Tuesday, July 8, 2014

No 703      “EN  MI  OPINIóN”      Julio 8, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST”    Lázaro R González Miño Editor.

“Con un poco de atraso Feliz 4 de Julio”
¡obama Choky is back!!!

Desde el pasado jueves en la tarde fuimos objeto del más descarnado y violento ataque para destruirnos nuestra computadora. Aparentemente DIOS está de nuestro lado. Yo pensé que no podría resolver todo aquel reguero y destrucción electrónica. No tengo dinero para llamar a un técnico y yo de esto no se nada. Pero como era poco lo que perdería ya porque creí que todo estaba perdido metí las manos donde no tengo ni la más ligera idea y milagrosamente todo está trabajando bastante bien. No sé pero me parece que arriba hay alguien que tampoco le gusta lo que está haciendo el negro.  ¡Que DIOS nos siga ayudando!                                         Lázaro R González Miño




Amenper: Celebrando el 4 de Julio
Hoy estoy celebrando el día dela independencia en la zona de Estero-Naples. Siempre vengo a este refugio porque me recuerda las celebraciones de antaño. Esta es la celebración #45,  43 de ellas como exilado.
 La degradación de la nació es algo de lo que he sido testigo.
En la celebración de Naples se puede apreciar la diferencia.  Naples es como una máquina del tiempo, no porque aplaudan a la carroza republicana y abucheen a la demócrata, pero porque las personas y su comportamiento recuerdan a los tiempos de antes.  
No se ve un papel en la calle terminada la parada, cada persona pone su basura en los basureros, y los tatuajes, tan comunes en Miami son muy poco vistos como era cuando América era América.
Dicen que es que la zona de Naples es el refugio de los “ricos”, no lo creo, creo que es el refugio de las personas decentes. No hay que ser pobre para ser cochino, ni hay que ser rico para ser responsable y limpio.
Nuestros gobernantes han racionalizado nuestras libertades y promulgado normas, reglamentos y leyes que promuevan nuestra dependencia. Reclutamiento de riquezas por medio de impuestos su transferencia a otros es promovido, imprudentemente, como "progreso". No es más que la servidumbre y la dependencia.  
La esencia de los Estados  se está cercenando con cada excusa hecha, cada libertad confiscada en nombre de la "seguridad" por cada dólar robado y la violación de los preceptos de los fundadores y proscripciones de autores ignoradas. Para continuar la celebración fui a ver la película AMÉRICA.
Se la recomiendo, es una comparación genial de Souza de los que era América y lo que es hoy en día.
Por eso De Souza es el hombre más odiado por los liberales que están destruyendo América. 
Entonces, resolvamos en este día de la independencia 2014  dedicarnos a la proposición de los fundadores de esta nación. Porque no somos sujetos. "Nosotros" Somos el gobierno. Y nosotros el pueblo debemos retomar nuestra reclamación de poder vivir en un país como lo soñaron los fundadores.

 

Que se ha dejado de hacer....! Armando Lopez-Calleja  From: aelcv@netzero.com

Para que a una persona o entidad  se le pueda calificar de estar realizando un buen trabajo en el desempeño su cargo, cualquiera que este sea, tenemos que calificar  justamente las cosas que ha resuelto y las que ha dejado de resolver y cual de las dos tiene mas importancia para el objetivo y resultado que se espera de su trabajo.

Voy a dar mi opinión, como lo que soy un ciudadano de los EEUU,  común y corriente, formando parte de una sociedad democrática, que gracias a Dios, nos da la posibilidad de expresar libremente nuestras opinión, siempre con espititud constructive 1ro.-Que se ha dejado de hacer, desde mi modesto punto de vista;..

1.-La CRISIS ECONOMICA;
No comencemos con que Crisis Economica viene del gobierno anterior, "agua pasada no mueve el Molino", cuando un Nuevo Gobierno asume el poder, debe trabajar para resolver los problemas que se encuntre al ser elegido, tanto en el poder ejecutivo, como el poder legislativo.
Que es lo que no ha resuelto en estos 6 años en el gobierno; 

1.1.-Elaborar un Plan y ejecutarlo, para impulsar el Sector de las Construcciones, para crear empleos directos en la  construccion de nuevas comunidades, con cientos de viviendas, las redes tecnicas y los servicios publicos y privados, siendo este sector el que genera mas empleos indirectos, en las industrias necesarias para habilitar los edificios y que sean utilizables por las familias y por los empleados de los servicios y negocios, 
La creacion de empleos, implica un aumento sustancial de la recaudacion de los impuestos, lo que permite balancear el presupuesto sin afectar complomisos sociales, bomberos, policia, ayuda a los minusvalisos, ni a los desamparados, etc.

1.2.-Para bajar los precios de todos los materiales que se usan en las construcciones y en todos los secotres de la economia del Pais, incluyendo los productos de la Canasta Familiar, principalmente los alimentos.
Para ello es imprescindible bajar el precio de los combustibles y sus derivados incluyendo la  gasolina, El pueblo se pregunta;
1.2.1.-Por que, no se construyó oleoducto desde Alaska.
1.2.2.-Por que no se ha intensificado la fabricacion de vehiclos con moteres electricos
           e hibridos
1.2.3-Por que no se han construidos miles de molinos eolicos para producer
         electricidad barata, ya que no se nefesita emplear combustible.
1.2.4-Por que no se construyen masivamente los paneles solares para genrar electrida
       barata, ya que no se necesita ttampoco combustible para generarla.
1.2.5-Con estos sustanciales ahorro  en los consumes de combustibles, no seria
       necesario que el pais tenga que comprarlo a los paises enemigos, al precio que 
       ellos nos impongan, 

2.--Como es posible que se les siga comprando todo tipo de mercancia a otros paises, porque nos lo venden mas barato, aunque internamente se venden caro, esto ha traido como consecuencia que la deuda externa de este pais, sea de                  $19'616,961'616,221 dolares  ya que en los ultimos 6 años  se ha incrementado en casi un 55%, y que al trasladar muchas industrias a otros paises, han afectando la produccion nacional, dejando sin trabajo a  miles de obreros.

