Thursday, May 15, 2014


No 661    “En mi opinión”    Mayo 15, 2014
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor

bENGHAZI

obama phantoms

.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

This Group Is Marching On Washington To Remove Obama From Office 5/16/14

Organizers are expecting as many as 30 million individuals to take part.


Freedom is the sure possession of those alone who have the courage to defend it…
“OPERACION AMERICAN SPRING”
WE THE PEOPLE ARE COMING:
WASHINGTON D.C. MAY 16, 2014
As Western Journalism previously reported, a protest planned for Friday is calling on like-minded patriots to unite in the nation’s capital to demand the ouster of a number of politicians.
Known as Operation American Spring, retired Army Col. Harry Riley explained that those involved will be “calling for the removal of Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, Nancy Pelosi, and Eric Holder as a start toward constitutional restoration.”
Reportedly fashioned in the same mold as rallies like Occupy Wall Street, organizers are expecting as many as 30 million individuals to take part.
As a response to last month’s standoff between supporters of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and federal Bureau of Land Management officers, the same group has also announced a simultaneous demonstration near the Bundy Ranch in Bunkerville.
Events planned by other groups in the past have failed to deliver the radical change sought, leading Riley to suggest a new approach is needed.
“For more than five years,” he said, “We the People have been writing, calling, faxing Congress, the media, screaming in town halls, marching, rallying, demonstrating, petitioning, all to no avail. Every branch of government looks at We the People, whom they have taken an oath to serve, as pests, interfering with their political agenda, cramping their self-serving, greedy agenda.”
He explained that the previous efforts have culminated in what he expects to be a major show of populist solidarity.
“Every political persuasion, rich, poor, every color, all ages, men, women , liberal, conservative, independent, unemployed, et al, are now mobilizing to participate in this peaceful, non-violent, cause in the search for constitutional restoration for America,” he concluded.
Of course, many involved expect some level of retaliation by the targets of their outrage. As OAS spokesperson Terry Trussell noted in a recent radio interview, he is concerned the Obama administration could launch a drone strike on protesters gathered in D.C.
Riley has reportedly already received death threats, resulting in an FBI complaint against a man calling for his execution on Facebook.


Read more at 
http://www.westernjournalism.com/millions-expected-coinciding-protests-d-c-bunkerville/#5LzZPLhjoiqdhG4f.99


Left Fears Obama Impeachment Is Near?

Western Journalism <wcj@westernjournalism.com>

"Mr. President, it's called an abrogation of duty. You have not taken your oath to honestly and faithfully execute the duties of your office. As commander in chief, you have NOT protected us. This dereliction of duty as Commander-in-ChiefDEMANDS YOUR IMPEACHMENT." -Judge Jeanine Pirro

       But Judge Jeanine Pirro is not alone, the list of pundits, Washington insiders, celebrities and elected officials who are calling for the impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama is growing with each passing day. 

       And make no mistake: You're driving this train. These further calls for Mr. Obama's impeachment originate with the buzz that average Americans, like you, are generating, 
but the job is not done. In the coming days, we need to send 100,000 Blast Faxes to the Republican Leaders and Tea Party Members in Congress to make the Impeachment of Barack Obama a reality... and only you can make that happen. 

And Judge Jeanine Is Not Alone.

      But Judge Jeanine Pirro is not the only political or media elite who has recently jumped on the impeachment train. 

       
 Andrew McCarthy, a former federal prosecutor and regular contributor toNational Review is about to publish a major book that makes the case for Barack Obama's impeachment. The Washington Times writes: "A new book written by a former top federal prosecutor — Andrew McCarthy — takes a look at all the scandals and secrecies that have plagued the Obama administration, dissects the facts and then sums: Impeachment is a valid notion." 

       
 Recently, twenty-two United States Senators penned a letter to Mr. Obama which said that his outrageous attempts to nullify our nation's laws threatens our"entire constitutional system." 

       
 And even the liberal blogosphere is sounding the alarm. Here's just one example. Several days ago, a major left-wing website, The Root, boldly ran the headline "Benghazi Panel: A Path to President Obama’s Impeachment?" 

       We've said it before and we'll say it again: The ONLY thing prohibiting Congress from REMOVING Barack Obama TODAY is THEIR delusion that YOU WON'T SUPPORT IT, and you are changing that dynamic with each passing day. 

       And truth be told, perhaps the greatest obstacle in the long quest to force Congress to impeach Barack Obama has been the unwillingness of political and media elites, like Pirro and McCarthy, to even mention the 
"I-word," ... and now, that is also changing, thanks to you. 

