ES MÁS
ADECUADO.
PERO LO QUE DICE EL ESCRITOR ES
UNA REALIDAD QUE VEMOS EN LAS RELACIONES ISRAELI-OBAMA QUE KERRY Y
OBAMA ODIAN A ISRAEL Y NETANYAHU. EL PRIMER MINISTRO ISRAELI
TUVO QUE SALIR POR LA PUERTA TRASERA DE LA CASA BLANCA EN UN ACTO DE DESPRECIO
DE OBAMA, Y KERRY HA COMPARADO A ISRAEL COMO UN ESTADO DE APARTHEID.
DABA PENA COMO AMERICANO OIR A
NUESTRO PRESIDENTE HABLAR DE COMO RESTITUIR LA PAZ EN EL MEDIO ORIENTE, NI UNA
PALABRA DE UN VERDADERO APOYO A NUESTRO ALIADO, NI UNA PALABRA ATACANDO A
NUESTRO ENEMIGO, UN PESAR POR LAS MUERTES EN AMBAS PARTE Y UN PEDIDO DE PAZ QUE
MÁS PARECÍA UN PEDIDO A ISRAEL QUE RETIRARA SUS TROPAS QUE ESTABAN EJERCIENDO
UNA AUTODEFENSA CONTRA LOS ATAQUES CONTRA SU POBLACIÓN.
UNA RENDICIÓN INCONDICIONAL DE
ISRAEL, ESO ES LO QUE PIDEN KERRY-OBAMA.
LOS COHETES DE HAMAS NO VAN
CONTRA INSTALACIONES MILITARES PERO DIRIGIDOS A LAS CIUDADES DE ISRAEL, SI NO
HAN MATADO MÁS ES POR SU INEFICIENCIEA. HAY MÁS MUERTOS PALESTINOS
EN LA CONTRAOFENSIVA PORQUE EL EJERCITO DE ISRAEL ES SIMPLEMENTE MEJOR
ENTRENADO Y SUS OBJETIVO PRINCIPAL ES DESTRUIR LOS LUGARES DE DONDE ES ATACADO
Y DESPUÉS RETIRARSE. ¿QUÉ HAY DE MALO EN ESTO? SOLO PUEDE PARECERLE
MALO A LOS QUE TIENEN COMO OBJETIVO PRINCIPAL DESTRUIR A LA ÚNICA DEMOCRACIA
DEL MEDIO ORIENTE.
ABAJO EL ESCRITO DE NEWSMAX, ES
LARGO PERO MUY ILUMINANTE SOBRE LA ACTUALIDAD DEL MEDIO ORIENTE Y NUESTRA
POLITICA EXTERIOR BAJO ESTA ADMINISTRACION
HAMAS ON THE ROPES; OBAMA AND KERRY TO
THE RESCUE
If Barack Obama and John Kerry’s
bizarre intervention on Hamas’ behalf against Israel over the weekend seems
confusing, it’s because you’re talking their boilerplate rhetoric about being “friends
to Israel” who respect her “right to defend herself” seriously. Obama
regards Turkey as a more valuable ally than Israel. Turkey is run by an
increasingly deranged Islamist who is very eager to keep Hamas in the game.
Obama is also miffed at Egypt, which overthrew the Muslim Brotherhood
government Obama once celebrated as a triumph of his “Arab Spring” foreign
policy. Egypt under the Brotherhood would have been helping Hamas right
now; instead, they’re blowing up Hamas tunnels that protrude into their territory.
Obama personally dislikes Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Secretary of State Kerry’s brain
floats in a numbing stew of anti-Western ideology that led him to describe
Israel as an “apartheid state” when he thought nobody who disagreed was
listening. Both Obama and Kerry are keen for some sort of “win” in the
burning world Obama’s reckless foreign policy has created, and they know
they’re not going to get it by browbeating the homicidal lunatics who run Hamas
– Obama’s “smart power” idea boils down to leaning on the civilized people who
feel compelled to at least pretend they take
him seriously, while letting savages get away with murder.
All of these influences combined
to bring forth a “cease-fire” proposal that amounted to Israel surrendering to
Hamas. The deal would have done more than reset things to the status quo
that existed before three Israeli students were murdered in cold blood, the
Israelis went into Gaza to arrest the perps, and Hamas responded with a shower
of random rockets at Israeli civilian areas. Hamas would have been rewarded for its brutal terror attacks and evil
human-shield tactics, with the lifting of the Gaza naval blockade. That
would make it much easier for Hamas to take delivery on the North Korean
weapons they’ve secretly purchased.
Getting that blockade lifted is a
high priority for Obama’s true friend and ally in the Middle East, Turkish
Prime Minister Recep Erdogan. Turkey is getting ready to send another
terror flotilla to run the blockade in support of Hamas, and this time it will
supposedly have Turkish military support, which could lead to a naval battle,
or perhaps even war between Turkey and Israel.
Obama and Kerry want to hand
Turkey and its terrorist-supporting partners in Qatar a victory without putting
them through all that unpleasantness. According to the Jerusalem Post, Obama is actually a bit peeved at Erdogan for
throwing gasoline on an already incendiary situation, and his once-cordial
relationship with the Turkish leader – by some accounts, one of the few world
leaders who actually seems to like Obama
personally – has cooled a bit:
Harold Rhode, a senior fellow
at the New-York-based Gatestone Institute and a former adviser on Islamic
affairs in the office of the American secretary of defense, told The
Jerusalem Post in an interview on Sunday that the real issue in
the ongoing conflict is that Turkey and Qatar are supporting the Muslim Brotherhood
and Hamas in their goals.
