No 849 “En mi
opinión”
Enero 15, 2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño EDITOR
Amenper: Viva la
Diferencia
Presionando
en el link de arriba pueden ver que la Casa de Representantes ha hecho el
trabajo para lo que los votantes los eligieron.
Ahora
pasa al Senado, cada Senador como en la casa de representantes, emitirá su voto
públicamente.
Esperamos
una votación similar, si alguien no lo hace, entonces podemos decir que esa persona
está de acuerdo con la decisión ejecutiva de Obama, no antes.
No porque
una persona piense que hay que hacer algo de un tipo de reforma migratoria
quiere decir que está de acuerdo con Obama. Porque sabemos que en la decisión
de Obama no está la solución al problema, pero la continuación del problema.
Todos los
que queremos que se resuelva el problema de inmigración están de acuerdo en
cerrar las fronteras a los ilegales, porque es posible, si se puede poner un
hombre en la luna, ¿Cómo no se va a poder controlar la frontera? Si
no se hace es porque no les conviene a los que nos están desgobernando.
En esto
estamos de acuerdo todos, entonces una vez logrado el control de las fronteras,
hay quien quiere resolver el problema de los que ya están aquí de una manera y
otros de otra manera.
Unos
quieren que los monten en camiones y los manden de vuelta a todos, lo cual es
un deseo legítimo, pero una realidad poco pragmática, otros quieren que se
envíen de vuelta a los que han cometido delitos y se trate al resto caso por
caso, otros quieren que se respete el caso de personas que llegaron menores de
edad, que se han educado en las universidades y que nunca han tenido problema
con la ley, los que llaman a esto “American Dream”.
Pero lo
principal que podemos reconocer nosotros es que hay muchos tipos de
inmigrantes, y que cuando presentamos la solución, no es fácil, porque no
fueron lo mismo los inmigrantes europeos del principio de la revolución
industrial en Estados Unidos, que los inmigrantes requeridos por sus
conocimientos técnicos y profesionales, que los inmigrantes agrícolas que hacen
el trabajo que otros no quieren, que los exilados políticos, que los que entran
como exilados políticos sin serlo, que la invasión extranjera disfrazada de
inmigración que entra ilegalmente. Individualmente cada una de esas
personas es un ser diferente que puede o no puede pertenecer al estereotipo del
grupo, y todos los factures hay que tomarlos en consideración aunque siempre
dentro de un método organizado tomando en consideración lo mejor para la
sociedad y para la nación.
La vida
me ha hecho conocer individuos dentro de los grupos migratorios. Entuve
en contacto con cientos de inmigrantes del Mariel como voluntario durante
el incontrolable éxodo, he sido testigo personal con mi contacto
público de diferentes estratos migratorios desde el mostrador de la
farmacia en mi ciudad de Miami por más de cincuenta años, mi trabajo
después, me ha puesto en contacto con la nueva migración de Méjico
y Centroamérica, y he podido apreciar de primera mano la diversidad de los
grupos, he aprendido a no juzgar al ganado por la manada sino ver el valor
de cada vaca.
Hay
solución, si hay buena fe, porque vivimos en una sociedad que con su
ingeniosidad tradicional resuelves los mayores problemas que ha enfrentado en
la historia.
Entre las
personas de buena fe con respecto al problema migratorio, lo que vemos son
diferencias dentro de una misma idea, resolver el terrible problema migratorio
que ha creado la izquierda.
Simplemente
son versiones de personas que quieren lo mejor para la nación.
Lo que no
es bueno para la nación es por ambiciones políticas hacer acusaciones sin base
real contra los que son nuestros, porque haciendo esto lo único que logran es
dar al enemigo municiones para que nos dispare.
Si no
estamos de acuerdo con alguna de las soluciones, eso se resuelve negociando y
discutiendo los puntos de vista, las acusaciones son para los que han creado el
problema, a esos hay que atacarlos con todo, entre nosotros tenemos que
discutir entre amigos.
Amenper: "No
busque la perfección - Nunca la alcanzará."
Nadie es
perfecto, no importa que le pongas el nombre perfecto a tu hijo, se puede
llamar Perfecto Pérez, pero será imperfecto.
Buscar la
perfección en la persona es una pérdida de tiempo y una decepción.
