No 702      “EN  MI  OPINIóN”      Julio 2, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST”    Lázaro R González Miño Editor.

La Traición y los cómplices…

A nadie aquí le ha llamado la atención de que miles de niños han entrado de pronto por la frontera de Mejico con USA. Caballeros déjense de comer enjundia de gallina. Esto es una invasión, si una invasión de niños para hacerle las cosas más difíciles a los agentes guarda frontera que realmente no se ocupan demasiado de guardar las fronteras y que además “En m opinión” no reciben las ordenes enérgicas que debían recibir de su presidente. Esto no es más que un capítulo más de esta opereta en la que casi todo el mundo es espectador. Es como si a nadie le importara. Y así perderemos el mejor país del mundo por los enemigos que entran por la frontera pero principalmente por los ENEMIGOS INTERNOS que hasta sentados en el congreso y la silla presidencial y los americanos están chupándose el dedo gordo y no hacen absolutamente nada por parar este relajo y falta de respeto. Así vamos a celebrar el 4 de Julio. Los que Firmaron ese documento el cuatro de julio se deben estar estremeciendo en sus tumbas por ver la traición de los mismos americanos.  ¿También eres tú un cómplice, que no vas a hacer nada?    Lázaro R González Miño

Remember How Seal Team 6 Was Shot Down? Now We Could Finally Know Why Obama Is Covering It Up

In this video, we reveal this and much more...

KRIS ZANE — JULY 1, 2014

On August 6, 2011, in Wardak Province, Afghanistan, jihadists perched on top of a building shot down a decrepit CH-47 helicopter, Extortion 17, packed with 30 Special Ops forces–most of them part of the elite SEAL Team 6. Almost immediately, facts about the attack were hushed up that included skirting away the black box. Furthermore, within hours, everyone on board was cremated, supposedly because they were burned beyond recognition. Family members of the victims have learned that virtually everything the Obama administration has revealed about the attack is a lie.

The likely reason for the coverup? The high-tech weapon used to shoot down Extortion 17, a heat-seeking missile, more than likely was supplied by none other than Barack Hussein Obama.

In this video, we reveal this and much more…

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/revealed-seal-team-6-murder-weapon-supplied-obama/#IhtAqQPfZUiDBJC8.99

 

Amenper: Memo to Anti-Coal Warriors

Usually, I don't speak much about nuclear power. 

Because of the fact that I have a son in the nuclear industry, some may consider my opinion to be influenced by personal interests.

But let me pass you this article of William Tucker about Nuclear energy in today’s Journal.

Now that the liberal press is up in arms against coal, they should remember that because of Jimmy Carter law against nuclear plants, coal still exists as an important energy source.  Otherwise it would be almost extinct.

We have the energy resources we need and enough to export. 

We have oil, but we don't drill, we have gas but regulations make it difficult to use it, we have the best nuclear technology in the world, but we had to give it to other countries, because our president imposed a ban in nuclear plants for 35 years.

Jimmy Carter is in a close race with Obama for the dubious honor of being the worst president in the history of the United States.

Sometimes I ask myself, is this ignorance?, or is it an intelligent plan designed to destroy the country?

Memo to Anti-Coal Warriors: Make Nuclear Peace

It's not too late to fix Jimmy Carter's energy blunder of the 1970s.

WILLIAM TUCKER

The Environmental Protection Agency has issued a 645-page ruling whose basic aim is to cut coal plants out of the mix in producing the nation's electricity. States will supposedly be given a choice, but the only real way to meet the agency's demands for carbon-dioxide reductions will be to cut back on coal. All this will be a devastating blow to the Midwestern economy, driving up energy prices for everyone, while having only the slightest impact on global warming.

There is a great irony to this. In the early 1970s, coal was being phased out as the nation's principal source of electricity. The initial concerns about air pollution had focused on coal, and environmental groups such as the Sierra Club were campaigning to lift the 20-year-old ban on imported oil so we could replace coal with low-sulfur oil from Libya and Indonesia.

All this came to a halt with the Arab oil embargo of 1973-74. It became clear that burning oil for electricity in the U.S. was a luxury we could no longer afford. But there was a salvation on the horizon. The nation was just embarking on a monumental effort to implement nuclear power, with almost 200 reactors on the drawing boards or in the pipeline. This would supplant both coal and oil and solve the problem of air pollution once and for all. (Concerns about carbon emissions had not yet arisen.)

Work on more than 50 reactors had already begun when the effort hit a snag. With the new administration of President Jimmy Carter, environmentalists gained a foothold in the government for the first time. They were opposed to air pollution but they were more opposed to nuclear power. At the same time, Mr. Carter was under tremendous pressure to find a replacement for foreign oil, so environmentalists came up with a solution. Theorists such as soft-energy guru Amory Lovins argued that coal could be cleaned up through new technologies—the fluidized bed, for instance, which pulverizes coal for nearly complete combustion. This would allow coal to serve as a bridge to the coming legions of wind, solar and other renewable energies that would be ready to take over completely somewhere around 2025.

