No 856 “En mi
opinión”
Enero 23, 2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R
González Miño EDITOR
The Biggest Lie Obama Told In his State of the
Union Address
“I have no more campaigns to
run. My only agenda for the next two years is the same as the one I’ve had
since the day I swore an oath on the steps of this Capitol — to do what I believe is best for America.”
Of course, there’s the lie
about no more campaigns. He’s always campaigning. The lie is in the statement
about the day he “swore an oath on the steps of this Capitol. Here’s the
presidential oath that every president takes:
“I do solemnly swear (or
affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United
States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the
Constitution of the United States.”
He did not swear to do
what he believed is best for America. He swore to “preserve, protect and defend
the Constitution of the United States” to the best of his ability. There is a
big difference in how “best” is being used.
The tyrants of history
believed that what they were doing was the best for their empire or nation. No
autocratic ruler believes otherwise.
Some of the worst
atrocities in history were done by men who believed that what they were doing
was the best, even if it meant killing millions of their own people and going to
war to kill millions more. As the proverb states, “you can't make an omelet
without breaking some eggs.” When Winston Churchill said during World War II
that “God is with us,” