No 729 “En mi opinión” VIERNES, AGOSTO 15, 2014

No 729  “En mi opinión”  VIERNES, AGOSTO 15, 2014

 “IN GOD WE TRUST” LAZARO R GONZALEZ MIñO EDITOR 

                                          God Bless America!!!

https://www.youtube.com/embed/JVAhr4hZDJE#t=19%2a

Amenper: EL ISLAM

www.virtueonline.org/ lo-islam-no-dr-peter-hammond

Pueden leer en el enlace arriba el libro del Dr. Peter Hammond: la esclavitud, el terrorismo y el Islam. 

Lo que nos dice Hammond es que no los chinos ni los rusos, representan la mayor amenaza para el mundo pero el Islam, que representa lo que podría ser el cumplimiento del libro de Apocalipsis en la Biblia. Esto es una muy preocupante lectura para un cristiano , pero hay que leerlo para ser informado en esta cuestión tan importante.

El Islam no es una religión, ni es un culto. En su forma más completa, es un sistema completo y total, el 100% de la vida de sus miembros.  El Islam fue creado por Mahoma para crear un ejército de fanáticos al cual le ofreció beneficios como una vida espiritual con estímulos carnales de coito con decenas de vírgenes en el paraíso si daban la vida luchando por la implantación del califato mundial.  Esta es la primaria y más importante gestión, Esto es el Islam, aunque traten de disfrazarlo de religión.

El Islam tiene componentes religiosos, legales, políticos, económicos, sociales y militares. El componente religioso es una pantalla para todos los otros componentes.

Islamización comienza cuando hay suficientes musulmanes en un país a manifestarse por sus privilegios religiosos.

Cuando sociedades culturalmente diversas, tolerantes y políticamente correctas de acuerdo a las exigencias musulmanas de sus privilegios religiosos, algunos de los otros componentes tienden a arrastrarse así.

Aquí está cómo funciona:

Mientras los restos de la población musulmana alrededor o debajo del 2% en un país determinado, en su mayor parte se considerará como una minoría amante de la paz y no como una amenaza para los demás ciudadanos. Entonces ellos se comportan mejor y los ciudadanos de este país no comprenden lo que en realidad es el Islam.   Este es el caso de países como Estados Unidos--Musulmanes 0.6%, Australia--Musulmana 1,5% Canadá--Musulmanes 1,9%,China--Musulmanes 1,8%,Italia--Musulmana 1,5%,Noruega--Musulmanes 1,8%

Cuando sube entre el 2% al 5%, empiezan a hacer proselitismo de otras minorías étnicas y grupos descontentos, a menudo con reclutamiento en las cárceles y entre bandas callejeras. Esto está ocurriendo en: Dinamarca, Musulmanes 2%,Alemania--Musulmanes 3.7%,Reino Unido--Musulmanes 2.7%,España--Musulmana 4%,Tailandia--Musulmanes 4,6%

Después del 5%, ejercen una influencia excesiva en proporción a su porcentaje de la población. Por ejemplo, tratan de oficializar  la introducción de alimentos halal (por normas islámicas), asegurando así trabajos de preparación de alimentos para los musulmanes. Aumentarán la presión sobre las cadenas de supermercados a halal característica en sus estantes, junto con las amenazas en caso de incumplimiento. Esto está ocurriendo en: Francia--Musulmanes 8%,Filipinas - Musulmanes 5%,Suecia--Musulmanes 5%,Suiza--Musulmanes 4,3%,Holanda--Musulmana 5.5%,Trinidad y Tobago--musulmanes 5,8%

En este punto, se trabajará para conseguir el actual gobierno para que puedan gobernar ellos mismos (dentro de sus ghettos) bajo la Sharia, el objetivo final de la ley islámica El principal trabajo de los islamistas es establecer la ley Sharia en todo el mundo. 

