No
1026 “En mi opinión” Agosto 17, 2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R Gonzalez Miño Editor
Lázaro
R González Miño para alcalde de Miami Dade
AMENPER: Playa Girón parte II, la secuela de una traición.
|
 |
|
¿Por qué no ondea la bandera americana
cuando se iza en la embajada de Cuba?
La
bandera de EEUU ya ondea (no mucho porque no hay viento) en el Malecón.
Pero
siempre hay viento en el malecón.
Quizás
el malecón suprimió el viento como triste testigo de los miles de emigrantes
que vio perecer buscando la libertad.
Estamos
siendo testigos de Playa Girón parte II, la secuela de una traición.
No
que esto sea una noticia sorprendente, desde que Obama fue electo en el 2009,
la suerte de Cuba quedó echada.
Nos
dicen que ningún presidente republicano hizo nada por Cuba, pero esa es la
diferencia, no hacer nada era bueno, la libertad de Cuba era y es asunto de los
cubanos, el no hacer nada era mucho mejor que hacer lo que hicieron las
administraciones socialistas demócratas, desembocando en el socialista en jefe,
Barack Hussein Obama y su secretario de estado el hippie comunista John Kerry.
Comenzando
con la traición del presidente demócrata John Kennedy en la invasión de
playa Girón, pasando por el marielazo de Jimmy Carter, las conferencias de
Clinton para reanudar relaciones, los balseros en Guantánomo, y el asesinato de
los Hermanos al Rescate, hasta la actual administración, hemos visto que
Fidel se ha sentido cómodo y al ataque siempre que hubo un presidente
demócrata.
Ni
Girón, ni los balseros el asesinato de los Hermanos al Rescate y mucho
menos el levantamiento del embargo y las relaciones con Castro que se habían
establecido desde la época de Eisenhower, se hubieran visto con un presidente
republicano.
Porque
aunque los presidentes republicanos se preocupaban por la situación
internacional antes de intervenir en Cuba, a ninguno se le hubiera ocurrido
violar la ley para reanudar las relaciones con Cuba ilegalmente como lo ha
hecho Obama.
Pero,
¿Se ha preocupado alguna vez Obama sobre el estado de derecho?
Y
el estado de derecho se ha violado de diferentes maneras en esta reanudación de
relaciones.
Échale
un vistazo:
La
liberación del rehén norteamericano Alan Gross pudiera haber sido Bienvenida. Gross
había estado vegetando en una cárcel cubana durante cinco años por el delito de
llevar teléfonos y computadoras a los judíos en la isla.
Pero
intercambiar tres espías cubanos condenados en tribunales civiles establece una
equivalencia incorrecta moral y legal.
Peor
aún, extender el reconocimiento al régimen dictatorial de Cuba perjudica a los
intereses nacionales de Estados Unido.
Hacer
todo esto sin consulta con las cámaras legislativa es una violación flagrante
al sistema de derecho.
La "Hoja informativa" de la Casa
Blanca sobre Cuba, deja en claro que la administración de Obama no recibió nada
a cambio de sus concesiones numerosas y sustanciales al régimen comunista de la
Habana. En esencia, después de cinco años de "negociaciones" la casa
blanca terminó concediendo todo lo que comenzó a pedir Raúl Castro desde el
principio: La única negociación sería cambiar los tres espías cubanos cuyas
actividades condujeron a la muerte de un estadounidense en la década de 1990.
Todo
lo que ha hecho Obama es conceder todas las largas demandas de Raúl.
Los
cubanos no ganarán libertad de expresión, de asociación, de pensamiento o de
cualquier otra cosa como resultado de las llamadas negociaciones que de hecho
fueron claudicaciones. El restablecimiento de la entrada de turistas americanos
y las relaciones comerciales, son para beneficio de Fidel no para los Estados
Unidos. ¿Qué puede ser el mercado de Cuba para los
Estados Unidos? Ni la capacidad económica ni el volumen de importación son
comparables a cualquier otro país, con los que los Estados Unidos hace
negocios, sin embargo para la economía de Cuba es
un salvavidas que se le extiende a la dictadura más larga de la historia. Esto
sin contar que abre las puertas del Banco monetario internacional para que
puedan pedir prestado y no pagar.
Pero
esto es simplemente un renglón más en el legado de Obama.
¿Cómo
escribirá la historia el legado de Obama?
Esta
pregunta tiene una sola respuesta. La historia la escriben los vencedores, el
cómo se escribirá la historia tendrá el primer capítulo con el resultado de las
elecciones presidenciales de Noviembre de 2016.
Está en nuestras
manos el cómo se escribirá la historia
AMENPER: Aborto total post-nacimiento…
La cultura de complacencia no tiene límites
legales o morales. El problema es sentirse bien y hacer lo que le dé
la gana, el trabajo no importa porque para eso están los programas de
beneficio, el sexo debe de ser libre y sin compromisos, y si tienen un aborto,
no importa que ya esté en su séptimo mes, el método de “aborto parcial”
resuelve el problema.
El “aborto parcial” es sacar la parte inferior
del bebé, es un parto sin sacar la cabeza, por lo que según la ley ya lo no lo
hace un nacimiento. Cuando se encuentra la parte inferior afuera,
con una jeringuilla larga que llega a la cabeza se extrae la masa encefálica y
de nuevo se empuja a la criatura hacia el interior.
A los pocos días la criatura sin cerebro aborta
“naturalmente”.
Si esto les parece un crimen usted es un
ignorante retrógrado, es simplemente un "aborto parcial" algo
aprobado por la ley.
Bueno, si ya estamos en esto, por qué no seguir,
vamos a avanzar con estas leyes de diferentes clases de
abortos. ¿Tiene usted un niño que ha crecido no cómo usted
imaginaba? ¿Es majadero y no lo deja dormir bien, o no es muy
inteligente o feo para su gusto? o en otro caso de relaciones
familiares ¿su anciano padre o abuelo empieza a convertirse en una
carga? ¿Por qué no hacemos una ley para hacer un aborto post-nacimiento?
pudieramos hacer una ley para poder librarnos de estos "fetos"
indeseables. Esto nos ayudaría a llevar una vida más complacientes sin la
presencia de estos "problemas".
Fuentes sin identificar nos informan que ya
científicos del centro de investigación de salud de la mujer de Barack Obama
conscientes de estas situaciones y preocupados por el bienestar de las
mujeres, han hecho un adelanto épico en salud de la mujer y el
derecho a elegir.
Los científicos han desarrollado un método para
permitir el aborto post-nacimiento, pasado mucho mas allá del tercer
trimestre-
Según lo explicado por el científico de la
ejecución del proyecto, el cirujano de origen japonés Dr. Temato Facilito:
"hasta ahora, las mujeres se limitaron a abortar sólo su propio feto y
sólo durante los tres primeros trimestres antes del nacimiento. Nuestro
laboratorio ha sido pionero en el uso de la clonación humana del epitelio
uterino y piel para crear un útero externo que nos gusta llamar el "útero
de saco externo" para reclamar el aborto de seres humanos perjudiciales
y molestos”
El nuevo método permite clonar y hacer crecer una
bolsa o útero de membrana en un laboratorio de las células de la mujer y en un
procedimiento quirúrgico se fija la bolsa a una persona a través de un
enlace externo.
Cualquier "feto" de cualquier edad o
relación no importa el tiempo que haya estado en el mundo, ya sea padre abuelo,
hija, hijo u otro familiar o persona indeseable, sólo tiene que ser
insertado en la bolsa, y después regresar a la clínica, Dr. Temato Facilito que
honrará la opción de la mujer y dispondrá de los contenidos. Luego se limpia la
bolsa y la mujer es libre de usarla de nuevo, puede insertar y desechar tantos
fetos como quiera.
Cuando sondeado sobre la ética de tal invención,
Dr. Facilito respondió: "no veo ningún dilema ético. La ley permite que
ese feto dentro del cuerpo de la mujer, simplemente pueda quitarse y
desecharse.
Como creemos firmemente en la elección de la
mujer a hacer lo que quiera con su cuerpo, además de reutilizar y
reciclar, cosechamos el feto más para investigación biomédica.
