No 921 “En mi opinión” Abril 7,
2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST” LAZARO R GONZALEZ MIñO EDITOR
AMENPER: CAMBIAR
EL CAMBIO
El conservadurismo está tomando fuerza por una reacción opuesta al
liberalismo extremo que ha invadido al partido demócrata y los desastrosos años
de la administración de Obama tanto en su política doméstica como en lo social
y económico.
Es la hora de los conservadores, es la hora de cambiar el “cambio”.
Con la posición de los candidatos republicanos de declarar su
conservadurismo el público una nueva generación está interesándose en aprender lo
que el conservadurismo realmente es, que no es la filosofía retrógrada y
fracasada que pintan los liberales, al contrario es la base natural para un
gobierno pequeño que pone el destino de la nación manos de la filosofía y los
valores morales que han sido la tradición americana.
La libertad, el respeto al usufructo de su trabajo del individuo, la
defensa su territorio, estos son valores naturales en el ser humano, y estos
son los valores naturales que defiende la filosofía conservadora.
Donde el socialismo ha fracasado, la doctrina del libre mercado ha
triunfado, esto lo podemos ver en lugares como la republica Checa y hasta en
los países socialistas como China y Vietnam que no han tenido más remedio que
ensayar con la economía del libre mercado.
Las raíces del conservadurismo se extienden a antiguas concepciones de
la naturaleza humana expresada por Platón en Grecia y los filósofos más
adelante de la República romana.
En la naturaleza, tanto los animales irracionales como el animal
racional que es el hombre, tiene el deseo innato de tener su territorio y su
propiedad de bienes materiales, este es su objetivo y para eso hace su mayor
esfuerzo con su trabajo. En la cuna de la civilización en Grecia, los filósofos
coordinaron este instinto primitivo con la temperancia del hombre civilizado,
expresando lo que hoy en día consideramos como la filosofía conservadora. Cuando
este derecho del hombre a su propiedad o a su territorio es injustamente
violado, sus libertades son violadas, y la reacción es de defender
sus derechos contra el que trata de quitarle lo que considera su derecho a lo
que le pertenece..
El comunismo nombre de una justicia social politizada, viola los
derechos de las personas responsables que con su trabajo han logrado bajo la
libertad, una propiedad. El resultado es que toda la propiedad pasa
a un estado que no sólo roba al individuo del fruto de su trabajo, pero de su
libertad.
De los primeros esfuerzos modernos para definir el conservadurismo en
el mundo de habla inglesa, el mejor articulado fue en su momento el del
parlamentario británico Edmund Burke. La filosofía fue probablemente mejor
definida para nuestro tiempo por Russell Kirk y William
Buckley en los Estados Unidos tuvieron influencia sobre sobre Ronald Reagan y
Margaret Thatcher, y todos sabemos los resultados de estos dos gobernantes, de
memoria agradable para nosotros y funesta para los que todavía mantienen las
maravillas del socialismo.
Rusell Kirk resumió el conservadurismo en principios centrales
en su libro “La Mente conservadora:
Una creencia en un orden trascendente, respeto por la
complejidad de la existencia humana, que una sociedad civilizada requiere
órdenes y clases, que la libertad y propiedad están estrechamente relacionados,
estar alerta y desconfiados de sofistas, calculadores economistas que quieran
reconstruir la sociedad sobre diseños abstractos y que aunque el cambio pudiera
ser necesario, se debe proceder con cuidado, con cautela, y con un ojo hacia la
preservación de las instituciones sociales de base
Kirk como Adam Smith dijo que un orden natural establecido por un
poder trascendente rige la vida política en gran parte del mismo modo que la
física guía a las estrellas. Ese orden natural es imperfecto y a veces injusto,
pero nos preserva de los estragos de nuestros instintos animales, nos preserva
de la injusticia de tomar de otros lo que no nos pertenece..
Cuanto más intentamos distorsionar las desigualdades naturales o
derribar los roles sociales tradicionales con esquemas políticos o sociales,
mayor será el riesgo de desencadenar fuerzas políticas caóticas que destruyen
los derechos de libertad y propiedad. En otras palaras, la
“igualdad” es una utopía, porque aunque todos los hombres nacieron iguales y
tienen los derechos inalienables que les otorga el creador, el hombre es
responsable de su conducta. Por la conducta del hombre surge la inevitable
desigualdad, y por mucho que nos lo traten de decir y repetir en esta
administración la igualdad no puede existir.
Pero aunque los derechos son meramente personales; en una
sociedad como la americana desde su fundación ha sido un vínculo ha unido a
generaciones pasadas. En esta concepción, los derechos no son simplemente “lo
que me debe el estado”, son lazos que unen a la sociedad en una telaraña de
privilegios y deberes se extienda más allá de mi propia vida.