“[Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip] Erdogan has been associated with the Muslim Brotherhood long before he was prime minister,” Rhode said.
It should now be clear to all that Erdogan “is now out of the bag,” Rhode said, adding that US President Barack Obama does not speak to the Turkish leader anymore despite previously describing him as one of his closest friends among the world’s leaders.
“Erdogan is doing whatever he can to help Hamas,” he said, asserting that it will only hurt the Palestinian people in the end.
“[Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip] Erdogan has been associated with the Muslim Brotherhood long before he was prime minister,” Rhode said.
It should now be clear to all that Erdogan “is now out of the bag,” Rhode said, adding that US President Barack Obama does not speak to the Turkish leader anymore despite previously describing him as one of his closest friends among the world’s leaders.
“Erdogan is doing whatever he can to help Hamas,” he said, asserting that it will only hurt the Palestinian people in the end.
Obama’s “smart power” means
following the path of least resistance. He appeases and capitulates to
get foreign crises off the radar screen, viewing them as annoying distractions
from the “transforming America” project he prefers to focus on. That
makes Obama the perfect patsy for “asymmetrical warfare,” which is all about
becoming a bloody nuisance and annoying civilized people into making
concessions. Hamas can’t defeat Israel, but
they can keep making life miserable until they get what they want, piece by
piece. Hamas has demonstrated that no amount of dead Palestinians will
dissuade it, and they’re not going to recoil from a round of harsh newspaper
editorials or finger-wagging from the United Nations or U.S. State Department,
so the “smart power” calculus calls for going to work on Israel until they buckle under.
In the process, the basic
argument of the terrorist is accepted, and their tactics are validated: we’ll keep hurting innocent people until we get what we want, and
we can never be permanently defeated, so this only ends when we win. It’s
a gruesome upgrade of the childish tactic of screaming until the grown-ups give
you at least part of what you wanted. Indulging this tactic from children
is bad parenting. Indulging it from brutal terrorists is an invitation to
further bloodshed. The terrorists know their human-shield tactics will
work, so they’ll redouble their efforts to put civilians in front of their
rocket launchers, striking at Israel with impunity and howling bloody murder
when retaliatory strikes kill the people Hamas has put in harm’s way.
They’ll also have every reason to escalate their bloody atrocities in the
future, knowing that no matter what they do, they’ll get a reset to the status
quo afterward. Escalation is the logical conclusion when terrorists are
satisfied their basic strategic model is sound.
Writing at Haaretz, Avi Shavit explains that Benjamin
Netanyahu actually represents the more moderate elements
among Israel’s defenders, looking for a big strategic victory over Hamas that
would stop short of their total destruction. There are significant voices
in the Israeli military who want to go further than that. Obama and
Kerry’s ham-fisted intervention on Hamas’ behalf might tip the balance of this
argument away from the moderates:
Until last weekend, the moderates
held the upper hand. They felt the military achievements of Operation
Protective Edge were rather good: The Iron Dome system intercepted the rocket
attacks on Israel; the air force caused enormous and horrible damage in the
Gaza Strip; and the ground forces destroyed 10 out of 12 offensive tunnels that
threatened the Israeli communities near Gaza. At the same time, Hamas’
strategic capabilities were eroded somewhat, and the pressure on its leadership
grew stronger. With proper management, the military success could have been
translated to a certain extent into a significant diplomatic victory: The
Egyptian initiative.
But over the weekend, U.S.
Secretary of State John Kerry ruined everything. Very senior officials in
Jerusalem described the proposal that Kerry put on the table as a “strategic
terrorist attack.” His decision to go hand in hand with Qatar and Turkey, and
formulate a framework amazingly similar to the Hamas framework, was
catastrophic. It put wind in the sails of Hamas’ political leader Khaled
Meshal, allowed the Hamas extremists to overcome the Hamas moderates, and gave
renewed life to the weakened regional alliance of the Muslim Brotherhood.
The Obama administration proved
once again that it is the best friend of its enemies, and the biggest enemy of
its friends. The man of peace from
Massachusetts intercepted with his own hands the reasonable cease-fire that was
within reach, and pushed both the Palestinians and Israelis toward an
escalation that most of them did not want.
Another Haaretz piece by Chemi Shalev explains,
“Nothing riles the White House more than the appearance that Israel is
supplying ammo to Obama’s political enemies,” as it did by rejecting Kerry’s
cease-fire proposal. This is personal for thin-skinned Obama now, and
that’s enough to pull him away from his golf outings and fundraisers to make
trouble for Israel.
The New York
Times does its part to pitch in for Hamas by writing that they’re
actually winning the current conflict. Notice that one of
the Hamas victories the Times writes about,
the cancellation of flights into Ben Gurion airport, was a gift from the Obama
Administration:
Hamas, the
militant Palestinian faction that dominates theGaza Strip, has more
to boast about in its current 20-day battle againstIsrael than ever
before. Forty-three Israeli soldiers have been killed in fierce fighting.
Gunmen infiltrated Israel through tunnels five times. Rockets repeatedly rained
over Tel Aviv, and one even led most airlines to halt flights into
Israel’s only international airport for two days.
As added leverage for cease-fire
negotiations, Hamas seems to have at least the dog tags and perhaps remains of
one of the Israelis killed in combat. Internationally, there is both mounting
outrage over the hundreds of civilian Palestinians dead and growing consensus
that any cease-fire deal should include Hamas’s demands for lifting trade and
travel restrictions on Gaza and investing in its economy and infrastructure.
Yet Hamas shows little readiness
to declare victory, as it did only 20 months ago, based largely on a
single rocket hitting an apartment building in a Tel Aviv suburb. Analysts
attributed this apparent intransigence to a fractured leadership, redrawn
regional alliances, the sharp downturn in Gaza’s condition and a sense within
Hamas that this time the fight is for its very existence.