"No nos beneficiamos de estas
operaciones como una empresa codiciosa, pero simplemente se recoge tanto como
podemos para pagar nuestra sobrecarga clínica y laboratorio, junto con nuestros
propios salarios generosos. Además estas intervenciones quirúrgicas
serán costeadas completamente por el Obamacare y beneficios de la salud de la
mujer" dijo el doctor Temato Facilito.
Como era de esperar, opiniones sobre Capitol Hill
han caído estrictamente a lo largo de líneas partidarias, con líderes demócratas
y aspirantes presidenciales aplaudiendo este salto adelante en la salud de la
mujer y eliminar las últimas barreras al derecho a elegir, mientras que los
conservadores recalcitrantes y sus candidatos presidenciales se presentan
cruelmente negando el progreso real que este adelanto de la
ciencia ha dado a la humanidad. -
AMENPER: 1968
Parece
historia antigua, hace 47 años iba a tener la experiencia de votar en unas
elecciones presidenciales por primera vez en mi vida. Nunca voté en
Cuba, primero no tenía la edad para votar, y después cuando pude votar, elegí
no votar en unas elecciones que eran una farsa.
En los
Estados Unidos, por compromisos políticos locales, al hacerme ciudadano me
inscribí como demócrata, y voté demócrata en las primeras elecciones locales, y
voté por Robert King High para gobernador, los demócratas de entonces no se
parecían a los socialistas de hoy, y no me siento mal por haber votado así.
Pero ya
en las esferas federales se veía venir la veta socialista que hoy en día es una
catarata. A pesar de que Robert Kennedy o Humphrey hubieran sido
moderados hoy en día su política exterior y doméstica empezaba a enseñar las
características que dominan al partido hoy en día.
Mis
primeras elecciones fueron un momento trascendental en los Estados Unidos, fue
una experiencia desgarradora nacional, llevada a cabo en un contexto que
incluía el asesinato del líder negro Martin Luther King, Jr. y los posteriores
disturbios raciales en todo el país, el asesinato del candidato presidencial
Robert F. Kennedy,y manifestaciones multitudinarias contra la guerra de
Vietnam a través de la universidades americanas y campus universitarios, y
enfrentamientos violentos entre la policía y los manifestantes contra la guerra
en la Convención Nacional Demócrata de 1968.
Mi
decisión de votar por Richard Nixon estaba determinada, pero aproveché la
oportunidad como demócrata registrado, en las primarias, para votar por George
Wallace. No que pensara que Wallace hubiera sido un buen presidente,
no que pensara que Wallace tuviera el menor chance de ganar las elecciones
primarias, pero quise hacer lo que Wallace pidió, “enviar un mensaje a
Washington” enviar a los políticos demócratas el mensaje que estaban tomando el
camino equivocado que la decisión de John F. Kennedy de abandonar los
brigadistas en la bahía de Cochinos había sido un acto de traición y que Castro
estaba usando el pacto Kennedy-Kruschev para subvertir américa.
Que en
lo doméstico el estado de welfare se estaba estableciendo y los aumentos de
impuestos estaban destruyendo a la clase media.
Ha
tomado tiempo, pero desgraciadamente este mensaje ya no hay que enviarlo,
ya todos lo conocen como una realidad, el mensaje ahora es que hay que eliminar
del gobierno a todos los que han contribuído para hacer este mensaje una
realidad..
El 5 de
noviembre de 1968, el candidato republicano, el ex vicepresidente Richard Nixon
ganó las elecciones sobre el candidato demócrata, el vicepresidente Hubert
Humphrey. Nixon funcionó en una campaña que prometía restaurar el "orden
público", y realmente lo logró, por eso ganó la re-elección en 1972, por
una mayoría abrumadora contra el declarado amigo de Fidel Castro, el socialista
George McGovern. El punto demócrata es que nunca oyeron el mensaje de los que
votamos por Wallace en las primarias, al contrario empezando por McGovern y los
demás candidatos que han electo, todos tienen una agenda socialista.
En
ambas elecciones en 1968 y 1972, voté republicano por Nixon a pesar de estar
registrado demócrata. De hecho nunca he votado por un presidente
demócrata ni cuando estaba inscripto como demócrata.
Es mi
esperanza que lo que yo y miles hicimos en 1968 y 1972, cuando
votamos por Wallace, es lo mismo que están haciendo los que votan en las
encuestas por Donald Trump. Espero que estén enviando un mensaje a
Washington a los políticos republicanos y demócratas que están en el camino
equivocado y que después escojan al candidato que nos puede representar mejor
en las elecciones generales..
There Is Only
One Way To Stop The Iran Nuke Deal
|
|
|
|||
|
|||||
|
THE Western Center For Journalism
Obama Is Saying, 'I Don't Need You...
I Already Got The UN. It's Gonna Happen. I Don't Care. You Guys Are Just
Exercising Your Own Folly Here. I Don't Need You Guys To Vote For This. It's
Already A Done Deal.'" -Rush Limbaugh
It's already becoming clear. Even if 43 Democrats in the House of Representatives and 13 Democrats in the Senate override Barack Obama's threatened veto of his so-called Iran Nuclear Deal, Barack Obama intends to implement it by Executive Decree anyway. As Rush says, the whole kabuki charade of Congress holding a vote is nothing more than an exercise in folly. Congress is spinning its wheels because Barack Hussein Obama really has no intention whatsoever of letting Congress or the courts stand in the way of his scheme to give Iran a glide path to obtain nuclear weapons. Even if they veto... he'll decree it anyway. And, that being the case, what must happen now to stop Barack Obama should be more than clear. If Mitch McConnell and John Boehner hold this sham vote, they are only facilitating Obama's lawlessness. Instead, they need to tell Barack Hussein Obama that there is no agreement with Iran... no removal of sanctions... and no release of 150 Billion dollars in frozen assets that Iran will only use to fund acts of terrorism through the world. Iran gets NOTHING... PERIOD.
The Cat Is Out Of The Bag. This
So-Called Deal Was Nothing More Than A Ruse To Give Iran Nuclear Weapons.
Even Barack Obama knew he could not get away with simply declaring, from the get-go, that he was going to give Iran a free-and-clear path to obtain nukes. It was far better to devise a phony-baloney negotiation that he could sell to a willfully ignorant public as a means to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. Of course, this so-called deal stops nothing. It accelerates Iran's path to obtaining nukes by giving Iran a pathway to obtain them in the next 10-15 years (that's assuming that Iran actually complies with the terms of the deal... and they won't), but why be bothered with such pesky details. But aside from this obvious deception, it is now known, based on a report that was released from MEMRI on August 10, 2015, that Barack Obama and John Kerry already secretly recognized Iran's right to enrich uranium as far back as 2011. Here's Limbaugh referring to the report from MEMRI: "Now, the second thing we were lied about, even before the negotiations began, is John Kerry, who was a senator at the time, acting on Obama's orders, had already recognized Iran's right to enrich uranium on their own soil." In reality, Iran is not violating the deal they made with Barack Obama. What we may view as cheating on Iran's part is actually Iran complying with a secret side deal Iran made with Barack Obama that goes back to 2011 as well as the secret side deals that are part of what was allegedly negotiated last month. In other words, Barack Obama and the mullahs of Iran secretly agreed to violate this sham deal BEFORE they apparently made the deal. This deal is just one big con job. Congress is being punked... you're being punked... we're all being punked. It's time to put a stop to the deception. It's time to tell our elected officials in Washington to do what they do best... NOTHING... no vote under the provisions of the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act... no 150 billion dollars for Iran that will simply be used to finance global terrorism... no release of sanctions... Iran gets NOTHING. And they need to make it clear to Mr. Barack Hussein Obama that any attempt at compliance when it comes to this so-called Iran Deal will bring about severe repercussions. That's the message our politicians need to hear and it's a message they need to hear right now.
It All Makes Sense Now...
Limbaugh wasn't
the only one sounding the alarm. The more details that emerge, the more this
whole sordid tale moves into focus.