Esta tradición del conservadurismo en los Estados Unidos ve derechos
bajo una luz muy diferente de los liberales. Los derechos en la filosofía
conservadora americana se basan en tradición y costumbre de una filosofía
conservadora recibida de sus fundadores..
Por esto los candidatos republicanos están autodenominándose
conservadores, porque lo que está pasando en estos últimos años, no es la
filosofía tradicional de los Estados Unidos. Hay en una parte de la
ciudadanía una nostalgia por los tiempos pasados que hicieron a esta nación la
envidia del mundo.
Nestor Dan… From: Joseph Goldberg To: prunaesq@aol.com
Israeli doctors say Obama has a mental disorder.
Haberman and Vaknin are legitimate. Check them out on Google.
Written by Dr. Michael A. Haberman, M.D.
This Israeli doctor says Obama has a mental disorder. Labels him a
pathological narcissist and there is no greater insanity than electing one as President said Dr. Sam Vaknin who is an Israeli psychologist.
Dr. Sam Vaknin States, "I must confess I was impressed by Obama from the
first time I saw him. At first I was excited to see a black candidate. He looked youthful, spoke well, appeared to be confident, a wholesome presidential package. I was put off soon, not just because of his shallowness but also because there was an air of haughtiness in his demeanor that was unsettling. His posture and his body language were louder than his empty words.
Israeli doctors say Obama has a mental disorder.
Haberman and Vaknin are legitimate. Check them out on Google.
Written by Dr. Michael A. Haberman, M.D.
This Israeli doctor says Obama has a mental disorder. Labels him a
pathological narcissist and there is no greater insanity than electing one as President said Dr. Sam Vaknin who is an Israeli psychologist.
Dr. Sam Vaknin States, "I must confess I was impressed by Obama from the
first time I saw him. At first I was excited to see a black candidate. He looked youthful, spoke well, appeared to be confident, a wholesome presidential package. I was put off soon, not just because of his shallowness but also because there was an air of haughtiness in his demeanor that was unsettling. His posture and his body language were louder than his empty words.
Obama's speeches are unlike any political speech we have heard in
American history. Never a politician in this land had such quasi
"religious" impact on so many people. The fact that Obama is
a total incognito with Zero accomplishment, makes this inexplicable infatuation
alarming.
Obama is not an ordinary man. He is not a genius. In fact he is quite
ignorant on most important subjects. Dr. Sam Vaknin, the author of the "Malignant Self Love," believes Barack Obama appears to be a narcissist. Vaknin is a world authority on narcissism. He understands narcissism and describes the inner mind of a narcissist like no other person. When he talks about narcissism everyone listens. Vaknin says that Obama's language, posture and demeanor, and the testimonies of his closest, dearest friends suggest that the man is either a narcissist or he may have narcissistic personality disorder (NPD).
Obama is not an ordinary man. He is not a genius. In fact he is quite
ignorant on most important subjects. Dr. Sam Vaknin, the author of the "Malignant Self Love," believes Barack Obama appears to be a narcissist. Vaknin is a world authority on narcissism. He understands narcissism and describes the inner mind of a narcissist like no other person. When he talks about narcissism everyone listens. Vaknin says that Obama's language, posture and demeanor, and the testimonies of his closest, dearest friends suggest that the man is either a narcissist or he may have narcissistic personality disorder (NPD).
Narcissists project a grandiose but false image of themselves. Jim Jones, the charismatic leader of People's Temple, the man who led over 900 of his followers to cheerfully commit mass suicide and even murder their own children was also a narcissist. David Koresh, Charles Manson, Joseph Koni, Shoko Asahara, Stalin, Saddam, Mao, Kim Jong Ill and Adolph Hitler area few examples of narcissists of our time.
All these men had a tremendous influence over their fanciers. They created
a personality cult around themselves and with their blazing speeches elevated their admirers, filled their hearts with enthusiasm and instilled in their minds a new zest for life. They gave them hope!
They promised them the moon, but alas, invariably they brought them to
their doom. When you are a victim of a cult of personality, you don't know it until it is too late. One determining factor in the development of NPD is childhood abuse "Obama's early life was decidedly chaotic and replete with traumatic and mentally bruising dislocations, "says Vaknin. "Mixed-race marriages were even less common then. His parents went through a divorce when he was an infant two years old. Obama saw his father only once again, before he died in a car accident. Then his mother re-married and Obama had to relocate to Indonesia, a foreign land with a radically foreign culture, to be raised by a step-father.
At the age of ten, he was whisked off to live with his maternal (white) grandparents. He saw his mother only intermittently in the following few years and then she vanished from his life in 1979. She died of cancer in 1995.