       But the work is far from done. We need another push. 
Will you make your voice heard and help us send 100,000 Blast Faxes to our Republican leaders and Members of the House and Senate who are bona-fide Tea Party Members? 

Even The Left Knows It... The Time To Impeach Barack Obama Is Finally Upon Us And It Is Now.

       We'll be the first to admit it, pushing our elected officials to impeach Barack Obama has been a long, hard fight. Until a few months ago, it was impossible to even get an elected official or a pundit to even mention the 
"I-Word." 

       But that's changing... it's changing big time, thanks to you: 

       When we ran a Google search on the term 
"Impeach Obama" Google returned over 4.6 million results and another Google search on the term "Benghazi Impeachment," returned over 7.1 million results from Google. 

       Everyone is talking about impeachment and by the way, in addition to the headline from The Root quoted in the section above, here are just a few of the headlines that also popped up. Some even come from far-left websites: 
 
 "John Boehner Joins The Impeachment Crowd By Claiming Obama is Lying About Benghazi..." -PoliticsUSA
 "Impeach-Obama Calls Grow After Latest Benghazi Revelations" -The New American
 "Benghazi Committee A Prelude To Impeachment?" -Outside The Beltway
 "Is A Drive To Impeach Barack Obama On Its Way?" -Washington Post
      And since we're talking about Benghazi, don't be fooled by media spin or talking points. Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats are running from the recently formed Benghazi House Select Committee as if it were the Black Death because they know, full well, that the formation of this committee could jump-start the movement to impeach Barack Obama. 

       Still don't believe the left is scared? Consider the fact that over the past several months, the DNC has sent out several major appeals urging Democratic donors to help them place a Democrat majority in the House of Representatives to PREVENT BARACK OBAMA'S IMPEACHMENT. 

       Make no mistake. Republicans are finally starting to talk about impeachment. Conservative-establishment pundits and media elites are finally starting to talk about impeachment. And the far-left is finally starting to fear impeachment. 

       And the credit goes to you... 
but only you can make impeachment inevitable... only you can make it happen sooner, rather than later... and only you can make it happen now. 
Floyd Brown

 

JORGE AGUIAR <jaguiar13@aol.com>: THE OUT OF CONTROL POWER OF CORRUPT AND/OR INEPT/INEFFICIENT GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND EMPLOYEES



Agencies that are not accountable and punishment to no one.  Government agencies employees that cannot be fired regardless of what they do.Automatic pay raises and benefits regardless of performance . WHY THERE IS NOT A CLEAN STRAIGHT FOWARD PROCEDURE TO FIRE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES EMPLOYEES ?

I cannot believe that any Democrat or Republican would agree to have this government agencies and employees with the enormous over the law privileges they now have. At least federal judges appointed for life can be removed by an act of congress. Why should the country  be held hostage to government employees regardless of the quality of work or even outrageous actions and nothing happens to this people. I think that this administration has abolish accountability and is now in the DNA of the country. 

This is the era where “greatness and exceptionalism ended”. 

Jorge Aguiar
Doral, Florida

Report: IRS Made Up to $15.6 Billion in Faulty EITC Payments in 2013

by Jason Bramwell on May 13 2014printer friendly
The IRS made little progress in reducing improper Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) payments last year, doling out an estimated $13.3 billion to $15.6 billion in error, according to a new report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA).
The IRS estimated that 22 to 26 percent of all EITC payments were issued improperly in fiscal year 2013


AMENPER: Sobre la Salud Mental
Yo nunca estuve de acuerdo con Karl Rove de que Hillary Clinton tenía un daño cerebral causado por una caída que la tuvo hospitalizada, y que tiene una condición que la hace presentarse como desorientada e incapaz de tomar una decisión.
Esto no tiene lógica, si fuera así ...¿como vamos a justificar la conducta de Hillary antes de la caída?, además que me dices de Kerry, Al Gore  y Obama, que no han sufrido ninguna caída.
Lo siento Karl, pero creo que estás equivocado, tienes que buscar otro razonamiento para la manera de actuar de esta gente. 
Algunas enfermedades mentales se han relacionado con un balance anormal de productos químicos especiales en el cerebro llamadas neurotransmisores. Los neurotransmisores ayudan a las células nerviosas en el cerebro se comunican entre sí. Si estos productos químicos están fuera de balance por motivos de drogas estupefacientes, los mensajes no pueden hacerlo a través del cerebro correctamente, dando lugar a los síntomas de la enfermedad mental.  A largo plazo el abuso de sustancias, en particular, se ha relacionado con la ansiedad, la depresión y la paranoia.
 Todos estos individuos han declarado públicamente que han usado drogas en su juventud, durante las bacanales de los sesenta.
También, una pérdida importante temprana, tales como la pérdida de un padre o una madre promiscua (Puta) que lo haga sentirse perturbado, y pueden desencadenar la  enfermedad en una persona que es susceptible a la enfermedad mental.
Tengo que estar de acuerdo con los miembros del partido demócrata que han dicho que Karl Rove cometió un error al decir que la causa de la perturbación mental de Hillary fue por la caída que la tuvo hospitalizada recientemente.