3.-Que ha pasado con la proteccion de nuestras frotneras, las que parecen un colador, llena de deficiencias, lo que ha permtido que la cifra de ilegales sea de 13,750,068 personas y recientemente han pasado increiblemente mas de 50,000 nuevas personas, principlmente  niños y mujeres- Conclusion la solucion a la inmigracion illegal, sigue sin resolverse....!

5.-Una de las peores consecuencia de la Crisis Econoica y que afecta directamente a la familia Americana es la delincuencia, a continuacion las cifras nacionales. Asaltos=415,084,-Robos==219,721,-Crimenes violentos==5'542,735,-Violaciones=44,242,-Robos de casas=1='104,570,-Rateria=3'275,433,-Robos de vehiculos=475,731,-Abusos de Drogas==840,110 y la mas destacada  Robo de identidad=47'030,231, con estas estadisticas que los gobernantes no se toman el trabajo de estudiar, antes de estar proponiendo despedir a los policias, por que no son capaces de crear las condiciones para crear trabajo, para que estos numeros no sigan aumentando y evitarle a la poblacion, estar continuamente asustada,. pensando con razon, que algo les pueda suceder y fomar parte de estas estadisticas.

Quisera que los colegas que tienen conocimiento de las tareas realizadas por este gobierno en beneficio del pueblo Americano, los invito a que nos demuestren  el seguro medico, llamado "Obama- Care" es bueno para el pueblo.
Antes habian unos 40 millones de persons sin "seguro medico", unos, porque no tenian un buen sueldo y otros porque no les interesaba, ahora tenemos 40.4 millones de personas bajo el nivel de pobreza, que no lo pueden pagar, tenemos unos 40.3 millones de personas, afectados directamente por el desempleo, que tampoco lo pagaran y arriba de eso les van a poner multas por no inscribirse. y a los que tienen poco ingreso le van a pagar un subsidio, lo peor, ese dinero saldrá de un aumento de los impuestos a los que trabajan, o  se lo van a sustraer de los fondos  privados del medicare, sabiendo que eso es illegal....!

La mesa esta servida....!

Ing. Armando Lopez-Calleja.-Miembro del CNP de Cuba en el Exilio y de la UCP.

A la pregunta inicial de nuestro amigo Armando Lopez Callejas: Que se ha dejado de hacer....! “En mi opinion” la respuesta es: Se ha dejado de hacer todo lo útil y necesario. Y se ha hecho todo lo que le convenía al presidente y todos sus acólitos y perjudicaba a la nación americana.                                    Lázaro R González Miño


AMENPER: Engaños de Benghazi: Aumentan las pruebas

Habiendo capturado Ahmed Abu Khatallah y comenzado procesarlo como presunto autor intelectual del 11 de septiembre del  ataque contra el puesto de avanzada de EE.UU. en Benghazi, Libia, el gobierno de Obama está enseñando su ropa interior, y el calzoncillo tiene un hueco grande en el trasero.
En el proceso, se ha quedado al descubierto  su mano antes de Bengasi  al negar protección que había pedido el embajador, así como el bluff fallido que era el tratar ocultar que era el resultado de una conspiración terrorista planificada.
La acusación del Sr. Khatallah "explica una conspiración calculada" detrás del ataque de Bengasi, informa The Washington Times.
La acusación dice Khatallah, un comandante del grupo terrorista Ansar al-Sharia y sus cómplices, conspiraron "para proporcionar apoyo material y recursos" a ellos mismos y a otros terroristas "en la preparación y en la realización de" el ataque que mató Embajador EE.UU. J. Christopher Stevens y tres otros estadounidenses.
Eso hace que la acusación determine "una falsedad, que es como una  sentencia de muerte a la teoría de que el ataque se debió a una protesta espontánea contra un video producido por Estados Unidos", dice The Times.
El gobierno impulsó esa teoría en el  tramo de la campaña de re-elección del 2012, esperando que se la creyeran
El teniente general William Boykin, ex N º 2 en la inteligencia del Pentágono, dice el paradero de Khatallah fueron conocidos a finales de septiembre de 2012, pero la administración "tuvo que ver cómo la historia de vídeo se va a jugar y lo importante que todo el asunto era Benghazi va a ser "antes de capturarlo.
Esto se sabía para cualquiera que se molestara en ver las noticias.  Cuatro diferentes corresponsales de medios de comunicación, pudieron hacerles entrevistas a Khatallah, el tipo se paseaba por el parque de su pueblo, pero los sofisticados equipos de investigación de los Estados Unidos, no sabían dónde estaba podían encontrarlo.  Lo único que tenían que hacer era hacerse pasar por periodista y seguro que le concedía una entrevista.
Realmente esta administración se burla diariamente de la inteligencia del pueblo americano, tratan a los ciudadanos como si fueran anormales fáciles de engañar. 
Ahora Obama está en retirada, y vemos como Hillary quiere distanciarse de Obama.  Veremos en las elecciones que se comportará como los asesinos de Núremberg ella no sabía nada, solo cumplía las ordenes que Obama le daba.   Se estaría declarando ingnorante, pero esto es lo que ha estado haciendo Obama hasta ahora, se entera de las cosas por los periódicos, y los medios de comunicación complacientes le dan una patente de corso para que lo siga haciendo.
Hasta cuando esperará este pueblo para pasarles la cuenta.
Con Khatallah ahora bajo custodia, que es un problema aún más grande de lo que era el día de las elecciones de 2012, porque se acercan las elecciones parciales del 2014..
Esta acusación hace de Benghazi un engaño de la Casa Blanca de Obama y sus asesores de política exterior,  más claro, y más impactante que nunca.