One must never underestimate the manipulative genius of pathological
narcissists. They project such an imposing personality that it overwhelms those around them. Charmed by the charisma of the narcissist, people become like clay in his hands. They cheerfully do his bidding and delight to be at his service. The narcissist shapes the world around himself and reduces others in his own inverted image. He creates a cult of personality.His admirers become his codependents. Narcissists have no interest in things that do not help them to reach their personal objective. They are focused on one thing alone and that is power. All other issues are meaningless to them and they do not want to waste their precious time on trivialities. Anything that does not help them is beneath them and does not deserve their attention. If an issue raised in the Senate does not help Obama in one way or another, he as no interest in it. The "present" vote is a safe vote. No one can criticize him if things go wrong. Those issues are unworthy by their very nature because they are not about him.
Obama's election as the first black president of the Harvard Law Review led
to a contract and advance to write a book about race relations. The University of Chicago Law School provided him a lot longer than expected and at the end it evolved into, guess what? His own autobiography! Instead of writing a scholarly paper focusing on race relations, for which he had been paid, Obama could not resist writing about his most sublime self. He entitled the book Dreams from My Father. Not surprisingly, Adolph Hitler also wrote his own autobiography when he was still a nobody. So did Stalin. For a narcissist no subject is as important as his own self. Why would he waste his precious time and genius writing about insignificant things when he can write about such an august being as himself?
Narcissists are often callous and even ruthless. As the norm, they lack
conscience. This is evident from Obama's lack of interest in his own brother who lives on only one dollar per month. A man who lives in luxury, who takes a private jet to vacation in Hawaii, and who raised nearly half a billion dollars for his campaign (something unprecedented in history) has no interest in the plight of his own brother. Why? Because, his brother cannot be used for his ascent to power. A narcissist cares for no one but himself.
This election was like no other in the history of America. The issues were
insignificant compared to what is at stake. What can be more dangerous than having a man bereft of conscience, a serial liar, and one who cannot distinguish his fantasies from reality as the leader of the free world? I hate to sound alarmist, but one is a fool if one is not alarmed.
Many politicians are narcissists. They pose no threat to others. They are
simply self-serving and selfish. Obama evidences symptoms of pathological
narcissism, which is different from the run-of-the-mill narcissism of a Richard Nixon or a Bill Clinton for example. To him reality and fantasy are intertwined.
This is a mental health issue, not just a character flaw. Pathological
narcissists are dangerous because they look normal and even intelligent. It is this disguise that makes them treacherous. Today the Democrats have placed all their hopes in Obama. But this man could put an end to their party. The great majority of blacks voted for Obama. Only a fool does not know that their support for him is racially driven. This is racism, pure and simple. The downside of this is that if Obama turns out to be the disaster I predict, he will cause widespread resentment among the whites. The blacks are unlikely to give up their support of their man. Cultic mentality is pernicious and unrelenting. They will dig their heads deeper in the sand and blame Obama's detractors of racism. This will cause a backlash among the whites. The white supremacists will take advantage of the discontent and they will receive widespread support.
I predict that in less than four years, racial tensions will increase to
levels never seen since the turbulent 1960's. Obama will set the clock back decades. America is the bastion of freedom. The peace of the world depends on the strength of America, and its weakness translates into the triumph of terrorism and victory of rogue nations. It is no wonder that Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez, the Castrists, the Hezbollah, the Hamas, the lawyers of the Guantanamo terrorists, and virtually all sworn enemies of America are so thrilled by the prospect of their man in the White House. America is on the verge of destruction.
There is no insanity greater than electing a pathological narcissist as
President.
Michael A. Haberman, M.D.
AMENPER: Mirada
al escenario de las próximas elecciones…
Estoy mirando el campo republicano para candidatos
para presidente, y como pensaba esto se reduce a Jeb Bush, Scott Walker y
Ted Cruz.
En las encuestas serias presentan que Ted Cruz tiene un gran impulso
tras el anuncio oficial de su candidatura la semana pasada. Su apoyo ha
aumentado del 5% al 16% en poco más de un mes, lo suficiente para convertirlo
en uno de los tres candidatos en el nivel más alto de los contendientes del
partido republicano, junto con Scott Walker y Jeb Bush.
Walker continúa liderando el campo con 20%, aunque eso es abajo de su
25% parado un mes atrás. Pero esto se debe a que la subida de Cruz le ha
quitado puntos a Walker. Bush continúa sondeando al 17%, seguido por
Cruz en 16%, Ben Carson y Paul Rand al 10%, Marco Rubio y Mike Huckabee en 6%,
Chris Christie en el 4% y Rick Perry al 3%.