The Times is
unwittingly making the case for more aggressive Israeli action. In a
conflict like this, terrorists win all ties. A
return to the status quo is a victory for Hamas. At a minimum, Israel has
to take that terror tunnel network down. The conflict escalated
significantly after those tunnels were used to launch an aborted attack on an
Israeli community. The Israeli military knew such escalation would come
with casualties for their forces, as they switched from an air campaign to
brutal close-quarters fighting. They went ahead anyway, because they know
how dangerous those tunnels are… especially if they might soon be used to move
some very special munitions from Iran or North Korea.
Hamas wasn’t all that interested
in ceasing fire over the weekend, at least until the ass-kicking from Israel
resumed, at which point a few Hamas shills started making noises about how it
might be a good idea to take a break after all. (It’s grimly amusing to
hear them bleating about violence on Muslim holidays when they were preparing
to use their terror-tunnel network to launch bloody massacres on Jewish
holidays.) It’s back to business in Gaza today, as Fox News reports:
Israeli jets resumed airstrikes
in the Gaza Strip in response to Hamas rocket fire hours after the United
Nations Security Council ratified a draft statement
early Monday calling for a cease-fire in the region.
Israel’s military said it struck
two rocket launchers and a rocket manufacturing facility in central and
northern Gaza after a rocket hit southern Israel. The rocket caused no damage
or injuries.
Earlier, the Israeli military
said it had not carried out any attacks in Gaza since 9:30 p.m. on Sunday, but
that troops on the ground were pressing on with efforts to destroy the
cross-border tunnels constructed by Hamas for attacks inside Israel.
The military said it opened
artillery fire on Beit Lahiya in northern Gaza in response to the rocket fired
at Ashkelon, said the office of Israel’s military spokesman. “Quiet will be met
with quiet,” the office statement said.
RICARDO
SAMITIER: En Todos Los Periódicos, TV Y Radio Se Movilizan Para SALVAR A
Obama De Sus Últimos Fracasos…
Comenzando
Con La Liberación De Carvajal Por Holanda… Seguido Por Lograr Una TREGUA EN
GAZA… Y No Conseguir Consenso En EU. Sobre Rusia…
Ya; Ni
Los Pequeños Países Europeos Respetan A Los Estados Unidos De Obama…
Pero
la Prensa HABLA DEL ÉXITO LOGRADO… (JA-JA-JA) el
Supuesto
logró es que Venezuela Ha Quedado identificada
Como
otro “GOBIERNO
NARCO TRAFICANTE”… cosa que todos
Sabemos
desde que llegó Chávez al poder hace 16 años…
Todos
los países siguiendo las directrices de Mao Set Tun…
Se
dieron a la tarea de DESTRUIR A LA JUVENTUD AMERICANA
CON
DROGAS… hoy según los reportes 35% de los jóvenes
Usan
drogas… “YA NO
HAY HOMBRES PARA PELEAR UNA GUERRA”
Para
los que no lo saben… ya que esa guerra no se enseña…
“LA
GUERRA DEL OPIO” 1842… Fue hecha oficialmente por
Inglaterra
para defender los derechos a VENDER OPIO en CHINA…
En
defensa de los Contrabandistas… por esa razón Inglaterra logró
El
territorio de HONG KONG, y que sus ciudadanos tuvieran los
Mismos
derechos que los chinos… posteriormente esos
Derechos
se les dieron a Franceses, Alemanes y Norte Americanos…
Quienes
fueron los más FAVORECIDOS por esa guerra…ya que eran
Los
que desde el final de la Guerra de Independencia… eran con sus
Barcos
“CLIPPER” fabricados en Boston el mayor número dedicados
Al
TRANSPORTE y TRAFICO DE OPIO… siendo el mayor contrabandista
El SENOR
“DELANO” ABUELO DE FRANKLING “DELANO” ROOSEVELT…
Cuando
el OPIO se generalizó en China y no tenían con que pagar…
Se
estableció la COMPRA de chinos… que los contrabandistas traían
A
las AMERICAS como obreros contratados por 7 años y con ellos
Fabricaron
los ferrocarriles y canales en los GRANDES LAGOS…
También
vendieron chinos en la AMERICA LATINA y en Cuba…
Ahora
IGUAL QUE LA CHINA DE 1842… el 35% quizás más de los
Jóvenes
norte americanos usan DROGA… Y NO PRODUCEN…
GRACIAS
a los comunistas y socialistas que siguiendo las doctrina
De
MAO… se dedicaron por años a introducir droga en USA… y
Ahora
son los POLITIQUEROS ELECTOS… los que están legalizando
La DROGA
Y LA HOMOSEXUALIDAD… para darle el GOLPE FINAL
A
ESTADOS UNIDOS…
Amenper: La administración de Obama parece una culebra.
Una culebra es un animal rastrero, pero no
es a eso a lo que me refiero, aunque quizás también la descripción pudiera
considerarse adecuada. Una
culebra es lo que llaman a los novelones de la televisión. Como las culebras las situaciones se
intercalan unas con otras y se enredan en un nudo que se desarrolla según la
conveniencia de la emisora basada en las encuestas.
En el culebrón de Obama, ahora vemos el
último descubrimiento de una de esas asociaciones atacadas por el
IRS. Resulta que un
agente del IRS confesó que ellos tienen orden de la administración de hacerle
la vida difícil a los que atacan a las políticas del gobierno. Esta institución conservadora se
dedicaba a apoyar a Israel. Así
que vemos como el escándalo del IRS se intercala en la madeja de la política
exterior contra Israel. En
resumen, que el pensamiento de esta administración es que ni la libertad de
expresión merece respeto, ni un país soberano y democrático que lucha contra
los enemigos que debieran ser nuestros enemigo, debe de ser defendido.