Por eso a
la hora escoger un candidato, tenemos que buscar al no al perfecto, que no
existe, no eliminar al que ha cometido errores, porque todos hemos cometidos
errores de juicio, pero al que por su conducta y su trayectoria durante su
carrera sea afín a nuestros valores, pero nunca juzgarlo por unos errores de
juicio en un momento determinado.
Si eres
cristiano, sabes que Pedro negó a Cristo tres veces la víspera de su
crucifixión, que tuvo muchos momentos de flaqueza, sin embargo fue el
encomendado por Cristo, que conocía sus imperfecciones para fundar su iglesia
porque conocía su fidelidad a la verdad cristiana.
San
Pablo, que fue un perseguidor de los cristianos, fue el encomendado por
Cristo para llevar el evangelio a los no judíos en el mundo.
Hay
algunas personas que idealizan la perfección, y son presa fácil para los
imperfectos que auto-predican su perfección atacando las imperfecciones de los
demás.
Estamos
en el principio de escoger un candidato para presidente para oponerse al
candidato del partido demócrata.
Veremos
cómo se acusan los unos a los otros por sus errores. Pero todos los
que han salido a la palestra son más afines a nuestros principios que cualquier
candidato que piensa presentar el partido demócrata.
Cuando
oigamos las imperfecciones de los candidatos, hay que recordar que las
imperfecciones no son deficiencias; son recordatorios de que estamos
en esto juntos, con un objetivo final.
Los
errores los hace imperfectos, pero la práctica reduce la imperfección, sobre
todo cuando reconocen sus errores.
La
tragedia es que nuestra atención se centra en lo que la gente hizo en un caso
particular, en lugar de lo que son, lo que han sido, y a lo que puedan llegar a
ser
Ninguno
de nosotros conoce el motivo que llevó a una persona a cometer un error. Por lo
tanto, como no sabemos, no podemos hacer nada más que sospechar o inventar el
motivo de lo que inspiró la acción de otros. Y no podemos dejarnos llevar por
posiciones doctrinales rígidas y perfectas acusando a otros
candidatos que buscan la nominación de la falta de perfección, denigrando
a otros por motivos de ambición.
Tal vez,
si no estuvieran tan ocupados en cuanto a ver los defectos de los que tienen
nuestros mismos valores, y buscáramos su trayectoria, encontraríamos las
cualidades que pueden poseer.
El
momento es de desplazar el enfoque de asignación de culpas y hacia el
entendimiento.
Culpar a
otros denigrando su carácter en una campaña primaria es una ayuda a la campaña
final contra el otro partido, es desviar la atención al objetivo final que es
el cambio del sistema socialista que se está implantando progresivamente bajo
las administraciones demócratas.
No
es sabio el aceptar las percepciones de los demás de lo que los
otros son y de lo que no son capaces de ser, según su opinión, olvidando
el adagio de "ver la paja en el ojo ajeno y no ver la viga en el
nuestro".
Es sabio
eludir la opinión de otros sobre una persona y simplemente informarse
sobre lo que han hecho que medidas han adoptado con integridad, en el conjunto
de su trayectoria pública.
Nos
gustaría ver unos debates en que se hable de los errores de la presente
administración, que son muchos, y no se pierda el tiempo en atacar al otro
candidato, sino presentar su agenda de cómo tratar de resolver los problemas
que este presidente nos ha dejado.
De esta
manera podríamos escoger al candidato por su plataforma, no por los errores
aislados que hayan podido cometer en un momento dado.
Esto es
lo que tenemos que buscar, nos vamos a ver invadidos de propaganda cara y
elaborada denunciando las imperfecciones del otro candidato.
Pero
todos tienen cualidades contrarias a los izquierdistas que nos presentará el
otro partido.
Cualquiera
que sea el electo en las primarias merece nuestro voto.
Lo que
tenemos que hacer no eliminar a nadie por un error aislado, porque si buscamos
la perfección, no votaríamos por ninguno, y el candidato del otro partido
ganaría.
Ha pasado
y hemos tenido que pagar caro por esto, ¿Lo haremos de nuevo?
House Votes To
Roll Back Obama’s Immigration Order
The bill passed despite opposition by 26 Republicans.
IMAGE:
HTTP://WWW.WESTERNJOURNALISM.COM/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/AVATARS/3289/3DA321B9693559DBB826187F825667C8-BPTHUMB.JPG
According to breaking reports Wednesday, the U.S. House of
Representatives narrowly passed a resolution overturning Barack Obama’s
executive action granting deferred deportation for hundreds of thousands
of illegal immigrants who arrived in the country as children.