Me parece que aunque sin lugar a dudas Marco Rubio anunciará en la
Torre de la Libertad la semana que viene que no correrá como senador y que va a
entrar en la contienda como candidato presidencial, pero creo su principal
objetivo es obtener la visibilidad para la vice-presidencia, lo mismo que
Ben Carson.
Cruz realmente ha empezado a ganar con los votantes que se
identificaron como "muy conservadores" desde su anuncio. Entre
ellos, lidera ahora el campo con 33% a 25% para Walker y 12% a Carson con nadie
más en los dos dígitos incluyendo a Bush y Rubio..
El mes pasado Walker estaba a la cabeza con este grupo y casi la
totalidad de la disminución de su apoyo total durante el último mes ha llegado
porque se le ha trasladado hacia la Cruz.
El reconocimiento de Cruz con los votantes republicanos en general ha
aumentado de 61% a 82% desde su anuncio.
Lo bueno de todo esto es que todos se han dado cuenta que la mejor
manera que enfrentarse a Hillary Clinton es con una plataforma
conservadora.
Veremos en los debates a Jeb Bush presentarse como conservador y Cruz,
Walker y Rubio ya tienen la percepción de conservadora establecida.
No hablo de Rand Paul, ´porque de su padre lo aprendió, molestará en
los debates pero cuando le fuercen a delinear sus ideas libertarias, quedará
fuera del juego, a pesar del fanatismo de sus seguidores.. Pero me gustaría que
fuera secretario del tesoro de la próxima administración republicana.
La idea es que cualquiera que salga como candidato frente a Hillary
Clinton, estarán proclamando un “cambio”, no pueden usar la palabra
porque ya Obama la corrompió, pero todo el mundo sabe que la percepción de un cambio
para volver a los valores tradicionales será buena para cualquier candidato.
Los conservadores que no salieron a votar por Romney, saldrán a votar
ahora por el candidato republicano con la plataforma conservadora, y los
independientes, libertarios y moderados, no van a dejar de votar contra
Hillary Clinton porque el candidato sea más conservador que lo que ellos
quisieran.
No creo que digan lo que digan las encuestas ahora, Hillary Clinton
pueda presentar una batalla tan buena como la que pintan en la izquierda.
Ellos lo saben, por eso están tratando de forzar a Elizabeth Warren
para que aspire. Pero la Warren es una versión socialista todavía
peor que Hillary, así que tampoco podría conseguir el voto de los
independientes y moderados.
A pesar de lo que nos están dando a comer los medios de comunicación,
hasta ellos saben que Hillary Clinton no tendrá las elecciones en el bolsillo
como ellos predicen. Y lo mismo se puede decir de las alternativas
como Biden y Warren. Me parece que los votantes le cobrarán al
partido demócrata su socialización en las urnas.
Esto se irá aclarando según se acerquen las elecciones partidistas,
pero no creo que entre los candidatos, hayan empecinados sin chance como en el
caso de Santorum en las pasadas elecciones, y esto será una ventaja para las
elecciones generales.
AL QAEDA EN BUENOS AIRES - CHISTE
|
|
|
Philip Riggio. LA CRIOLLADA
La criollada, o la claque de oficialismos hemisféricos que de sus propios errores y fracasos no deja de gritarle culpable a Estados Unidos, pronto se reunirá en Panamá donde ha de presenciar en la Cumbre de las Américas el fenómeno de un presidente norteamericano que no sólo está de acuerdo con ella sino que zalamero desprestigia a
su propio país haciéndole juego al mandatario comunista de Cuba.
Mejor preguntarse la criollada por qué sus ciudadanos huyen no para uno de los países de ella sino para Estados Unidos.
Philip V. Riggio
2777 NE 183rd Street
Aventura, FL 33160
561-762-0288
La criollada, o la claque de oficialismos hemisféricos que de sus propios errores y fracasos no deja de gritarle culpable a Estados Unidos, pronto se reunirá en Panamá donde ha de presenciar en la Cumbre de las Américas el fenómeno de un presidente norteamericano que no sólo está de acuerdo con ella sino que zalamero desprestigia a
su propio país haciéndole juego al mandatario comunista de Cuba.
Mejor preguntarse la criollada por qué sus ciudadanos huyen no para uno de los países de ella sino para Estados Unidos.