Lo que descubre este artículo hubiera sido
suficiente para un juicio de impugnación de cualquier otro gobernante. Pero la negrura de Obama, aunque es
parcial, es una coraza que lo protege.
The IRS's Foreign Policy
Emails show a political motivation behind
tax-exempt scrutiny.
The IRS has stuck by its story that tax-exempt
applications by conservatives got slow-rolled because of bureaucratic bungling
not because the groups opposed President Obama's policies. Now the slow drip of
email evidence to congressional investigators is casting further doubt on that
tale.
In 2009 the Pennsylvania group Z Street applied for tax-exempt status
for its mission of educating people about Israel-related issues. In 2010 an IRS
agent told Z Street that its application was delayed because the tax agency's
Washington, D.C. office was giving special scrutiny to groups whose missions
might conflict with Administration policies. The IRS's "Be On the
Lookout" list that November also included red flags for groups referring
to "disputed territories."
Z Street sued in August 2010 for viewpoint discrimination and its case
is headed for discovery in federal court. Now emails uncovered by the House
Ways and Means Committee show that the IRS and State Department were conferring
in 2009 about pro-Israel groups like Z Street and considering arguments to deny
their tax-exempt applications.
In an April 16, 2009 email, Treasury attache to the U.S. consulate in
Jerusalem Katherine Bauer sent IRS and Treasury colleagues a 1997 JTA News
article sent to her by State Department foreign service officer Breeann
McCusker. The subject was whether 501(c) groups buying land in Israel's
disputed territories were engaged in "possible violations of U.S. tax
laws." The article chronicles the controversy and whether
"ideological activity" can "legally be financed with the help of
U.S. [tax] dollars."
"Thought you might find
the below article of interest—looks like we've been down this road
before," Ms. Bauer wrote. "Although I believe you've said you can't
speak to on-going investigations, I thought it was worth flagging the 1997
investigation mentioned below for you if it can be of any use internally when
looking for precedence [sic] for the current cases." A Treasury spokesman
declined comment on Ms. Bauer's behalf.
The "current cases" would have been applications like Z
Street's in which Israel-related activity was apparently being scrutinized for
its ideological and policy content. The government says Z Street got special
scrutiny because it was focused in a region with a higher risk of terrorism,
which is hard to believe and in any case doesn't explain all of the IRS's
behavior.
It doesn't cover, for instance, why one questionnaire we've seen from
the IRS to another Jewish group applying for tax-exempt status asked,
"Does your organization support the existence of the land of Israel?"
and "Describe your organization's religious belief system toward the land
of Israel." No matter the answers, they should not affect the processing
of an application for 501(c) status. The State-IRS emails reveal a political
motivation for IRS scrutiny that gives Z Street powerful evidence for its suit
charging IRS bias.
On Monday the IRS filed an appeal of the judge's decision denying its
motion to dismiss Z Street's case. The government says the action stops all
discovery while the appeal is pending, a process that could take months or even
years. By filing the appeal on the last possible day, the Justice Department is
running out the clock on discovery during the remainder of the Administration.
This is a whole lot of effort to prevent discovery in a case that is not
even seeking damages. Ways and Means uncovered the email exchange between State
and the IRS only after Treasury was forced to turn over documents it had
previously withheld. What else
did it lose in the ether?
AMENPER:
La burbuja del crédito de Puerto Rico se revienta. Por
Mary Anastasia O'Grady
Y aquí vamos de nuevo: otro
paraíso del Estado grande está agotando el dinero de otros, para parafrasear
a Margaret Thatcher. Esta vez se trata de Puerto Rico, que ha tomado
demasiado dinero prestado y ahora está dando señales de que quizás no pueda
pagar toda su deuda. La única pregunta es quién pagará los platos rotos.
Los médicos aseguran que los
adictos tienen que tocar fondo antes de encontrar la voluntad para cambiar sus
comportamientos. Puerto Rico, que vivió alucinando durante la última década con
el dinero barato de los prestamistas estadounidenses, podría estar cerca del
fondo. La triste situación de sus cuentas fiscales sólo se comprara con la de
su economía, que también está hecha trizas. ¿No les recuerda a Detroit?
Este sería un buen momento para
intentar ser honestos sobre lo que ha causado esta desesperación. Pero hasta el
momento, la clase política de Puerto Rico parece más inclinada a dejar a sus
prestamistas en el aire y continuar como si no hubiera pasado nada.
A fines de junio, el gobernador
de Puerto Rico, Alejandro García Padilla, firmó una ley que permite la
reestructuración de más de US$19.000 millones de deuda de los monopolios
estatales de electricidad, agua y autopistas de la isla. La ley sorprendió al
mercado de bonos municipales porque Puerto Rico tiene una fuerte tradición de
respaldar la deuda de los monopolios públicos cuando es necesario.
La Autoridad de Energía Eléctrica
—AEE, conocida en inglés como Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, o Prepa— ha
sido un problema particularmente recurrente debido a los robos, la incapacidad
de los grandes clientes como las entidades del Estado para pagar sus cuentas y
el alto precio del petróleo, que es usado como combustible. No obstante, a
medida que los gastos del gobierno han superado los ingresos por casi una
década, se ha hecho más difícil robar a Sutano para pagarle a Mengano.
Recientemente, la compañía tuvo que acudir a su cuenta de capital para pagar su
deuda de petróleo.