AMENPER: ¿Por qué las ratas están abandonando el Barco..............????
Algunas veces se me han parado los pastelitos y las coqueticas en la boca del estómago cuando en un cafetín cubano he tenido que escuchar a los analistas de la calle 8. 
Con su erudición adquirida durante la trayectoria por el estrecho de la Florida, en un bote rápido pagado con el trabajo de sus familiares en una factoría de Hialeah, y varios títulos obtenido en los centros educativos de la Cuba de Castro, expresan su opinión incontestable sobre la política americana.
 "Acere, ¿que tás hablando? Obama é el mayimbe, él é el presidente y pué hacer lo que le salga de sus timbales"  " ¿que e eso que dices de separación de tibores? El único tibó é el de Obma que es é el que má mea".
Claro que cuando me iba podía hacer mejor la digestión cuando tomaba en perspectiva el origen del análisis.
Pero siempre me ha molestado más cómo la actitud del ejecutivo era justificada por los medios de comunicación. 
Pero esto parece estar cambiando, y es un buen síntoma.  Cuando las ratas se separan del barco, es que ven que este se está hundiendo.
Estamos  viendo que Incluso los liberales ahora están comenzando a cuestionar la propensión del Presidente Barack Obama para usar de una manera  ilegal "acción ejecutiva" para eludir el Congreso.
En CNN el analista legal Jeffrey Toobin dice algo sobre la amenaza más reciente de Sr. Obama — sobre la reforma de inmigración — "está pisando, en terreno pantanoso, peligrosamente ilegal aquí." Sr. Toobin recuerda que el Presidente "puede solamente actuar cuando el artículo II de la Constitución dice que el Presidente tiene la autoridad", y eso no incluye usurpando el poder de un Congreso elegido por el pueblo para representar sus puntos de vista. ... El ultra liberal Jonathan Turley no tira golpes al aire en su crítica del movimiento de inmigración de Obama. "Lo presenta como un mal jugador en las Vegas que trata de ganar con barajas marcadas.." Eso suena bastante bien, teniendo en cuenta Obama se ha convertido en un jugador reincidente con el estado de derecho. ... Noticias del Wall Street Journal , basadas en la reacción de los liberales al fallo de la Corte Suprema Hobby Lobby "uno pensaría que" de repente la Corte Suprema había "impuesto la ley islámica." Como el diario señaló en su cuestión de orden, "sin embargo, como cuestión de derecho, en lugar de oportunismo político, la decisión es una reivindicación de la libertad religiosa en esta importante (todavía, gracias a Dios) República Constitucional pluralista."... En lo que seguramente pasará a la historia como uno de los momentos más incómodos presidenciales el presidente Obama bromeó esta semana, en voz alta y en público, que tal vez la casa blanca los pasteles saben tan bien porque el pastelero "pone crack en ellos."
No creen que quizás este sentido del humor de Obama en el que el presidente usa una droga ilegal explica mejor el comportamiento extra constitucional del Presidente?



SAMITIER: U.S. NAVY DESTROYER STOPS FOUR MEXICANS

U.S. Navy destroyer stops four Mexicans rowing towards Texas.
The Captain gets on the loud-hailer and shouts,
"Ahoy, small craft. Where are you headed?"

One of the Mexicans puts down his oar, stands up, and shouts,
"Gringo ,we are invading the United States of America
to reclaim the territory taken by the USA during the 1800's."

The entire crew on the destroyer doubles over in laughter.

When the Captain finally catches his breath,
he gets back on the loud-hailer and asks,
"Just the four of you?"

The same Mexican stands up again and shouts,
"No, we're the last four.
The other 12 million are already there."




Amenper: Imagine a world without America
Hollywood establishment referred to the new documentary of Dinesh D’Souza in a negative manner, including one review which labeled “America” the worst film in history, and another called for a boycott of the film. The attacks were unprecedented all guns were out to destroy the film.
But the new docudrama from New York Times bestselling author Dinesh D’Souza and Academy-award winning producer Gerald R. Molen (Schindler’s List) once again surprised Hollywood with a 60% increase in box office on the 4th of July, making it the #9 movie in America on a per screen basis. The film took in an estimated $4 million over the five-day holiday weekend. Another surprise came in the form of a report from CinemaScore, the industry tracking service that grades viewer attitudes about movies they’ve just seen. America scored an unusual A+ with 97 rating from filmgoers joining an elite group of 52 films which have included “Titanic,” “Driving Miss Daisy,” and “The King’s Speech.”
“In our film we talk about the shaming of America and how progressive elites attempt to silence the average American,” noted producer Molen 
Some people had mentioned D’Souza have had shown guts in taking the risks to make a film in Hollywood, not against Obama like 2016, but against the false doctrines of the progressive elite.  
Dinesh was a student that came to America as a young adult , because I too came as a young adult to study in America, I personally think that it is not a matter of guts, it is a matter of convictions. 
Dinesh had lived abroad, and because of this, he could see and appreciate better the miracle of America, much better than the natives that take the miracle for granted and don’t have a perspective to really appreciate its greatness.
In 2016 he mentioned his surprise with the students that not only did not appreciate what they had, but were in an obsessive path to destroy it.
The Documentary goes over the false doctrines of the left.  First interviewing the liberal professors, allowing them to express their venom; then he went to interview other professors that didn’t share the liberal views.
The facts were astonishing, the truth was evident.  We had slavery in America; there have been slavery in the history of every country in the world.  But America is the only country were more than 100,000 white soldiers gave their life to eradicate black slavery.
Latter when segregation surged because of political mistakes, but white lawmakers fixed the situation.
The innuendos about imperialist ambitions of American are lies repeated without basis.  American after its wars not only gave back the territories back to the enemy but helped them to reconstruct their country.  Like Colin Powell said at the U.N., the only land U.S.A. asked for was the land to bury its dead.
Mexicans claim that Mexico could be a great country if they had California and Texas.  Of course they are talking about the Texas and California of today, with infrastructure made in U.S.A.
But if California and Texas would be Mexican territory, its citizens would be trying to cross the border to America.
Tejas was not invaded from America. Houston was a Tejano, his generals and troops were tejanos and the majority were of Hispanic descend.  The massacre of the Alamo by Santana left more Hispanic-Tejanos dead than anglo-tejanos.
Texas was an independent country; it gained its independence from Mexico, later they decided to enter the Union.
In 1847 there was little resistance from anyone in California as they replaced the dysfunctional and ineffective Mexican government which had already been replaced by the Californios. The Mexican government by 1846 had already had 40 presidents in the first 24 years of its existence. Most new settlers and Californios were neutral or actively supported the revolt that finally like in Texas culminated into voluntary annexation to the U.S.A.
After the Hispano-American war, Cuba, was granted independence. Later, Philippines was granted independence too, and Puerto Rico, because of the vision of the patriot Muñoz Rivera, that created the “Associated free State” have maintained a privileged status of been practically independent with the benefits of being part of the federal U.S.A. (Spanish is the official language of Puerto Rico)
Puerto Ricans could be independent, but independentists are always defeated during referendums and elections.
Let’s take a look to what is happening today in Puerto Rico.  This is an article in the Wall Street Journal by Maria Anastasia O’Grady. It speaks by itself, it is not the resources, it is how and who manages the resources.