Philip V. Riggio
2777 NE 183rd Street
Aventura, FL 33160
561-762-0288
BLACK
PASTOR SLAMS GAYS: ‘You’re Perverted, You’re Lost And You Need Deliverance’ http://clashdaily.com/2015/04/black-pastor-slams-gays-youre-perverted-youre-lost-and-you-need-deliverance/
Obama administration claims Iran deal a “forever
agreement” COWBOY
BYTE
The Obama administration mounted a new argument Monday for why skeptical
lawmakers and U.S. allies should back the preliminary nuclear agreement with
Iran, calling it a “forever agreement” that would block all pathways to a
nuclear weapon and set up tough international inspections with no end date.
Check this out:
Check this out:
Energy Secretary
Ernest Moniz, in a rare appearance at the White House press briefing, used that
term in defending the deal he helped strike in Switzerland.
“I want to say this
is not an agreement for 10 years or 15 years or 20 years. It is a long-term
agreement with a whole set of phases,” he said. “And if Iran earns over this
time period trust and confidence in their peaceful objectives, well then over
time the constraints will, in phases, ease up, but never get lower than the
additional protocol and all of the access that it provides.
Continue Reading on www.foxnews.com
Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/37704/obama-administration-claims-iran-deal-a-forever-agreement-despite-expiration-dates/
Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/37704/obama-administration-claims-iran-deal-a-forever-agreement-despite-expiration-dates/
Why
Socialism Never Works and Never Will. by David L. Goetsch
I recently debated a liberal on the issue of socialism
versus free-market capitalism. Understand that my opponent had never had a job
outside of higher education. Consequently, his understanding of anything I said
was limited. This column summarizes some of the key points I made during that
debate. One more thing before getting into the actual debate. This professor is
familiar with a book I wrote on Teamwork that is
used by colleges, universities, and corporations in the U.S. and abroad. His
debating techniques was to conflate socialism with teamwork.
Proving they are poor students of history—among other
failings—Barack Obama and his fellow liberals have used their political
hegemony to tilt the American economy toward socialism. From his first day in
office Barack Obama has attempted to transform America into his fantasy of a socialist paradise. As a
nation, we have not yet moved far enough down the path to economic destruction
to qualify as a socialist state, but the left has made marked progress in
establishing statism as the new reality in America, and statism is the first
cousin of socialism. Just as the teen years are the final phase an individual
passes through on the way to adulthood—at least legally speaking—statism is the
final phase an economy passes through on the way to socialism. When Obama
finally steps down, he will hand over a statist economy to his successor.
Why is it important for Americans to understand what
awaits them at the bottom of the slippery slope liberals are pushing our
economy down? It is important because lurking at the bottom of this slippery
slope is socialism, and history has shown over and over that socialism does not
work. Writing for THE FREEMAN, Mark J.
Perry had this to say about the ultimate failure of socialism wherever it has
been tried: “While it promised prosperity, equality, and security, it delivered
poverty, misery, and tyranny. Equality was achieved only in the sense that
everyone was equal in his or her misery.”
Socialism
is one of those concepts that looks good on paper but breaks down in reality
because it eventually succumbs to the tenets of human nature. For socialism to
work, people would have to be genetically hardwired to suppress their
individual self-interest for the good of the larger group, something that
rarely happens. Further, in those cases liberals like to cite where individuals
put the welfare of the group ahead of their own personal wants, needs, and
agendas they do so only by exception. This kind of behavior occurs at times,
but not as a general rule. Human beings are hardwired to look out for number
one.
Self-interest
is one of the most powerful motivators known to man. It is a subset of the
survival instinct. Some individuals will sporadically operate on the basis of
group-positive altruism, but only a few and rarely on a consistent basis. In
truth, it is the rarest of individuals who puts the group ahead of self on a
regular basis and in a dependable manner. Rather, humans are programmed to
follow their survival instinct. It is this instinct that makes capitalism the
more viable economic system when compared with socialism. Capitalism is based
on principles of human nature such as the survival instinct, while socialism is
based on principles that require individuals to defy human nature.
Liberals, as one might imagine, are seldom happy with
my musings on capitalism versus socialism. Consequently, they occasionally try
to refute my claims by offering the example of teamwork (as did my opponent in
the debate mentioned earlier). Liberals who use this ploy like to
claim—inaccurately—that socialism is nothing more than teamwork on a grand
scale. They use this example because they know that I am the author of a
widely-used book on teamwork (Effective Teamwork, Pearson/Prentice-Hall,
2004) and that I often help corporations that are trying to establish teamwork
as the norm among their employees. However, if they took the time to read my
book they would be exposed to an interesting irony that might help even the
most ardent among them understand why their pet economic theory never works in
actual practice.