Given the choice between coals and nuclear, Mr. Carter chose coal. He canceled experimental reactors, shut down research, ended the reprocessing of spent fuel (a decision that created the unnecessary problem of nuclear waste), and effectively brought the technology to a halt. At the time, the nation was burning half-a-billion tons of coal a year. Mr. Carter vowed we would reach one billion tons by 2000 and that promise was fulfilled. Even as coal use declines today, we still consume just under one billion tons a year.

As a result, America has lost its lead in nuclear technology. There are now 60 reactors under construction around the world—including 26 in China—but only four new ones being built in the U.S. Russia, France and South Korea are even further ahead in the technology, selling their reactors all over the world. India and Argentina each just brought a new reactor on line in May.

On Friday, Russia fired up a fast breeder reactor, the holy grail that consumes all forms of nuclear waste. We abandoned the technology in the 1990s.

To illustrate further how far things have declined in this country: Fourteen years ago Bill Gates assigned Microsoft's MSFT -1.30% technology genius Nathan Myhrvold to explore the frontiers for advanced energy. Mr. Myhrvold settled on a design using the traveling wave, a reactor that burns for 50 years without refueling and consumes its own waste. After waiting a year at the gates of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in Rockville, Md., Messrs. Gates and Myhrvold realized there was no hope of experimenting in the U.S. So they took their reactor design to China. In 2011 Mr. Gates signed an agreement with the Chinese National Nuclear Corporation to develop the traveling wave.

The same thing is happening with thorium, which produces no plutonium and is therefore proliferation-proof. Most nuclear engineers believe thorium to be a far superior fuel to uranium. China and India are developing thorium technology, but not the U.S.

It is ridiculous to think we can go into the Industrial Belt of the Midwest and tell people they must close down coal plants without anything to replace them. Natural gas is offered as an alternative, but with gas leading a manufacturing revival, pressure building to export it, and attempts under way to substitute gas for gasoline in our cars, who knows how long the price will remain low?

We should be building nuclear reactors right beside every old coal plant. Had we pursued this path 40 years ago, we would not only have lowered U.S. carbon emissions, as have France and Sweden, but we could be helping other countries reduce theirs as well. We can still, if we go back to that road not taken and revive nuclear energy.

Mr. Tucker is the author of "Terrestrial Energy: How Nuclear Power Will Lead the Green Revolution and End America's Energy Odyssey" (Bartleby Press, 2010).

WATCH: Impeachment Is Nothing Compared To What Ted Cruz Wants To Do To Eric Holder

"If this was a Republican administration..."

JUSTIN KOSKI — JULY 1, 2014

Texas Senator Ted Cruz sounds off on Attorney General Eric Holder for his appointing of of a major democratic donor, Barbara Bosserman, to investigate the IRS scandal. Cruz then called for Holder’s impeachment if he refused to appoint an independent prosecutor.

Cruz cited the decisions of the Attorneys General under Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton to appoint independent prosecutors when they both were accused of abusing their power.

“If this were a Republican administration, every media outlet would have banner headlines every single day.”

“If the allegation is of abusive government power at the IRS, to target citizens for their political beliefs, then you cannot entrust the investigation to a partisan whose political interest is protecting the party in power,” said Cruz.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/ted-cruz-goes-holder-wont-appoint-special-prosecutor-impeached/#Krki8BMHszK3RtOI.99

Israel Finds Missing Teens Dead, Considers Strikes Against Hamas

Should they strike?

F. PETER BROWN — 

The recent discovery of the bodies of three missing teens in Israel has triggered outrage against Hamas, the Palestinian terrorist group. Hamas is believed to be responsible by Israeli authorities for kidnapping and then murdering the teens.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanhayu expressed anger against Hamas for the slayings:

They were kidnapped and murdered in cold blood by beasts.

He added:

Hamas is responsible and Hamas will pay.

Netanyahu also expressed deep remorse for the three murdered Israeli students:

On behalf of the people of Israel, I wish to tell their dear families … our hearts are bleeding, the entire nation is weeping with you.

The Israeli ambulance was stoned by Palestinian Arabs after it picked up the corpses of the three teens.

Now Netanyahu’s security cabinet has convened after nightfall to discuss the situation. They are weighing the options of going after Hamas, the group believed to be responsible by Israel.

A retired colonel, Shaul Shay, said:

If the goal is to create large-scale damage to the infrastructure in Gaza, it can be done from the air.

He also said:

But if the goal is to change the strategic environment, you need boots on the ground.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/israel-finds-missing-teens-dead-considers-strikes-against-hamas/#SWY8q8wjYTBXlg6m.99

OBAMA’S ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION INVITATION. By: John Hayward  

You can tell the tidal wave of illegal aliens, many of them unaccompanied minors, surging across the southern border is causing a bit of political discomfort for President Obama, because he briefly felt obliged to pretend he’s not happy about it.  ”Briefly” means last Friday, when the President gave us the hilarious vaudeville pantomime act of asking the people of Central America to stop throwing their kids across the hemisphere.  From a Washington Times report:

President Obama made a personal plea Friday for the families of Central America not to send their children to America, trying to stanch the crisis of illegal immigrant youths flooding across the border.