The amendment was included in a larger bill
aimed at funding the Department of Homeland Security through the remainder of
the year.
Prior to the vote, House Speaker John Boehner
explained that his party’s opposition to the executive action on immigration is
not based on partisan disagreements–but a desire to uphold the Constitution.
“We do not take this action lightly,” he said,
“but simply there is no alternative. It’s not a dispute between the parties or
even between the branches of our government. This executive overreach is an
affront to the rule of law and to the Constitution itself.”
The bill is now set to be presented for a
Senate vote, where supporters will face an uphill battle for passage.
Even with a majority in the new session, the 54
Senate Republicans would need the help of at least six Democrats to pass the
bill.
Republican Rep. Charlie Dent said he is
confident members of the other chamber are “not going to pass this bill.”
Some reports indicate senators might take out
the immigration amendment and return the funding bill to the House for approval
ahead of next month’s deadline
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/house-votes-roll-back-obamas-immigration-order/#dSuciHW32YJ9TzAj.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/house-votes-roll-back-obamas-immigration-order/#dSuciHW32YJ9TzAj.99
Amenper: Estaba equivocado el Islam, es una religión. Pero también es una agencia
del enemigo
Alguien me llamó la atención porque he dicho en varias ocasiones que el
Islam no es una religión, sino una asociación militar inventada por Mahoma como
forma de religión para hacer que los soldados perdieran el miedo a la muerte,
que hasta buscaran la muerte para una vida mejor en el paraíso si morían
matando infieles.
Me hace notar que las instituciones religiosas todas fueron fundadas por
humanos, algunos con las mejores intenciones otras como Mahoma con motivos
personales para ganar riquezas o poder. Pero que todas son consideradas como
religiones. Me dice que por lo general como instituciones humanas,
todas se corrompen en mayor o menor grado una vez que adquieren cierta riqueza
o cierto poder, aunque sea de una forma legítima. Pero que por
eso, no dejan de ser religiones.
Pero de lo que estaba hablando, sin negar que mi amigo tiene cierta razón,
es que el Islam en estos momentos, no sólo no se merece la exención de
impuestos de una institución religiosa sin fines de lucro, pero se debe
considerar dentro del capítulo de agencia de una nación extranjera, sobre todo
porque las naciones extranjera que representan con su institución son nuestros
enemigos.
El Islam siempre ha sido una institución para la guerra y la política, no
una institución de paz o realmente solo religiosa. Durante la
segunda guerra mundial se aliaron a los nazis, pelearon junto a los nazis con
varias divisiones musulmanas y ayudaron a la exterminación de los judíos.
El Imán Amin A Husseini (¿no relation?) fue un cercano colaborador de Himmler
el jefe del servicio secreto y la policía del estado Nazi, como lo pueden ver
en las viejas fotos que les presento arriba.
Durante el imperio Otomán fueron enemigos de judíos y cristianos,
conquistaron el mundo conocido y después protestan por las cruzadas.
Pero hoy tenemos un Presidente con el nombre de Hussein que en árabe quiere
decir "el bien parecido" o " el que parece bien", que le
parece bien el decirnos que el Islam es una religión de paz.
El Islam y las mesquitas son agencias de una potencia extranjera, porque
hay ya movimientos con categoría de estado, y estados constituidos que son
teocracias Islámicas y han declarado la guerra a los Estados Unidos.
Según la ley, los agentes de estados extranjeros se tienen que inscribir
con el departamento de defensa para poder ser identificados y consecuentemente
vigilados. Aunque Bill de Blasio piense diferente.
Ahora quizás puedo considerar por el razonamiento de mi amigo, que el Islam
es una religión, como es el ateísmo moderno, los cultos satánicos, el
espiritismo, la santería y otras instituciones religiosas de membrecía
minorista. Pero no veo que la mayoría de esos cultos reciban ayuda y
protección del gobierno.
Creo que el Islam está no solo fuera de las consideraciones para que
se le pueda considerar los privilegios de una institución religiosa,
aunque sea una religión, pero hay que considerarla, sin contar el hecho de que
sea una religion o no lo sea, como una agencia de estados
extranjeros que son nuestros enemigos.