   ,  Puerto Rico's Borrowing Bubble Pops

Moody's measure of 'expected default' for Puerto Rico is higher than Argentina and Venezuela.
Here we go again: Another big-government paradise is running out of other people's money—to paraphrase Margaret Thatcher. This time it's the commonwealth of Puerto Rico that has borrowed too much and is now signaling that it might not be able to pay it all back. The only question that remains is who will eat the losses.
Head doctors say that addicts have to reach rock bottom before they find the will to change their ways. It may be that Puerto Rico, high on cheap money from American creditors for the last decade, is reaching its nadir. The sad state of its fiscal accounts is rivaled only by its economy, which is also in disarray. Detroit, anyone?
Now would be a good time to try a little honesty about what has caused this desperation. But so far Puerto Rico's political class seems more inclined to stick it to creditors and keep on keeping on.
In late June Puerto Rican Gov. Alejandro García Padilla signed a bill into law allowing the restructuring of more than $19 billion of debt of the commonwealth-owned electricity, water and highway monopolies. The law stunned the municipal market because Puerto Rico has had a strong tradition of backstopping public-monopoly debt when necessary.
The electricity company known by its initials in English as Prepa has been a particularly pesky problem because of theft, the failure of big customers, such as government entities, to pay their bills, and the high price of oil, which it uses as fuel. But as expenses in the government's general fund have been outstripping revenues for nearly a decade, it has become more difficult to rob Pedro to pay Pablo. Recently the company had to dip into its capital account to pay its oil bill.
The new restructuring law may have been meant to reassure general-obligation bondholders that Puerto Rico is safeguarding the funds necessary to pay them first. Yet on June 30 Moody's MCO +1.10% Analytics reported that its one-year measure of Puerto Rico's "expected default" is higher than that of Argentina, Venezuela and Ukraine.
Investment companies Franklin Templeton and OppenheimerFunds, which together hold $1.7 billion of Prepa debt, have challenged the new restructuring law in U.S. District Court in Puerto Rico. They argue that only the U.S. Congress can make bankruptcy rules. Puerto Rico says that there are no immediate plans to default, and on Tuesday Prepa remained current on its debt by making $418 million in payments to bondholders.
But Puerto Rico's Government Development Bank has also said it believes the island has the authority to enact the new law. Last week Moody's said that the law "provides a clear path to default for public corporations."
A Puerto Rican default should not surprise anyone. According to Carlos Colón de Armas, acting dean of the School of Business Administration at the University of Puerto Rico, for eight years from 2005 through 2012, government expenses exceeded revenues on average by approximately $1 billion annually. The dean told me by telephone that total commonwealth debt is now around $73 billion and in 2013 it was 101% of the island's gross national product (GNP) up from 57% in June 2001. (Although gross domestic product is the most widely accepted measure of an economy's size, it reflects the profits of large multinational corporations booked for tax purposes in Puerto Rico but not retained in the local economy. Therefore, GNP, a measure of what is produced by locals, is a more accurate tool to assess the economy.)
This fiscal profligacy is a significant departure from the three previous decades, Mr. Colón de Armas said. He noted that the island's economic competitiveness has been in decline since the 1970s due, in part, to the distortions created by special tax incentives for U.S. multinationals (aka "936" for its designation in the IRS code), which shifted the tax burden onto local entrepreneurs. Yet for more than three decades, despite economic decline, the debt to GNP ratio remained stable.
Now conventional wisdom blames the debt crisis on the 2005 phaseout of "936." But Mr. Colón de Armas holds that the mess was caused simply by gross government overspending and overborrowing. It began with $550 million loans in the fiscal year budget of 2004-2005. Thereafter borrowing, largely to finance operational expenses, took off. The Federal Reserve's low interest policy and the appetite for triple-tax exempt debt (which throws off income that is free of federal, state and local tax) among municipal bond investors fed the frenzy.
Gov. García Padilla, who took office in 2013, increased expenses by almost $600 million in his first budget. While he is now cutting spending, the cuts are mostly from that increase, according to Mr. Colón de Armas. Some $500 million-$800 million in fat—from subsidies to special interests to funding for political parties—remains untouched in the $9.6 billion budget.
It may be tempting to try to preserve Puerto Rico's top-heavy state and pass the cost of bad management onto investors who didn't do their homework. But creditors are paying attention now, and bad faith won't go unnoticed.
Write to O'Grady@wsj.com 


Samitier: Joan Rivers Dijo En CNN que Obama es Homosexual y La Esposa Mitchell TAMBIEN

Aquí Tienen La Noticia…
Cada Vez Esta Más Claro La Homosexualidad De Obama
Y De Mitchell… A Extremos Que Se Atreven A Decirlo Hasta
En La TV… La Decadencia De Obama Esta En Picada…
Y Pensar Que Le REGALARON un NOBLE DE LA PAZ…

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/07/04/showbiz/celebrity-news-gossip/joan-rivers-michelle-obama-gay-transgender/




After What This School Board Just Said, Every School In America Could Be Trashing Michelle’s Lunch Program

"...Michelle Obama who, last time I checked, has been elected by no one.” B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE — JULY 7, 2014