“Our message is absolutely don’t send your children unaccompanied on trains or through a bunch of smugglers,” Mr. Obama said on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

He made the plea in response to a bipartisan group of senators who Thursday demanded that he “personally make clear” that minors jumping the border won’t get special treatment.

The president, who continues to struggle with how to deal with the thousands of unaccompanied alien children flooding across the southern border, stressed that the journey to America isn’t safe for children traveling alone and that the U.S. will send them home after they arrive.

“Our message is absolutely don’t send your children unaccompanied on trains or through a bunch of smugglers,” he said. “That is our direct message to the families of Central America: Do not send your children to the borders. If they do make it, they’ll get sent back. More importantly, they might not make it.”

“They’ll get sent back?”  How stupid does this man think we are?  Tell you what, Mr. President: how about you personally travel aboard the first mass repatriation flight to Honduras, and give your “they’ll be sent back” warning in a speech from there, surrounded by the thousand minors you just hauled back from the refugee camps you want American taxpayers to spend $2 billion on.  Then people might start paying attention to your rhetorical “messages.”

In truth, false messages are being sent to American voters, while the incoming wave of refugees are getting the real message loud and clear.  The same Washington Times article includes a quote from an unnamed Administration official who admitted “more than 50 percent of children who illegally cross the border alone will be allowed to remain in the United States.”  A 50-50 shot at getting your kid residency plus benefits in the United States looks pretty good to people trapped in the violent squalor of Central America, stuck between corrupt governments and trigger-happy drug gangs.  And really, that’s a ridiculous under-estimation of the odds of success.  The real “repatriation” rate for families traveling with children won’t crack 10 percent, and it’ll be even less for unaccompanied minors.

Obama was back to his Cloward-Piven strategy of deliberately overloading the U.S. immigration system on Monday, promising to use more executive orders like the one that launched this invasion, his Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, because Congress won’t give him what he wants.  The Democrats’ enthusiasm for “enlightened” despotism, and their hunger to keep that flood of illegals coming in, reached insulting lows when Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) said that if House Speaker John Boehner doesn’t get a “comprehensive immigration reform bill” cooking soon, “the president will ‘borrow’ the power that is needed to solve the problems of immigration.”

That’s the new euphemism for dictatorship: “borrowing” powers forbidden by the Constitution, because Congress won’t do what the dictator wants.  Perhaps smarting from the long string of Supreme Court decisions that have made a mockery of his claims to be an expert in constitutional law, the President didn’t endorse this novel theory of power-borrowing in so many words on Monday, instead opting to pretend that he’s deeply sorrowful that he must trample on the separation of powers to get what he wants, because the American system refuses to obey him.  From a Fox News report:

President Obama vowed Monday to bypass Congress and pursue unilateral changes to the country’s immigration system, defying House Republicans who say his executive actions are part of the problem.

The president, speaking in the Rose Garden, said he is forced to go it alone because the House has failed to act on a comprehensive overhaul. He said Speaker John Boehner informed him last week the House will not vote on an immigration bill this year.

“America cannot wait forever for them to act,” Obama said. He said he’s launching a new effort to “fix as much of our immigration system as I can, on my own, without Congress.”

I expect thunderous applause from every Democrat in the land when the next Republican president invokes precisely the same reasoning to bypass Congress and fix our tax system, which is far more broken and confusing than our immigration laws.

The president’s announcement is sure to infuriate congressional Republicans. Obama is pushing for new executive actions in defiance of Boehner’s vow last week to pursue a lawsuit against the president over alleged executive overreach. Even before Monday’s announcement, Boehner and his colleagues alleged that the president has gone too far in making changes without Congress to immigration policy, the Affordable Care Act, environmental regulations and other issues.

This new push would go further still.

In a written statement, Boehner called Obama’s announcement “sad and disappointing,” and said executive orders “can’t and won’t fix these problems.”

“Sad” and “disappointing” are not the correct words for this, Speaker Boehner.  What Obama is doing with this illegal-alien tsunami, and his talk of shredding the Constitution to get what he wants, is outrageous.  And it’s not “sad” in the sense that we should feel a swell of pity for the President – he’s aggressively abusing his power, and bringing in foreign power, to rewrite the American system in a way voters did not endorse, and very few support.  This might be thought of as “sad” if it wasn’t working.  But it is.

Which brings us to the classic Cloward-Piven part of President Obama’s remarks – as pure a distillation of their manufactured-crisis theory as you’ll ever hear:

During his remarks in the Rose Garden, Obama cited the current surge of illegal immigrant children crossing the southern border and said the “crisis” should underscore the need to pass a comprehensive bill. But Boehner claimed that it was Obama’s past executive orders — those easing deportations for some illegal immigrants — that “have led directly to the humanitarian crisis along the southern border.”

