“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor
Lazaro R Gonzalez Mino: A la "primera dama" de los USA, la ignoraron o la eliminaron descarnadamente... No la dejaron entrar en la foto. Con el feo que se manda y el mal caracter que tiene quien la va a querer al lado en una foto con la primer ministro de Dinamarca y el primer ministro de Gran Bretana. Solaballa, pa'ya pa'ya!!! Pa feo con "La mula del Juan el carbonero de mi pueblo"... Miren a ver si tengo razon? http://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2013/12/10/foto-selfie-de-obama-con-primeros-ministros-de-dinamarca-y-gran-bretana-se-vuelve-viral/
Amenper: El Regalo sugerido por obama para las navidades.
WASHINGTON, 08 De diciembre de 2013 — Organizando América (OFA), el brazo activista de la administración de Obama, está dando a sus miembros puntos y estrategias para lanzar Obamacare a sus familias en estas pascuas.
Ese es justo el tema que la gente debe de hablar en la mesa durante la cena de Navidad.
El sitio web de OFA enumera una serie de pasos que recomienda a su familia: presenta una lista del plan de la charla durante la comidas, consejos de conversación; deben de comprometerse a tener una charla progresista. "Tenemos que prometernos tener una conversación con nuestra familia acerca de los seguros de salud durante estas Navidades".
Esto es seguido por una sesión en el internet para entrar tu nombre, dirección de correo electrónico y la "voluntad" de cumplir con los consejos, y apretar el botón para cerrar el trato.
El sitio web ofrece cuatro pasos para ayudar a este regalo: un correo electrónico a un ser querido; que incluye unl "certificado del regalo" del Obamacare que puede imprimir para redimirlo en su clínica de planificación de familia favorito".
Deben también tener una conversación sobre cuidado de la salud; y ayudar a su ser querido para inscribirse..
No especifican que es lo que está incluido en el Certificado de Regalo, pero nos imaginamos que incluye regalos de servicios de salud de la Eutanasia, aborto y anticonceptivos.
Estamos incluyendo uno de los certificados del Obamacare para que puedan regalárselo a sus seres queridos.
A sus hijas para que tengan servicios rápidos de abortos y la disponibilidad de los diferentes anticonceptivos.
Además pueden darles a sus padres y abuelos, el compasivo regalo de la Eutanasia.
SAMITIER: TODAS ESTAS SILLAS COJEAN DE LA MISMA PATA.
Como en las “Crónicas De La Nobleza” Los Obamas, los Bushes,
los Clintons... TODOS JUNTOS POR 16 HORAS EN EL AVIÓN...
Si no trabajaran para la misma empresa... no viajarían juntos...
Es un ejemplo más de que todos tienen la obligación de dejar
Atrás sus diferencias por el bien del “GOBIERNO MUNDIAL”.
Más De 100 “LIDERES” Se Reunieron Para
Rendir Honores A Mandela… Pero Todos
Son Favorables Al “Gobierno Mundial”
Si analizamos los 15 Puntos “EXIGIDOS” por el Presidente Wilson para la paz
en la Primera Guerra Mundial... 1917 y los “EXIGIDOS” por Roosevelt en Yalta en
1945 para la paz en la Segunda Guerra Mundial... mas Todos Los ACUERDOS DE
PAZ que se han firmado durante los últimos 60 años...
Mas LAS DECLARACIONES de los “LIDERES” cada vez que han firmado un ACUERDO...
Nadie puede NEGAR que TODOS DICEN LO MISMO... Quizás el que más CLARO HABLO... fue el viejo BUSH... quien al finalizar la Guerra del Golfo dijo y espero que todos lo RECUERDEN... “Entramos en un “NUEVO ORDEN MUNDIAL” le falto decir con
“UN GOBIERNO MUNDIAL”
Por cierto... EL ULTIMO VEJAMEN que le hicieron al “Viejo Bush” los verdaderos y secretos directores de la conspiración para la DESTRUCCIÓN MORAL DE USA... que es NECESARIA para el establecimiento del GOBIERNO MUNDIAL... fue ordenarle que fueraTESTIGO de una BODA HOMOSEXUAL...
LRGM: OTRAS DOS PATAS PA'UNA MESA... DE TODOS MODOS COJEA... Y POSIBLEMETE TIENE HASTA COMEJEN... QUE CLASE DE "M" mayuscula. http://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2013/12/10/barack-obama-y-raul-castro-estrechan-las-manos-en-el-homenaje-a-mandela/
Samitier: Los Suizos Tambien estan cansados
Excelente discurso de un miembro del parlamento sobre los PLANES DE DESTRUCCIÓN de occidente de los musulmanes...
SUBTÍTULOS EN INGLES, ESTA MUY BUENA ESTA INTERVENCIÓN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCW2hxux3Ro, in German and English
Swiss Member of Parliament Has Had Enough
Samitier: La burla continua...
OBAMA y LOS CLINTON se burlan de todos... Gracias a la prensa...
Questions asked of the Press-- Long overdue
http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=A1jeJmeeMjs
Samitier: Fíjense Que Las Conclusiones De Los Socialistas
Es Totalmente Diferente A La De Conservadores
A Tale of Two Cities
Chicago, IL Houston, TX
Population 2.7 million 2.15 million
Median HH Income $38,600 $37,000
% African-American 38.9% 24%
% Hispanic 29.9% 44%
% Asian 5.5% 6%
% Non-Hispanic White 28.7% 26%
Pretty similar until you compare the following:
Chicago, IL Houston, TX
Concealed Carry gun law no yes
# of Gun Stores 0 184 - Dedicated gun stores plus 1500 - legal places to buy guns- Walmart, K-mart, sporting goods, etc.
Homicides, 2012 1,806 207
Homicides per 100K 38.4 9.6
Avg. January high temperature (F) 31 63
Liberal conclusion: Cold weather causes murder.
Amenper: Libre Mercado
Para los que hemos vivido por la mayor parte de nuestra vida en la economía de mercado y hemos utilizado sus sistema en nuestra vida diaria, nos sentimos confundidos con las filosofías socialistas que se están utilizando por esta administración que cambian nuestro estilo de vida.
Adam Smith en su libro “La riqueza de las Naciones” nos repite hasta cansarnos, lo que representa la libertad de comercio.
“En los mercados libres, Smith argumentó, la gente se mueven casi mágicamente a los resultados más eficientes por las fuerzas del egoísmo individual y la competencia.
Los panaderos no suministran el pan con el interés básico de alimentar a los hambrientos, lo hacen para obtener ganancias para él mismo.
Sin embargo, trabajan en la sociedad con una labor que ayuda a alimentar a los hambrientos.
En el proceso además, otros panaderos intentarán obtener ganancias por la venta de pan a los mismos consumidores.
Para ganar clientes, para vender su pan, tratarán de hacer el mejor pan o vender más barato el mismo pan o dar un servicio mejor cuando vendan el pan.
Todo esto es bueno para el consumidor y la sociedad que como un conjunto se beneficia de esta competencia.”
Las ideas de Smith eran ampliamente influyentes y se consideró extensamente como el padre de la economía moderna y el capitalismo.
Smith y quienes le siguieron se han referido a este concepto como la "mano invisible".
Si leemos a Adam Smith, podemos ver como aplicamos en nuestra vida diaria sus principios.
En mi casa mi señora siempre está buscando los especiales, y recibiendo los beneficios de la “mano invisible”, en el precio.
Compra en el supermercado que más barato vende el producto recorta cupones y visita varios supermercados según el precio que ofrece..
Cuando yo tengo que comprar algo voy al 7 Eleven, me cuesta más caro, pero no tengo que esperar en cola en la caja ni tengo que buscar el mejor precio, lo que me interesa es el servicio rápido.
El 7 Eleven también utiliza la “mano invisible” pero no por precio pero por servicio y en el mercado libre todos tenemos la libertad de escoger.
En los países socialistas sólo tienen las tiendas del estado, todas iguales y los precios son los mismos, no hay especiales ni rebajas.
Además una vez que un país se socializa los productos desaparecen, esto se debe a que desaparece el estímulo por el egoismo individual para producier. Adquirir los bienes de consumo entonces no depende del precio, lo que importa es poder encontrar los productos.
Milton Friedman solía decir que si se pusiera al frente del desierto del Sahara a un gobierno socialista, al cabo de pocos años no habría arenas, habría que importarla.
Este es el fracaso del Obamacare, la idea socialista del Obamacare es que haya un solo proveedor, con los planes establecidos por este proveedor, no tendremos que escoger, nuestro papá gobierno escoge por nosotros, no hay especiales ni rebajas sólo el precio y el servicio que nos ofrece el proveedor único.
Nos lo vendieron como libre mercado (si le gusta su seguro puede quedarse con su seguro, si le gusta su médico puede quedarse con su médico). Pero hemos visto que no es así.
La alternativa que se ha propuesto hasta la saciedad es darle la libertad a los aseguradores para que vendan interestatalmente en toda la nación, la libertad de comercio.
El asegurado tendrá para escoger entre miles de planes y miles de aseguradores que competirán entre ellos dando el mejor precio y el mejor servicio.
Todo estaría en las manos del asegurado, puede comprar en Publix, en Cosco o en el 7 Eleven..
Carlos Bringuier: Obama, presiona a República Dominicana con sus degenerados. https://blu172.mail.live.com/default.aspx?id=64855#n=231226276&fid=1&mid=e61a0a95-61d0-11e3-a7c5-001e0bcc4980&fv=1
James "Wally" Brewster y su "esposo" Bob Satawake
Captura de video - Embajada de EEUU en República Dominicana)SANTO DOMINGO, 04 Dic. 13 / 01:17 pm (ACI/EWTN Noticias).- La llegada del embajador gay de Estados Unidos, James Brewster, junto a su "esposo" Bob Satawake, ha despertado gran controversia en República Dominicana, un país donde la Constitución aprobada en 2010 reconoce como matrimonio solamente a la unión entre un hombre y una mujer.James Brewster y Bob Satawake han sido durante mucho tiempo activistas de los supuestos "derechos" que reclama la comunidad LGTB (lesbianas, gays, transexuales y bisexuales), entre ellos el del mal llamado "matrimonio" homosexual.Brewster se desempeñó incluso como co-presidente del Consejo de Liderazgo LGBT para el Comité Nacional Demócrata de Estados Unidos.En 2012, la pareja de activistas gays recaudó alrededor de 500 mil dólares para la campaña de reelección de Barack Obama como presidente de Estados Unidos, de acuerdo a CNN.Según declaró al llegar a suelo dominicano, Brewster "en mi nueva posición oficial, mi esposo Bob y yo buscaremos fortalecer aún más las relaciones que durante la pasada década hemos desarrollado aquí en la República Dominicana".Sin embargo, de acuerdo a un jurista consultado por ACI Prensa, el "matrimonio" gay de Brewster y Satawake no sería reconocido en el país al no estar avalado constitucionalmente, como tampoco sus muestras de afecto, aunque podrían estar protegidos por la inmunidad diplomática del embajador norteamericano.La Constitución de República Dominicana, un país en el que se estima que el 78 por ciento de su población es católica, en su artículo 55, inciso 3, señala que "el Estado promoverá y protegerá la organización de la familia sobre la base de la institución del matrimonio entre un hombre y una mujer".Para la constitución dominicana, dice, como debe ser, que "la familia es el fundamento de la sociedad y el espacio básico para el desarrollo integral de las personas", y está constituida "por vínculos naturales o jurídicos, por la decisión libre de un hombre y una mujer de contraer matrimonio o por la voluntad responsable de conformarla".