The media elites aren't reporting it yet, but if you search the Internet, you'll see that a number of stories have already emerged over the past several days that are designed to give Barack Obama cover should he see the need to implement his so-called Iran Deal by Executive Decree. VICE News, for example, just reported: "A potential veto-proof majority in Congress that rejects the agreement might prove to be of little legal consequence in determining the fate of the pact. In a way, Obama has already committed the nation to abide by the Iran deal under international law — even before Congress has taken action on it." You read that right, Barack Obama will claim he is justified in issuing a dictatorial degree because he is compelled to do so by something that liberals believe trumps the Constitution... INTERNATIONAL LAW... And that's exactly why Barack Obama dirty-dealed Congress and took his deal to the America-haters at the United Nations BEFORECongress would have a chance to take their token vote. Magicians call what Obama is doing misdirection:  Barack Obama secretly gave the terrorist state of
Iran his full-throated, but secret, permission to enrich uranium as far back
as 2011. Then he made a public show of openly negotiating a treaty with Iran
to cover-up what he had already done behind our backs. But he knew that he could never muster 67 votes in
the United States Senate to ratify his treaty, so he called his treaty a
diplomatic agreement and told Congress he was going to implement it anyway. Instead of standing up to Obama, the hopelessly
predictable, Mitch McConnell and John Boehner's begged Barack Obama not to do
it. Please Mr. Obama, we'll suspend the Constitution and
give you what you want, just give us a token vote so we can deceive the
stupid yokels who vote for us into believing that we oppose you. Obama magnanimously agreed to their
sniveling pleas. And now... as Boehner and McConnell hopelessly spin
their wheels attempting to find a 2/3 majority to stop Barack Obama, Obama is
sitting back in the chair in the office he usurped so long ago and he's LAUGHING,
because even if Congress overrides his veto, he knows he's simply going to go
ahead and implement his Iran deal anyway. Why is Obama playing this pathetic game? He's doing it because he's lawless... he's doing it because he believes it's fun to watch Congress waste its time chasing its own tail... he doing it because he wants to make Congress look foolish and stupid and show them, once and for all, that he's The Boss of the United States of America... and, most of all, he's doing it simply because he believes he can do it... Barack Obama can be stopped, but no one is going to do it for us. It's up to every patriotic American who is reading this urgent appeal to keep logging faxes and phone call into Washington. It's up to each and every one of us to fight this fight because, if we don't, we will lose our country. Floyd Brown
The Western
Center for Journalism is a 501©3 educational organization. Contributions are
tax-deductible as allowed by IRS regulations. Personal and corporate contributions
are allowed.
|
|||||
LAZARO R GONZALEZ Para Alcalde del Condado Miami Dade
Elecciones de noviembre 8, 2016
Escriba el nombre de
Lázaro R González en la boleta electoral en el espacio en blanco Para alcalde
del Condado Miami Dade.
Por favor dígaselo a sus amigos y familiares si quiere que se acabe el
relajo, el robo, el descaro, la mala administración y que el gobierno le
responda a usted, no permita más abusos.
Aquí a continuación les presenta nuestro proyecto
sobre las cosas que creo debemos arreglar en el condado en cuanto tomemos
posesión de la alcaldía. Este proyecto es solo un borrador y por lo tanto lo
modificaremos con sus ideas y sugerencias cuantas veces sea necesaria antes de
las elecciones del 8 de noviembre del 2016. Queremos hacer un gobierno del
pueblo, por el pueblo y para el pueblo. Necesitamos que ustedes sean los que
decidan que es lo que hay que cambiar y mejorar. Ustedes tienen la palabra y la
acción:
Este es el borrador del proyecto hasta hoy Agosto
15/2015
"ESTAS SON NUESTRAS
PROPUESTAS A LA CARTA CONSTITUCIONAL DEL CONDADO MIAMI DADE" POR UN MEJOR
MIAMI
ENMIENDAS PROPUESTAS:
Enmienda #1 Para disminuir el desempleo el Condado Miami Dade
inmediatamente implementara soluciones para hacer más rápido, sencillo y menos
costoso el proceso de mejorar su sistema administrativo para: Expedir permisos,
inspecciones, disminuir la burocracia para hacer más fácil este proceso y
estimulara a las empresas privadas para crear nuevos empleos en el condado
Miami Dade.
Sí____ No____
Enmienda # 2 Todos los candidatos a cargos públicos por
elecciones como Comisionados, alcalde, Jueces etc.
a) No les será permitido presentarse a ser reelectos más de una
vez.
b) El máximo de tiempo para servir para políticos electos será
de 8 años.
c) Deben presentar prueba de que no tienen antecedentes penales.
d) Hacer una declaración jurada de todos sus bienes, dinero y
propiedades al comenzar su perido electo..
e) Entregar un currículum laboral, experiencia y académico que pruebe su capacidad y
experiencia.
f) Tienen que entregar un plan de las mejoras que se comprometen
a implementar en el ejercicio de la posición a que son candidatos. Este plan
será Jurado, notariado y entregado ante el Clerk de la Corte un mes antes de
las elecciones. El candidato podrá ser impugnado en la corte por no cumplir con
su documento de compromiso.
Sí____ No____
Enmienda # 3: El proceso de RECALL o REFERENDUM se facilitara
con los siguientes cambios:
a) 20 firmas de apoyo por planilla,
b) No necesidad de afidávit por el Circulador.
c) El circulador si debe firmar la hoja recolección de firmas de
apoyo; al final del documento una sola vez. Sirviendo de testigo como que sí
estuvo presente en el momento de que los ciudadanos firmaron dicha hoja de
recogida de firmas de apoyo al referéndum.
d) No será necesario que la hoja de firmas de apoyo sean
notarizadas.
e) Prohibida la persecución o acoso a las personas que
participen en el proceso como voluntarios.
El gobierno tiene que proteger a los ciudadanos y no protegerse
de los ciudadanos.
Sí____ No____
Enmienda # 4: Reducir el presupuesto del condado Miami Dade, en
un 10% anualmente hasta que lleguemos al nivel del presupuesto del año 2000.
Este presupuesto tiene que ser balanceado de acuerdo con una razonable
colección de impuestos.
Sí____ No____
Enmienda # 5: Reducir proporcionalmente los salarios de los
empleados del condado Miami Dade que ganen más de $45,000.00 Los mayores
salarios tendrán mayor reducción. Los que ganen menos de $45,000.00 no tendrán
disminución de salario.
Valor inicial del
Salario desde Valor del Salario
hasta % de reducción
de la diferencia Disminución en
Valor del salario Máximo salario
a recibir.
a $ 1.00 $ 45,000.00 0% $ 0.00 $ 45,000.00
b $ 45,001.00 $ 75,000.00 10% $ 3,000.00 $ 72,000.00
c $ 75,001,00 $ 105,000.00 20% $ 9,000.00 $
96,000.00
d $ 105,001.00 $ 135,000.00 30% $ 18,000.00 $
117,000.00
e $ 135,001.00 $ 165,000.00 40% $ 30,000.00 $
135,000.00
f $ 165,001.00 $ 195,000.00 50% $ 45,000.00 $
150,000.00
g $ 195,000.00 $ 225,000.00 60% $ 63,000.00 $
162,000.00
h $ 225,001.00 $ 255,000.00 70% $ 84,000,00 $
171,000.00
i $ 255,001.00 $ 285,000.00 80% $ 108,000.00 $
177,000.00
j $ 285,001.00 $ 315,000.00 90% $ 135,000.00 $
180,000.00
k $ 315,000.00 $1’000,000.00 100% Disminuir hasta => $
180,000.00
El máximo salario que podrá recibir un empleado en el Condado
Miami Dade será $180,000.00
Sí____ No____
Enmienda # 6: Modificacion del Plan de Pensiones del Condado
Miami Dade:
a-Convertir el plan de pensiones en un 401K y terminar con el
actual Plan de Pensiones.
b-Edad mínima de Retiro 65 años en el condado Miami Dade.
c-Después de retirado no se puede trabajar nuevamente en el
condado.
d-Se eliminan todos los otros beneficios actuales a empleados,
funcionarios y políticos.
Sí____ No____
Enmienda # 7: Se terminan todas las asignaciones y beneficios
especiales como autos, gasolina, comidas, viajes y otras. Solo se mantendrá el
beneficio de seguro médico y el plan de retiro 401K
Sí____ No____
Enmienda # 8: Terminar todos los privilegios ilegales cuando se
contrate personal el nepotismo, favoritismo a la hora de contratar los
empleados del condado. No más empleos a los familiares, amigos o por favores
sexuales. Las personas relacionadas consanguíneamente, por lasos afectivos o
favores especiales: Serán despedidos inmediatamente.