Boehner said “additional executive action from this president isn’t going to stem the tide of illegal crossings, it’s only going to make them worse.” He also referred to last week’s Supreme Court ruling that Obama overstepped in making recess appointments, saying the court “reminded us” that there are “sharp limits” to presidential power.

As for his conversation last week with the president, Boehner said he only told Obama what he’s been saying for months: that until the public and elected officials trust him to enforce the law, “it is going to be difficult to make progress on this issue.”

Yes, he just “cited” the crisis he deliberately created as a justification for getting even more of what he wants.  Cloward-Piven all the way down, baby!  And while Speaker Boehner is correct to point out that more executive orders to weaken our immigration system will only make the crisis worse, it’s a bit silly to pretend that Obama himself doesn’t know that.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi – reliably dense enough to forget that the victims aren’t supposed to know they’re being mauled by a Cloward-Piven attack – chipped in by looking at the thousands of alien kids tucked into makeshift refugee shelters, beaming warmly at the humanitarian nightmare her Party has created, and pronouncing it a wonderful “opportunity.”

“This crisis that some call a crisis, we have to view as an opportunity,” Pelosi squealed in delight.  ”If you believe as we do that every child, every person has a spark of divinity in them, and is therefore worthy of respect – what we saw in those rooms was a dazzling, sparkling array of God’s children, worthy of respect.”

That’s grimly amusing coming from an abortion extremist who is all about snuffing out “divine sparks of life” in some children.  How about all the children who are dying on their thousand-mile trek to accept your amnesty offer, Mrs. Pelosi?  Texas police say they come across such bodies “quite often.”  The most recent gruesome discovery was an 11-year-old Guatemalan boy who got lost on his way to Nancy Pelosi’s opportunity drive, and died a mile from the Texas border with a rosary around his neck…. and the phone number of his brother in Chicago written on the inside of his belt buckle.

As for the Supreme Court smackdowns, it’s debatable just how “sharp” those limits on executive power are, especially since Obama and the Democrats show absolutely no sign of being chastened by their defeats, nor is their friendly media interested in shaming them.  Attacks on the American constitutional order that get partially repelled years later by Supreme Court decisions cannot be judged entirely ineffective.  In this case, if Obama scribbles some more amnesty orders and the 150,000 unaccompanied alien minors anticipated this year turns into 200,000 or 250,000, does anyone really think a 2016 thrashing at the Supreme Court would result in all those kids getting sent home?  What Obama is doing on the border cannot be reversed by any court, and if they step in to slow him down in a couple of years, it will already be too late to make a difference.

Obama’s “plea” to the governments and people of Central America on Friday was really just a bit of theater to reinforce the Administration’s favorite new talking point, which is that the new wave of illegal aliens are wrong or foolish to come here – they were supposedly deluded by “misinformation” from smugglers, local media, and government officials.  That’s supposed to get Obama off the hook for provoking the crisis.  It’s not his fault that hundreds of thousands of people failed to read the fine print in his executive orders!

But it bears repeating that the truth is painfully obvious, and entirely contrary to this silly talking point.  The message being sent to illegals did not come from Obama looking into a camera, holding up a map of the Rio Grande, and inviting them all to visit Texas.  The message is sent by what our political class says about illegal immigration, and the reality of what happens to those who make it across the border.  Interviews with the new arrivals underline that many of them have friends of relatives already living in the United States, who are giving them not “misinformation,” but a quite accurate picture of where the immigration reform debate has been heading.

Those contemplating a run for the border can hear Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) sayingthat while Republicans decide whether or not to provide the alien-friendly immigration “reforms” he wants, “I believe the President of the United States has already in statute, in the law, the ability to heal and put in a safe harbor millions of undocumented immigrants while the Congress of the United States finally decides it’s going to take action.”  He added that he expects Republicans to keep saying “no, no, no” on an immigration deal… but he also expects Obama to be “broad, expansive, and generous in the use of his prosecutorial discretion.”  Message to aliens: no deportations.

The only hitch in this strategy thus far has been the unanticipated volume of the new arrivals.  They weren’t supposed to come quite this rapidly; it spooked the American electorate, especially once photos of the grim reality in Nancy Pelosi’s Hubs of Opportunity started leaking out.  President Obama felt obliged to announce on Friday that he’s moving additional resources to the border – something that he would have done a long time ago, if he was sincerely concerned about the crisis itself, rather than its political fallout.  This story has been percolating through conservative media for months, and the mainstream press picked it up weeks ago.  The President would have known about the gathering crisis before those refugee camps started filling up – we have intelligence services that would detect massive migrant waves moving across the hemisphere.  But only now does Obama decide to beef up the Border Patrol?