LRGM: Obama’s Speech at Mandela Memorial Will Cost Taxpayers $500,000 Per Minute. 10 December 2013
President Barack Obama’s expected 10-minute speech at Nelson Mandela’s memorial will cost taxpayers at least $500,000 per minute.
That’s not counting any cakes and coffee he and his inner circle consume aboard Air Force One during the 18,000-mile round trip to Johannesburg, via Dakar, in Senegal.
The 28-hour two-way flight will cost $5 million because the four-engined Boeing 747 costs roughly $180,000 an hour to operate, according to a May 2012 report by the Congressional Research Service.
Read more at http://minutemennews.com/2013/12/obamas-speech-mandela-memorial-will-cost-taxpayers-500000-per-minute/#DweIfT92DSjTjUcM.99
LRGM: Alert: Boehner Plotting Amnesty Betrayal. [?]
We'll cut to the chase. Credible conservative insiders are sounding the alarm and making a compelling case that Speaker of the House John Boehner is working behind the scenes to hand Amnesty to Barack Obama on a silver platter.
One goes so far as to clearly imply that once the filing deadlines have passed for potential conservative challengers to "primary" entrenched Republicans, Boehner will move full-speed-ahead with legislation to grant Amnesty to millions of illegal aliens.
But there's good news. Sunlight is still the great disinfectant and patriotic Americans like you can nip this plot in the bud. We can expose this secret plot to the light of day, but to make that happen, our self-proclaimed political leaders must hear from you right here and right now.
Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the Leadership of the Senate and the House of Representatives. Or alternatively, send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives.
Boehner Has Just Hired A "Professional Amnesty Advocate" To Spearhead Efforts To Pass Amnesty.
For months, conservatives let out collective sighs of relief because John Boehner had repeatedly stated, without equivocation, that the Senate's "Gang of Eight" Amnesty bill was dead on arrival in the House.
Back in November, The Hill reported: "For months, the Speaker has vowed that the House would neither take up the Senate Gang of Eight bill nor consider a similar 'comprehensive' piece of immigration legislation."
And Boehner even stated: "The idea that we're going to take up a 1,300-page bill that no one had ever read, which is what the Senate did, is not going to happen in the House. And frankly, I'll make clear we have no intention of ever going to conference on the Senate bill."
Then last week, Boehner shocked Washington insiders by hiring Rebecca Tallent - a woman who Mark Krikorian, head of the Center for Immigration Studies, called a"professional amnesty advocate" - to spearhead "immigration reform" efforts in the House of Representatives... And the radical left jumped for joy.
According to the Washington Times: "Immigrant rights [Amnesty] advocates cheered the move as a sign of Mr. Boehner's dedication to action."
But Tallent is more than just a "professional amnesty advocate." Tallent is one of the architects of the failed Kennedy-McCain Amnesty push that patriotic Americans like you stopped years ago.
Daniel Horowitz with RedState.com put it this way: "Let this seep in for a moment. The most important immigration policy staffer on the Republican side not only shares the views of the opposition, but actually leaders know, in no uncertain terms, that you are wise to this planned betrayal. Mark our words, when they know that you're wise to what they're planning to do... THEY WILL BACK DOWN.
Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the Leadership of the Senate and the House of Representatives. Or alternatively, send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives.
What A Tangled Web We Weave, When First We Practice To Deceive.
But hints of deception are not simply based on Boehner's decision to hire an"Amnesty-Top-Gun" to spearhead "immigration reform" efforts in the House of Representatives.
Consider the following report from Breitbart.com:
"A new report from the Texas-based Quorum Report, published by longtime Texas journalist Harvey Kronberg, says that House Speaker John Boehner plans to push amnesty legislation through the House, after the primary filing deadline for candidates. The move would prevent Tea Party from challenging GOP lawmakers who support amnesty in 2014."
"Scott Braddock [with the Quorum Report] reported on Tuesday that 'in recent weeks, various Texas business interests have told Quorum Report that Boehner has been telling them that he will start holding immigration votes not long after the filing deadline has passed.'
"Braddock noted that those business community sources spoke with him 'on condition of anonymity because their conversations were held behind closed doors and they added it wasn't made clear to them just how confidential the information was meant to be.'"
Erick Erickson with RedState.com chimed in: "Here's what is going to happen. Boehner will wait until 2014, after qualifying for all the serious challenges to incumbents is over. Then he'll get all these Republicans talking out of both sides of their mouths and the Democrats together for a bipartisan immigration reform push. The threat of primary challenges well passed, they'll get their amnesty deal done. ... Republicans are so convinced you will turn out and vote for them in 2014 to spite Obama, they are perfectly happy to screw you over in this fight knowing how cheap a date the conservative movement has become."