A key
point I make in my book is that teamwork as practiced in sports and in the
workplace works—when it works—only because of the incentives provided to
individual members of the team. Human beings are motivated by incentives. I
teach corporate executives that they should not expect people to practice the
principles of teamwork just because doing so will benefit their team. Good employees
do want to benefit their teams, but they will be more determined to do so if
benefitting the team also benefits them as individuals. A rarely stated truth
about teamwork is that people practice it only when incentives are provided
that make it worth their while as individuals. This can be done on sports and
work teams, but it cannot be done with socialism. With socialism, supposedly
everybody benefits (or fails to benefit) at the same level regardless of
effort, and there is the rub. In reality, socialism just changes who benefits
from those productive individuals and entrepreneurs who create wealth to
government flunkies who consume it before it ever filters down to the people.
Teamwork
falls apart most often because selected members of the team fail to carry their
share of the burden. When this happens, other members of the team quickly begin
to question why they should put forth any extra effort when team member X, Y,
or Z is doing so little. The question upon which teamwork breaks down is this:
Why should I work hard when someone else who doesn’t is going to benefit to the
same extent that I do? Good question. This same question inevitably arises with
socialism, and it is a question that completely undermines the concept. In any
group, there will always be entitled freeloaders and lazy nere-do-wells who
would rather watch than work and who want to benefit without the inconvenience
of effort.
Work and
sports teams are small enough that non-contributors can be easily recognized
and, in turn, disciplined, rooted out, or otherwise dealt with. But socialism
is a society-wide enterprise that allows non-contributors to conceal themselves
by taking refuge in its vastness. But despite the protection of bigness, people
in a socialist society still eventually become aware that some members of the
community are benefitting without putting forth any effort. As a result, they
begin to question why they should continue to work hard. If I can benefit
equally by doing nothing, why work? Why not just go fishing and let someone
else break his back? These questions succinctly summarize why the inevitable
result of socialism is that it incentivizes sloth. Never forget that an
economic system gets more of what it incentivizes.
Even in a
long-standing socialist setting, if you change the rules and reward people
according to their level of productivity they quickly become productive again.
The problem socialists have with this approach is that if they change the rules
and begin to reward people according to their productivity they have scrapped
socialism begun to practice capitalism. Whether socialists like it or
not, human beings operate according to individual incentives. In any situation,
they want to know what’s in it for them. They also want to know that if they
produce more they will be rewarded more. There is nothing wrong with this,
despite the strident screeching of socialists. This is how people are made.
If
socialists don’t like people are made they need to take their objections up
with a higher authority than the president or Congress. Unfortunately, few
socialist believe in the authority in question, but that is their problem.
Further, if they would take the time to think the issue through more carefully,
socialists would learn that by producing more people benefit not just
themselves but the larger group also. Free-market capitalism is based on this
concept. It does more than just accommodate human nature, it harnesses it for
the benefit of all. Socialism, on the other hand, tries to defy human nature,
an approach that has never worked and never will.
Read more at http://patriotupdate.com/articles/why-socialism-never-works-and-never-will/
Read more at http://patriotupdate.com/articles/why-socialism-never-works-and-never-will/
Cumbre de las Américas pro-gay y proabortista
|
|
|
No sé si lo sabes, pero este miércoles 8 de abril comienza la Cumbre Social previa a la cumbre de las Américas que tendrá lugar el 10 y 11 de abril en Panamá.
Desgraciadamente, los grupos abortistas y homosexualistas están tratando de marcar la agenda. Y eso que la cumbre está dedicada a "prosperar en equidad”. ¿Hay alguna manera de prosperar en equidad sin proteger el derecho a la vida y a la familia como célula básica de la sociedad? Díselo ahora a los representantes de la OEA:
http://www.citizengo.org/es/20990-oea-respeten-vida-familia-y-derechos-padres
Tu mensaje llegará al secretario general de la OEA, representantes de la OEA en los 34 estados miembros y cancilleres. Además, estaremos físicamente en la cumbre y llevaremos tu firma a las reuniones.
Ahí recordaremos la Convención Americana de Derechos Humanas que es muy clara. Fíjate, Lazaro R:
· Protección
del derecho a la vida. Art. 4, apartado 1: "Toda persona
tiene derecho a que se respete su vida. Este derecho estará protegido por la
ley y, en general, desde el momento de la concepción".
· Promoción
de la familia. Art. 17, sección 1."La familia es el elemento natural y
fundamental de la sociedad y tiene derecho a ser protegida por la sociedad y
del Estado".
· Responsabilidad
de los padres en la educación sexual de sus hijos.
Artículo 12, apartado 4: "Los padres o tutores, según sea el caso, tiene
el derecho de proveer a la educación religiosa y moral de sus hijos o pupilos
que esté de acuerdo con sus propias convicciones".