Cuando los musulmanes aproximan el 10% de la población, tienden a aumentar la anarquía como un medio de queja acerca de sus condiciones. En París, ya estamos viendo quema de automóviles. Cualquier acción no que toque a un musulmán ofende y trae resultados en los levantamientos y amenazas, tales como en Ámsterdam, con la oposición a Mohammed dibujos animados y películas sobre el Islam. Esas tensiones se ven todos los días, particularmente en las secciones musulmanas en: Guyana--Musulmanes 10%,India--Musulmana 13,4%,Israel--Musulmanes 16%,Kenia--,musulmanes 10%,Rusia - Musulmán 15%

Después de alcanzar el 20%, las Naciones pueden esperar disturbios, formaciones de milicia yihad, matanzas esporádicas y las quemas de iglesias cristianas y sinagogas judías, tales como en:  Etiopía--Musulmanes 32,8%

,Al 40%, las Naciones experimentan matanzas generalizadas, ataques terroristas crónica y guerra de la milicia en curso, como en: Bosnia--Musulmanes 40%,Chad--Musulmanes 53,1%,Líbano--Musulmanes 59,7% 

Del 60%, las Naciones experimentan persecución sin trabas de los no creyentes de todas otras religiones (incluyendo a los musulmanes no conformes con el Yihad), limpiamiento étnico esporádico (genocidio), uso de la Sharia como un arma y Jizya, el impuesto de colocar en infieles, tales como en:  Albania--Musulmanes 70%,Malasia--Musulmanes 60,4%,Qatar--Musulmanes 77,5%,Sudán - Musulmanes 70%

Después de 80%, esperan intimidación diaria y Yihad violenta, una limpieza étnica de estatal e incluso un genocidio, como el intento de expulsar de las Naciones Unidas a los infieles y avanzar hacia 100% musulmán, como ha sido experimentado y está en curso: Bangladesh--Musulmanes 83%,Egipto--Musulmanes 90%,Gaza - Musulmana 98,7%,Indonesia--Musulmana 86.1%,Irán--Musulmán 98%,Irak - Musulmanes 97%,Jordan--Musulmán 92%,Marruecos--Musulmanes 98,7%,Pakistán - Musulmán 97%,Palestina--Musulmanes 99%,Siria--Musulmanes 90%,Tayikistán - Musulmanes 90%,Turquía--Musulmán 99.8%,Emiratos Árabes Unidos--Musulmán 96%

Ahora, ¿Cómo llegaron de porcentajes menores del 1% a los 98% y 99%?

pudieron hacerlo por la libertad de culto en los lugares democráticos.  Lo hicieron pasando como una religión para acabar con las religiones.

Una vez que adquieren el 100% iniciará en la paz de 'Dar-es-Salaam'--la casa islámica de la paz. Aquí se supone para ser la paz, porque todo el mundo es un musulmán y las madrazas son las únicas escuelas que el Corán es la palabra única, como en: Afganistán: Musulmanes 100%,Arabia Saudita--Musulmana 100%,Somalia - Musulmana 100%,Yemen--Musulmana 100%

No existe otra religión que pueda tener el 100% de los ciudadanos en esa denominación, ni país que trate de hacerlo.  Sólo se puede lograr bajo un régimen totalitario que nada tiene que ver con la espiritualidad de una religión.

 Por desgracia, seguimos oyendo que el Islam es una religión de paz, que los terroristas son unos cuantos militantes.  Pero el objetivo del Islam no es nunca lograr la paz, como en estos Estados donde el 100% son musulmanes,  la doctrina del Islam es intimidar y vomitar odio y satisfacen su sed de sangre matando a los de otra religión y los musulmanes menos radicales, para mantener el poder totalitario..

 "Antes yo tenía nueve años, había aprendido el canon básico de la vida árabe. Era yo contra mi hermano; Yo y mi hermano contra nuestro padre; mi familia contra mis primos y el clan; el clan contra la tribu; la tribu contra el mundo y todos nosotros contra el infiel. --León Uris, 'El Haj'

Es importante entender que en algunos países, con bastante por debajo de 100% de población musulmana, como Francia, las poblaciones musulmanas de minorías viven en guetos, dentro de los cuales son 100% musulmán, y dentro de que viven según la ley islámica. La policía nacional no entran ni siquiera estos guetos. No existen tribunales nacionales, ni escuelas, ni instalaciones religiosas no musulmanas. En tales situaciones, los musulmanes no integrar en la comunidad en general. Los niños asisten a madrazas. Ellos aprenden sólo el Corán. Para asociar incluso con un infiel es un crimen castigable con la muerte. Por lo tanto, en algunas áreas de ciertas naciones, imanes musulmanes y extremistas ejercen más poder del que indicaría el promedio nacional.

1,5 billones hoy los musulmanes constituyen el 22% de la población mundial. Pero sus tasas de natalidad son más altos que las tasas de natalidad de los cristianos, hindúes, budistas, judíos y todos los otros creyentes. Los musulmanes superarán el 50% de la población mundial a finales de este siglo. ¿Por qué no vemos una preocupación mayor sobre esto?