Can it be true? Was John Boehner planning to lock arms with Barack Obama on Amnesty all along to appease big dollar special interests? Did he only pretend to stall Amnesty to prevent pesky Tea Party candidates from challenging closeted pro-Amnesty Republican incumbents?
We'll let you, the reader, make your own conclusions. But one thing is certain: A behind-closed-doors betrayal is in the works and we're not about to let Boehner and Company pull the wool over your eyes. The fix may be in but the righteous outrage of patriotic Americans can stop it.
Ignacio Gonzalez: $600 Mil ObamaCare Website Co. Exec, Michelle Obama Pal, Visited White House. October 28, 2013
Before this the link between Toni Townes-Whitley and Michelle Obama was only casual. Toni Townes-Whitley had become a top executive at a company with a poor track record that began receiving huge contracts under Obama.
Was Toni Townes-Whitley still a good friend of Michelle Obama? Was her role in receiving all those government contracts only coincidental?
The Daily Caller has answered part of the question quite definitively.
Michelle Obama’s relationship with Princeton classmate Toni McCall Townes-Whitley, whose company earned the no-bid contract to design the disastrous Healthcare.Gov Obamacare website, has continued to socialize with the First Lady since the Obamas have been in the White House.
Townes-Whitley and her husband even enjoyed “Christmas with the Obamas” at the White House in December 2010, according to a Facebook album created by Townes-Whitley.
Although neither Michelle Obama nor Townes-Whitley has discussed their relationship, the Christmas event took place just seven months after Townes-Whitley joined CGI Federal as a senior vice president.
A 600 million dollar website that doesn’t work made by a company with a lousy track record and a top executive who’s a pal of the First Lady.
It’s the free market at work. I blame the private sector.
Top Exec at ObamaCare Website Co. was in Radical Black Groups with Michelle Obama
October 26, 2013 by Daniel Greenfield
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
I don’t know if this is a smoking gun necessarily since we have yet to establish whether they kept in contact after Princeton, but it does add a troubling dimension to the question of why a company with a bad track record suddenly began receiving huge contracts from Obama Inc.
Including a huge no bid contract for the ObamaCare Healthcare.gov website.
First Lady Michelle Obama’s Princeton classmate is a top executive at the company that earned the contract to build the failed Obamacare website.
Toni Townes-Whitley, Princeton class of ’85, is senior vice president at CGI Federal, which earned the no-bid contract to build the $678 million Obamacare enrollment website at Healthcare.gov. CGI Federal is the U.S. arm of a Canadian company.
Obama and Townes-Whitley both worked with the Third World Center and with the “Organization of Black Unity”.
Third World Center didn’t just refer to the Third World, as you might assume, but to radical minority activists in the United States who began referring to themselves that way. Princeton has since changed the name as an outdated relic of radicalism.
Michelle Obama’s radical activism at Princeton has been discussed in detail before.
Princeton, 1984.
Michelle Obama attends and promotes a “Black Solidarity” event for guest lecturer Manning Marable, who was, according to Cornel West, probably “the best known black Marxist in the country.” The event is the work of the Third World Center (TWC), a campus group whose board membership is exclusively reserved for minorities.
Michelle Obama was a board member at the Third World Center which means that it’s quite likely she knew Townes-Whitley. Townes-Whitley joined CGI Federal under Obama and some press releases make it clear that Townes-Whitley was involved in government contracts.
CGI Federal (NYSE: GIB) has won a position on a $900 million blanket purchase agreement with the U.S. Agency for International Development for information technology support.
The Fairfax, Va.-based IT and business process contractor said the potential five-year IT Forward BPA supports the agency’s IT reform efforts.
CGI has worked with the agency for more than a decade, said Toni Townes-Whitley, a senior vice president.
That’s a pretty huge contract, again for a company with a poor track record. And here’s an even bigger one.
The U.S. Department of Interior (DOI)/ Interior Business Center (IBC), Acquisition Services Directorate (AQD) has awarded CGI Federal Inc. (CGI), a wholly-owned U.S. operating subsidiary of CGI Group Inc. (NYSE:GIB)(TSX:GIB.A), a prime position on the indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (ID/IQ), multiple-award contract for Foundation Cloud Hosting Services. The ID/IQ, which supports the DOI Office of the Chief Information Officer (CIO), as well as other government customers including both civilian agencies and the Department of Defense has a total contract ceiling value of US $1 billion over nine years
CGI, the first large company Cloud Service Provider to receive FedRAMP provisional authorization to operate for a government specific community cloud, will support DOI-wide cloud hosting, data center consolidation and IT infrastructure tasks. CGI will deliver a range of services for storage, secure file transfers, virtual machines, database and web hosting, as well as development and test environment hosting.
“As a Federal cloud leader, CGI brings experience and innovation to the delivery of cloud-based services through this contract, enabling DOI and its bureaus to more effectively support their broad and important missions,” said Toni Townes-Whitley, Senior Vice-President for Civilian Agency programs at CGI.
It certainly seemed like Toni Townes-Whitley was front and center every time CGI Federal received strangely huge contracts from Obama Inc.