Es obvio que no cabe promover el aborto. Y también es obvio que
para prosperar en equidad, es necesario promover y defender la familia
entendida como la unión entre un hombre y una mujer. Por lo mismo, la
convención apunta al derecho de los padres a educar a sus hijos conforme a sus
convicciones morales y/o religiosas por encima de las ideologías políticas o de
las imposiciones totalitarias.Eso es lo que vamos a defender los próximos días en Panamá. ¿Te apuntas?
http://www.citizengo.org/es/20990-oea-respeten-vida-familia-y-derechos-padres
Lazaro R, el año pasado estuvimos en Asunción (Paraguay) en la 44ª Asamblea General. El debate fue durísimo. Pero finalmente terminamos ganando. Logramos que no se impusiera el derecho al aborto ni el matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo.
No fue fácil, pero lo logramos. Fuimos casi 60.000 los que participamos en la campaña. Si fuiste uno de ellos, Lazaro R, ¡gracias y enhorabuena.!
Ahora estoy seguro que los grupos feministas y el homosexualismo político espera su "revancha”.
De hecho las organizaciones sociales y ciudadanos reunidos el 12 de marzo de 2015 en el Diálogo Nacional de la Sociedad Civil y Actores Sociales emitieron un preocupante documento preparatorio del Foro Hemisférico de sociedad civil. Entre otras cosas proponen:
· Priorizar
la inversión en educación para la salud,
incluída la sexual y reproductiva
· Desarrollar
programas en educación sexual,
reproductiva y de género
· Desarrollar
políticas educativas y de investigación, formal e informal,
con contenidos de género
· Crear
un foro permanente interamericano y nacional de las organizaciones de la
sociedad civil que promueva la integración desde la diversidad,
interculturalidad, equidad de
género e identidad sexual.
Son sólo propuestas. Pero está claro por dónde va la batalla:
donde siempre, aborto y agenda gay. Por eso es tan importante que nos
movilicemos más y mejor.http://www.citizengo.org/es/20990-oea-respeten-vida-familia-y-derechos-padres
Además, Lazaro R, este año -como sabrás- hay un nuevo secretario general. Fue elegido el pasado mes de marzo. Se trata del ex canciller uruguayo, Luis Almagro. Su perfil en temas morales es parecido al del ya ex secretario general, José Miguel Insulza. Pero además, es abiertamente procastrista.
Para que te hagas una idea, aunque Cuba está fuera de la organización por antidemocratica, estará presente mediante la participación de un rector y del cantante Silvio Rodríguez.
Me temo que las aspiraciones del Movimiento Cristiano de Liberación de que "por primera vez” la cumbre se solidarice con los demócratas cubanos va a ser muy difícil.
Pero también va a ser difícil que de la cumbre salga una declaración de firmeza frente la deriva preocupantemente totalitaria del régimen venezolano. En todo caso, te iré contando lo que vaya pasando. Lo iremos publicando en la misma campaña.
http://www.citizengo.org/es/20990-oea-respeten-vida-familia-y-derechos-padres
Gracias por defender la vida y la familia, gracias por apoyar la primacía de los padres en la educación de sus hijos, gracias por defender la democracia frente a las tentaciones totalitarias. Juntos construimos una América más digna para todos.
Un fuerte abrazo,
Luis Losada Pescador y todo el equipo de CitizenGO
PD. Por favor, Lazaro R, firma esta campaña y publícala en tu muro de Facebook. Llevaremos tu firma y la de tus amigos a la cumbre de Panamá.
CitizenGO es una plataforma de participación ciudadana que trabaja para defender la vida, la familia y las libertades fundamentales en todo el mundo. Para conocer más sobre CitizenGO, haz click aquí, o síguenos en Facebook o Twitter.
Uncommon Naiveté in Fed's Common Core
Over the past few months in cities
throughout the country, we have seen harsh moments that have been characterized
as "racial incidents." Whether it be Ferguson, Mo., New York City, or
Los Angeles, these events continue to occur in states regardless of which party
dominates the political landscape.
The three cities previously mentioned are considered Democratic strongholds, which shows us that this is a problem regardless of who is in charge. But what exactly is the problem? What are we missing, or is there something that we are not talking about enough? Can we say it is just one thing that can be summed up as police brutality?
I think it would be ignorant to say there is just one thing that leads to situations like these. There are many things that we need to improve on as a nation. Better training for law enforcement is undoubtedly one of them. Police body cameras to record incidents would be a step in the right direction.
The three cities previously mentioned are considered Democratic strongholds, which shows us that this is a problem regardless of who is in charge. But what exactly is the problem? What are we missing, or is there something that we are not talking about enough? Can we say it is just one thing that can be summed up as police brutality?
I think it would be ignorant to say there is just one thing that leads to situations like these. There are many things that we need to improve on as a nation. Better training for law enforcement is undoubtedly one of them. Police body cameras to record incidents would be a step in the right direction.