AMENPER: CAL THOMAS: Pope Francis has it wrong on redistribution of wealth

I have great respect for the humility displayed by Pope Francis, but in his latest call for the “legitimate” redistribution of wealth, he has it backward. Instead of taking more money from those who have earned it, he should advocate for creating new wealth.
If the money I have earned, saved, invested and spent responsibly to care for myself and my family is confiscated by the state (and goodness knows the state already takes a lot of it), who is going to care for us should I retire or become incapacitated? I can’t live on Social Security alone. What will happen to the charities to which I now contribute? Will the government give them an equivalent amount? Where will that money come from?
Time magazine reports that, according to the best guess of bankers, Vatican wealth is between $10 and $15 billion. If Pope Francis is serious about redistribution, he should lead by example and sell all Vatican property, including its valuable artwork, empty its bank and give the money to the Italian government, or to the United Nations.
Charity and philanthropy are better than wealth redistribution because they create a bond between the giver and the receiver, unlike an anonymous government check. These donations also establish an expectation that the receiver has a moral responsibility to use the money or services wisely and be accountable to the giver.
What happens when the giver runs out of money? Will the receiver invest the money he has already been given to build wealth for himself, or will he squander it and eventually end up back where he started? And if the previously poor receiver becomes wealthy, should he then be expected to give his money to the state and resume his previous condition of poverty?
Redistribution, or whatever name you give the practice, is socialism. Socialism often leads to mutually shared poverty.
Poverty has many causes, but there are mainly four: 1) a dictatorial governmental system that thwarts individual initiative and liberty; 2) a religious system that oppresses people, especially women, in the name of an angry deity who is ready to pounce on anyone having pleasurable experiences; 3) the wrong economic system, which stifles growth and discourages risk-taking; 4) Wrong lifestyle choices when it comes to education, sex, marriage and crime.
The United States has tried redistribution in Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal and Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty. It doesn’t work. In fact, according to a 2014 report by the Council of Economic Advisers, the percentage of the population in poverty declined just 16 percent between 1967 and 2012 and, in 2012, “there were 49.7 million Americans grappling with the economic and social hardships of living below the poverty line, including 13.4 million children.”
Redistributing America’s poor children from their failing public schools to better ones would improve their long-term prospects, but liberal politicians won’t let them escape for fear of losing political contributions from teachers’ unions.
George Gilder, author of the best seller “Wealth and Poverty,” has observed: “As Marxist despots and tribal socialists from Cuba to Greece have discovered to their huge disappointment, governments can neither create wealth nor effectively redistribute it, they can only expropriate it and watch it dissipate. Under capitalism, wealth is less a stock of goods than a flow of ideas and information, the defining characteristic of which is surprise.”
In a speech to the heads of major UN agencies meeting in Rome last week, Pope Francis also said about wealth distribution: “Specifically, this involves challenging all forms of injustices and resisting the economy of exclusion, the throwaway culture and the culture of death which nowadays sadly risk becoming passively accepted.”
He’s right about that, but removing barriers to the creation of wealth is a better path to elevating the poor than penalizing the wealthy through asset confiscation.
Email nationally syndicated columnist Cal Thomas attmseditors@tribune.com.


Crazy New Obama Tax

You may have heard about a new currency law coming to America.

On July 1st of this year, 
Title V of the Obama Administration’s HR Bill #2847, known as FATCA, goes into effect.

And after collectively spending more than 100 hours reading the actual legislation and its associated news coverage, we found 4 concerns we think you need to be aware of… 

1. Most people mistakenly think they’re not affected by FATCA. If you are a U.S. citizen… or if you hold any of your money in U.S. dollars, this new law definitely affects you.