Public schools across the nation are reeling from the costly and unappetizing meal choices that have resulted from Michelle Obama’s campaign to fight childhood obesity. Under her direction, the federal government has implemented a number of strict restrictions regarding the nutrition contents of foods served in school cafeterias.
Administrators are increasingly fighting these regulations, with many districts looking to Congress for a way to opt out of the program. For their part, Republicans in the U.S. House have proposed legislation allowing schools that can prove the regulations are cost-prohibitive to bypass the first lady’s pet project.
One school board president in Wisconsin recently weighed in on the restrictions, taking a few jabs at Michelle Obama in the process.
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that Muskego-Norway School District Board President Rick Petfalski wants the freedom to decide what is best for local students instead of receiving mandates from D.C.
“We believe that proper food nutrition and meal portion guidelines are best decided at a local level,” he maintained.
He is reportedly willing to forego federal funding for the opportunity to provide meals kids in his district are actually willing to eat. Under the existing guidelines, he noted that the district’s food service program was set to reach a funding shortfall of $54,000 – primarily based on sluggish sales of the unpopular meals.
If his district shuns the federal mandates, however, he said the department could actually reach a surplus of more than $7,000.
“By leaving the program we will not be required to follow these onerous guidelines,” he explained, “pushed by and large by Michelle Obama who, last time I checked, has been elected by no one.”
The Journal Sentinel noted that other area districts are making similar decisions.
Central High School District of Westosha Administrator Scott Pierce said that adherence to the program had his district on track for an $80,000 deficit. He just wants the opportunity to employ a private vendor – which has already been secured – to provide healthy, tasty food for local students.
“We’re not trying to fatten up our kids,” he asserted. “We’re trying to give them food they like.”
Waterford Graded School District Superintendent Christopher Joch reported that the mandates led to significant waste, adding that parents in his district were outspoken critics of the program.
“The food ended up in the garbage instead of the kids’ mouths,” he recalled.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/school-board-leader-goes-tremendous-rant-michelles-nutrition-mandates/#YCA45WRrEKTv8YIm.99

M. ALEMAN: Famous Presidential Lies Contest

Written by, To The Point News

LBJ:  We were attacked (in the Gulf of Tonkin)

Nixon: I am not a crook

GHW Bush:Read my lips - No New Taxes

Clinton: I did not have sex with that woman... Miss Lewinski

GW Bush: Iraq has weapons of mass destruction

Obama:
·  I will have the most transparent administration in history.
·  The stimulus will fund shovel-ready jobs.
·  I am focused like a laser on creating jobs.
·  The IRS is not targeting anyone.
·  It was a spontaneous riot about a movie.
·  I will put an end to the type of politics that "breeds division, conflict and cynicism".
·  You didn't build that!
·  I will restore trust in Government.
·  The Cambridge cops acted stupidly.
·  The public will have 5 days to look at every bill that lands on my desk
·  It's not my red line - it is the world's red line.
·  Whistle blowers will be protected in my administration.
·  We got back every dime we used to rescue the banks and auto companies, with interest.
·  I am not spying on American citizens.
·  Obama Care will be good for America.
·  You can keep your family doctor.
·  Premiums will be lowered by $2500.
·  If you like it, you can keep your current healthcare plan.
·  It's just like shopping at Amazon.
·  I knew nothing about "Fast and Furious" gunrunning to Mexican drug cartels.
·  I knew nothing about IRS targeting conservative groups.
·  I knew nothing about what happened in Benghazi.
·  I have never known my uncle from Kenya who is in the country illegally and that was arrested and told to leave the country over 20 years ago.
·  And, I have never lived with that uncle.  He finally admitted (12-05-2013) that he DID know his uncle and that he DID live with him.
·  If elected I promise not to renew the Patriot Act.
·  If elected I will end the war in Iraq and Afghanistan within the 1st 9 months of my term.
·  I will close Guantanamo within the first 6 months of my term.  
·  I will bridge the gap between black and white and between America and other countries.
And the biggest one of all:
·  "I, Barrack Hussein Obama, pledge to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America."