There is also a dire need to devote
substantial energy to what is going on in cities like Chicago, Detroit, New
Orleans, and Washington, D.C., where we witness a plethora of violence,
shootings, and murder all the time.
Teenage pregnancy is all too prevalent in these areas,
as well. As women give birth at a young age, it hinders their ability to
continue their education due to the significant responsibility of caring for a
child.
Without the education required for jobs with reasonable wages, the children are eventually forced into poverty, and the cycle of dependence continues. I have said it before: We should focus on childcare facilities that would allow unwed mothers to get their general education development or higher degree and become self-supporting.
Yes, education is the great divide in our country. A well-educated individual in America can usually write their own ticket in today's world, regardless of ethnicity, race, gender, or financial status at birth.
My whole medical career as a pediatric neurosurgeon was focused on young people and enhancing their lives. We would do everything we possibly could to not only give children longevity, but also quality of life.
Now that I've retired from medicine, I am just as interested in the quality of their future. That is why it is so important to emphasize education. It also is very important for us to emphasize fiscal responsibility. Those of us who are adults today are in charge of the finances of tomorrow. Running up huge bills for our children to pay is being fiscally irresponsible.
Without the education required for jobs with reasonable wages, the children are eventually forced into poverty, and the cycle of dependence continues. I have said it before: We should focus on childcare facilities that would allow unwed mothers to get their general education development or higher degree and become self-supporting.
Yes, education is the great divide in our country. A well-educated individual in America can usually write their own ticket in today's world, regardless of ethnicity, race, gender, or financial status at birth.
My whole medical career as a pediatric neurosurgeon was focused on young people and enhancing their lives. We would do everything we possibly could to not only give children longevity, but also quality of life.
Now that I've retired from medicine, I am just as interested in the quality of their future. That is why it is so important to emphasize education. It also is very important for us to emphasize fiscal responsibility. Those of us who are adults today are in charge of the finances of tomorrow. Running up huge bills for our children to pay is being fiscally irresponsible.
Common Core has been a hot topic regarding education,
and while I think it is important to have standards, putting such a task in the
hands of the federal government is naive, as opposed to the sound idea of
placing the onus on local municipalities, schools, teachers, and parents. The
ability to maintain high academic expectations of our students is dependent
upon the curriculum and lessons presented in the classroom.
While proponents of Common Core may see benefits to such a system, how can the initiative be effective if it imposes confusing experimental teaching methods that our teachers cannot adequately adopt and our parents cannot actively support? Children thrive on confidence and encouragement, neither of which exists in an environment where the education purveyors are uncomfortable with the standards by which they and their pupils are judged.
America, like the rest of the world, is in the process of changing. It can be a good change, or it can be a bad change. I think the way to ensure it is a really good change is to have a lot of our incredibly bright, talented young people involved in the political process early on — and this can only happen through a great education.
This nation's founders were extremely well educated, and they acknowledged that our system of governance relies upon an informed populace. We need the intellect, savvy and innovative spirit of our children.
They should not be outsiders looking in. They should be participants in all aspects of shaping the future of our country, because they are, indeed, the future of our country.
While proponents of Common Core may see benefits to such a system, how can the initiative be effective if it imposes confusing experimental teaching methods that our teachers cannot adequately adopt and our parents cannot actively support? Children thrive on confidence and encouragement, neither of which exists in an environment where the education purveyors are uncomfortable with the standards by which they and their pupils are judged.
America, like the rest of the world, is in the process of changing. It can be a good change, or it can be a bad change. I think the way to ensure it is a really good change is to have a lot of our incredibly bright, talented young people involved in the political process early on — and this can only happen through a great education.
This nation's founders were extremely well educated, and they acknowledged that our system of governance relies upon an informed populace. We need the intellect, savvy and innovative spirit of our children.
They should not be outsiders looking in. They should be participants in all aspects of shaping the future of our country, because they are, indeed, the future of our country.
Dr. Ben Carson is an
emeritus professor of neurosurgery, oncology, plastic surgery, and pediatrics
at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and has been awarded more than 60
honorary doctorate degrees and dozens of national merit citations. He has
authored more than 100 neurosurgical publications and has written five
best-selling books, including "America the Beautiful." For more on
Dr. Carson, Click Here Now.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/BenCarson/Common-Core-Education-Ferguson-Fiscal-Responsibility/2015/04/01/id/635738/#ixzz3WYd825ob
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/BenCarson/Common-Core-Education-Ferguson-Fiscal-Responsibility/2015/04/01/id/635738/#ixzz3WYd825ob
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!
No comments:
Post a Comment