CGI Wins $1B Cloud Hosting Deal from US Gov’t
Multiple-award ID/IQ with total ceiling value of US $1B
FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA–(Marketwired – Aug. 6, 2013) – The U.S. Department of Interior (DOI)/ Interior Business Center (IBC), Acquisition Services Directorate (AQD) has awarded CGI Federal Inc. (CGI), a wholly-owned U.S. operating subsidiary of CGI Group Inc. (NYSE:GIB)(TSX:GIB.A), a prime position on the indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (ID/IQ), multiple-award contract for Foundation Cloud Hosting Services. The ID/IQ, which supports the DOI Office of the Chief Information Officer (CIO), as well as other government customers including both civilian agencies and the Department of Defense has a total contract ceiling value of US $1 billion over nine years, including option periods that extend through November 2022.
CGI, the first large company Cloud Service Provider to receive FedRAMP provisional authorization to operate for a government specific community cloud, will support DOI-wide cloud hosting, data center consolidation and IT infrastructure tasks. CGI will deliver a range of services for storage, secure file transfers, virtual machines, database and web hosting, as well as development and test environment hosting.
“As a Federal cloud leader, CGI brings experience and innovation to the delivery of cloud-based services through this contract, enabling DOI and its bureaus to more effectively support their broad and important missions,” said Toni Townes-Whitley, Senior Vice-President for Civilian Agency programs at CGI. “Now organizations within DOI have access to a very flexible contract vehicle to help them easily procure infrastructure solutions that will cost-effectively and securely meet emerging needs and new challenges for many years to come.”
Today CGI provides cloud services to a host of federal and state agencies under the General Services Administration (GSA) Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA), and was an awardee under GSA’s Email as a Service (EaaS) BPA (ceiling of US $2.5 billion) to provide email and records management services from the cloud. DOI will join a long list of federal agencies that have entrusted CGI to deliver services to support Cloud First and Data Center Consolidation initiatives, including the General Services Administration (GSA), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and the Department of Health and Human Services.
CGI partnered with leading technology and services firms including Accelera, Accellion, Acquia, Akamai, Carpathia, Chenega Government Consulting, Esri, G&B Solutions, IQ Business Group, LanTech, Microsoft, NJVC, Onix Networking, Phase One Consulting Group, Riverbed Technology, Salesforce.com, Technatomy, and Valley Automation, to offer DOI, its bureaus and offices access to innovative, comprehensive, and flexible cloud services to meet business needs throughout the ten-year ID/IQ period of performance.
About CGI Federal Inc.
CGI Federal Inc. is a wholly-owned U.S. operating subsidiary of CGI Group Inc., dedicated to partnering with federal agencies to provide solutions for defense, civilian, and intelligence missions. Founded in 1976, CGI Group Inc. is the fifth largest independent information technology and business process services firm in the world. Approximately 69,000 professionals serve thousands of global clients from offices and delivery centers across the Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific, leveraging a comprehensive portfolio of services including high-end business and IT consulting, systems integration, application development and maintenance, infrastructure management as well as a wide range of proprietary solutions. With annualized revenue in excess of C$10 billion and an order backlog exceeding C$18 billion, CGI shares are listed on the TSX (GIB.A) and the NYSE (GIB). Website:www.cgi.com.
Politics
CGI Federal executive spent ‘Christmas with the Obamas’
Patrick Howley
President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama greet and pose for pictures with guests at the Christmas Holiday Reception in the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Dec. 10, 2010. (Official White House Photo by Samantha Appleton, facebook.com/tonitwhitley)
Michelle Obama’s relationship with Princeton classmate Toni McCall Townes-Whitley, whose company earned the no-bid contract to design the disastrous Healthcare.Gov Obamacare website, continued after the Obamas moved into the White House.
Townes-Whitley and her husband even enjoyed “Christmas with the Obamas” at the White House in December 2010, according to a Facebook album created by Townes-Whitley.
Although neither Michelle Obama nor Townes-Whitley has discussed their relationship, the Christmas event took place just seven months after Townes-Whitley joined CGI Federal as a senior vice president.
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3933559" alt="President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama greet and pose for pictures with guests at the Christmas Holiday Reception in the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Dec. 10, 2010. (Official White House Photo by Samantha Appleton, facebook.com/tonitwhitley)" src="http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/toniwhitleyobamachristmas.jpg" width="400" height="320" />
Townes-Whitley, Princeton class of ’85, leads CGI Federal’s Civilian Agency Programs (CAP) Business Unit, which earned the no-bid contract to build the Obamacare enrollment website Healthcare.gov. CGI Federal is the U.S. arm of a Canadian company. (Related: Michelle Obama’s Princeton classmate is executive at company that built Obamacare website)
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3933565" alt="President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama greet and pose for pictures with guests at the Christmas Holiday Reception in the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Dec. 10, 2010. (Official White House Photo by Samantha Appleton, facebook.com/tonitwhitley)" src="http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/toniwhitleyobamachristmaswide.jpg" width="400" height="267" />
The Department of Health and Human Services reviewed only CGI’s bid for the Obamacare account. CGI was one of 16 companies qualified under the Bush administration to provide certain tech services to the federal government. A senior vice president for the company testified last week before The House Committee on Energy and Commerce that four companies submitted bids, but did not name those companies or explain why only CGI’s bid was considered.