Watch: Fox News Expert Lets Slip Obama Birth Certificate Could Be A Fraud

"...we're stuck with the guy."

B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE —

During a recent speech, U.S. Marine Lt. Col. Bill Cowan responded to an audience member’s suggestion that Barack Obama is likely not a “legitimate American.”

The terrorism expert and frequent Fox News analyst couched his remarks in abstract rhetoric; however, he noted that the skeptic’s concerns could be based in reality.

“You may be right,” he said. “You may be absolutely right.”

Despite his apparent willingness to accept that Obama’s BIRTH CERTIFICATE might be a forgery, however, Cowan urged his audience to focus on more immediate goals in an effort to save the nation.

“Is he legitimate? We don’t know,” he said. “And we may not know for another 100 years. The problem is we are living in the real world.”

He explained that, as it stands, Obama “was sworn in to be our president; and even if tomorrow someone found a real legitimate BIRTH CERTIFICATE somewhere else that said he couldn’t be our president, the legal process to push that through and get him out would far exceed the rest of the time he has in office.”

In essence, Cowan lamented, “we’re stuck with the guy.”

He suggested that, at least for now, Americans should be more interested in making sure Obama’s replacement is a leader interested in steering the nation away from his disastrous policies.

“No matter what our complaints are about him, no matter what he does right or wrong – mostly wrong – he is not running for office again,” Cowan said. “So, at the end of the day, it doesn’t matter.”

It would be far more beneficial, he concluded, for conservatives to keep their eye on upcoming elections that truly can bring about positive change.

“We’re going to be electing someone else next time,” he said; “and if we’re not careful, it’s going to be Hillary Clinton and we’re going to be right where we are now.”

Looking forward to the 2016 election, Cowan was asked if he saw another candidate on the horizon with Ronald Reagan’s attributes.

“Even if there is a Reagan out there,” he said, “the Republican Party is so fractured and so self-serving in so many corners, that they’re going to fight it all the way.”

While he shied away from expressing favoritism for any potential candidate, he did offer one perceived benefit Mitt Romney would have should he decide to run again.

“Is he an ideal candidate? No,” Cowan said. “But he’s been thoroughly scrubbed by the media. They’ve taken their shots at that guy and he passed. We don’t know if anyone else at the moment will be able to do that.”Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/fox-new-contributor-bill-cowan-confirms-obamas-birth-certificate-fraud/#yktW2Htzv6ovt4Jt.99

Allen West Declares Obama An Islamist

Jorge A Villalon:

Former Florida Rep. Allen West declared President Obama an Islamist who is intentionally working against the security of the United States.

“The only plausible explanation for many actions taken by President Obama and his administration is that they are working counter to the security of the United States of America,” the former Florida congressman and retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel wrote in the post published Wednesday.

Among six example he gives to back up his point is Obama’s decision to release of five Taliban in exchange for Sgt. Bergdahl in May, providing weapons of support to the Egyptian government led by the Muslim Brotherhood, and negotiating with Hamas.

He also writes at length about Obama’s recent decision to lift a ban on Libyan’s attending U.S. flight schools and studying nuclear science, which had been in place since 1983.

“Can anyone explain what the strategy and objective is here in lifting this ban with a nation that is or should be on the terrorist watch list?” he asks. ”Sorry, but I can only explain this one way: Barack Hussein Obama is an Islamist in his foreign policy perspectives and supports their cause.”

“The pivot away from the Middle East seems to be nothing more than an opportunity to enable Islamists and their goals,” he continues. “Anyone supporting this Libyan ban being lifted is indeed an enemy of this state.”

¿En qué país del mundo hay más días de vacaciones?

Un sondeo internacional llevado a cabo por la web de viajes Hotels.com revela que el país que más días de vacaciones ofrece a sus trabajadores es Rusia, donde disfrutan de 28 días de descanso en el trabajo y 12 días de vacaciones públicas, lo que suma un total de 40 días no laborables. Le siguen Italia y Suecia, con 36 días de asueto. Brasil, Noruega, Francia y Finlandia tienen 35 días de vacaciones. Y en España y Dinamarca los trabajadores descansan 34 días al año.
A la cola en lo que a tiempo de vacaciones se refiere se encuentra México, donde los currantes solo cuentan con 13 días de fiesta. El segundo con menos días no laborables es Canadá, que ofrece a sus trabajadores 15 días de descanso al año.