Liberacion de 53
Presos.¿ Quien tuvo la Ultima Palabra...Obama o Castro???.
cubinfocen@aol.com, gatria@aol.com
En el dia de Ayer . Martes 13 de Enero en una llamada a La Habana,
En el dia de Ayer . Martes 13 de Enero en una llamada a La Habana,
Cuba, hable con el Sr. Elizardo Sanchez, que es el Portavoz de la
Comision Cubana de Derechos Humanos y Reconciliacion Nacional.
Por muchos años Elizardo ha sido y sigue siendo
una de las personas
mas documentadas con relacion a los presos y a los que han sido
liberados.
Elizardo dijo que quedan en las carceles cubanas mas de 70
presos y
que algunos llevan mas de 20 Años Presos. Entonces
esta liberacion ha sido una farza . Muchos de los que estaban en la lista
ya habian sido liberados have
meses , otros ni siquiera habian sido juzgados y del resto algunos estaban
al cumplir su condena.
Mi pregunta es : Si se liberaron 5 Espias entre los que se
encontraba uno de los
responsables del derribo de las avionetas donde murieron 3 ciudadanos
americanos y un residente...Por Que Cuba no libero presos
que cumplen largas condenas , algunos en
carceles cubanas por mas de 20 años ? . Ademas los
liberados realmente no son completamente libres , tienen Libertad
Condicional.
“Does He Take
Responsibility for ANYTHING?”: Former Secret Service Agent Blasts Obama. http://minutemennews.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/th-33-300x173.jpg
Former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino blasted
President Obama’s decision to blame security concerns for his decision not to
attend an anti-terrorism rally in Paris.
The White House blamed security concerns for
Obama’s decision not to attend the “March Of Unity” in Paris after a deadly
Islamic terrorist attack on the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in Paris.
The Secret Service said that it was never asked to prepare for a presidential
visit to Paris.
Bongino, who served in the Secret Service under
presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama before galvanizing conservative voters with
recent Maryland Senate and congressional runs, told The Daily Caller that Obama
blamed the Service because he knew they couldn’t fight back against him in the
press.
“He knows there’s nothing the Secret Service can
say. They don’t want to hurt the relationship so as a matter of decorum they
can’t say anything,” Bongino said. “I imagine what they’re really thinking is,
‘Is this guy serious?’ It’s not an easy job. After the fence-jumper, morale’s
not great over there now, but he still says something that is so obviously not
true.”
“Just look at the Mandela funeral which was
geometrically worse when it comes to threat and he went to that because he
wanted to go. If the president wants to go he goes. The Secret Service doesn’t
tell him he can’t go. That’s only in movies.”
Read more at http://minutemennews.com/2015/01/take-responsibility-anything-former-secret-service-agent-blasts-obama/
Obama Will Fight Media To Stop Anti-Jihad Articles
http://patriotupdate.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/obama-binoculars-ap-300x180.jpg But that claim of a peaceful Islam was
repeatedly coupled with Obama’s policy of pressuring journalists not to anger
aggressive Muslim believers. ”I will say that there have been occasions … where
the administration will make clear our point of view on some of those
assessments based on the need to protect the American people and to protect our
men and women in uniform,” Earnest said.
President Barack Obama has a
moral responsibility to push back on the nation’s journalism community when it
is planning to publish anti-jihadi articles that might cause a jihadi attack
against the nation’s defenses forces, the White House’s press secretary said
Jan. 12.
“The president … will not now
be shy about expressing a view or taking the steps that are necessary to try to
advocate for the safety and security of our men and women in uniform” whenever
journalists’ work may provoke jihadist attacks, spokesman Josh Earnest told
reporters at the White House’s daily briefing.
The unprecedented reversal of
Americans’ civil-military relations, and of the president’s duty to protect the
First Amendment, was pushed by Earnest as he tried to excuse the
administration’s opposition in 2012 to the publication of anti-jihadi cartoons by
the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo.
The White House voiced its objections in 2012 after the magazine’s
office were burned by jihadis, followings its publication of anti-jihadi
cartoons.
Read more at http://patriotupdate.com/2015/01/white-house-obama-will-fight-media-stop-anti-jihad-articles/
Read more at http://patriotupdate.com/2015/01/white-house-obama-will-fight-media-stop-anti-jihad-articles/
Imam: New Charlie Hebdo Cartoon ‘Act of War’
image:
http://conservbyte.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/anjem-choudary-300x204.jpg
We need to treat supporters of
terrorists as terrorists.