La nueva ley de reestructuración
pudo haber tenido la intención de asegurarles a los bonistas que Puerto Rico
está salvaguardando los fondos necesarios para pagarles a ellos primero. Sin
embargo, el 30 de junio, Moody's MCO -0.68% Analytics dijo que en su parámetro de
"expectativa de cesación de pagos" a un año, Puerto Rico sigue por
encima de Argentina, Venezuela y Ucrania.
Las firmas de inversión Franklin
Templeton y OppenheimerFunds, que suman US$1.700 millones en deuda de la AEE,
han desafiado la nueva ley de reestructuración en la Corte de Distrito de
Estados Unidos en Puerto Rico. Argumentan que sólo el Congreso estadounidense
puede dictaminar reglas de quiebra. Puerto Rico, un estado libre asociado,
asegura que no hay planes inmediatos de declararse en cesación de pagos. Hasta
el martes, la AEE se mantenía al día en su deuda al pagar US$418 millones a los
bonistas.
Por su parte, el Banco
Gubernamental de Fomento para Puerto Rico también ha dicho que cree que la isla
tiene la autoridad para implementar la nueva ley. La semana pasada, Moody's
dijo que la ley "provee un camino claro para la cesación de pagos de las
corporaciones públicas".
Una cesación de pagos
puertorriqueña no debería sorprender a nadie. Según Carlos Colón de Armas,
decano interino de la Escuela Graduada de Administración de Empresas de la
Universidad de Puerto Rico, durante ocho años, desde 2005 hasta 2012, los
gastos del gobierno superaron los ingresos en aproximadamente US$1.000 millones
en promedio anualmente. El decano me dijo por teléfono que la deuda total del
estado libre asociado se encuentra en cerca de US$73.000 millones y en 2013
representaba 101% del Producto Nacional Bruto de la isla (PNB) frente a 57% en
junio de 2001. (Aunque el Producto Interno Bruto es la medida más ampliamente
aceptada del tamaño de una economía, refleja las ganancias de las grandes
multinacionales registradas para efectos tributarios en Puerto Rico, pero que
no se quedaron en la economía local. Por lo tanto, el PNB, una medida de lo que
es producido por la economía local, es una herramienta más precisa).
El despilfarro fiscal es un
cambio significativo respecto a las tres décadas previas, dijo Colón de Armas.
Él indicó que la competitividad económica de la isla ha ido en descenso desde
la década del 70, en parte, por las distorsiones creadas por los incentivos
tributarios especiales para las multinacionales estadounidenses (conocidas como
"936" por su designación en el código tributario del país), que
trasladaron la carga impositiva a los emprendedores locales. Sin embargo, por
más de tres décadas y pese al declive económico, la relación GNP-deuda se
mantuvo estable.
El sentido común culpa de la
crisis de deuda a la eliminación del "936" en 2005. Pero Colón de
Armas asegura que el desastre fue causado simplemente por un gasto excesivo del
gobierno y por tomar demasiado dinero prestado. Comenzó con un préstamo por US$550
millones en el presupuesto del año fiscal 2004-2005. Posteriormente, los
préstamos, principalmente para financiar gastos operativos, se dispararon. La
política de tasas bajas de la Reserva Federal y el apetito por la deuda exenta
del triple impuesto (que descarta los ingresos que están libres de impuestos
federales, estatales y locales) entre los inversionistas de bonos municipales,
alimentó la locura.
El gobernador García Padilla,
quien asumió el cargo en 2013, incrementó los gastos en cerca de US$600
millones en su primer presupuesto. Aunque ahora está recortando los gastos, las
reducciones provienen principalmente de ese aumento, según Colón de Armas.
Entre US$500 millones y US$800 millones en adiciones aproximadamente, que van
desde subsidios a intereses especiales hasta financiación para los partidos
políticos, sigue sin cambios en el presupuesto de US$9.600 millones.
Podría ser tentador tratar de
preservar el Estado paternalista de Puerto Rico y pasar el costo de los malos
manejos a los inversionistas que no hicieron su tarea. Pero los acreedores
están prestando atención ahora y la mala voluntad no pasará inadvertida.
“EMO” PARA ESTO HEMOS QUEDADO… LRGM
GLORIA LEAL: Museo del Exilio o monumento a la humillación
GLORIALEAL
¿Qué
hubiese pasado si en vez de unirse a las fuerzas mambisas, José Martí hubiera
decidido recaudar fondos para crear un Museo fuera de Cuba sobre los años de
exilio de los cubanos que vivieron en Nueva York, Cayo Hueso y Tampa? ¿Qué
pensaríamos de Ignacio Agramonte si en lugar de entregar su vida y sus bienes
para comprar armas se hubiera dedicado a recopilar proclamas y retazos de
banderas cosidas por las valientes mujeres de las guerras de independencia?
Martí
no era un soldado. No tenía las condiciones físicas, ni su personalidad era la
de un guerrero. Con todo y eso escogió morir dignamente a la ignominia del
exilio. Prefirió el fusil a no tener tierra propia. A seguir viendo su suelo
ultrajado por extranjeros, interesados en saquearla y apoderarse de ella otro
siglo más. Cuando a Martí se le terminaron las palabras, empuñó el fusil y se
fue al monte a caballo, a la manigua a matar o ser matado. Con honor.
Es por
eso que me indigna leer que un grupo de cubanos exiliados pretenden recaudar
una enorme cantidad de dinero para construir un museo de memorabilia del
exilio. Una estructura que costaría $130 millones de billetes. Repugnante.