Where ObamaCare Is Going…

Dr. Atlas is a physician and a senior fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution

In this article he explains something that is evident.  Socialist medicine as communism and socialism is a system that has failed wherever has been implanted.

Centralized government doesn’t work in any instance

I have a son that lived in countries with socialist medicine, Belgium and England, during my visits talking with his neighbors, I could see first-hand the evils of socialist medicine.  The system is increasingly in trouble around the world. 

But we have to listen to people in the street and the media that still tell us about the wonders of this evident failure.   .

And we have in the United States, Barack Obama, a failure as president that is an advocate of this failure. And we have a candidate to the presidency, Hillary Clinton, that tried unsuccessfully to establish Hillary care a  health care system even more socialist than ObamaCare, during her husband presidency.

The government single-payer model that liberals aspire to for the U.S. is increasingly in trouble around the world.

SCOTT W. ATLAS.

The liberal attraction to making government the sole source of health-care insurance has not abated even as the deficiencies in ObamaCare, a halfway move toward the single-payer model, have become increasingly evident. The question is whether growing signs of single-payer trouble overseas will be enough to discourage this country's flirtation with socialized medicine.

The Obama administration showed its hand long ago with the nomination of Tom Daschle, an advocate for Britain's socialized National Health Service, as secretary of Health and Human Services in 2009. (Mr. Daschle withdrew amid criticism for nonpayment of taxes.) The White House installed another outspoken NHS fan, Donald Berwick, as an interim appointee (2010-11) to run the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

This summer, the Commonwealth Fund—a private foundation focused on health care that is a favorite of progressive policy types—issued a report ranking the NHS as the best medical system among those in 11 of the world's most advanced nations, including Canada, France, Germany, Switzerland and Sweden. Coming in last: U.S. health care. 

Yet the Commonwealth rankings are contradicted by objective data about access and medical-care quality in peer-reviewed academic journals. For instance, Americans diagnosed with heart disease receive treatment with medications significantly more frequently than patients in Western Europe, according to Kenneth Thorpe in Health Affairs in 2007. In Lancet Oncology in that same year, Arduino Verdecchia published data demonstrating that American cancer patients have survival rates for all major cancers better than those in Western Europe and far better than in the U.K.

Similar examples concerning the deadliest and most significant diseases abound in medical journals. One may ask why the Commonwealth Fund's health-care rankings published in June don't reflect that reality. Theanswer lies in the report's methodology, which relied heavily on subjective surveys about "perceptions and experiences of patients and physicians."

Yet even as the single-payer system remains the ideal for many on the left, it's worth examining how Britain's NHS, established in 1948, is faring. The answer: badly. NHS England—a government body that receives about £100 billion a year from the Department of Health to run England's health-care system—reported this month that its hospital waiting lists soared to their highest point since 2006, with 3.2 million patients waiting for treatment after diagnosis. NHS England figures for July 2013 show that 508,555 people in London alone were waiting for operations or other treatments—the highest total for at least five years.

Even cancer patients have to wait: According to a June report by NHS England, more than 15% of patients referred by their general practitioner for "urgent" treatment after being diagnosed with suspected cancer waited more than 62 days—two full months—to begin their first definitive treatment.

In response the British government has enlisted private care for help, including most recently through the Health and Social Care Act 2012. In May last year, the Nuffield Trust, an independent research and policy institute, along with the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the U.K.'s leading independent microeconomic research institute, issued a report on NHS-funded private care. The report showed that over the past decade the NHS, desperate to reduce its ever-expanding rolls, has increasingly sent patients to private care. The share of NHS-funded hip and knee replacements by private doctors increased to 19% in 2011-12, from a negligible amount in 2003-04.

In 2006-07, according to the report, the NHS spent £5.6 billion on private care outside its system. This increased by 55% to £8.7 billion in 2011-12, including a 76% rise in spending on nonprimary care, going to £8.3 billion from £4.7 billion, despite significant reductions in spending on private care attributed to the financial crisis.

Britons who can afford to avoid the NHS are eager to do so. Even with a slight decrease due to the 2008 financial crisis and its aftermath, about six million British citizens buy private health insurance and about 250,000 choose to pay for private treatment out-of-pocket each year—though NHS insurance costs $3,500 annually for every British man, woman and child.

The socialized-medicine model is struggling elsewhere in Europe as well. Even in Sweden, often heralded as the paradigm of a successful welfare state, months-long wait times for treatment routinely available in the U.S. have been widely documented.