2. The more you trade and invest, the more likely you are to get hit hard by this new bill.

3. It is not difficult for an American tax payer to be labeled “recalcitrant” as part of this new law. And as soon as you are…you potentially become subject to a 30% tax.  

4. The implementation of FATCA has been delayed several times, but now the IRS says it will not be delayed anymore. It will go into full effect on July 1st of this year.

In fact, on April 2nd of this year, the new IRS commissioner said, “Whatever else we are going to do, we are going to implement the non-discretionary legislative mandates we have been given: the Affordable Care Act and FATCA”

We think every American needs to learn about this law, which is set to go into effect in fewer than 
70 days.

Get the facts, and learn how to protect yourself.

To help, Stansberry Research put together a slide show presentation on their website, which you can access free of charge.

Click here to learn more about this new law.

Sincerely, 

Joseph Farah


AMENPER: IMPUESTOS SIEMPRE ES EL PROBLEMA, NUNCA LA SOLUCIÓN 
Hace rato que la noticia de que Pfizer estaba en gestiones de compra de la compañía farmacéutica británica Astra Zeneca era conocida por los que de una manera u otra están relacionados con la industria.

Pero lo que no sabíamos era que esto se iba a convertir en una "cause célèbre" sobre la discusión de la libertad de mercado y las leyes antimonopolio existentes en UK y USA.

La ley antimonopolio no es una ley contra la libertad de mercado, al contrario se hizo para proteger la libertad de mercado, para evitar que una compañía grande pudiera controlar una industria y perjudicar controlando los precios a los competidores y usuarios.

Pero lo que está pasando es que los enemigos de la economía de mercado, hipócritamente están usando la ley para sus agendas.
En este caso de la compra de Astra Zeneca, los sindicatos británicos estás protestando para que el parlamento no permita la venta, porque dice que se perderán empleos.  Quizás se pierdan algunos empleos administrativos, pero el hecho de que Pfizer mantendrá las plantas de producción y de investigación y probablemente creará otras, aumentará los trabajos.  Pero es que estos sindicalistas lo que quieren es protagonismo para ganar preponderancia en las elecciones con los tontos que lo siguen.

Los otros protestones están aquí en los Estados Unidos, son los que están diciendo que Pfizer escogerá pagar los impuestos corporativos por Inglaterra porque son menores que los de los Estados Unidos.  Bueno, que buen comerciante no haría esto.  Lo que sucede en este caso es una vitrina del problema de la fuga de corporaciones de los Estados Unidos.   Lo que no entienden estos socialistas es que los empresarios tienen sus empresas para ganar dinero, y eso no es nada perverso.  Mientras los Estados Unidos mantengan aumentando los impuestos corporativos, las industrias seguirán emigrando, y los empleos se irán con ellos.
El problema no son los empresarios que emigran y que son los que reciben la culpa, los culpables son estos políticos liberales que no duermen pensando que impuesto van a subir.
Me alegro que esto se haya filtrado de la industria farmacéutica al foro político, porque ahora todo el mundo está hablando de esto, y quizás ahora puedan comprender mejor de que se trata la desgracia de los impuestos corporativo.

Y nadie mejor para explicarlo que Bat Buchanan, que nos dice en el escrito que les envio abajo, de que se trata este problema. Quizás la frase más importante es la que dice que "Si en los Estados Unidos se abolieras el impuesto corporativo, no existiría una empresa que pensara en irse para el extranjero" a todo el mundo le gusta hacer negocios en los Estados Unidos, pero a nadie le gusta que los políticos le roben su dinero.
Abolish the corporate income tax
By Pat Buchanan