Polls show Americans not only responding negatively to the humanitarian crisis on the border, but also a growing desire to restrict legal immigration further, although they still seem supportive of visa programs for skilled workers.  Some of the reluctance for high levels of legal immigration is probably a response to the endless economic doldrums of the Obama years, the sense that the American economy isn’t creating enough jobs to sustain the people who are already here.  In fact, a remarkable report from the Center for Immigration Studies, released last week, found that virtually all net jobs created from 2000 to 2014 went to immigrants – in other words, job creation is barely keeping pace with immigration, while the native-born workforce shrinks.

Hitting the brakes on immigration in the face of such concerns is a reasonable response, not xenophobia.  But of course, it will be denounced as xenophobia by the dominant political and media culture of the United States… and that message will be heard beyond our borders far more clearly than a presidential press conference or two.  The message that what the American people want from immigration reform matters very little to the Ruling Class has been sent loud and clear, too.

AMENPER: CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS

No. 13-354. Sostuvo 25 de marzo 2014-Decidió 30 de junio 2014 *

La Ley de Restauración de Libertad Religiosa de 1993 (RFRA) prohíbe "el Gobierno [de] sustancialmente imponer un cargo por el derecho [ing] del ejercicio de la religión de una persona, incluso si el cargo resulta de regla de aplicabilidad general, ¬" a menos que el Gobierno "demuestra que la aplicación de laa obligación  a la persona-(1) es para promover un convincente ¬ interés mental; y (2) es el medio menos restrictivo de interés público imperativo más allá de 2 USC § § 2000bb-1 (a), (b).

En su versión modificada por la Ley de Uso del derecho  Religioso y ´personas institucionalizadas de 2000 (RLUIPA), RFRA cubre "cualquier ejercicio de la religión, sea o no obligado por, o central, un sistema de creencia religiosa sea ¬." § 2000cc-5 (7) (A).

Esta acertada decisión de la corte suprema si la sacamos de la verborrea legal, se trata simplemente de la aplicación de la libertad de culto que implementaron los fundadores de la nación. Una nación creada en sus principios por perseguidos religiosos.

No se trata realmente de lo que oímos, no se trata de nada que tenga que ver con la salud ni el derecho de la mujer.  Cualquier mujer puede comprar un anticonceptivo a un precio barato o lo puede obtener sin costo en las clínicas de “planificación familiar”- O sea que las reclamaciones de “guerra contra las mujeres” y las reclamaciones de ataques a la salud de la población es pura política liberal.

Por la otra parte, no es cierta religión lo que se está defendiendo, la mayoría de los católicos han usado  anticonceptivos.  Es simplemente el derecho de una persona de negarse a que le impongan una carga que va contra el ejercicio de las doctrinas de institución religiosa a que pertenecen. Esto es lo que aclara la decisión. Las dos partes están presentando hechos que no son muy exactos, pero lo que sí es exacto es que la libertad de culto, o sea la libertad de pensar y practicar una religión al no ser que sea contra el interés público.  O sea que si no afecta el derecho de otros, el derecho personal de practicar una religión está protegido por la constitución.

Si esta administración por intereses políticos, trata la constitución como papel higiénico, la Corte Suprema solamente le está recordando que aunque bajo ataque, todavía en este país la separación de poderes está vigente y que es el derecho de la corte interpretarla y asegurar que se cumpla.

 

Georgia 'Guns Everywhere' Law In Effect Today

Due to a new measure effective today, Georgia residents may take guns into some bars, nightclubs and schools as long as they have a license to carry.

The law allows religious leaders to “opt in” to permit guns on their worship premises and also makes it legal for permit-holders to take firearms near Transportation Security Administration (TSA) checkpoints.

Critics call the measure the “guns everywhere” bill. They believe it disturbs places of worship, bars and schools, though Georgians may not bring their firearm into a bar or church if the property owner bans them. GeorgiaCarry lobbied for the bill, calling it “meaningful pro-gun legislation.”

Georgia Governor Nathan Deal signed the bill into law in April. The measure was approved by the Republican-controlled Georgia General Assembly.

 

 

Samitier: Dime Con Quien Andas Y Te Diré Quién Eres... Resuelto! Los Homosexuales Declaran A El Papa Bergolio oficialmente "COOL"...

El notorio homosexual Elton John,

declara que el Papa Francisco,

es "maravilloso".

Dijo: “Nosotros, Los Hateros Sexuales, Somos Todos

Homofóbicos, Retrógrados, Intolerantes, Etc.

Porque Queremos Un Mundo Sano!

Ahora Los ENFERMOS Somos Los NORMALES… Qué No DAMOS LAS NALGAS…

Pop icon Elton John calls Pope Francis "wonderful"

http://news.yahoo.com/pop-icon-elton-john-calls-pope-francis-wonderful-173457364.html

El Gobierno, Repleto De Homosexuales Y Comunistas Infiltrados,

Como Maestros y Técnicos En Toda Clase De Actividades…

Usa Un Muñequito Lésbico Para Adoctrinar A Los Menores Usando

El Dinero Del Pueblo.