I believe we have a winner



RICK PERRY: OBAMA EITHER ‘INEPT’ ON BORDER SECURITY, OR HAS ‘SOME ULTERIOR MOTIVE’  By: John Hayward

It doesn’t look as if President Obama will accept Texas Governor Rick Perry’s invitation to visit the refugee camps in Texas filled with underage illegal immigrants.  That’s no surprise to the Governor, who appeared on ABC’s “This Week” to confront a full spread of Democrat talking points launched by host Martha Raddatz.  In case you were wondering, yes, the Democrats and their media pals have figured out a way to blame all this on George Bush.
What’s fascinating about Raddatz’s Party spin is that it completely ignores what the illegals piling up in those camps are actually saying.  The talking-point idea that the tide of border crossings will subside now that Obama gave a press conference and said “hey, guys, stop throwing your children across the border” is Mad Hatter-level lunacy.  It also has very little to do with Bush-era laws, beyond the way the Obama Administration chooses to interpret them, and has thus far failed to move sufficient security forces to the border to keep the illegals from getting onto American soil.  Interviews with the new arrivals make it abundantly clear that they are here to collect on Obama’s amnesty promises, based more on information relayed from friends and relatives in the United States than the fine print on any of the immigration laws Obama has been either ignoring or erasing.
But let’s indulge the Democrat talking points for a moment and ask: If the reason all these illegals instantly become de facto American citizens, immune to deportation proceedings, is because of decade-old laws that tie the Imperial President’s hands (unlike pretty much any other law on the books), then why do Obama and his flacks keep saying we should relax, because they’re all going to be deported?  The public “don’t send your kids here” statements Raddatz cites as Obama “leadership” to the bemused Governor Perry include promises that the illegals will be repatriated.
Allow me to quote President Obama directly: “Our message is absolutely don’t send your children unaccompanied on trains or through a bunch of smugglers.  That is our direct message to the families of Central America.  Do not send your children to the borders.  If they do make it, they’ll get sent back.  More importantly, they might not make it.”
White House spokespeople mention repatriation every time this topic comes up.  The Administration is going through a big pretense of telling the illegal aliens they’re on the honor system to keep in touch with Immigration and Customs Enforcement while their “deportation” cases are processed, before releasing them into cities across the nation.  But now the hot new Democrat talking point is that they can’t be deported, and it’s all Bush’s fault?  In that case, why has the Administration been constantly lying about deportations for the past few weeks?
Of course, we all know why: so that loyal footsoldiers in the media can write reassuring stories about how the Administration has got this situation under control.  Only nativist hysterics would call this human tidal wave an “invasion,” because they’re all going to be “repatriated,” don’t you know!  A piece at the L.A. Times this morning provides “previously unavailable” evidence that the “permiso” rumors of permanent residence for children and families who make it across the border “have proved increasingly true” under the Obama Administration:
The number of immigrants under 18 who were deported or turned away at ports of entry fell from 8,143 in 2008, the last year of the George W. Bush administration, to 1,669 last year, according to Immigration and Customs Enforcement data released under a Freedom of Information Act request.
Similarly, about 600 minors were ordered deported each year from nonborder states a decade ago. Ninety-five were deported last year, records show, even as a flood of unaccompanied minors from Central America — five times more than two years earlier — began pouring across the Southwest border.
Democrat spin on Obama’s alleged “leadership” against the immigration crisis is delirious.  As Gov. Perry points out, the tangible evidence of the absence of leadership is visible in those refugee camps… provided you can get past the guards to see what’s going on inside.  Let me put it this way: what conclusions would a prospective illegal alien draw from watching this exchange between Martha Raddatz and Rick Perry?  She echoes a previous guest by whining at him about how “compassion” dictates we throw the borders open to anyone lucky enough to make it across the Rio Grande.  The segment begins with a Customs and Border Protection Official soothingly (and incorrectly) promising that the aliens are “family members” who should be welcomed, not “gang members” or “dangerous individuals.”  (In truth, quite a few of the “unaccompanied minors” are teenagers sporting gang tattoos.)  Raddatz castigates Perry for not accepting the laughable proposition that another 150 Border Patrol agents will be able to shut down a wave of more than 80,000 inbound illegals over the coming year.  He’s kept on the defensive throughout the interview.
If you were watching that interview from Guatemala or Honduras, would you not conclude that the odds of staying in the U.S. are heavily in your favor, if you can just get your kids across the border?  Democrats are acting as if a few words from Barack Obama will short-circuit the higher reasoning functions of people desperate to leave these squalid Central American nations.  His too-little-too-late rhetoric is supposed to hypnotize them into discarding the realities on the ground.  Not even American voters are falling for that any more.
It bears repeating that the Administration knew this wave of immigrants was coming, but did absolutely nothing to stop it – not even putting a hundred new Border Patrol agents on station – until the public outcry grew deafening.  They’ve been dragged kicking and screaming into the mere pretense of effective action.  Among other things, it was entirely predictable that Obama’s amnesty executive orders, and the bipartisan clamor for an amnesty deal in Congress, would provoke a surge of border violations.  For that matter, even the “comprehensive immigration reform” caucus has been conceding for years that any improvement in the American economy would likely provoke a resurgence of illegal immigration – and as the latest unemployment reports prove, Obamanomics has been very good at mulching full-time jobs and spewing out part-time positions, accompanied by silly media trumpeting of a “recovery.”
Governor Perry has a lot of guts to voice his suspicions that this was all done on purpose, to create more pressure for further weakening of our immigration laws.  (I can’t help noticing that none of the people bleating about Bush-era rules that make unaccompanied minors un-deportable express the slightest interest in tightening those laws.  We can give out citizenship retroactively to border violators, but don’t you dare suggest that we should apply “repatriation” procedures retroactively, the way this Administration risibly claims it’s chomping at the bit to do.)  Perry’s closing remarks made a hundred times more sense than anything else said on “This Week” about the illegal immigration crisis:
We have been bringing to the attention of President Obama and his administration since 2010, he received a letter from me on the tarmac. He sends — I have to believe that when you do not respond in any way, that you are either inept, or you have some ulterior motive of which you are functioning from.
So the issue is, this president understands now that we have a huge problem on our southern border. We have to deal with it. And I don’t think you’re going to be able to address it until you put the resources there, and that’s boots on the ground. We’re asking for the FAA to allow for drones to be used.
Unless we secure our southern border, this is going to continue to be a massive amount of individuals that are coming to the United States. And, frankly, we don’t have a place to house them as it is. And if we have a major event, a hurricane that comes in to the Gulf Coast, I don’t have a place to be housing people who are displaced.
It’s bizarre to watch the Ruling Class and its media courtiers twist themselves into pretzels to deny the obvious reality that illegal aliens can see with perfect clarity.  They can also see that anyone who dares to describe the situation accurately, or call for effective measures that would actually halt the migratory wave, gets torn to shreds on American TV.


Maybe It’s Time To Impeach Him?

Here's the worst scandal of them all...