To fix the problem, the Swedish government has aggressively introduced private-market forces into health care to improve access, quality and choices. Municipal governments have increased spending on private-care contracts by 50% in the past decade, according to Näringslivets Ekonomifakta, part of the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise, a Swedish employers' association.

Swedish primary-care clinics and nursing facilities are increasingly run by the private sector or receive substantial public funding. Widespread private competition has also been introduced into pharmacies to tear down the previous government monopoly over all prescription and non-prescription drugs. Though Swedish economist Per Bylund calculates that the average Swedish family already pays nearly $20,000 annually in taxes toward health care, about 12% of working adults bought private insurance in 2013, a number that has increased by 67% in five years, according to the trade organization Insurance Sweden. Almost 600,000 Swedes now use private insurance, though they are "guaranteed" public health care.

The recent Veterans Affairs scandal, following the disastrous ObamaCare rollout, was a red flag about problems of nationalized health. Now concrete evidence is coming in from other countries that have tried it for decades. The reality is that the key goals for health-care reform—reducing spending, expanding access to affordable coverage, preserving personal choice and portability of coverage, promoting competition in insurance markets, and maintaining excellence in medicine—do not require government to directly provide insurance or health care.

Late Night Comic Shows He’s No Longer Afraid of Obama with Devastatingly Funny Bit

The President’s BEACH VACATION has taken jabs from pundits, news reporters, and now, Jimmy Fallon. “The Tonight Show” funnyman certainly didn’t disappoint on Tuesday when he laid on joke after joke at Obama’s expense.

“I think Obama understands people’s concerns. After spending the day at the beach, he said, ‘This has been fun, but I should really get back to the golf course because priorities are priorities.”

He compared the very different attitudes that Obama and Hillary Clinton have – his list of differences and similarities made it clear that one of them really wants the JOB, while the other one wants nothing to do with it.

This is what we call entertainment!

Home / A WORLDWIDE MARXIST REVOLUTION / Who is the Real Barack Hussein Obama?

WHO IS THE REAL BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA?

August 12, 2014 by Frank de Varona

President Barack Hussein Obama is the most secretive, enigmatic, and mysterious occupant of the White House. After more than five and a half years in office, we are still unsure as to where he was born, the validity of his birth certificate and SOCIAL SECURITY card, his religion, his medical history, his admission and scholastic records from various schools and universities, and how far are his ultimate plans for the radical transformation of our nation. Does he want to destroy the United States as a Superpower and allow China and Russia to enslave us? Does he want to establish in our beloved country a communist regime?

Obama´s mother’s passport RECORDS have mysteriously disappeared from the U.S. Department of State. These records would have provided valuable information as to where she was at the time of his birth.

We do know that Barack Obama has spent more than three million dollars with the best legal firms in the country to seal all his records. Why would a public figure do that? Does the president have many things to hide? Why does the mainstream media have so little curiosity? Why do investigative reporters give him again and again a free pass and COVER UP his many mistakes and impeachable scandals in office? Many established newspapers, magazines, and television networks acted as if they were part of his 2008 and 2012 campaigns and gave Obama undue advantage over his Republican presidential candidates.

The established media continues to this day to COVER UP, and therefore be complicit, in the many crimes committed by Barack Obama as president which include high treason, dereliction of duty, criminal negligence, obstruction of justice, and witness tampering. The exception to this practice is Fox News, conservative radio, the Wall Street Journal, and a few other newspapers. Unfortunately, under the Obama administration there are many “dark corners” that the liberal and pro-Obama established press, ihas failed catastrophically to investigate. The mainstream media has done a disservice to the American nation by giving so many free passes to President Barack Obama for all his violations of the Constitution, crimes and scandals of his administration.

The “Liar-in Chief” who lives in the White House

Glenn Beck did a 42-minute television program before the 2012 presidential election called “Exposing Obama’s FRAUDULENT History and Radicalized Beliefs.” Beck explained that Barack Obama’s life as told by him is pure fiction and a fairy tale. He also exposed his communist ideology and beliefs.

Fox News poll done in the middle of May 2014 has revealed that six in ten Americans believe that President Barack Obama lies to the nation on important matters some or most of the time. In 2013 a liberal organization selected Barack Obama for the award of “Lie of the Year” for his multiple promises that under ObamaCare the American people could keep their doctors and their INSURANCE PLAN and that every family would save $2,500.
The Fox News poll indicated that 37% think that Obama lies most the time, 24% say he lies some of the time, 20% of voters say that he lies only now and then, and 15% that he never lies. It is hard to believe that 15% of the nation can be so stupid. Where have they been for the past five and half years?