Justice Dept Uses Lesbian Cartoon Characters 

To Teach Kids About Cell Phone Safety

The Department of Justice has spent $1.2 million on a website which depicts cartoon cellphones 

engaging in real-life dating scenarios, in an effort to help teens define their “digital line” as it pertains to relationship abuse.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/26/justice-dept-uses-lesbian-cartoon-characters-to-teach-kids-about-cell-phone-safety/#ixzz36Htoac9D

¿Qué Es “Abuso De Un Menor” ???  Usted decide...

Los Médicos Dictaminaron Que Nacer En La Casa Es Un Crimen…

Toda Mis Padres y Hermanos Nacieron En La Casa…

Cualquiera que se enfrenta al sistema medico oficial, es una amenaza a la sociedad.   

El Gobierno decide lo que es bueno para el Pueblo! 

Cuando los homosexuales sidosos iban por las discotecas infectando a otros,

eso era su derecho.  Pero cuando una madre desea dar a luz en su casa,

eso es abuso infantil, de acuerdo al mismo gobierno.

También UNA NALGADA… Es ABUSO Infantil…

Pero Una ENTRADA DE PALOS POR LA POLICIA

ES UNA NECESIDAD SOCIAL… 

Algo no cuadra???

See more at: http://healthydebates.com/police-confiscate-healthy-baby-born-home/#sthash.3nH0wlC5.dpuf

Watch: What Sheriff Joe Just Suggested To Do To Secure The Border Will Make Liberals Go Crazy

“I would go back to what I did in Mexico..."

B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE — JUNE 30, 2014

In a recent radio interview, the Arizona lawman often described as ‘America’s toughest sheriff’ weighed in once again on the immigration crisis that has disproportionately affected his state and others that share a border with Mexico.

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio concluded that he has “a lot of authority as sheriff,” though he has a few ideas about how to secure the border and stem the flow of illegal immigrants that could only be implemented by the federal authorities.

“I would go back to what I did in Mexico,” he said, recalling his years as a special agent with the Drug Enforcement Agency.

He explained that U.S. agents “worked right along with Mexico authorities locking up dope peddlers,” noting the same approach could be used to fight illegal immigration.

“I’d send my Border Patrol across the border,” he said, and encourage them to “work with the Federales and the military.”

While Arpaio conceded that such an approach is unlikely from this or any modern administration, he concluded “that’s what we used to do and we really dried up the drug traffic.”

He noted that the U.S. military could be involved in the interest of safety, noting that the only roadblock would be convincing the Mexican president that such a bilateral approach would be beneficial to all involved.

Arpaio asserted that he would simply “go in there, have a few drinks with him, and get the job done.”

Instead, the sheriff lamented that the federal government is spending its time accusing him and his department of racial discrimination based on the effort to uphold federal law.

“I had 160 of my people trained for six weeks and given the authority to enforce federal illegal immigration laws,” he said. “They took that away from me. I guess we’re doing too good a job.”

He concluded that the border will continue to pose problems as long as those in power refuse to act. The recidivism rate among illegals, he noted, is extraordinarily high, leading him to believe that criminals are being “dumped on the streets of Arizona” upon their release instead of being deported to their home country.

The current influx of illegals, he suggested, was likely “a ploy to generate controversy” in the hopes that “Congress would finally look at the situation or the president would start issuing executive orders.”

Public backlash against the steady stream of border-crossers, however, has caused that plan to backfire, he said.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/sheriff-joe-thinks-novel-approach-border-security-work/#iHgigGFje5w0ZEKv.99

AMENPER: A comer yerba

Cuando los ambientalistas preocupados por el "cambio climático" se convierten en comisarios de la policía federal de nutrición, es una receta para el desastre.

Leyendo de la actualización para el 2015 de las Guías Alimentarias para los estadounidenses, que se revisan cada cinco años. Los departamentos federales de Agricultura y Salud y Servicios Humanos se basan en las recomendaciones del Comité Asesor de las Guías Dietéticas ambientalista para modificar las normas de nutrición de la nación.

Y ahí es donde las ruedas se le caen al carretón.

El comité incluye a nutricionistas "radicales" que quieren salvar el planeta para los estadounidenses cambiando a una "dieta basada en plantas"----, oyeron, no más lechón asado al pincho este cuatro de Julio, no más arroz con frijoles negros. Nos dicen. "En general, queremos estar seguros de hacer recomendaciones para una dieta saludable, ecológicamente responsable", dice la presidenta del comité Bárbara Millen.

Así que es lo que nos están diciendo, ¿Que los, consejos de nutrición no se basan consideraciones dietéticas, sino en lo que se considera ser "ecológicamente" saludable para el planeta?

Incluso si la mayoría de los estadounidenses ignoramos estas tonterías, las directrices afectan en última instancia, los programas federales de nutrición, como las comidas escolares.

Nuestros hijos y nietos considerarán que somos salvajes comiendo y nos pedirán yerba verde en nochebuena.