FRED WEINBERG — 

PAGES: 1 2
By now, you’d have to be living under a rock somewhere not to have heard that the Internal Revenue Service seems to have “lost” a bunch of emails sent and received by Lois Lerner which the House Oversight Committee has subpoenaed in connection with its investigation into IRS harassment of conservative groups.
Please.
This is the same Internal Revenue Service that requires electronic records retention from us mere taxpayers under the penalty of them trying to take from us everything we own.
And their own manual—available online—says that they have to treat email as any other record that must be archived and retained.
And they’re telling us that the dog ate this woman’s—who took the Fifth Amendment to avoid incrimination—emails?
As someone who wrote his first Fortran program while a freshman in high school on Bradley University’s IBM 360-25 and has been closely involved in computing ever since 1966, let me use the one word that comes to mind.
Bullcrap.
There is no way that those emails do not exist, and there is no way that they cannot find them. They can make all the excuses they want, but it simply doesn’t pass the smell test.
We can only conclude that there must be a real, serious smoking gun out there that could (and should) send her and her supervisors to prison for a long time.
That is the only reason I can think of that they are trying such a pathetic lie to avoid coughing up what Congress asked for.
I know that there are serious professionals at the IRS whose time and effort would be much better used doing something else. Establishing a huge bureaucracy to look into everyone’s income and get a share of it is like trying to stop people from smoking pot. It hasn’t worked and never will.
It’s way past time we changed our tax system to tax consumption as opposed to income.
First, it is fair.
It makes taxpayers out of everyone. What’s “regressive” about everyone paying some sort of tax?
Second, it keeps the government out of the business of knowing what you make, how you make it, and how much of the money you earn it is entitled to.
And third, it keeps people like Barack Obama, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi (and their successors of any ideology) from using tax policy to achieve social goals many if not most of us do not share.
States have been collecting sales taxes for years without the intrusive apparatus used to collect income taxes.
And when everybody has a stake because everybody buys something, maybe we’ll be a little more picky about who we elect to spend that money–and even more picky about what we spend that money on.
Getting back to the email flap, pure and simple they’re lying to us right through their Federally insured Delta Dental Plan Tri-Care teeth. Anybody involved ought to go to prison. And we need a special prosecutor—I don’t mean Eric Holder; I mean a REAL prosecutor—appointed to impanel a grand jury and do a serious investigation.
PAGES: 1 2
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.


Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/maybe-time-impeach/#YrBjQ4WHztgLqTt2.99

 

 

More Chaos On The Southern Border…

Two years later, the crisis I predicted has come to pass.

ERIC MINOR — 

PAGES: 1 2
“Bill, you call your position supporting President Obama’s amnesty of child illegals ‘noble’. It is naive at best. You and the President may as well have shouted with a bullhorn that parents throughout the third world should immediately sneak into the US with children in tow. Who wouldn’t want a better life for their children? It’s been a crisis for decades and you’ve added fuel to the fire.”
That was the “pithy” email I sent to Bill O’Reilly on June 19, 2012 after viewing his nightly program on Fox News, during which he soft-peddled or even outright endorsed President Obama’s amnesty towards illegal alien “dreamers”. That was the first time my frustration had ever boiled over enough while watching “The O’Reilly Factor” that it actually prompted me to send an email.
I sent another one a few moments later as I simply had to vent about something from his guest as well: “Did I hear Juan Williams correctly? As long as the President first makes a game effort to get a law passed in Congress, such as comprehensive immigration reform, he is then entitled to unilaterally enact that law without the consent of Congress? Absurd.”
Now, two years later, the crisis I predicted has come to pass. Each week, hundreds or even thousands of alien children are streaming across the southern border into America. In a pathetic example of life imitating art, they surrender to the first border patrol agent they can find–much like the affable North Korean soldier who enthusiastically surrenders to Hawkeye, BJ, and anyone else in a U.S. uniform in “The Yalu Brick Road” episode of M*A*S*H.
I’m not patting myself on the back for having some keen and rare insight on this matter two years ago. Almost any moderately intelligent adult with even the most rudimentary understanding of human nature would have been able to guess the inevitable outcome. It makes one wonder if it is sheer incompetence that is driving the actions of the current administration–or if President Obama is in fact intentionally trying to destroy America as we know it.
I know the liberal progressives that are happening upon this column are rolling their eyes at that last statement. But as the hit parade continues to roll on, one simply can’t help but wonder, “Is it deliberate?”
The noble republic set up by our founders seems to have gone off the rails. The imperial president, as Mark Levin calls him, rules by fiat while an impotent Congress stands by meekly with barely a whimper of protest. The separation of powers doctrine established by the Constitution has been all but obliterated as President Obama uses “his pen and his phone” to enact (or ignore) whatever laws and regulations he fancies.
I can understand the Democrats remaining silent. But what about the Republicans? Is there not a single Republican in the House of Representatives with enough courage and integrity to draft articles of impeachment against the President? I don’t care if they have a bonafide chance to pass the House (by a simple majority) and the Senate (by a two-thirds majority) or not. Is there no one who will step up and defend the rule of law and say that this will not be tolerated?
PAGES: 1 2
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/chaos-southern-border/#2WyEYSJZ8YHUVVP0.99


What This Camera Captured Is One Of The Creepiest, Weirdest Things In White House History

This scene was captured during a NBC news tour through the office of Valerie Jarrett, Obama's top advisor

B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE — 

While Americans struggling under a disastrous economy and rampant federal regulation might have plenty of reason to blame the Obama administration, many contend it is not the president but his closest advisor, Valerie Jarrett, who deserves the credit – or blame – for these and other policies.
NBC News recently devoted a segment to the influential woman, during which she discussed a number of issues including Obama’s sagging approval numbers and the assertion that Fox News boss Rupert Murdoch is a staunch advocate for immigration reform.
“We’re going through some tough times now,” she admitted. “But I’ll tell you something that I learned very early in the first campaign is that you can’t look at the daily polls. If we listened to the polls, he would’ve abandoned the race in the middle of the primary season.”
She also shared her assertion that, after two dinner meetings with Fox News boss Rupert Murdoch, she is convinced he is “committed to immigration reform.”
What caught the most attention, especially among her conservative detractors, is not what she said but what NBC’s cameras caught in an otherwise innocuous panning shot of her office. Though the network did not mention it, several sources picked up on an odd picture frame holding a headshot of Jarrett.
NBC News
Upon closer inspection, it is clear three figurines are bowing in front of her as though she is their god. Significant conversation resulted among right-wing blogs and other media outlets wondering whether the frame depicted a genuine reflection of her own perceived importance, or if it was simply a lighthearted gag gift as The Blaze posited.

WATCH: Impeachment Is Nothing Compared To What Ted Cruz Wants To Do To Eric Holder

"If this was a Republican administration..."