It is now obvious to the nation that the president of United States is a pathological liar. He has never told the truth about ObamaCare and the multiple scandals of his administration. Any one of these scandals committed by the president is sufficient for impeachment. The unprecedented and shameful scandals include the illegal and unconstitutional war of 2011 to overthrown Muammar Gaddafi in Libya, the Benghazi terrorists attack, the gunrunning operation of weapons from Libya to Turkey to Syria where most of the weapons fell into the hands of al-Qaida-linked terror groups, the Fast and Furious gunrunning of weapons to Mexican drug cartels, the Muslim Brotherhood infiltration in the Obama administration, the National Security Agency (NSA) spying on all Americans, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) hacking the computers of the Senate Intelligence Committee, the CIA director John Brennan, a convert to Islam, stating that his worldview is shaped by Islam, the spying of Associated Press journalists, and the IRS, EPA, Justice and Labor Departments persecution of political enemies, conservative, religious and Tea Party organizations.
Are you surprised that Obama is failing in every key domestic and foreign policy issue? Do you want a president who lies some or most of the time? Why is it that we cannot elect president that the people could respect? Is it because there was massive electoral FRAUD in 2008 and 2012 presidential elections?

During the presidential campaign of 2012, President Obama kept repeating that he had defeated al-Qaeda, when he was fully aware that al-Qaeda was stronger than ever in the Middle East and in Africa. The Republicans in Congress do not trust President Obama on any issue since they are aware of all of his empty promises and the fact that he seldom tells the truth.

During the 2008 presidential campaign, Senator Barack Obama ran as a moderate, centrist, unifier, and post-racial presidential candidate while hiding his extreme radical past and Marxist ideas. He presented himself in 2008 as a candidate who would transcend partisan politics. Senator Obama promised to unite us, balance the budget, and solve all of our problems here and abroad. Obama even said that the oceans will stop rising as a result of his election. All of these promises were lies.

Barack Obama promised to have an open and transparent administration. However, he has presided over the least transparent administration in history. Even the liberals in the pro-Obama media are now complaining of the abuses of the freedom of the press of the Obama administration.
Leonard Downie, former executive director of the liberal newspaper, The Washington Post, wrote a critical 30-page report entitled “the Obama Administration and the Press.” Downie, a professor of journalism at Arizona State University, pointed out that Obama did not follow through with his promise to have a transparent administration after severely criticizing the lack of transparency of the administration of George W. Bush.
Downie wrote the following: “In Washington the officials of the Obama administration each day are more fearful to talk to journalists. The war of the government against leaks and other efforts to control information are the most aggressive since the government of Richard Nixon.” He explained that government officials are being subjected to lie detectors while their emails and telephone calls are being spied upon. These actions have spread fear among government officials to speak to journalists even about routine matters. The government has implemented a program called “Insider Threat” by which government officials are being told to spy on anyone who speaks to the press. These are the actions that are typical of communist regime such as the ones in Cuba and Venezuela.

On May 14, 2014, the liberal newspaper which endorsed Obama twice for president, The Miami Herald, wrote an editorial entitled “Backsliding on Secrecy”, strongly criticizing the Obama administration’s lack of transparency and violations of privacy. The editorial is stated the following:
How s the Obama administration doing on the related issues of transparency and stopping privacy invasions? Answer: Poorly. The publication of No Place to Hide by Glenn Greenwald, whose reporting on Snowden disclosures earned him a Pulitzer Prize, are a timely reminder that, one year after the world learned about the Orwellian capabilities of the National Security Agency, there is still no law in place to protect Americans from the NSA’s reach. Meanwhile, the president is taking steps to tighten the lid on secrecy and making it harder for reporters covering intelligence agencies to perform their JOBS, a related issue: administration efforts to safeguard the privacy of individuals from businesses and institutions are far from ideal.” After criticizing the legislative efforts of President Obama as being too modest, the editorial asked the question why the president could not impose limits on his own under executive orders on the NSA.