El Congreso no debe permitir que los extremistas cometan atropellos contra lo que los estadounidenses consumen.

Si una cruzada ambiental se apodera de lo que se supone que son las pautas de nutrición, a continuación, los legisladores deben retener los fondos para las directrices.

No debemos permitir que con el dinero de nosotros los contribuyentes nuestros hijos tengan una dieta obligatoria determinada no por dietistas pero por burócratas de la religión ambientalista.

Y que los déspotas dietéticos mastiquen eso y se traguen sus yerbas y nos dejen con las comidas que nos ha permitido vivir por todos estos años.

Claro que como van las cosas ¿Qué importa el congreso?  Tenemos al presidente con su pluma alegre firmando decisiones ejecutivas. Aunque nosotros los cubanos quizás podamos convencer al presidente que los frijoles como son negros, es mejor que la yerba verde.

MIRIAM DOPICO: WANT TO STOP RACISM IN AMERICA? THIS VIDEO IS ONLY 2 MINUTES LONG...PLEASE WATCH IT AND THEN FORWARD FAR & WIDE.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6BY67I5OOk

Want To Stop Racism In America ? - Arrest Barack Obama

WND MEDIA

NEWSPAPER VERY SORRY FOR ENDORSING OBAMA

Prez 'has earned every bit of an abysmal approval rating'

The Billings, Montana, Gazette, the biggest newspaper in the state, and, in fact, the biggest in a region that includes portions of neighbors North Dakota, Wyoming and Idaho, is admitting, slightly after the fact, that it was wrong to endorse Barack Obama for president in 2008.

“Sometimes, you have to admit you’re wrong,” the newspaper said in an unbylined editorial on June 27. “And, we were wrong.”

It listed a series of scandals and controversies generated by the Obama administration, and the lack of progress on real issues.

“These are all signs – none of them definitive on their own, necessarily. However, when taken in completely, these demonstrate a disturbing trend of incompetence and failure. It’s not just that Americans are in a sour mood about national politics. That’s probably part of it. Instead, Obama has become another in a line of presidents long on rhetoric and hopelessly short on action,” the paper said.

“Obama’s hope and change have left liberals and conservatives alike hoping for real change, not just more lofty rhetoric.”

The Washington Examiner noted the change of heart with a headline, “That bad, huh? Newspaper so disappointed in Obama it apologizes for 2008 endorsement.”

The Examiner continued, “Better late than never.”

The Gazette explained that for the 2008 election, it believed that “things couldn’t get much worse after the sub par presidency of George W. Bush.”

“But,” the paper wrote, “President Barack Obama’s administration has us yearning for the good ol’ days when we were at least winning battles in Iraq.”

It listed the number of “bungled or blown policies” by Obama, “which lead us to believe Obama has earned every bit of an abysmal approval rating.”

Those issues, all of which have been covered extensively on the pages of WND over the last six years, include the National Security Agency program to spy on Americas, the crackdown by Obama on coal-fired power plants, Iraq, the Bowe Bergdahl exchange in which Obama released five known and feared terrorist leaders, the Veterans Administration scandal, stem cell technology, Obama’s crackdown on journalists and, “finally, Obamacare has become synonymous with boondoggle.”

The criticisms were pointed on these issues.

“”The administration as done nearly nothing to safeguard civil liberties or put in safeguards to protect our constitutionally guaranteed freedoms,” the paper wrote about the NSA spying scandal.

On Bergdahl, the paper said, “What should have been an easy public relations victory for bringing a lost soldier home turned into a public relations nightmare, and continued to erode public confidence, leading some to wonder if Obama’s team can’t even get something as important as bringing home a captive soldier correct, what can it be successful at?”

The VA debacle “was another black eye for the administration which appeared to look incompetent when it comes to taking care of wounded, or in-need veterans.”

On Obamacare, it said, “One thing is certain: The public presentation and roll-out of the program was so riddled with technical glitches and problems, it greatly undermined the public’s confidence in the system.”

The Western Journalism Center pointed out that the newspaper did not endorse Obama again in 2012, after calling for his election in 2008.

At that time, the paper said, “At this extremely challenging time, America needs a uniter, not a divider. In this economic turmoil, America needs a thoughtful, cool-headed optimist who envisions a bright future for all citizens. … Our great nation needs a new leader who can inspire confidence at home and aboard. Obama is that leader.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/newspaper-apologizes-for-endorsing-obama-in-08/#PhjhMWe4Su5vqjBe.99

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/newspaper-apologizes-for-endorsing-obama-in-08/#PhjhMWe4Su5vqjBe.99

Send Congress the pink slip Shock campaign that fired up 2010 revolution is back.