Published: Tuesday, May 13, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
Updated 16 hours ago
News that Pfizer, the world's largest pharmaceutical company, plans to buy Britain's AstraZeneca for $106 billion, renounce its U.S. citizenship and declare itself a British company has jolted Congress. Pfizer is being denounced as disloyal to the land of its birth, and politicians are devising ways to stop Pfizer from departing.
Yet Pfizer is not alone. Hedge fund managers are urging giant corporations such as Walgreens to go nation-shopping for new residences abroad to evade the 35 percent U.S. corporate income tax.
At issue is not why companies are fleeing the U.S. but why our politicians continue to drive them out of the country.
If, as a nation, we are committed to “creating jobs,” does it make sense to impose the highest corporate tax rate in the West on our biggest and best job creators?
For years, Rep. Jack Kemp urged the creation of enterprise zones in poor communities like Benton Harbor, Mich., and Harlan County, Ky. Businesses that relocated there would be exempt from corporate income taxes.
Why not make the United States the largest enterprise zone on Earth — by abolishing the corporate income tax?
If the corporate income tax were repealed, no U.S. company would think of moving abroad, and every transnational company would think about moving to the U.S.
Every U.S. company, liberated from its corporate tax burden, would see its profits soar and have more cash on hand for cutting prices and raising wages. And every company that relocated here would create new U.S. jobs.
Many politicians seem to think the corporate tax punishes the rich and powerful and is an indispensable weapon in reducing inequality and redistributing wealth. This is neosocialist myth.
As Ronald Reagan used to say, corporations don't pay taxes — people do.
The billions in corporate income taxes paid by Wal-Mart and McDonald's come out of the dollars spent by consumers who shop at Wal-Mart and eat at McDonald's. Middle America pays the corporate income tax.
How could we make up for the lost revenue to government? Simple. The corporate income tax last year produced $273 billion, less than a 10th of federal revenue. Imports, which kill U.S. jobs and subtract from GDP, totaled $2.7 trillion last year.
Put a 10 percent tariff on imports, and the abolition of the U.S. corporate income tax becomes a revenue-neutral proposal.
Consider what our political class has done to our once self-sufficient American republic. We impose on businesses, our principal job creators, the most punitive corporate tax rate in the West. Through “free trade,” we tell U.S. companies that if they wish to avoid our taxes and get around our minimum wage, health, safety and environmental laws, they can move to China, produce there and bring their products back free of charge — and kill their competitors too patriotic to leave America.
“The Decline and Fall of the United States of America” is going to be a piece of cake for future historians to write.
Pat Buchanan is the author of “Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?”

SAMITIER: Lo que LA PRENSA Controlada por los HOMOSEXUALES no DICE…

Turn off for: Spanish
En 1916… El Káiser Alemán Venció Al Ejército Ruso… Entonces GANARON EL PODER Los Comunistas… Los Que Firmaron Un Acuerdo De Paz Con Alemania Aceptando La Crearon De Las Repúblicas Bálticas… Y De Ucrania… El Káiser ACABO CON EL IMPERIO RUSO… 
Un año Después… Con La Ayuda Norte Americana Fue Vencida Alemania…
Y Se Firmó El Tratado De Versalles… y Fue El presidente
Wilson De USA… Quien Incluyó En El Tratado…
Que Ucrania Tenía Que Dejar De Ser Una “Republica Libre”
Se Tenía Que Devolver Ucrania y Bielo Rusia A Lenin y
La Rusia Comunista… Pues Sin “El Granero De Ucrania”
No Podía Sobrevivir… El “Régimen Comunista…”
Ahora Estamos Sufriendo las Consecuencias De Los
Comunistas Norte Americanos Que Gobernaban Con La
Elección De Woodrow Wilson Que Hace 97 Años…
Financió La Creación Del Comunismo En Rusia… 
La Debacle Actual Comenzó… Después del ASESINATO MASIVO Por Hambre Que Hicieron Los Comunistas En Ucrania… Después Los Comunistas
RE-POBLARON Ucrania… CON RUSOS…  
Es CASI IMPOSIBLE  resolver en UN AÑO… La Situación… Creada Por Los Comunistas Norte Americanos… Que Desde Entonces CONTROLAN EL PARTIDO DEMÓCRATA y Gran Parte del Republicano…  

Obama MAS MENTIROSO QUE FIDEL CASTRO...

Se Acuerdan De Los Pronósticos De Fidel…
Obama Le Ha Ganado…
Dijo Que Puede Abastecer De Gas A Europa… Para Liberarla Del Gas Ruso
Lo Cual Es Totalmente IMPOSIBLE… Solamente los INCAUTOS pueden creerlo
Para leerlo todo:


The hypocrite leftists who would not give up their own oil energy consumption.

He probably drives a big limo which gush dozens of gallons of ...guess what ? You got it gas from oil refineries.He probably get on his  personal airplane, also never possible an electricity moved plane, not yet available...je,je..He must for sure consume food that is transported by trucks, trains,or even planes and ships...MOVED BY OIL  derivates like gasoline or bunker gasoil fuel...yet this hypocrite as all the rest of ecolos  is trying to stop what people need to survive to get a living ,to get jobs on the grounds of a claim that can not be substantiated neither is there an alternative solution RIGHT AT THIS VERY DAY to substitute oil by something that does not exist yet and is not ready for that substitution. Peter Martori.