The Miami Herald editorial further stated the following:

“Last month, James R. Clapper, Junior., Mr. Obama’s director of national intelligence, issued a directive barring officials at 17 agencies from speaking to journalists about unclassified, intelligence-related topics without permission. Repeat, unclassified. Violations will be treated like a breach in security. This from a president who promised the most transparent administration in history. Given all of this and Mr. Obama’s slow and incomplete response to the NSA disclosures, it suggests that he places little value on the privacy rights of Americans or on the right of the press to probe into the dark corners of the American government.”

James R. Clapper lied under oath at a congressional hearing by stating that the NSA does not spy on Americans. Later, he admitted that he told a lie, yet the Congress did not declare him in contempt, as it did with Attorney General Eric Holder. Routinely, the Obama administration violates the Constitution by denying Congress is right to oversight the federal branch. It routinely withhold documents requested by the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Continue Reading Next Pages: 1 2 3 4 … | Next → Single Page

Filed Under: A WORLDWIDE MARXIST REVOLUTION, A-Blog, Essentials, Featured Articles,Frank de Varona

Marzo Fernandez <marzofernandez@hotmail.com> Subject: FW: EL MUNDO SE ESTA ACABANDO?

LES CONFIESO DE TODO CORAZON, CADA QUE ABRO
EL LAPTOP, ESPERO ENCONTRARME CON LA TRAGICA
NOTICIA DE QUE INICIO LA 3ra GUERRA MUNDIAL.
EL "BOMBARDEO" DE NOTICIAS ES TOTAL, AUNQUE 
TODAVIA NO TENGO MUY CLARO, QUIENES SON LOS 
BUENOS, SI LOS CHIITAS O LOS ZUNIES.  ACLARO 
QUE LOS QUE NO ME GUSTAN SON LOS "KURDOS"
NO SE. PERO NO ME GUSTAN.
 
A VECES , ME CAMBIAN MUY RAPIDO, Y NO SE SI ESTOY
EN UKRANIA, O POR AFGHANISTAN, Y CON EL FAMOSO
CALIFATO, ESTOY TOTALMENTE PERDIDO, AHORA ME
HABLAN HASTA DE ESPANA.   ESTOY AL HABLAR CON MI 
AMIGO [QUE PARA MI ES EL UNICO QUE SABE] ELCORONEL
OCTAVIO PEREZ, PARA RECIBIR CLASES PARTICULARES
DE TODAS ESAS TRIBUS, QUE AL PARECER SE QUIEREN
QUEDAR CON TODO. POR SUERTE NADIE HA MENCIONADO

A CACIQUE HATUEY, NO PROBLEMS CON LOS CUBANOS/
 
SI COMO ESTA LA COSA, METEN EN EL RUEDO AL LOCO
DE KOREA DEL NORTE, QUE NOS VA A ENVIAR MISILES,
Y SI POR CASUALIDAD, ANUNCIAN QUE YA LOS IRANIES
TERMINARON LA ATOMICA Y QUE ESTAN APUNTADO
PARA ACA. SE SOLTO EL LOCO , Y ADEMAS ME SALTAN 
DE EGIPTO PARA SIRIA, SIN AVISAR,   Y AHORA LO QUE ME 
FALTABA, MI ESPOSA VIENDO NOVELAS DEL SULTAN ZULEIMAN
 EN EL IMPERIO OTOMANO
[ALGUIEN SABE MAS O MENOS POR DONDE ESTA ESO]'
 
ME ESTAN ANUNCIANDO, QUE HOY VA A HABLAR HILLARY
SOBRE AL MALIK.  DE CORAZON CREIA QUE ERA UN PELOTERO.
DECIA QUE TENDRA QUE VER HILLARY CON ESO.  AHI MISMO
ME SALTAN PARA LIBIA, QUE HILLARY ES CULPABLE DE 
NO SE QUE COSA. HOY COMPRO UN MAPA, PARA VER SI
PUEDO SEGUIR LA RIMA.  DE VERDAD PARECE UN NOVELON
QUE CUANDO UNO CREE QUE SE ESTA ACABANDO, EMPIEZAN
LAS NUEVAS VERSIONES, AMIGOS QUE AHORA SON ENEMIGOS,
ENEMIGOS QUE SON AMIGOS, QUE CLASE DE MARANA.
LO QUE SI ESTOY CONVENCIDO, ES QUE TODO EL MUNDO
SE HA PUESTO DE ACUERDO PARA  "JODER" A LOS AMERICANOS.
EN CONCRETO A MI, ME ESTAN TUMBADO TODA LA PLATA
QUE PAGO EN "TAX:
 
DESPUES DE LOS BOMBARDEROS  EN IRAK, COGEMOS UN AIRE
Y NOS VAMOS PARA  SIRIA.   EN EL INTERIN., PUTIN COMPRA
CEREALES DE BRASIL., PARA ENVIAR A KIEV.  Y LO ULTIMO
YA LO VIERON MADURO, ALIMENTANDO A GAZA, 
""""""Y DE TODO ESTO QUE PIENSA EL MUNDO."""""
 