JUSTIN KOSKI — 
Texas Senator Ted Cruz sounds off on Attorney General Eric Holder for his appointing of of a major democratic donor, Barbara Bosserman, to investigate the IRS scandal. Cruz then called for Holder’s impeachment if he refused to appoint an independent prosecutor.
Cruz cited the decisions of the Attorneys General under Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton to appoint independent prosecutors when they both were accused of abusing their power.
“If this were a Republican administration, every media outlet would have banner headlines every single day.”
“If the allegation is of abusive government power at the IRS, to target citizens for their political beliefs, then you cannot entrust the investigation to a partisan whose political interest is protecting the party in power,” said Cruz.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/ted-cruz-goes-holder-wont-appoint-special-prosecutor-impeached/#LLCOPLxCM4ZvdOuO.99





Preparémonos para el Cambio
Por lagranepoca.com
El universo está lleno de misterios que desafían nuestro actual conocimiento. En “Más allá de la ciencia” La Gran Época recopila historias sobre estos extraños fenómenos para estimular la imaginación y abrir posibilidades nunca antes soñadas. ¿Serán ciertas? Decídalo usted.

Henry P. Stapp es un físico teórico en la Universidad de California-Berkley quien trabajó con algunos de los padres fundadores de la mecánica cuántica, él no busca probar que el alma exista, pero dice que su existencia encaja en las leyes de la física.

No es correcto decir que creer en el alma no es científico, de acuerdo con Stapp. Aquí la palabra “alma” se refiere a una personalidad independiente del cerebro o del resto del cuerpo humano que puede sobrevivir más allá de la muerte. En su artículo, “Compatibilidad de la teoría de la física moderna con supervivencia de la personalidad”, escribió:
“Las fuertes dudas sobre la sobrevivencia de la personalidad basadas únicamente en la creencia de que la supervivencia después de la muerte es incompatible con las leyes de la física son infundadas”.

Él trabaja con la interpretación de Copenhagen de la física cuántica –más o menos la interpretación utilizada por los fundadores de la mecánica cuántica, Niels Bohr y Werner Heisenberg. Incluso Bohr y Heisenberg tenían algunos desacuerdos sobre cómo funciona la física cuántica y desde entonces los entendimientos sobre la teoría han sido diversos. El artículo de Stapp sobre la interpretación Copenhagen ha sido de gran influencia. Fue escrito en la década de los 70 y Heisenberg escribió un apéndice para éste.

Stapp señaló acerca de sus propios conceptos:
“No ha habido ningún indicio de mis descripciones (o concepciones) anteriores de esta mecánica cuántica ortodoxa sobre cualquier noción de supervivencia de la personalidad”. 

Por qué la Teoría cuántica podría dar indicios de vida después de la muerte

Stapp explica que los fundadores de la teoría cuántica solicitaron a los científicos que cortaran fundamentalmente al mundo en dos partes. Sobre el corte, las matemáticas clásicas podrían describir el proceso físico experimentado empíricamente. Debajo, las matemáticas cuánticas describen un reino “que no implica determinismo físico completo”.

De este reino bajo el corte, Stapp escribió:
“Uno generalmente encuentra que el estado evolucionado del sistema, no puede ser igualado con ninguna descripción clásica de las propiedades visibles para los observadores”.

Entonces, ¿cómo observan los científicos lo invisible? Usan propiedades particulares del sistema cuántico e instalan aparatos para ver sus efectos en el proceso físico “sobre el corte”.

La clave está en la elección de quien lo experimenta. Cuando trabajas con el sistema cuántico, la elección del observador se muestra para impactar físicamente lo que se manifiesta y que puede ser observado sobre el corte.

Stepp citó la analogía de Bohr sobre esta interacción entre el científico y los resultados de su experimento: 
“es como un hombre ciego con un bastón: cuando el bastón se lleva suelto, el borde entre la persona y el mundo exterior se divide entre la mano y el bastón; pero cuando es sostenido firmemente se vuelve parte del yo exploratorio: la persona siente que él mismo se extiende hasta la punta del bastón”.

Lo físico y lo mental están conectados de forma dinámica. En términos de la relación entre mente y cerebro, parece que el observador puede sostener una actividad cerebral determinada que de otro modo sería breve. Ésta es una elección similar a la que hace un científico cuando decide qué propiedades del sistema cuántico estudiar.

La explicación cuántica sobre cómo la mente y el cerebro pueden separarse o diferenciarse, aún conectadas por las leyes de la física “es una revelación agradable”, escribió Stapp. “Esto resuelve el problema que ha plagado ambas, ciencia y filosofía por siglos, la necesidad del mandato científico ya sea para equiparar a la mente con el cerebro, o para hacer al cerebro dinámicamente independiente de la mente”.

Stapp dijo no es contrario a las leyes de la física que la personalidad de una persona muerta pueda adherirse a alguien vivo como en el caso de la llamada posesión espiritual. No requeriría ningún cambio básico en la teoría ortodoxa, aunque “requeriría flexibilidad en la idea de que eventos físicos y mentales ocurren sólo cuando ambos se juntan”.

La teoría física clásica solo puede evadir el problema, y los físicos clásicos solo pueden trabajar para desacreditar la intuición definiéndola como un producto de la confusión humana, dijo Stapp. En lugar de eso, la ciencia debería, reconocer “los efectos físicos de la conciencia como un problema físico que necesita ser respondido en términos dinámicos”.

Cómo este entendimiento afecta el tejido moral de la sociedad

Por otra parte, es imperativo para mantener la moral humana considerar a la gente como algo más que solo máquinas de carne y hueso.

En otro artículo, titulado “Atención, intención y voluntad en la física cuántica”, Stapp escribió:
“Ahora se volvió ampliamente apreciada la asimilación del público en general de esta visión “científica”, de acuerdo con la cual cada ser humano es básicamente un robot mecánico, la cual parece tener un impacto significativo y corrosivo en el tejido moral de la sociedad”.

Escribió sobre “la creciente tendencia de la gente a exonerarse a sí misma argumentando que no soy “yo” quien está equivocado, sino algún proceso mecánico interno: “mis genes, me hicieron hacerlo”; o “mi alta glucosa en la sangre me hizo hacerlo”. Evoca la famosa defensa por demencia que sacó a Dan White después de cinco años de haber asesinado al alcalde de San Francisco George Moscone y al supervisor Harvey Milk”.


 “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)