Tom Steyer: The Leftist billionaire responsible for the Keystone XL pipeline delay

BY KATIE
The Obama administration announced on Friday that a final decision regarding the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline has once again been delayed. According to both the White House and Debbie Wasserman Schultz, there was no politics behind the decision to delay.
Actually, that couldn’t be further from the truth.
Many of you probably don’t know the name Tom Steyer. Steyer is a left-wing San Francisco billionaire former hedge fun manager, a radical environmentalist. He’s promised progressives $100 million for key congressional races this fall — so long as Obama doesn’t move forward with the Keystone pipeline:
Billionaire hedge fund operator and “green” energy magnate Tom Steyer has pledged $100 million in the 2014 election cycle to help Democratic candidates who oppose the Keystone pipeline and who favor “green” energy over fossil fuels. Steyer claims to be a man of principle who has no financial interest in the causes he supports, but acts only for the public good. That is a ridiculous claim: Steyer is the ultimate rent-seeker who depends on government connections to produce subsidies and mandates that make his “green” energy investments profitable. He also is, or was until recently, a major investor in Kinder Morgan, which is building a competitor to the Keystone pipeline. Go hereherehereherehere and here for more information about how Steyer uses his political donations and consequent connections to enhance his already vast fortune.
But Steyer’s hypocrisy goes still deeper. Today, he is a bitter opponent of fossil fuels, especially coal. That fits with his current economic interests: banning coal-fired power plants will boost the value of his solar projects. But it was not always thus. In fact, Steyer owes his fortune in large part to the fact that he has been one of the world’s largest financers of coal projects. Tom Steyer was for coal before he was against it.
Where does the Left get off demonizing the Koch brothers while Obama allows Steyer to control the fate of thousands of American jobs for his own deceitful, selfish, hypocritical purpose?
The hypocrisy of this administration is already clearly evident and well documented. Just at the Left wants to shame the Kochs, so should conservatives shame Steyer. Spread the word: It’s time to expose this lying progressive and return the government to true conservatives.

.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

This Group Is Marching On Washington To Remove Obama From Office

Organizers are expecting as many as 30 million individuals to take part.


Freedom is the sure possession of those alone who have the courage to defend it…
“OPERACION AMERICAN SPRING”
WE THE PEOPLE ARE COMING:
WASHINGTON D.C. MAY 16, 2014
As Western Journalism previously reported, a protest planned for Friday is calling on like-minded patriots to unite in the nation’s capital to demand the ouster of a number of politicians.
Known as Operation American Spring, retired Army Col. Harry Riley explained that those involved will be “calling for the removal of Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, Nancy Pelosi, and Eric Holder as a start toward constitutional restoration.”
Reportedly fashioned in the same mold as rallies like Occupy Wall Street, organizers are expecting as many as 30 million individuals to take part.
As a response to last month’s standoff between supporters of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and federal Bureau of Land Management officers, the same group has also announced a simultaneous demonstration near the Bundy Ranch in Bunkerville.
Events planned by other groups in the past have failed to deliver the radical change sought, leading Riley to suggest a new approach is needed.
“For more than five years,” he said, “We the People have been writing, calling, faxing Congress, the media, screaming in town halls, marching, rallying, demonstrating, petitioning, all to no avail. Every branch of government looks at We the People, whom they have taken an oath to serve, as pests, interfering with their political agenda, cramping their self-serving, greedy agenda.”
He explained that the previous efforts have culminated in what he expects to be a major show of populist solidarity.
“Every political persuasion, rich, poor, every color, all ages, men, women , liberal, conservative, independent, unemployed, et al, are now mobilizing to participate in this peaceful, non-violent, cause in the search for constitutional restoration for America,” he concluded.
Of course, many involved expect some level of retaliation by the targets of their outrage. As OAS spokesperson Terry Trussell noted in a recent radio interview, he is concerned the Obama administration could launch a drone strike on protesters gathered in D.C.
Riley has reportedly already received death threats, resulting in an FBI complaint against a man calling for his execution on Facebook.
Read more at 
http://www.westernjournalism.com/millions-expected-coinciding-protests-d-c-bunkerville/#5LzZPLhjoiqdhG4f.99

.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

obama phantoms 

bENGHAZI

“THE  FREEDOM  IS  NOT  FREE”


<IN  GOD  WE  TRUST>

No comments:

Post a Comment