WASHINGTON – What happens when more than 9 million messages warning Congress to shape up or ship out?  The only time it ever happened was 2009. That's when WND launched the "Send Congress a Pink Slip" campaign resulting in an avalanche of imminent firing notices that were carefully and successfully delivered to every member of Congress over a period of several months.  The warnings were delivered on pink paper – depleting all supplies of pink paper in North America. Piled on top of one another, they would tower above the tallest building in the Capitol, the Washington Monument – eventually even the tallest building in the world. Some members extolled the campaign against overspending and irresponsible behavior, while others whispered and murmured about it behind closed doors.  Ultimately the pink slip campaign presaged the tea party movement and one of the biggest voter revolts in American history in 2010.  And that's why WND is bringing it back – updated, rejuvenated and refined – in 2014.  Here's the message to every single member of the House and Senate you can send by participating in the campaign before November:  THIS IS YOUR FINAL NOTICE!  It's time to do the job you were elected to do: ·  Hold the president accountable for repeated violations of the Constitution. ·  Punish all those culpable for using the IRS to target citizens based on their political beliefs and activities. ·  Break up the Veterans Administration cartel and get medical care to our vets now. ·  Demand Barack Obama enforce immigration laws now or else. If you fail to live up to these urgent demands, your REAL PINK SLIP WILL BE ISSUED ON ELECTION DAY.  Signed,  Your employer,  Each pink slip bears your actual name and address as provided in your order. And they all ask for a response from each member. During the last campaign, bundles of pink slips were dispatched...  It's a not-so-subtle way of reminding members of Congress - Democrats and Republicans - who they work for, who pays their salaries and who sent them to Washington. It's an effective way to let them know they might be back on the job market in November if they don't read the political tea leaves and understand the frustration and anger being felt on Main Street.  "It's time to shake these people up, again," said Joseph Farah, WND founder and chief executive office. "Republicans need to hear it as much as Democrats. After all, they're not holding Barack Obama accountable. He should have been impeached by the House, which is controlled by the so-called opposition party. Participating in this campaign is like taking part in one gigantic collective primal scream heard from coast to coast."  ...and cartloads...  If you want Congress to exercise its power to hold the White House accountable for abuse of the Constitution, for targeting political "enemies" with Internal Revenue Service harassment, making wounded warriors and other veterans wait months for medical services and for refusing to enforce immigration laws, here's your opportunity to make your voice heard along with millions of others who share your anger and frustration.  The secret of its success is the delivery method. All pink slips are sent using FedEx, ensuring actual delivery to congressional offices. The messages are bundled for delivery by recipient to keep the costs down and to increase the impact.  "How else could you send every member of Congress a message in one minute for a total cost of $29.95?" asks Farah. "It can't be done. We found the sweet spot for getting their attention in a dramatic way. It's never been replicated – until now." ...and truckloads.  If you’d like to bury Congress in pink slips again, now's your chance.  For just $29.95 you can send an individualized notice to every member of Congress in the form of a "pink slip." It will bear your name and your address and be sent and delivered to every member of the House and Senate, giving them plenty to think about before the November election.  Are you ready for another revolution in 2014? Only you can make it happen.  If your memory fails you, or if you never heard of the 2009 pink slip campaign, here are some points to highlight:  Pretty in pink slips – 7 million and counting!  Pink slips could paper path from NY to Washington Historic! 850,000 'pink slips' to Congress – in 3 days  Pink-slipping Congress wipes out paper supplies Congressional news conference hails 5 million pink slips  Boxes, pallets, truckloads of pink slips going to Congress Participate in the campaign

Call Toll-Free to Order:  If you prefer to order by phone, you can call our friendly, Midwestern customer service reps  toll-free at 1-800-4WND-COM  (1-800-496-3266),  Monday-Friday, 9am-5pm Central.

IMAGINENSE POR 2 MINUTOS QUE ES LO QUE SE DEMORARAN EN LEER ESTO: IMAGINENSE QUE LOS EXTRATERRESTRES SECUESTRARON A OBAMA Y SE LO LLEVARON PARA SU PLANETA “TOM-KOLL” DE VISITA A 500 MILLONES DE ANOS LUZ DE USA Y QUE SU NAVE SE LES ROMPIO Y NO TIENEN MAS NAVES NI LA PUEDEN ARREGLAR, O QUE UN TRIBU DE CANIVALES DE AFRICA PRIMOS DE EL SE LO COMIERON EN UN AJIACO, O QUE LE CALLO EN LA CABEZA EL AVION PRESIDENCIAL  EN UNA ISLA REMOTA DE HAWAII, O QUE LOS REPUBLICANOS SE LO COMIERON EN UN AJIACO EN EL CONGRESO, O SE LO LLEVO EL “CHUPACABRAS O EL “CHICHIRICU”  O EL “COCO, O QUE EL MAGO DEL RINGLIN LO DESAPARECIO DE AVIAJE, O QUE NUNCA EXISTIO OBAMA, O QUE SE METIO EN LA BOLSA DE UN CANGURO UYENDOLE A MICHEL, O QUE SE LO COMIO EL TIBURON SANGRIENTO… AHHHHHH!!!                                                   QUE RICO TATA…

“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño

 “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”