Lo que
“no supimos defender como hombres” con balas y bombas para destruir a los
tiranos, lo “lloraremos como mujeres” construyendo un magnifico edificio de
tres pisos donde guardaremos ¿qué? ¿Las cucharitas de plata que trajimos de
Cuba, o los boletos que pagamos para una cena de gala con orquesta para bailar,
y con lo que sobrara de la recaudación comprar una antena para oír Radio Martí
clandestinamnente en la isla?
¿Cuánto
costaría una guerra aunque fuera ideológica o psicológica para terminar con el
régimen cubano instalado 55 años sobre las tumbas de los héroes que dieron su
vida por lograrlo? Entre los muchos intentos, hace unos años se empezaron
gestiones con profesionales de las comunicaciones para recaudar fondos con el
fin de publicar páginas enteras en los principales diarios del mundo libre (The
Times of London, The New York Times, El País, Frankfurter
Allemaigne, Le Monde, Corriere de la Sera, etc.)
denunciando los crímenes del infausto gobierno de La Habana. La propuesta
progresó cero. Los millones de dólares nunca han aparecido para acabar con
aquello.
Ahora
aparece un grupo de exitosos hombres de negocios que pretende recaudar nada
menos que una purruchada de millones de dólares para construir un museo de
memorabilia del exilio, mejor dicho, ¿de los fracasos?, ¿de las derrotas?,
¿humillaciones y pérdida del terruño (amén de las vidas), diáspora, ahogados,
balsas de neumáticos? ¿O de cuentas bancarias que dan fe de la buena vida en
yates y mansiones de un exilio que se ha enriquecido y enorgullecido de sus
triunfos económicos a costa de medio siglo de espera en tierra extraña?.
¿En qué
cabeza cabe crear un monumento a la indignidad? ¿Cómo vamos a engreírnos de una
larga cadena de trágicas humillaciones? ¿Como vamos a desenmascararnos ante el
mundo mostrando nuestro fracaso? ¡Hacer alarde de nuestra inhabilidad para
defender con garras, dientes y uñas lo nuestro, y encumbrar nuestra cobardía, creando
un museo para guardar y celebrar lo que no supimos defender ni conquistar!
Martí
hubiera muerto de dolor y vergüenza.
Por
supuesto que los cubanos han crecido con Miami, y Miami ha crecido con ellos.
Han, hemos, contribuido a convertir este “pueblo de campo” en la ciudad
cosmopolita y moderna que es hoy día. Sin duda, los profesionales que llegaron
en la primera década del exilio, el “Early Exile” de los años sesenta, traían
sus conocimientos, experiencia y cultura para contribuir a esta sociedad que nos
abrió las puertas de las oportunidades para crecer. Contribuyó también el
entusiasmo por sobrevivir que se transformó en dedicación al trabajo,
“inventando y doblando el lomo” en lo que fuera hasta ir saliendo de la
absoluta pobreza con que llegamos hasta lograr revalidar carreras quemándose
los ojos estudiando de noche mientras trabajaba en uno, dos y tres trabajos
para mantener a la familia extendida que fue llegando. Con el tiempo y la
especialización se fueron construyendo empresas, urbanizaciones, edificios
rascacielos, comercios de todo tipo, industrias, universidades, calles y
carreteras, puertos y aeropuertos. La lucha por sobrevivir en tierra extraña
fue dejando atrás la tierra que una vez defendimos. Y la patria se fue
desfigurando, achicando en el recuerdo, quedando atrás, olvidando por la
indiferencia y los fracasos políticos, y las intenciones combativas fueron
muriéndose. Hasta convertirse en inercia inútil.
Pero de
eso, a un “monumento al exilio”.
Martí
hubiera muerto de dolor y de vergüenza.
GLORIALEAL
Escritora
y periodista cubana
M
ALEMAN: Acaban
de descubrir que muchos
> túneles de Hamas llegaban a casas de
> Israel. Fue capturado un terrorista y
> al obligarlo a hablar, confeso
> que Hamas tenía plan de atacar a Israel en la cena de
> Rosh Hashana en la cual entrarían a
> casas y matarían a la mayor cantidad de israelíes
> possible.Han descubierto una verdadera ciudad
> debajo de la tierra:
> TO SEE THE PHOTOS, PLEASE CLICK ON
> THE LINK
> BELOW: http://cryptome.org/2014-info/gaza-ugi/gaza-ugi.htm
> Enviado desde mi iPhone
> túneles de Hamas llegaban a casas de
> Israel. Fue capturado un terrorista y
> al obligarlo a hablar, confeso
> que Hamas tenía plan de atacar a Israel en la cena de
> Rosh Hashana en la cual entrarían a
> casas y matarían a la mayor cantidad de israelíes
> possible.Han descubierto una verdadera ciudad
> debajo de la tierra:
> TO SEE THE PHOTOS, PLEASE CLICK ON
> THE LINK
> BELOW: http://cryptome.org/2014-info/gaza-ugi/gaza-ugi.htm
> Enviado desde mi iPhone
Nestor Dan:
Doctor: “What's wrong with your friend?”
> Amigo: “El doctor pregunta ¿Qué es lo que tienes?”
> Cubano: “Dile que me duele en medio de las paletas y el dolor me sube hasta la sien.”
>
>
> Amigo: “He says that his popsicles hurt in the middle and it goes up to the one hundred”
>
>
> Doctor: “What else?”
> Amigo: “Que mas tienes?”
> Cubano: “Las muñecas me duelen mucho en las mañanas.”
>
>
> Amigo: “He say his dolls hurt very much in the mornings.”
>
>
> Doctor: “Tell your friend he is mentally retarded.”
> Amigo: “El doctor dice que te pongas mentolato por las tardes”
> Amigo: “El doctor pregunta ¿Qué es lo que tienes?”