Sí____ No____
Enmienda # 9: Todos los empleados del condado serán tratados de
la misma forma, con respeto y cortesía y tendrán los mismos derechos y deberes.
Las Uniones no tendrán ninguna opción de superioridad para discutir asuntos con
la administración del condado que conlleve a privilegios a un grupo específico
de trabajadores en detrimento de otros trabajadores.
Sí____ No____
Enmienda # 10: La policía y los servicios de seguridad tienen
que mejorar sus técnicas, entrenamiento y protocolos. El criminal y el
delincuente tienen que ser perseguido y castigado ejemplarmente, sea quien sea
y viva donde viva. Se fomentara un plan en el cual la ciudadanía puede y debe
participar activamente en la persecución de los criminales y ayudando a la
policía y los servicios de seguridad ciudadana.
Sí____ No____
Enmienda # 11: Los Taxes sobre la propiedad inmobiliaria no
podrán elevarse mientras el desempleo en el condado Miami Dade sea mayor al 8%.
Se debe eliminar la posición de Tasador de la propiedad y crear un departamento
mucho más pequeño y costoso; que realice los ajustes en los taxes de acuerdo
con esta enmienda.
Sí____ No____
Enmienda # 12: La administración del condado actuara de una
forma mucho más enérgica ante casos de mala administración, errores, corrupción
o abusos con los empleados o el público como los pasados ocurridos en Los
departamentos de Transporte, Viviendas, DERM, Aeropuerto, Puerto, ETC. Se
despedirá desde el Director del Departamento en problemas hasta la tercera
línea de ejecutivos. Y en los casos que se amerite se les pondrá a disposición
de la corte.
Sí____ No____
Enmienda # 13-
a-Reducción de los distritos del condado Miami Dade de 13 a 5
Cada distrito tendrá igual número de votantes.
b-Asalariar a los comisionados a $72,000.00
c- Está prohibido prohibirles a los comisionados o a cualquier
político electo o empleado del Condado Miami Dade de por vida que puedan
cabildear o hacer negocios, o ser parte de una compañía que haga negocios con
el condado de Miami Dade durante o después de terminar su empleo o servicio.
d-Los comisionados tendrán una sola oficina con 3 empleados.
e- El presupuesto total de su oficina será de $322,000 anual en
total.
f-Se elimina radicalmente la asignación de $800,000 anuales para
usar como gastos discrecionales por el comisionado.
Sí____ No____
Enmienda # 14: El alcalde y/o los comisionados del condado no
podrán aprobar y ordenar la ejecución de proyectos nuevos de la magnitud del
túnel de la Bahía o el Estadium de los Marlins. Todos los proyectos de gran
magnitud del condado deben ser consultados electoralmente con los ciudadanos y
aprobados por los votantes mediante votación secreta y directa.
Sí____ No____
Enmienda # 15- Se tiene que nombrar una comisión de personas
ajenas al condado Miami Dade o un gran jurado para que investigue todo lo
relacionado Los despilfarros que han quedado impunes como en El Aeropuerto, el
Puerto de Miami, el departamento de Transporte, DERM, Viviendas, El Túnel de la
bahía, El Estadium de los Marlins, etc. para saber quién se benefició y después
encauzarlo legalmente en la corte correspondiente.
Sí____ No____
Enmienda # 16 – El condado está en la obligación de publicar en
un sitio del internet creado al efecto Las subastas de trabajos públicos a
contratar por los diferentes departamentos. Deben publicarse también los nombre
de los lobistas que atienden a la subasta y a las empresas o personas que
representan y los detalles de la oferta incluido las cantidades que ofrecieron
cada participante. Y después de adjudicado el trabajo, tendrán que publicar
quien fue el ganador y porque razones. En la subasta debe estar presente un
oficial de la Oficina del Inspector General que certifique la legalidad del proceso
Sí____ No____
Enmienda # 17 - Toda persona “político u Oficial” que sea
despedido de su cargo por alguna razón legal como: fraude, cosa mal hecha o
delito, lucro indebido, mal desempeño de su función por estar por incumpliendo
sus obligaciones o renuncia personal por el motivo que sea. No debe recibir
ninguna pensión ni compensación de ninguna clase por parte del condado. En caso
de que se esté haciendo algún pago en estos momentos proceder a presentar
demanda en corte para detener estos pagos.
Sí____ No____
Enmienda # 18-
a-Se elimina la posición de Jefe de Policía y se sustituye por
la de Sheriff este ejercerá todas las funciones del actual Jefe de Policía.
b- El Sheriff, El Inspector General, El Jefe de la Oficina anti
corrupción y El Jefe de la Oficina de control de ética. A partir de la
aprobación de esta enmienda serán posiciones elegidas por los votantes del
condado Miami Dade en elecciones. c-Tendrán todas las funciones que tienen
ahora pero serán absolutamente independientes del alcalde y los comisionados y
rendirán cuenta directamente a los votantes.
Sí____ No____
Enmienda # 19:
a-A partir de la fecha en que estas enmiendas sean aprobadas por
votación en elecciones secretas y directas por los ciudadanos del Condado Miami
Dade. Estos cambios serán incorporados a la Carta Constitucional del Condado
Miami Dade inmediatamente.
b-Los próximos cambios que se le proponga en el futuro a dicha
carta solo podrán efectuarse mediante la acción de un Referéndum que aprueben
estos nuevos cambios mediante elecciones por los ciudadanos del condado Miami
Dade.
c-Los comisionados del condado Miami Dade, no tendrán el poder
de modificarlas, agregar, sustituir o cambiar ninguna de las regulaciones en la
Carta del Condado..
Si____ No____
Enmienda # 20
Se llevara a elecciones a los ciudadanos del Condado Miami Dade
La anulación de XDM Express Way de Miami. Creo que esto es un abuzo contra los
ciudadanos que ya contribuyeron con sus taxes a la construcción de las
Carreteras . Y es un delito cobrarles dos veces y por todo el resto de sus
vidas.
Si____ No____
Enmienda # 21
Presentaremos una ley para que los candidatos a elección de
candidatos a cargos políticos no puedan recoger dinero para sus campañas. Los
candidatos podrán presentar su candidatura sin gastos en el Departamento de
Elecciones y estarán dispuestos a presentar un plan de gobierno lo más completo
posible, para el periodo que se postule. Y si a la mitad de su tiempo en la
posición no ha cumplido con lo que ha hecho, será sometido a referéndum y
sacado de su cargo si los votantes estima que fallo en sus promesas.
Si____ No____
Enmienda #22
Todos los trabajadores que no realizan un trabajo necesario para
el bien estar del los ciudadanos del condado serán despedidos de sus posiciones
inmediatamente que una comisión detecte que sus trabajo no es benéfico para los
ciudadanos del condado.
Si____ No____
Enmienda # 22
“El transporte publico” Para nadie es un secreto que el
transporte publico es un verdadero desastre como casi todas las cosas que
maneja el alcalde del condado. PORQUE el sis tema de transporte de Miami NO
RINDE UN SERVICIO QUE ES EL QUE LOS CIUDADANOS DE MIAMI NECESITAN. Una de las
cosas es el desastre de la administración del transporte. Creo que tenmos que
pensar detenidamente que es lo que tenemos que hacer con el transporte. Yo
recuerdo cuando en las calle de Miami surgieron los ómnibus privado “La
Conchita” que empezaron y resulto que si resolvían muchísimas líneas. Pues
necesito que ustedes sugieran que se puede hacer. Aquí en Miami hay muchiosimos
trabajadores del transporte urbano en La Habana que tenia uno de los sistema
mas eficientes que he visto. Asi que envíenme sus ideas.
Si____No____
Enmieda # 23
“La Policia” Creo que la policía debe ser reentrenada y mas
eficiente. El robo y los delitos de drogas y de todo tipo ha aumentado a
niveles que la lista de todos los casos de delitos y asesinatos se lleva una
gran parte de los noticiero de los programas de los noticiero de los canales en
español e ingles. ¿Qué podemos hacer?
Hay alguien que sepa cómo resolver este tremendo problema que padecemos. La seguridad de los ciudadanos es una
prioridad A-1 Tenemos que tener seguridad con policías decentes y bien
entrenados.