 EUROPA MUY PEROCUPADA POR LO QUE ESTA PASANDO
EN EL MUNDO,  YA SE PREPARAN PARA LA GUERRA FRIA
QUE AHORA DICE QUE  ES    """"UNA GUERRA FRIA MUY 
CALIENTE"""
LISTOS PARA LA GUERRA TERMINO MEDIO

Jimmy Fallon Just Destroyed Obama’s Entire Presidency With This One Line…

Fallon’s joke hit hard and leave an uncomfortable truth for leftists.

JUSTIN KOSKI — 

Since taking over as the host of the Tonight Show, some have  wondered if the show would become a pro-Obama show because Jimmy Fallon seems to have a bit of a crush on the Obama family. How can we forget Fallon “slow jamming the news with the Preezy of the United Steezy”?

But Fallon can actually do what many late night hosts have done in the past: make fun of the president, regardless of his political party.

The President and his family have taken 31 trips since taking office and, according to the Daily Caller, have spent more than $44 million dollars of taxpayer MONEY on said vacations.

Obama seems to be taking vacations from vacations. His golfing and fundraising must be daunting. According to tpnn, Obama has played 186 rounds of GOLF since taking office. It’s these kinds of numbers that make Jimmy Fallon’s joke hit hard and leave an uncomfortable truth for leftists. Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/jimmy-fallons-joke-obama-funny-wasnt-true/#HxvrjYZpDMh3yGpT.99

UNA NOTA INTERESANTE DE MI AMIGO GUSTAVO ROJAS… ALGO MUY BUENO PARA REFLEXIONAR .                                                           

Si pones un buitre en un cajón que mida 2 metros x 2 metros y que este completamente abierto por la parte superior, esta ave, a pesar de su habilidad para volar, será un prisionero absoluto. La razón es que el buitre siempre comienza un vuelo desde el suelo con una carrera de 3 a 4 metros . Sin espacio para correr, como es su hábito, ni siquiera intentará volar sino que quedará prisionero de por vida en una pequeña cárcel sin techo.. EL MURCIÉLAGO El murciélago ordinario que vuela por todos lados durante la noche es una criatura sumamente hábil en el aire, pero no puede elevarse desde un lugar a nivel del suelo. Si se lo coloca en el suelo en un lugar plano, todo lo que puede hacer es arrastrase indefenso y, sin duda dolorosamente, hasta que alcanza algún sitio ligeramente elevado del cual se pueda lanzar a si mismo hacia el aire. Entonces, inmediatamente despega para volar   LA ABEJA. La abeja al ser depositada en un recipiente abierto, permanecerá allí hasta que muera, a menos que sea sacada de allí. Nunca ve la posibilidad de escapar que existe por arriba de ella, sin embargo persiste tratando de encontrar alguna forma de escape por los laterales cercanos al fondo. Seguirá buscando una salida donde no existe ninguna, hasta que completamente se destruye a si misma.    LAS PERSONAS:      En muchas formas, somos como el buitre, el murciélago y la abeja obrera. Lidiamos con nuestros problemas y frustraciones, sin nunca darnos cuenta que todo lo que tenemos que hacer es ver hacia arriba. Esa es la respuesta, la ruta de escape y la solución a cualquier problema. Solo mira hacia arriba!!. LA TRISTEZA MIRA HACIA ATRÁS, LA PREOCUPACIÓN MIRA ALREDEDOR, LA DEPRESIÓN MIRA HACIA ABAJO,     PERO LA FE ..... LA FE SIEMPRE MIRA HACIA ARRIBA!!    Que Dios, Ése Ser Supremo te bendiga, te muestre su rostro, te sonría siempre y permita que triunfes en todo, y derrame sobre ti muchas Bendiciones de Vida, Paz, Y  Amor.   Y como dice la canción que grabé en el 1983...... OYE ABRE TUS OJOS, MIRA HACIA ARRIBA, DISFRUTA LAS COSAS BUENAS QUE TIENE LA VIDA.....

 “En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño

“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”