Townes-Whitley, who went by her maiden name Toni McCall at the time, and her classmate Michelle Obama, née Michelle LaVaughn Robinson, are both members of the Association of Black Princeton Alumni, and worked together in two different radicalstudent groups on campus. (Related: Michelle Obama and CGI Federal executive belonged to student group at Princeton that hosted pro-terrorist speaker)
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/10/28/cgi-federal-executive-spent-christmas-with-the-obamas/#ixzz2n5uChiVK
US
Michelle Obama’s Princeton classmate is executive at company that built Obamacare website
4:57 PM 10/25/2013
Patrick Howley
First Lady Michelle Obama’s Princeton classmate is a top executive at the company that earned the contract to build the failed Obamacare website.
Toni Townes-Whitley, Princeton class of ’85, is senior vice president at CGI Federal, which earned the no-bid contract to build the $678 million Obamacare enrollment website at Healthcare.gov. CGI Federal is the U.S. arm of a Canadian company.
Townes-Whitley and her Princeton classmate Michelle Obama are both members of the Association of Black Princeton Alumni.
Toni Townes ’85 is a onetime policy analyst with the General Accounting Office and previously served in the Peace Corps in Gabon, West Africa. Her decision to return to work, as an African-American woman, after six years of raising kids was applauded by a Princeton alumni publication in 1998
George Schindler, the president for U.S. and Canada of the Canadian-based CGI Group, CGI Federal’s parent&&&&&&&&&&&&&& company, became an Obama 2012 campaign donor after his company gained the Obamacare website contract.
As reported by the Washington Examiner in early October, the Department of Health and Human Services reviewed only CGI’s bid for the Obamacare account. CGI was one of 16 companies qualified under the Bush administration to provide certain tech services to the federal government. A senior vice president for the company testified this week before The House Committee on Energy and Commerce that four companies submitted bids, but did not name those companies or explain why only CGI’s bid was considered.
On the government end, construction of the disastrous Healthcare.gov website was overseen by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), a division of longtime failed website-builder Kathleen Sebelius’ Department of Health and Human Services.
Update: The Daily Caller repeatedly contacted CGI Federal for comment. After publication of this article, the company responded that there would be “nothing coming out of CGI for the record or otherwise today.” The company did however insist that The Daily Caller include a reference to vice president Cheryl Campbell’s House testimony. This has been included as a courtesy to the company.
LRGM: TAXPAYERS LOSE $10.5 BILLION ON GENERAL MOTORS By: John Hayward
You know, this could have been a lot worse. So… up-twinkles, I guess. Only losing $10.5 billion on a payoff to special interests (in this case, labor unions) qualifies as a roaring success by current Washington standards. And, sadly, I don’t just mean Obama standards.
Fox Business brings us the happy news that the “G” in GM no longer stands for “Government”:
The Treasury Department on Monday announced that the government has sold its remaining shares of General Motors (GM) and that losses from the 2009 auto industry bailout total about $15 billion.
In a conference call, Treasury officials said the government has recovered about $39.9 billion of the $49.5 billion earmarked for GM under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) approved by Congress as the company teetered on the brink of bankruptcy nearly five years ago.
“With the final sale of GM stock, this important chapter in our nation’s history is now closed,” Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew said during the conference call.
In exchange for the bailout, the government received $2.1 billion in preferred GM stock and a 60.8% equity stake in the company, which led critics of the bailout to refer to GM as ‘Government Motors.’
Treasury has intermittently sold its shares of GM but always at a price below that which would have allowed the government to break even on the deal, which accounts for the nearly $10 billion in losses.
Potential losses to the taxpayers from an emergency dump of the stock have been up to three times as high over the past five years, so getting it down to a $10.5 billion loss is an “achievement” under the rules of Big Government, which of course bear no resemblance to the business or accounting rules that govern the industries Uncle Sam meddles in. Try to imagine the CEO of a company giving a triumphant speech about the rousing success of an “investment” that lost over ten billion dollars… and not even mentioning the loss.
Fox is one of the few news sources to prominently mention that the total damage from the auto industry bailout is more like $15 billion, but why quibble over a mere four and a half billion clams? That hardly qualifies as a rounding error on the titanic scale of government spending.
Why are taxpayers, many of whom will never own a GM automobile, supposed to be happy about spending $10.5 billion of their hard-earned money to prop up a failed business enterprise? It used to be common practice to equate GM with the city of Detroit, and suggest anyone opposed to a bailout for the company wanted the city and its people to suffer bankruptcy, but nobody talks that way any more.
When the survival of a single business entity is portrayed as a social imperative that requires the confiscation of funds from everyone in the country, we’re not talking about “capitalism” any more. We also find ourselves dabbling in the highly selective invocation of opportunity costs by politicians and government officials. Brian Doherty at Reason nails Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew for claiming “inaction could have cost the broader economy more than one million jobs, billions in lost personal savings, and significant reduced economic production.”
Responds Doherty, “What might have happened to that money, those resources, those skills, those people, if they had not been diverted by government action? No one knows, or will ever know, and the government would prefer you not think about it.”
That was the very first topic I ever wrote about professionally, and it remains a fascination of mine. Politicians refer to opportunity cost only in the context of the terrible things that will allegedly happen if they’re not allowed to spend money, or exercise regulatory control. But every action includes opportunity cost, on every scale from individual decision-making, to corporate investment, and most especially to billion-dollar government policies, which amass their financial resources through compulsive force.