> Cubano: “Dile que me duele en medio de las paletas y el dolor me sube hasta la sien.”
>
>
> Amigo: “He says that his popsicles hurt in the middle and it goes up to the one hundred”
>
>
> Doctor: “What else?”
> Amigo: “Que mas tienes?”
> Cubano: “Las muñecas me duelen mucho en las mañanas.”
>
>
> Amigo: “He say his dolls hurt very much in the mornings.”
>
>
> Doctor: “Tell your friend he is mentally retarded.”
> Amigo: “El doctor dice que te pongas mentolato por las tardes”
Cops
Using Fake Cell Phone Towers to Track Your Every Move
Over the past 12-18 months, there’s been an
increased level of scrutiny applied to the various ways local, state, and
federal law enforcement officials track and monitor the lives of ordinary
citizens. One tool that’s come under increasing fire is the so-called stingray
— a fake CELL PHONE TOWER that law
enforcement officials deploy to track a suspect, often without a warrant or any
other formal approval.
A stingray is a false cell phone tower that can
force phones in a geographical area to connect to it. Once these devices
connect, the stingray can be used to either hone in on the target’s location
or, with some models, actually eavesdrop on conversations, text messages, and
web browser activity. It’s not clear how much the police cooperate with the CELL PHONE CARRIERS on this —
in at least some cases, the police have gone to carriers with requests for
information, while in others they seem to have taken a brute-force approach,
dumping the data of every single user on a given tower and then sorting it to
find the parties they’re interested in tracking. Stingrays can be used to force
the phone to give up its user details, making it fairly easy for the police to
match devices and account holders.
Exclusive Interview: Rick Perry Says
Deploying Troops to Border Sends a ‘Powerful Message’
Perry, in an exclusive
interview with The Daily Signal, said even though the 1,000 military troops he activated to
help manage the border crisis in his state will not be authorized to make
arrests, the sheer presence of the military will deter illegal activity.
“It’s a powerful
reminder that what you are doing is a crime,” said Perry, who has been a critic
of the White House’s response to the border crisis. “It’s just like a law
enforcement effort in your neighborhood, where you see a parked patrol police
car on the corner, and the bad guys see it and don’t commit a crime.”
By announcing plans to
deploy the National Guard to the border on his own rather than through the
federal government, Perry has the power to order the troops to make arrests and
apprehensions.
But Perry, perhaps
responding to critics who worry about the troops’ lack of training in IMMIGRATION LAW, told The Daily Signal
he has decided not to give arrest power to those deployed to Texas’ border with
Mexico.
“Their real JOB is not apprehension,” Perry said.
“Border Patrol apprehends.”
National Guard on the Border
In 2006, President
George W. Bush sent 6,000 troops to the four border states. They repaired and
built fences and roads, and conducted surveillance, among other duties.
Troops in that
deployment did not have apprehension and arrest powers.
“What you are doing is a crime,” says @GovernorPerry
of illegal immigrants.
Troops were similarly
limited when President Obama eventually extended that deployment while ordering
a second wave of National Guard forces to Texas, California, Arizona and New
Mexico in 2010.
With troops’
responsibility likely to be limited again this time, Border Patrol agents who
are responsible for apprehending and arresting illegal immigrant crossers argue that
the National Guard will make little impact.
Border Patrol union
representatives told The Daily Signal last week they worry the troops will interfere
with agents’ work.
Perry, who says he has
talked to Border Patrol agents about his decision, believes otherwise.
“They aren’t displacing
Border Patrol,” Perry said. “It’ll be just like how we partner with law
enforcement. They want to see the border secure, so they won’t resist the
assistance. Just the presence and knowledge that they’re deployed will have a
powerful message.”
The troops that are due
the border next month will actually work side by side with police officers of
the Texas Department of Public Safety, not alongside Border Patrol.
The state officers are
there as part of Operation Strong Surge, a Perry initiative approved
last month that sent state troopers to the border to assist local law
enforcement.
Just like the National
Guard, state and local law enforcement officers can only defer to the Border
Patrol those they suspect have entered the country illegally.
Stopping Smuggler and Criminals
Not including the
deployment of the 1,000 troops, Perry said there are already 300 state and
National Guard troops at the border for Operation Lone Star, an annual joint military and civil
humanitarian medical mission.
“For those who say,
‘This is very out of the ordinary,’ the National Guard being at the border is
not an unusual situation,” Perry said. “There’s troops at the border every year
and there’s troops there now.”
Can the National Guard help Texas stop the surge of
crossings on the border?
Perry hopes the new
troops will send a message to drug cartels and other CRIMINAL groups that he says have exploited the
latest border trend — the surge of Central American children coming across the
Rio Grande Valley.
“There has not been as
much focus on the drug smugglers and other criminals because of these
children,” Perry said. “There’s been an effort by the cartels to distract
Border Patrol into taking care of these kids. The danger that this situation
presents for ordinary Texans and Americans has not been a focus of the
mainstream media.”
Perhaps realizing the
threat, President Obama dispatched a team to the border last week to determine
whether a federally ORGANIZED National Guard deployment was
necessary.
No matter what Obama
decides to do, Perry has said he intends to ask the federal government to pay
for his deployment of 1,000 troops, estimated to cost $12 million a month.
Perry, who warned the
Obama administration about the border crisis in his state more than two years
ago, did not speak with the president’s team while it visited Texas.
“This [the National
Guard deployment] is important for the peace of Texas and the country,” Perry
said. “I had to make a decision.”
Americans
taking it upon themselves to secure the border.
Check it out:
Check it out:
Photos showing dozens of
members of the militia groups on the U.S.-Mexico border carrying semi-automatic
rifles and wearing masks, camouflage and tactical gear provide one of the first
glimpses into the group’s activities on the border.