Hate preacher Anjem Choudary
has called the latest front cover of Charlie Hebdo an “act of war” against
Muslims. The magazine features Mohammed crying and holding a “Je Suis Charlie”
sign, with the headline roughly translating to “Everything is forgiven”.
But Choudary was unimpressed
with the offering from the remaining staff at Charlie Hebdo claiming it was
“ridiculing” Mohammed. He said the magazine was attacking the Muslim leader’s
personality, and that publishing it was “extremely serious”.
This is the second intervention
by Choudary since Islamic terrorists launched the devastating machine gun
attack on Charlie Hebdo that left 17 dead and many more injured. Soon after the
murders, he issued an open letter in which he said: “Contrary to popular
misconception, Islam does not mean peace but rather means submission to the
commands of Allah alone. Therefore, Muslims do not believe in the concept of
freedom of expression, as their speech and actions are determined by divine
revelation and not based on people’s desires.”
He claimed the latest front
cover was “blatant provocation” and claimed insulting Islam and Muslims is
“part of the war that is taking place”. He went on to demand that Western
societies be “sensible and sensitive to the emotions and the feelings of the
Muslims”, and accused governments of refusing to “nip it in the bud”.
Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2015/01/imam-new-charlie-hebdo-cartoon-act-war/
Breaking:
FBI Announced Arrest Of Ohio Man Linked To ISIS Attack On U.S. Capitol
Christopher Cornell allegedly amassed explosives, firearms, and ammunition
for a full-scale assault on federal employees and officials.
IMAGE:
HTTP://WWW.WESTERNJOURNALISM.COM/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/AVATARS/3289/3DA321B9693559DBB826187F825667C8-BPTHUMB.JPG
According to recent reports,
Green Township, Ohio, resident Christopher Lee Cornell is in custody Wednesday
for allegedly plotting to bomb the U.S. Capitol and open fire on any survivors.
ABC News indicates the FBI arrested
Cornell, 20, after spending months building a case against him. Using the
handle Raheel Mahrus Ubayda, the suspect reportedly posted social media
statements and propaganda encouraging violence and supporting the terror
network ISIS, also known as Daesh.
Cornell claimed to have received
support for his planned jihad by influential radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki,
though he stated in a message to an FBI informant that he did not believe
Muslims needed to have their plans approved.
“I believe that we should just
wage jihad under our own orders and plan attacks and everything,” he reportedly
asserted. “I believe we should meet up and make our own group in alliance with
the Islamic State here and plan operations ourselves.”
He allegedly discussed the
details of such a plan with the informant last year during meetings in
Cincinnati, reportedly amassing an arsenal of cash, firearms, ammunition, and
explosives ahead of his impending trip to Washington, D.C.
“The alleged activities of
Cornell highlight the continued interest of U.S.-based violent extremists to
support designated foreign terrorist organizations overseas,” the FBI and
Department of Homeland Security explained in a statement Wednesday.
The agencies concluded that
domestic terror supporters “will almost certainly continue to use social media
platforms to disseminate English language violent extremist messages.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/breaking-fbi-announced-arrest-ohio-man-linked-isis-attack-u-s-capitol/#vLTpZckD9WjJj2fW.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/breaking-fbi-announced-arrest-ohio-man-linked-isis-attack-u-s-capitol/#vLTpZckD9WjJj2fW.99
House Votes to Undo Obama Immigration Actions
The Republican U.S. House voted Wednesday to overturn
President Barack Obama's key immigration policies, approving legislation that
would eliminate new deportation protections for millions and expose hundreds of
thousands of younger immigrants to expulsion.
The 236-191 vote came on a broad bill that would provide nearly
$40 billion to finance the Homeland Security Department through the rest of the
budget year.
Democrats accused Republicans of playing politics with national
security at a time of heightened threats, and Obama has threatened to veto the
legislation. Prospects in the Senate look tough, too.
But House Republicans, in a determined assault on one of Obama's
top domestic priorities, accused him of reckless unconstitutional actions on
immigration that must be stopped.
"This executive overreach is an affront to the rule of law
and to the Constitution itself," said House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio.
"The people made clear that they wanted more accountability from this
president, and by our votes here today we will heed their will and we will keep
our oath to protect and defend the Constitution."
But Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., accused Republicans of
"viciousness" for trying to make it easier to deport immigrants
brought to the U.S. as children. Rep. David Price, D-N.C., called the GOP
effort "a political vendetta," adding, "It's a reprehensible,
reckless tactic which will compromise, has already compromised, the full and
effective functioning of our Homeland Security Department" at a time of
heightened security risks.
The immigration measures were amendments on the Homeland Security
bill.
One of them, approved 237-190, would undo executive actions that
Obama announced in November to provide temporary deportation relief to some 4
million immigrants in the country illegally. A second amendment would delete
Obama's 2012 policy that's granted work permits and stays of deportation to
more than 600,000 immigrants who arrived in the U.S. illegally as children.
That measure passed more narrowly, 218-209, as more than two dozen more
moderate Republicans joined Democrats in opposition.
The changes Obama announced in November especially enraged the GOP
because they came not long after Republicans swept the midterm elections,
taking control of the Senate and increasing their majority in the House.
Republicans pledged then to revisit the issue once Congress was fully under
their control.
But even with Republicans in control of the Senate, the bill faces
difficulty there, especially because House GOP leaders decided to satisfy
demands from conservative members by including a vote to undo the 2012 policy
that deals with younger immigrants known as "Dreamers."
Republicans are six votes shy of the 60-vote majority needed to
advance most legislation in the Senate, and even some Republicans in that
chamber have expressed unease with the House GOP approach, especially given the
importance of funding the Homeland Security Department in light of the Paris
terrorist attacks.
Some House Republicans acknowledged that the Senate was likely to
reject their approach, perhaps forcing them in the end to pass a Homeland
Security funding bill stripped of controversial provisions on immigration.
"They're not going to pass this bill," said Rep. Charlie
Dent, R-Pa.
Homeland Security money expires at the end of February so House
leaders have left themselves several weeks to come up with an ultimate
solution.
Immigrant advocates warned Republicans that Wednesday's votes
risked alienating Latino voters who will be crucial to the 2016 presidential
election.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/house-votes-undo-obama/2015/01/14/id/618553/#ixzz3OuAUZtXI
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/house-votes-undo-obama/2015/01/14/id/618553/#ixzz3OuAUZtXI
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
DUTCH MAYOR TO ISLAM: ‘If
You Don’t Like Our Freedoms, Pack Your Bags and F-ck Off’
Hell yeah. And he said it on live TV! That’s
what a leader says to backward ass Islam.
The Moroccan-born mayor
of Rotterdam has said Muslim immigrants who do not appreciate the way of life
in Western civilisations can ‘f*** off’.
Ahmed Aboutaleb, who
arrived in the Netherlands aged 15, spoke out in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo
attack in Paris last week.
Appearing on live
television just hours after the shootings, Mayor Aboutaleb said Muslims who ‘do
not like freedom can pack your bags and leave’.
Labour politician Ahmed Aboutaleb, a former journalist who was
appointed mayor of the Dutch city in 2008, is known for his straight-forward
stance on integration.
U.S. Terror Camps are Real, Watchdog Tells Newsmax
Islamic terrorist-training camps have been operating in the United
States for 30 years and pose a "very dangerous" threat, says Martin
Mawyer, president of the Christian Action Network.
"The group is called Muslims of the Americas and their leader is called Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani," Mawyer said Wednesday on "The Steve Malzberg Show" on Newsmax TV.
"They frequently want to play the card that they're just peaceful Muslims trying to raise their own kids, grow their own agriculture and live a sustainable Muslim life. Anybody that doubts that … [can] come to their property and take a look."
"The group is called Muslims of the Americas and their leader is called Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani," Mawyer said Wednesday on "The Steve Malzberg Show" on Newsmax TV.
"They frequently want to play the card that they're just peaceful Muslims trying to raise their own kids, grow their own agriculture and live a sustainable Muslim life. Anybody that doubts that … [can] come to their property and take a look."
But when the Christian Action Network, armed with a video camera,
attempted to put that to the test, they were ordered to get out.
Story continues below video.
Story continues below video.
Note: Watch Newsmax TV now on DIRECTV Ch. 349 and DISH
Ch. 223
Get Newsmax TV on your cable system – Click Here Now
"Their first words are there are armed guards, gates, security guards and people who hit you with a cane if you come," said Mawyer, author of "Twilight in America: The Untold Story of Islamic Terrorist Training Camps Inside America," written with Patti Pierucci and published by PRB Publishing.