Most of us understand that buying a new Xbox One costs hundreds of dollars that we could have used to pay off debt, make an investment, or buy something else that we would have put to different use; we make a (hopefully) rational decision that the enjoyment derived from the purchase is worth not just the money we spend, but the lost income, enjoyment, or financial advantage we would have gotten by using the money in other ways. If we decide not to work an hour of overtime, we understand that we’re sacrificing the money we would have earned.
Corporate planners, at least the successful ones, are even more mindful of opportunity costs when they make decisions. But politicians pretend those costs do not exist at all. They grow visibly angry when the topic is raised. They never want to discuss what free people would have done with the money seized by government, or how opportunity might have flourished in the absence of regulations. And they’re virtually incapable of understanding that even the collapse of a politically favored operation like General Motors, painful thought it might have been, would have created real opportunities with positive value. We are strictly forbidden to contemplate what might have been, or question the ethical propriety of using compulsory spending to erase the history that free people taking responsibility for their own investments might have written. We’re not even supposed to ask what the government could have done with the $50 billion in parked in that GM investment for five years – that’s a lot of lost value and interest – only to achieve a net loss of $10 billion, instead of a profit.
It is forbidden to chart any course except what the Ruling Class has plotted on our maps, or to ask why this wealthy individual who earned every penny of his money is evil and selfish, while that rich executive deserves to have his lifestyle supported by billions of dollars in taxpayer loot. And don’t you dare ask Barack Obama how the highly-compensated union workers who benefited from the GM bailout factor into his “income inequality” diatribe. The radiant blessing of the Ruling Class has been bestowed upon this company; it deserves everything it has, and everything you were compelled to give it. Shed no tears over the unmarked grave of possibility, where all the things we might have individually chosen to do are interred.
Hopefully the rescued General Motors will become the very model of sustainable prosperity and wise management, with everyone duly mindful of the $10.5 billion everyone else was forced to contribute to their success. And if not… well, they can rest comfortably in the knowledge that we’ll bail them out again, can’t they?
Update: It’s worth remembering that the GM “comeback” has been accomplished with an awful lot of government support, and the whole saga began with unconscionable treatment of the company’s non-union creditors, who – let us not mince words – got robbed. Even if the taxpayers didn’t lose ten billion over five years on this deal, General Motors would still be a long way from a free-market success story.
THE WESTERN CENTER FOR JOURNALISM: Impeach Obama Campaign Moves Into High Gear
He actually said it. His voice dripping with defiance, BarackObama took the microphone and decreed that ObamaCare will remain the law of the land as long as he's President of the United States.
Well... we can remedy that situation Mr. Obama. It's time for patriotic Americans to turn up the heat another notch and respond to Mr. Obama's defiant challenge.
Congress must hear from you now. The push to REMOVE BARACK OBAMA FROM OFFICE GOES INTO HIGH GEAR TODAY.
Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.
ObamaCare Is A Fraud. It's Time To Remove The Perpetrator From Office.
The idiotic ObamaCare website still does not work, and the personal information you leave on the site is ripe for hackers and identity thieves.
Millions have already lost their policies and hundred of millions more will lose their policies.
And the only substantive changes that the Anointed One has instituted are measures designed to hide the fact that his great experiment in socialized health care is an abysmal failure untilAFTER the 2014 election.
What is transpiring is SABOTAGE, plain and simple but ObamaCare is only the symptom. Barack Obama is the disease, and REMOVAL FROM OFFICE IS THE ONLY CURE .
Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.
So Why Is Obama Pressing Forward With ObamaCare?
Understand one thing. What Barack Obama is doing to this great country is no mistake.
It's not simple incompetence, and Obama's not telling little white lies because he's simply too proud to admit that his health care scheme is an abysmal failure.
Make no mistake, Barack Hussein Obama is purposefully attempting to destroy the United States of America.
It's an act of sabotage and ObamaCare is one very large part of his grand scheme... and it's time for YOU to make a decision.
Are YOU going to let Barack Hussein Obama get away with it, or areYOU willing to take a proactive step to change the dialogue in Washington and work to remove Barack Obama from office?
Are YOU going to simply sit back on your couch and complain and hope that someone does something to stop this megalomaniac, or areYOU ready and willing to speak out and join the movement to REMOVE BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA?
No... it's not going to happen overnight, but as more ObamaCare shoes drop, the movement to remove Barack Obama will mainstream and you can start the ball rolling in a big way, right here are right now.
Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.
If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.
Obama Knew He Was Lying When He Said: "If You Like Your Health Care Plan. You'll Be Able To Keep Your Health Care Plan... PERIOD."
Barack Obama repeated that outrageous lie as late as 2012, but on Thursday, Forbes unveiled the smoking gun; an Obama administration commentary in the Federal Register from June of 2010 that indicates that approximately 13 million people, who hold individual health care plans and 80 million people, who hold health care plans through their employer would lose their coverage.
Forbes summed it up as follows: "How many people are exposed to these problems? 60 percent of Americans have private-sector health insurance—precisely the number that Jay Carney dismissed. As to the number of people facing cancellations, 51 percent of the employer-based market plus 53.5 percent of the non-group market (the middle of the administration’s range) amounts to 93 million Americans."
And that 93 million-plus person figure (which is a conservative estimate by the way) doesn't include the tens of millions of people who will lose their health care plans because they either lose their jobs outright or move from full-time to part-time employment.
No one in the media or in Congress wants to say it, so we'll say it. Barack Obama didn't just lie... he's still lying. And Barack Obama isn't simply lying to cover his back-side... he's lying to swindle every person in the United States who either owns a business or collects a paycheck.