Ads by ClickForSAleAd
Options
Members of the militia groups, who say they have 10 active “teams” along the
state’s southern border, are seen at campsites, walking along the Rio Grande
River, pointing rifles and pistols out of frame and flipping off the camera in
the photos obtained by the San Antonio Express-News.
A
spokesperson for the group provided the photos under the condition that
members’ faces be blurred because of fear of being identified by “cartel and
gang members.”
Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/32257/border-militias-moving-across-texas/#qLhJuQmvz81K0P5k.99
Impeachment
Petition Steaming-Up
|
110,370
Americans have already signed the Impeach Obama petition
|
Dear Lazaro R: Americans are steaming-mad about Obama destroying OUR country. As you read this email, Obama is prepping Executive Actions to grant instant anesty and work permits to 5 million illegals. We MUST fight back immediately.
This
is why Revive PAC has launched a national TV ad and petition drive on the FOX
News Channel to Impeach Obama.
The Washington
politicians — obsessed with getting themselves reelected — absolutely hate
our TV ad.
But
as of this morning, 110,078 American VOTERS have already signed our Impeach
Obama petition.
Our goal is to deliver
1 million petition signatures to Congress demanding impeachment proceedings.
As
you can imagine, a national television campaign on the FOX News Channel isn’t
cheap.
Revive
America PAC has already spent over $100,000 to run our powerful Impeach Him
Now TV ad.
Frankly, we’re very
close to depleting our financial resources.
Revive
America PAC is the only conservative group with
national TV ads pushing for Obama’s
impeachment.
We urgently need your
support to continue.
Obama MUST be stopped
— because if we don't stop him, he will NEVER stop!
Sincerely,
Bob Adams
President &
Founder
Top
Obama Aide Just Admitted Obama Really Could Be Impeached
...senior Obama adviser Dan Pfeiffer
explained...
Following a pair of polls showing that a
significant number of Americans support Barack Obama’s impeachment and
removal from office, a high-ranking White House source expressed concern that
such an effort will pick up steam. In a statement to reporters Friday, senior
Obama adviser Dan Pfeiffer explained that he no longer looks at impeachment
as a GOP pipe dream.
“I saw a poll today that had a huge portion of the
Republican Party base saying they supported impeaching the president,” he
asserted.
While Pfeiffer acknowledged that many in D.C. would
“laugh that off,” he took a much more realistic view of the fledgling effort
among GOP leaders.
“I would not discount that possibility,” he said.
He went on to explain that House Speaker John
Boehner’s plan to sue Obama for his excessive use of executive power will
likely keep the issue at the forefront of many Americans’ minds.
“Speaker Boehner,” Pfeiffer said, “by going down
the path of this lawsuit, has opened the door to Republicans possibly
considering impeachment at some point in the future.”
He concluded that Obama’s own policy
initiatives could also make the possibility of impeachment more appealing to
Republican lawmakers.
“I think that if the president enacted immigration
reform, that would certainly up the likelihood that they would contemplate
impeachment,” he reasoned.
In the end, impeachment is a notion that Pfeiffer
said the administration takes “very seriously,” stating that he is against
the pursuit of any such measure.
“But I think it would be foolish to discount the
possibility that Republicans would at least consider going down that path,”
he concluded.
|
Angel Cuervo:
A Canadian Top 10 List ----- A MUST READ
A Canadian Top 10 List ----- A MUST READ
Canada's Version of
David Letterman's Top 10.
Just makes you want to
shake your head in disbelief.
This is Canada's Top Ten
List of America's Stupidity.
Of course we look like
idiots .... because we are.
Number 10 Only in America could politicians talk about the
greed of the rich at a $35,000.00 per plate Obama campaign
fund-raising event.
Number 9 Only in America ...could people claim that the
government still discriminates against black Americans when they have a
black President, a black Attorney General and roughly 20% of the federal
workforce is black while only 14% of the population is black 40+% of all
federal entitlements goes to black Americans - 3X the rate that go to whites,
5X the rate that go to Hispanics!
Number 8 Only in America...could they have had the two
people most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner (former head of the
Treasury Department) and Charles Rangel (who once ran the Ways and Means
Committee), BOTH turned out to be TaxCheats who are in favor
of higher taxes.
Number 7 Only in America...can they have terrorists kill
people in the name of Allah and have themedia primarily react by
fretting that Muslims might be harmed by the backlash.
Number 6 Only in America...would they make people who
want to legally become American citizens wait for years in their home countries
and pay tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege, while they discuss
letting anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just 'magically'
become American citizens (probably should be number one).
NUMBER 5Only in America....could the people who believe
(Tea Party) in balancing the budget and sticking by the country's Constitution
be thought of as EXTREMISTS.
Number 4 Only in America...could you need to present a
driver's license to cash a check or buy alcohol, but not to vote.
Number 3 Only in America...could people demand the
government investigate whether Oil Companies are gouging the public because the
price of gas went up when the return on equity invested in a major U.S. Oil
company(Marathon Oil) is less than half of a Company making
tennis shoes (Nike).
Number 2 Only in America... could you collect more
tax dollars from the people than any nation in recorded history, still spend a
Trillion dollars more than it has per year - for total spending of $7-Million
PER MINUTE, and complain that it doesn't have nearly enough money.
And Number 1 Only in America...could the rich people- who pay
86% of all income taxes - be accused of not paying their "fair share"
by people who don't pay any income taxes at
all.
Have we become a Nation of Morons?
“En mi
opinión” Lázaro R González Miño
“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”
No comments:
Post a Comment