Si_____ No______
Esto es solo un
trabajo preliminar. Necesitamos que todos ustedes participen para hacer de esto
un verdadero plan de gobierno del Condado Miami que responda a los verdaderos
intereses y necesidades de Miami. Yo solo sere la persona que impulse las ideas
que nos aporten y se pongan en acción. Pero usted es la persona indicada para
que nos diga que usted considera que nosotros tenemos que hacer para que
nuestro condado sea de verdad un verdadero lugar donde podamos criar a nuestros
hijos, para vivir decente y libremente.
Saludos,
Lázaro R González
Miño
“Su próximo
alcalde si DIOS que todo lo puede y ustedes lo hace posible” Necesito las
opiniones y sugerencias de ustedes.
“Por un mejor
Miami”
PERO RECUERDENSE DE QUE SI NO LES GUSTA
MI CANDIDATURA PARA ALACALDE DEL CONDADO ENTONCES PUEDEN REDUCIR LOS LADRONES
EN EL CONDADO VOTANDO POR ALI-BABA Y SUS CUARENTA LADRONES. Así serán solo 41 en el condado.
Hannity Responds to Beck’s Question on Donald Trump:
‘I Will Attempt to Answer It in This Post’
·
·
Conservative talk-show host Sean Hannity responded to
Glenn Beck Sunday, explaining in an open-letter posted to his website why he is
happy Donald Trump is running for president.
The response came days after Beck asked on Facebook why Hannity, and other mega-conservative
stars, seemingly support Trump.
“This is not an attack, this is an honest question,”
Beck stressed, before asking, “Why are the big name ‘conservatives’ supporting
him?”
Image source: Screen grab via
Hannity.com
“You are a friend and a patriot who has asked an
honest and thoughtful question, and I will attempt to answer it in this post,”
the Fox News host said at the outset of his letter.
Hannity, who said he is “personally UNDECIDED” on who
he will endorse or vote for, noted that this is not his “first rodeo” in
presidential politics. He added that in the past two weeks he has given air
time to many of the candidates, listing several qualities each one of them has
that he supports.
Then the radio talk-show host explained his support
for Trump being in the race.
“Now to Mr Trump: The first debate attracted 24
million Americans, by far a cable television record. There is zero doubt in my
mind that he was a big part of that record breaking debate,” he wrote.
Hannity added, “Kudos to Donald Trump for creating an
audience that not only benefitted him, but every other candidate and the entire
country. He single handedly made politics refreshingly fun, unpredictable and
interesting. That is a great benefit to the country.”
Hannity then responded to Beck point-by-point in the
lengthy letter.
“In conclusion, Glenn, I repeat … I am personally undecided at this point. But
I am glad Donald Trump is in this race. I like his straightforward outsider’s
view of politics. His personality and background are impressive and refreshing.
I like anybody who is not politically correct,” he wrote at the end.
Read the
entire letter below:
Glenn,
You are a friend and a patriot who has
asked an honest and thoughtful question, and I will attempt to answer it in
this post.
You asked, “Can we actually have a civil
discourse based on facts? Not on emotion or feelings?” Of course we can! For
all of you leftists out there in the media and elsewhere hoping this will
become a “food fight,” you will be extremely disappointed.
Let me first point out that I am
personally UNDECIDED as to whom I I will support in the GOP primaries. The good
news is the Iowa Caucus is February 1, 2016. That gives us over 5 1/2 months
before the REAL process begins in deciding who the Republican presidential
nominee will be. Five and a half months is an eternity in political terms.
A lot can and will happen between now
and then. Some candidates will trip and fall or stumble. Some will recover and
others may not. Polls will shift, debates will hopefully enlighten, and voters
(that is, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE) will decide which way this is going to go.
This is not my first rodeo. I began my
talk radio journey in 1987. I am about to begin my 20th year on the Fox News
Channel. I have followed presidential politics closely since my early teens. I
often remind both my listeners and viewers that this is a PROCESS. We do not
have to decide today.
As a registered conservative in New York
state, I only have one vote. From a voting perspective, I will have no say,
really, in deciding who the Republican presidential nominee will be in 2016.
Just as I have in past presidential cycles, I feel I can best serve both my
television and radio audiences by giving them as much access as possible to all
of the candidates so they can make an informed decision in the primary.
For example, in just the last 2 weeks I
have had on both radio and TV Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Rand Paul,
Ben Carson, Scott Walker, Carly Fiorina, John Kasich Mike Huckabee, Rick Perry,
and Chris Christie.
I have given many of the candidates a
FULL hour on my TV show, as well. My plan is to continue to offer all the
candidates more airtime throughout the entire process.
As I mentioned, I have two jobs that I
love to do every day (which is to build an audience, and to generate revenue),
but that is not my primary motivation. As somebody who follows the news closely
every day, I am extremely concerned about the direction of the country and the
world in general.
In my view, America is at a crossroads —
a tipping point. To me, this election is not about ME OR WHO I VOTE FOR. I
personally want the most CONSERVATIVE candidate (because conservatism works)
with the best, most inspiring solutions for the country; someone who can
passionately articulate those solutions, and win.
Which Republican candidate can offer
solutions that will:
1. Create jobs and help the 93 million
Americans who are out of the labor force get back to work
2. Help get nearly 50 million Americans
out of poverty
3. Help nearly 46 million Americans who
are on food stamps get back to work
4. Stop robbing future generations with
record debt and deficits. We now have over 18 trillion dollars in debt and over
100 trillion in unfunded liabilities.
5. Balance the budget, force the
government to live within its means, and lower taxes by transforming our tax
code
6. Save Social Security (because the
“Lock Box” has been stolen)
7. Save Medicare
8. Repeal Obamacare, and hopefully
replace it with personal healthcare savings accounts
9. Make America energy independent. This
would create jobs, lower the cost of energy, and reduce our dependence on
imported oil from countries that hate us.
10. Protect our borders from those who
do not respect our laws and sovereignty, and those who enter the country to
cause us harm
11. Transform a broken educational
system and replace public schools with school choice for parents and kids
trapped in failing schools
12. End burdensome regulations
13. Restore constitutional order and separation
of powers with co-equal branches of government as our founders intended
14. Identify by name our biggest enemy
(radical Islamists) and take every step necessary to defeat this evil
15. Undo this horrific, naive, and incredibly dangerous deal with the radical
Mullahs in Iran that chant death to America
16. Restore America’s sacred and special
relationship with Israel
17. Empower moderate nations and people
in the Middle East and elsewhere to defeat enemies in the region
18. Confront Putin with strength to stop
his geopolitical ambitions
19. Confront China and thwart its
geopolitical ambitions and unfair trade practices
20. Commit to the idea that America is
the single greatest force for good in the world, and that America’s role is to
lead the fight for freedom around the world
This is only a short list of challenges
we now face as a country. As our mutual friend “The Great One,” Mark Levin,
says, we are living in a post constitutional America. I have a sense of urgency
that I have never had before in my life that the “America” we love and grew up
in is slipping away, literally hanging in the balance. Now is NOT the time for
half measures It is time, as Reagan said, for a “revitalized second party with
no pale pastels but BOLD COLORED DIFFERENCES.”
I am extremely disappointed with current
congressional “leadership,” as they have failed to keep their most BASIC
promises. They refused to use their constitutional authority of the power of
the purse to defund Obamacare. They caved on their main 2014 campaign promise
to stop Obama’s illegal and unconstitutional executive amnesty. And they are
generally weak, timid and afraid to confront Obama for fear they will be blamed
for a government shutdown.
With that said I am greatly encouraged
by many of the 17 candidates currently running for the GOP nomination.
Sen. Ted Cruz has shown a willingness
few in Congress have shown TO FIGHT! His filibuster in 2013 was inspiring, as
is his willingness to take on his own party.
Sen. Rand Paul’s reminders about limited
government and fidelity to the Constitution is similarly refreshing.
Sen. Marco Rubio offers an extremely
bright, articulate and friendly vision of conservatism that will inspire many
Americans.
Former Sen. Rick Santorum is making a
strong push to rebuild the “Reagan Coalition” and is articulating how blue
collar voters will benefit under conservatism.
Gov. Scott Walker has shown that a
conservative can win in a blue state, and turn deficits into surpluses, create
jobs, and he was willing to put his political career on the line for his
conservative beliefs.