It's just one part of his grand scheme to destroy this great country, so he can then "fundamentally transform" it.
Barack Obama must be stopped and there's only one way to do it. This stain must be removed from the White House and that's only going to happen if patriotic Americans, like you, start to stand up and speak out.
Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.
If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.
How Long Must We Wait?
How long must we wait... how long should we sit back and permit Barack Hussein Obama to continue to rip apart the fabric of this country before we take action?
You don't have to wait. Starting right now, you can fire a shot across the bow... a shot that will be heard around the world... and send Barack Hussein Obama a clear and unmistakable message that he does not have carte blanche to ruin the United States of America.
Like so many on the far-left before him, going all the way back to Karl Marx, Barack Hussein Obama believes that it's his mission to promote "equality of outcome" (in a just world, the misery of the few must be shared by all) over "equality of opportunity" even if Americans must learn to live in chains to make it happen.
And that worldview makes Barack Hussein Obama a very dangerous man and one of the greatest threats to your personal liberty today.
What can we do to stop this monomaniac... this American dictator? There’s only one answer.
Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution reads: "The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors."
ObamaCare is only a symptom. The Obama presidency is the disease, and Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution, is the cure.
Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.
If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.
Can We Actually Remove Barack Obama? Should We Remove Barack Hussein Obama?
To answer those questions, we really need to address the often misunderstood subject of what exactly constitutes an removeable offense, in order to illustrate that Barack Hussein Obama's actions are grave enough to warrant removal.
As former President Gerald Ford, while serving in the House of Representatives, put it: a removeable offense is, "whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history."
Let's look at Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution again: "The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors."
The key phrase here is "high crimes and misdemeanors," a phrase grounded in English Common Law that was well-known to our Founding Fathers but is grossly misunderstood in this day and age.
"High crimes and misdemeanors" essentially means bad behavior.
Here's a passage from C-Span.org which succinctly and beautifully summarizes the historical significance surrounding the inclusion of the term "high crimes and misdemeanors" in the Constitution:
"'High crimes and misdemeanors' entered the text of the Constitution due to George Mason and James Madison. Mason had argued that the reasons given for impeachment - treason and bribery - were not enough... so Mason then proposed 'high crimes and misdemeanors,' a phrase well-known in English common law.In 18th century language, a 'misdemeanor' meant 'mis-demeanor,' or bad behavior." [Emphasis Ours]
In other words, "high crimes and misdemeanors" does not refer to a 'high' or 'lofty' criminal act (as some would lead you to believe).
It refers to a misdeed committed by a person occupying a high office and the Founders fully intended to allow for the removal of the President for actions which were... well... simply put... egregious... grossly incompetent... grossly negligent... outright distasteful... or, in the case of Barack Hussein Obama, actions which clearly show malevolence toward this country, which is unabated.
Make no mistake, for those who mistakenly hold the illusion that removing Barack Hussein Obama would be a simple matter of"playing politics," our Founders not only intended that the removal of a sitting President be a "political act" but set the bar extremely low for the removal of a sitting president.
As C-Span.org notes: "The Framers of the Constitution deliberately put impeachment into the hands of the legislative branch rather than the judicial branch, thus transforming it from strictly a matter of legal definition to a matter of political judgment."
The Obama Administration exemplifies maladministration. It qualifies as the poster-child for bad behavior. Obama and those around him are ravaging this great country and adding a sorry chapter to a noble history, and removal, as written in the Constitution, was tailor-made for Barack Hussein Obama and our Founders placed it in our Constitution for such a time as this.
It could be easily argued that we have a duty to remove Barack Hussein Obama. Of course, our elected officials won't have the back-bone to go it alone. That's where you come in.
Help us spread the word far-and-wide and our elected officials will come to know that the removal of Barack Hussein Obama is the will of the American people and that if they ignore the will of the people. they do so at their own political peril.
The question is not whether we should remove Barack Hussein Obama. Rather, the question is, can we remove Barack Hussein Obama before it is too late?
Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.
If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.
P.S. Enough is enough. The time to give Barack Obama the boot is upon us... and it is now.
Floyd Brown
PEE OR NOT PEE. M ALEMAN:TO PEE OR NOT TO PEE?
I have a job.
I work, they pay me.
I pay my taxes & the government
Distributes my taxes as it sees fit.
In order to get that paycheck, in my case,
I am required to pass a random urine test
(with which I have no problem).
What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes
To people who don't have to pass a urine test.
So, here is my question:
Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check
Because I have to pass one to earn it for them?
Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet.
I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their BUTT----doing drugs while I work..
Can you imagine how much money each state would save
If people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check?
I guess we could call the program "URINE OR YOU'RE OUT"!
Pass this along if you agree or simply delete if you don't.
Hope you all will pass it along, though.
Something has to change in this country - AND SOON!
P.S. Just a thought, all politicians should have to pass a urine test too!They should also have to pass an intelligence test, a common sense test and an understanding the constitution test, as well! Remember November 2014 is coming
Tengan todos muy buenos dias y buena suerte.
QUE DIOS LOS BENDIGA ABUNDANTEMENTE.
"EN MI OPINION" Lázaro R González Miño Editor.
lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com, lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,
"IN GOD WE TRUST"worked to craft the very legislation they seek to pass as Obama's crowning achievement."
Make no mistake, the fix is in and we can only "unfix" this betrayal by letting our so-called political
No comments:
Post a Comment