"Although, most people are unfamiliar with them, they are familiar with the Wall Street Journal's Daniel Pearl. Pearl was on his way to Pakistan to interview the leader of these American-based terrorist scams when he was later kidnapped and then beheaded," Mawyer said.
"This is a very dangerous group, they have had years of terrorist acts inside the United States from bombings to assassinations to cold brutal murder and operations including infiltration.
Get Newsmax TV on your cable system – Click Here Now
"Their first words are there are armed guards, gates, security guards and people who hit you with a cane if you come," said Mawyer, author of "Twilight in America: The Untold Story of Islamic Terrorist Training Camps Inside America," written with Patti Pierucci and published by PRB Publishing.
"Although, most people are unfamiliar with them, they are familiar with the Wall Street Journal's Daniel Pearl. Pearl was on his way to Pakistan to interview the leader of these American-based terrorist scams when he was later kidnapped and then beheaded," Mawyer said.
"This is a very dangerous group, they have had years of terrorist acts inside the United States from bombings to assassinations to cold brutal murder and operations including infiltration.
"These camps are located in more than a dozen states in this
country from New York to Pennsylvania to Florida to South Carolina to Georgia
to Virginia to Texas and to California. These are true no-go zones."
Shutting down the camps is tough to do, however, he said.
"Every time I talk to law enforcement they can't crack down on the particular group itself. They can only crack down on individuals that are arrested inside the group that are committing these crimes," he said.
In one case, though, it did happen.
"They did shut one of the camps down in Buena Vista, Colorado. They raided the camp and found all kinds of weapons, all kinds of information about how to kill FBI agents, how to set off bombs at military centers and a lot of those individuals went to jail," Mawyer said.
"After that, what they learned to do is rather than having the people who committed these crimes living on their camps, they train them on the camps, then they put them out to the general community.
"So when they're caught, the camp people can say they kicked them off the camp a number of years ago or six months ago because they were a bad seed and didn't want them on the property any longer."
The Christian Action Network is a Virginia-based public advocacy and education organization based on "biblical principles, values, traditions and American ideals."
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/Martin-Mawyer-Islamist-training-camps/2015/01/14/id/618658/#ixzz3OtsuUXGs
Shutting down the camps is tough to do, however, he said.
"Every time I talk to law enforcement they can't crack down on the particular group itself. They can only crack down on individuals that are arrested inside the group that are committing these crimes," he said.
In one case, though, it did happen.
"They did shut one of the camps down in Buena Vista, Colorado. They raided the camp and found all kinds of weapons, all kinds of information about how to kill FBI agents, how to set off bombs at military centers and a lot of those individuals went to jail," Mawyer said.
"After that, what they learned to do is rather than having the people who committed these crimes living on their camps, they train them on the camps, then they put them out to the general community.
"So when they're caught, the camp people can say they kicked them off the camp a number of years ago or six months ago because they were a bad seed and didn't want them on the property any longer."
The Christian Action Network is a Virginia-based public advocacy and education organization based on "biblical principles, values, traditions and American ideals."
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/Martin-Mawyer-Islamist-training-camps/2015/01/14/id/618658/#ixzz3OtsuUXGs
NASA Satellite Captures Peculiar Line in Wisconsin From Space —
Here’s the Scientific Explanation
Take a close look at the following image captured recently from NASA’s
Terra satellite.
Do you see an odd line west of Green Bay?
The damage a 2007 EF3 tornado did along a
40-mile-long path in Wisconsin is still visible from space. (Image source: NASA
via Weather Channel)
According to the Weather Channel, the peculiar line
visible from space is actually a scar left from a tornado that pummeled the
area more than seven years ago.
The image, captured on Jan. 10, shows the damage the EF3 tornado did to
the area.
Here’s another image, taken just two days after the tornado struck the
are
The damage a 2007 EF3 tornado did along a
40-mile-long path in Wisconsin is seen from space two days after the storm
rolled through the area. (Image source: NASA via Weather Channel)
The storm was responsible for destroying more than 14,000 trees along a
40-mile-long path on June 7, 2007, according to the Weather Channel.
The damage caused by the tornado is more visible in the winter because
the exposed path shows up white when snow falls on the ground.
Follow Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy) on Twitter
“En mi opinión”
No 849 Enero 15, 2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST”
Lázaro R González Miño EDITOR
No comments:
Post a Comment