Gov. John Kasich similarly took record
deficits in Ohio and turned them into record surpluses. He also created
hundreds of thousands of jobs. While budget chairman in DC, Kasich was the
architect of REAL BALANCED BUDGETS.
Gov. Jeb Bush’s record in Florida is
equally impressive. He created 1.4 million jobs, the nations first school
voucher program, and produced balanced budgets.
Gov. Rick Perry, but for his leadership
in Texas, America would have experienced a NET loss of jobs in Obama’s first
term. Obama owes Gov. Perry a debt of gratitude.
Gov. Bobby Jindal, who is young, bright,
and vibrant, had massive reductions in the size of government, vouchers, and a
proven willingness to take on the status quo.
Gov. Mike Huckabee deserves major kudos
for his commitment to religious freedom, the Constitution and the Fair Tax,
which, I believe, will transform the American economy for the better.
Gov. Chris Christie deserves credit for
taking on the third rail in politics, i.e., ENTITLEMENTS! The bottom line is we
have been lied to and stolen from, and unless we deal with these entitlements
(which have become the majority of government spending), our kids will not have
a future.
Dr. Ben Carson has articulated a version
of common sense, conservatism, and courage in confronting Obama that
congressional Republicans should learn from. His vision for healthcare savings
accounts is the perfect antidote to Obamacare.
Carly Fiorina has been nothing short of
inspiring in confronting Hillary Clinton’s moral, ethical, and legal
deficiencies. Her knowledge of the economy and world affairs has captivated the
country.
Now, I could point out areas of
disagreement and deficiencies in all the candidates … but I will leave that to
the voters and the liberal Obama-loving media. The Republican field of
candidates offer a far more inspiring vision for our country than either
Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders. If conservative principles are implemented
we can save and preserve the country for our kids and grandkids.
My hope is that the GOP candidates will
all push each other to become stronger in their commitment to this conservative
vision — all of which will get this country back on track before we become
another version of Greece.
Now to Mr Trump: The first debate attracted 24 million Americans, by far a
cable television record. There is zero doubt in my mind that he was a big part
of that record breaking debate.
By comparison, the first Republican
debate of the 2012 cycle hosted by Fox News in May 2011, drew just 3.2 million
viewers, according to Nielsen. Its highest-rated Republican debate (in 2012)
drew 6.7 million viewers.
Kudos to Donald Trump for creating an
audience that not only benefitted him, but every other candidate and the entire
country. He single handedly made politics refreshingly fun, unpredictable and
interesting. That is a great benefit to the country.
Now to your specific points, because you
said you “really want to understand.”
First you wrote:
“I get that Trump is reflective of what
people are feeling; secure the border; fight to win; don’t give in to China,
etc. I really do understand that he is saying things that people are feeling.
Justifiably.
I get the fact that he is saying that
America is a great place and that we can be great again. That is rare and
refreshing.
I understand that he is seen, and has
the proof in New York City, as a guy who can get things done. I understand and
like the fact that he just says what he is thinking. No politically correct BS,
no focus groups, and he does it with out apologizing.”
My only comment to this, Glenn, is … you
are answering your own question in many ways. These are not insignificant
things. Why, at this early stage, would you be so dismissive?
1. Fight to win
2. Stand up to China
3. Make America great again
4. Trump has a track record of getting
the job done
5. Secure the border 6. Straight
talking, non-politically correct politician!
To address what you say you do not
understand:
1. “He is part of the problem when he,
by his own admission, buys politicians”:
How refreshingly honest that he admits
what we all know. I asked him about this and he answered by saying he “hates”
the system, wants to change it, but as a businessman he played the game. I
applaud the honesty and desire to change it.
2. Trump “identifies his policies more
as a Democrat; he makes President Obama look truly humble…”
If you are looking for humble, Trump is
not your guy.
As for his political views I asked him a
number of times about it, including this week. He was clear that he was once a
Democrat and changed his views. You will have to decide for yourself how
sincere he is. My sense is that he is sincere. He is correct in pointing out
that Reagan was was a pro-choice Democrat who also evolved.
Glenn, one of the things I admire about
you is how you have changed. Your life story is extremely compelling because of
the significant changes you have made in your life.
You are not shy about pointing out how
you once led a pretty fast life. (I did, too, when I was young, as we have all
sinned and fallen short), how you found your faith, how you changed your
politics, and how your thinking evolved by studying our founders and framers. I
read that you recently became a libertarian. I like the changes you have made
and your willingness to share those things with your audience. Are you a better
person as a result of these changes? My guess is you are.
3. Trump was very pro-abortion until
very recently.
His answer at the debate was extremely
compelling, about how his views changed. He said he changed his mind because of
a child that was going to be aborted, but then wasn’t. That is believable to
me. Do you think he is lying about that?
4. He still says, “Don’t defund planned
parenthood …”
I asked him about that this week, and he
was very clear that funding would be dependent on whether Planned Parenthood
gets out of the abortion business. Personally, with our debt situation, and
with what Planned Parenthood has done, I wouldn’t give them a penny.
5. Trump is pro- “assault weapon ban …”
He said to me he that he “was” for the
ban, past tense. He now has a pistol carry-permit in NYC and said he believes
law-abiding Americans should have the right to “carry.”
6. He is in favor of a wealth tax that
would just “take money out of people’s bank accounts …”
I also asked him about this earlier this
week. He said when he supported this one-time tax on the very wealthy that we
were at a point when, if implemented, the tax would have paid off the entire
federal debt. He wanted this coupled with a balanced budget amendment. My
impression of this was that it would be meant as a patriotic gesture by those
who have greatly benefitted from the American Dream. Misguided, well
intentioned, perhaps. But he says he is against it now.
7.
Trump “says he is for boots on the ground in Iraq, and for ‘taking the oil’
from the Iraqi people…”
Mr. Trump and I disagreed about the Iraq
war; I was for it and he was against it. But I loved his idea of making Iraq
pay for its own liberation. I also love the idea of Iraq paying the families of
nearly 5,000 Americans who were killed fighting in that war. They deserve that
money. They deserve millions of dollars. Similarly, so do those soldiers and
families that suffered severe injuries. It’s the least Iraq should do for them.
As far as Trump’s plan against Isis of
creating a perimeter around the oil fields, which is their main financial
source for terror? I like that idea, if it is a part of a more comprehensive
plan of defeating them. Americans died in Mosul, Ramadi, Fallujah and Tikrit,
cities now controlled by Isis. They are modern day Nazis and are getting
stronger and richer and more evil every day. I have one caveat: IF AMERICA
FIGHTS ANY WAR, WE MUST WIN IT AND WIN IT QUICKLY. NO MORE POLITICALLY CORRECT
WARS THAT ARE POLITICIZED AND THEN ABANDONED.
This out of the box thinking is
refreshing. Why didn’t Iraq pay our military heroes?
8. Trump is a progressive “Republican …”
He says he is a conservative. It’s up to
you as to what you want to believe.
9. He says single payer healthcare
works; he would give people more than just Obama care …
Again, this week, in his interview with
me, Trump went into great detail about how he supports healthcare savings
accounts to replace Obamacare. I have been an advocate of healthcare savings
accounts since reading the book by the Cato institute, “Patient Power.” A GREAT
IDEA.
10. The First Lady would be the first to
have posed nude in lesbian porno shots …
I thought you were libertarian? Also I
go back to the fact that you have changed. Trump’s wife is a mother and what
she did in the past doesn’t make my top 10,000 list of problems we face as a
country.
11. He said he keeps all the Bibles he
is given in a “special place,” outside the city — and he only goes to church on
Christmas and Easter …
I have met atheists and agnostics who
seem more in awe of and dazzled by the majesty of God’s creation than those who
can cite every chapter and verse. To me, religion is a deeply, deeply held
personal issue that involves the heart. I am a Christian but a deeply flawed
one who regularly needs forgiveness. Having been raised a Catholic, I also have
issues with the “church” since sex scandal. I have never lost faith in God. The
Bible does say, “… The Kingdom of Heaven is within us,” and instructs us to “go
into our closets and pray.” I hope for Trump’s sake, and for everybody’s sake,
that he has peace in his faith; I know I do.
12. Trump is generally not a likable guy
…
The polls show Republicans like Trump at
this moment more than the other candidates. I have known him for years and have
found him to be extremely likable and engaging.
13. He has around 16 percent
favorability with Hispanics …
I also saw a poll where he was leading
with Hispanic voters in Nevada. IMHO, it’s too early to conclude where that
settles out.
14. He has gone bankrupt four times.
I thought his explanation at the debate
was extremely solid. He never went bankrupt personally, and of the hundreds of
business deals he has been involved in, four of them didn’t work out well.
Shouldn’t that be balanced out with all of the deals he has made that have been
successful? I think that is only fair. How many jobs has he created over the
years? How many careers were made because of his risk taking. Also the proof is
in the pudding. He has by every measure been an extremely successful
businessman who has made billions of dollars. Not something many people can
pull off. I admire success stories. If Trump was president, and he made
hundreds of decisions and only four of them went badly, we would likely be in
pretty good shape.
15. Just based on his favorability
ratings, he could never win in a general. Research shows that he may be near
his ceiling now …
In the end, that’s up to the American
people to decide, not us.
In conclusion, Glenn, I repeat … I am personally undecided at this point. But I
am glad Donald Trump is in this race. I like his straightforward outsider’s
view of politics. His personality and background are impressive and refreshing.
I like anybody who is not politically correct.
I hope his outspokenness and his courage
rubs off on his fellow Republicans, who have all become stale, timid, weak, and
generally (especially in DC) useless. Many Republicans can learn a thing or two
from Trump.
We have 5 1/2 months until the Iowa
caucuses. My promise is to dig deeper into the questions you and others have
raised that deserve answers. I also promise to give Mr. Trump and every other
candidate a fair shot to explain their views in detail. I think a FAIR SHOT is
the best way to serve my audience. Then it’s up to the American people, as it
should be.
My hope and prayer is that we elect a
bold, inspiring conservative visionary who will undo the damage caused by Obama
and leftist politicians, and that we can work together to save the country we
both love.
Best always,
Sean
Donald Trump Says It Will Be a ‘Miracle’
If Hillary Can Continue With Campaign Throughout Email Scandal
·
·
·
·
Appearing on
NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Donald Trump compared Hillary Clinton’s controversy
over her email server to that of former CIA Director
David Petraeus who
ultimately was forced to resign after it was revealed that he shared classified
information with a woman he was having an affair with.
“I think she
may not be able to run, to be honest, because this whole email thing is a
horrible thing,” Trump told Chuck Todd in an interview that aired Sunday morning, saying that it would be a
“miracle” if the former secretary of state is able to continue her 2016
presidential campaign.
Image source:
NBC News
“General Petraeus, his life has
been destroyed. And he did 5 percent of what she did,” Trump said. “So assuming
she’s able to run — which would be absolutely, to me, a miracle at this point —
I will beat her.”
“I think she’s the worst secretary
of state in the history of our country,” Trump continued.
And when Trump refused to answer
Todd’s question of who was the worst before her, the NBC host shot back, saying
“Everything with you is the best or the worst; there’s no nuance.”
The real estate tycoon also said
he imagined Clinton’s husband, former President Bill Clinton, was
“disappointed” that Trump had decided to throw his hat into the ring for the
Republican presidential nomination as he is the only candidate who could beat
Clinton.
Trump addressed the rumors that he
may jump the Republican ship and run as an independent in 2016 and said as of
right now, it’s “highly unlikely” that he will do that, but he’s going to keep
the door open.
Once again, Trump compared the U.S. to countries such as China and Japan and
lamented to Todd that the country no longer has victories. Later on during the
interview, Trump and Todd sparred about the U.S. economy compared to other
nation’s such as Mexico.
Image source:
NBC News
In the interview, Trump also
defended his changes in certain policy positions, such as abortion, likening
himself to former President Ronald Reagan. Trump referenced the recent
undercover videos that reportedly show Planned Parenthood officials discussing the
sale of aborted fetal tissue. The Republican presidential contender said
Planned Parenthood needs to stop providing abortions and condemned the
“attitudes” of the officials who appeared in the videos.
“In particular, I didn’t like the
attitude of the people. They talked about it like they were making widgets or
gadgets, and it was inappropriate,” he said. “So I didn’t like what I saw, I
didn’t like what the doctors, or whoever they were, talking about it. They
talked about it like we’re doing cars or something.”
However, Trump said he wasn’t
prepared to discuss if he’d shut down the government over Planned Parenthood
funding.
“I would say during the
administration of Ronald Reagan, you really felt proud to be an American and to
any great extent, people were proud,” Trump said on when the last time America
was “great again,” addressing Todd’s question in reference to his campaign
slogan.
Trump and
Todd, despite their tumultuous
relationship sat down for
the 30-minute interview, which ranged from Supreme Court appointments to ISIS,
below.
Gowdy Heard About Hillary’s Huge Trouble,
And His Response Is One She’ll Hate…
"If she were interested in cooperation, she would not have done..."
Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., chairman of the House Select Committee
on Benghazi, responded to the news that Hillary Clinton plans to turn over her
email server to the Justice Department, in response to an investigation into
the possible mishandling of classified information by the former secretary of
state.
The move by the Bureau comes following the reports that the Intelligence
Community’s Inspector General discovered four classified documents, to date,
among those released by Clinton–two of which are “top secret,” the highest
security classification.
Advertisement
RELATED STORIES
As reported by Western Journalism, Clinton stated
during a press conference in March: “I did not email any classified material to
anyone on my email. There is no classified material.”
Clinton’s campaign spokesman Nick Merrill said that “She directed her team to give her e-mail server that was used
during her tenure as secretary to the Department of Justice, as well as a thumb
drive containing copies of her e-mails already provided to the State
Department.” Merrill added: “She pledged to cooperate with the government’s
security inquiry, and if there are more questions, we will continue to address
them.”
Fox News’ Bill Hemmer asked Gowdy on Wednesday morning if he expected
full cooperation from Clinton now. “It’s hard not to laugh when I hear that,”
Gowdy responded. “I know he’s in the business of being paid to say absurd
things, but if that really was his intent and her intent, why did they set up
this unprecedented email arrangement?”
Advertisement
TRENDING STORIES
“Why did she keep the emails for 20 months after she left the Department
of State?” the congressman continued. “She did not turn them over then. Why did
she delete emails after 20 months? Did all of the sudden she decide after 20
months, ‘This is too burdensome for me to keep a bunch of emails on my server,
so let me not only delete them, but wipe the server clean.’
“If she were interested in cooperation, she would not have done any of
the things she has done to date. This is not about cooperation. This is not
about convenience. It’s about control. She wanted to control access to the
public record. And she also got away with it, but she didn’t,” said Gowdy.
Hemmer asked Gowdy if Clinton’s alleged mishandling of classified
information fit the same category as that for which Gen. David Petraeus was
prosecuted and convicted.
“The same rules ought to apply irrespective of their station in life. So
I am going to have to count on the [FBI] and [its director] Jim Comey, who has
a reputation for evenhandedness and fairness. The same folks who investigated
and prosecuted Gen. Petraeus are looking into the current allegations with
respect to classified information. If the facts are the same, I would expect
the result to be the same,” he replied.
Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano believes
Clinton’s breach is far more serious than Petraeus’. He said: “In his case it was ‘confidential’ materials,
which is the lowest level of classification. In her case it is ‘top secret’,
which is the highest level of classification.” In the case of Petraeus, the
documents were in his home, while Clinton’s were on her personal server, making
them vulnerable to hacking.
Gowdy released a statement Tuesday highlighting the severity of the former secretary of
state’s actions.“This is a serious
national security issue, and the seriousness of it should transcend normal,
partisan politics.”
h/t: TheBlaze
WND EXCLUSIVE
END-TIMES EXPERT: CHILL
OUT ABOUT POPE FRANCIS
Worry
he's Antichrist 'simply doesn't square with Scripture'
Pope Francis
There’s abundant reason for Christians to be watching world developments as new
geopolitical coalitions arise along with increasing persecution and other
circumstances that appear to relate to end-times prophecy.
But is Pope Francis
the Antichrist?
Chill out, at least
one end-times watcher says. Probably not.
The question was
raised recently in a Charisma News commentary by Jennifer LeClaire headlined, “Why So Many People Think
Pope Francis is the Antichrist.”
“It could be for some
of the same reasons his popularity is declining,” she said. “His approval
rating in the United States has dropped from 76 percent a year ago to 56
percent today, according to Gallup.”
She points to his
public focus on combating “social inequity and poverty.”
Talking Points Memo noted the Charisma News commentary drew considerable attention when it was
linked at the Drudge Report.
Joel Richardson,
whose works include “Mideast Beast,” “When a Jew
Rule the World,” the movie “End Times Eyewitness” and “Islam & The End
Times,” told WND there is “no
question that Pope Francis is a real disappointment to conservatives, whether
Catholic or Protestant.”
“In my opinion, the
greatest of his failures thus far was to officially recognize ‘Palestine’ as a
state. Such actions only empower a political movement that is founded not in
the desire to establish its own state, rather it is to eliminate the state of
Israel,” he said.
But Richardson said
the idea that Pope Francis is the Antichrist “simply doesn’t square with
Scripture.”
“There are many
Scriptures we could point to to establish this, but just a few should suffice,”
he said.
“According to the
prophet Daniel, the Antichrist will first emerge as a leader of small
significance, who rises in power, initially overthrowing three other kings,
eventually controlling a total of 10 kings (Daniel 7:8; 8:9-10; 11:23). The
Antichrist, also called ‘Gog’ by the Prophet Ezekiel, will arise specifically
from the region of Magog, which is essentially Asia Minor or modern-day Turkey
(Ezekiel 38:2). The Antichrist will eventually come to spend three-and-a-half
years speaking blasphemies and ‘unheard of things against the God of gods’
(Daniel 11:36), eventually elevating himself above God (Daniel 8:11,25;
11:36-38; 2 Thessalonians 2:4).”
Richardson said that
while Francis “may be a great disappointment as a pope,” it is “rather doubtful
that he will ever take to openly blaspheming and elevating himself above God.”
The Charisma News
commentary noted Francis has denounced capitalism, backed away from traditional
views of homosexuality, discussed a “New World Order” and warmed up to Islam
“like no other pope before him.”
Richardson noted some
have speculated Barack Obama is the Antichrist, while others point to Francis
and others.
“None of these
leaders aligns to the various biblical requirements,” he said. “At this moment
in history when there is such a tremendous sense of foreboding within the body
of Christ, we must rise above our feelings, hold steady, and look only to the
Scriptures.”
Author Tom Horn,
whose projects include “Blood on the Altar: The Coming War Between Christian
vs. Christian” and “Nephilim Stargates,” has addressed end-times prophecies regarding the pope in “Petrus Romanus: The Final
Pope is Here.”
In a documentary
based on the book – titled “The Last Pope?” – he describes
traveling to Rome, Geneva, Belfast and other places to “discover the story of
venerated Irish prophet St. Malachy” and his prophecy of the popes.
He cites medieval
historians and Vatican-affiliated experts, among others, regarding Malachy’s
prophecy.
In “Petrus Romanus,”
he explores the prophecy identifying the final pope as “Peter the Roman,” whose
reign is to end in the destruction of Rome.
According to
tradition, Malachy was called to Rome by Pope Innocent II in 1595, and while
there, experienced the vision of the future popes, including the last, which he
described in a series of cryptic phrases.
Horn believes the
final pontiff could be the one following Benedict XVI, who resigned.
The book charges that
there are those among “a multinational power elite and occult hierarchy” who
already have infiltrated the Catholic Church and will help deceive Catholics
into worshiping the Antichrist.
Horn told WND that
his earlier work predicted the resignation of Benedict, giving critics pause,
since it was the first time a pope had resigned in nearly 600 years.
He noted that Francis
took his name from a friar, and it could be interpreted as “Peter the Roman.”
He also pointed out
Francis’ Jesuit background and the progressive ideas in his pronouncements, or
encyclicals.
And then there are
the atheists on Francis’ advisory team, he noted.
“I think maybe, more
than anything, his condemnation of the free market, his embrace of ideas that
are Marxist and socialist” have raised questions, he said.
Now Francis is
planning a U.S. trip in which he will become the first pope to address
Congress.
While exactly who
will emerge to fulfill the roles prophesied in the Bible remains cloudy, “I
think there is something about all of this,” Horn said.
Many people over the
generations, he noted, have believed the Vatican would eventually be infested
with demonic clergy and be led by the Antichrist.
He said Christians
need to be watching carefully.
LeClaire concluded
her Charisma News piece by citing the chatter about Francis and asking whether
his role as pope is a fulfillment of prophecy.
“Here’s what we know:
More than 50 years ago, a Jesuit priest predicted the resignation of Pope
Benedict – to the day – and now Tom Horn, who worked with Cris Putnam to unveil
a 900-year-old prophecy buried in the library at the Vatican that describes a series
of 112 popes, and others are looking at this research. ‘Was he divinely
inspired? Was he demonically inspired?’ Horn asks. ‘Because we know demons know
things about times and dispensations, too.’”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/08/end-times-expert-chill-out-about-pope-francis/#FFzUf7fy1XRXCK4I.99
If scandals don’t block Hillary from the White House,
they’ll haunt her as president
But if, somehow, she manages to slide
past all the rising criminal allegations and defer all the pressure for her to
answer for her secretive information hoarding as secretary of state, she still
will have to worry about whether her own past can ever catch up with her — and
that’s a concern that won’t die away if she becomes president.
Rather, it’s a concern that will only
intensify if she’s the president.
On Friday, conservative blogger Glenn Reynolds (aka Instapundit) shared an interesting scenario set
forth by someone he identified only as “a journalist who requests anonymity.”
After reading through this writer’s
vision of Hillary’s future, should she attain the presidency, you’ll see why:
Hillary will be totally blackmail-able
if elected. Here’s
the logic:
1. It’s
safe to say that there were things on that server which could cause Hillary
tremendous harm politically – which is why she destroyed the evidence that
would have been exculpatory if you believed her explanation. In my mind, it’s
also why she used a private server to begin with.
2. She is
lying about what was on that server, potentially to include while under oath in
her upcoming congressional testimony.
3. If
someone had all the copies of her emails and those of her staff, they could
readily blackmail her because of the above. They’d have proof of her wrongdoing
and her lying about it.
4. Hillary
Clinton, as both a future Presidential candidate and a sitting Sec. of State
would have been one of the Top 100 intelligence targets in the world and
probably one of the top 10.
5. It’s
thus certain that the Chinese and Russians would each have had a team focused
on accessing her communications.
6. Every
security expert I know of has said it’s a virtual certainty the Chinese and
Russians both gained access to her server and all her emails. From what I know about their capabilities,
I’d agree.
There are probably a bunch of folks in
China and Russia who are praying (even if they’re atheists) for Hillary to be
elected. If she wins, they own the President of the United States. I can just
imagine in a meeting with Putin, Hillary being told to back off supporting
Ukraine or he’ll release her emails (as he hands her a folder containing the
most damaging ones for her to peruse). Put in that position, would Hillary fall
on her sword or sacrifice a country like Ukraine? I don’t know, but I wouldn’t
want to be living in Ukraine…
Someone with that kind of vulnerability
to blackmail shouldn’t be allowed to sweep the floors of the NSA, much less run
our country.
Sound far-fetched? Not to us.
More far-fetched is the scenario that even posits
Hillary will make it through a Democratic primary. In fact, The Washington Free
Beacon’s Matthew Continetti suggested Friday, the most realistic way to assure
her a clear path to the nomination is for President Obama to just go ahead and
pardon her for any and all crimes right now — so she can henceforth answer all
her trust-issues critics with a single, dismissive “I’ve been cleared.”
“Pardon Hillary now if you want to save
her campaign,” Continetti advised. “If not, if you let the investigation
proceed, then you may have no choice but to pardon her later. A little less
than a year and a half remains in President Obama’s term. Pardoning Clinton
would be a fitting capstone to his presidency. If he doesn’t do it, though,
Hillary still has options. There’s
always President Trump.”
Los Pichy-Boys report from Havana on the
opening of the U.S. embassy in Cuba
Los
pichy-boys como cubanos siempre lo tiramos todo a
relajo y es por eso que los Castro
has durado 56 años
|
Lázaro R González para
Alcalde del Condado de Miami Elecciones de Noviembre 8 del 2016. Use la boleta en blanco.
Por favor infórmeselo
a todos los familiares, vecinos y amigos, No aceptamos contribuciones
monetarias Contacto: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com
“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”
No comments:
Post a Comment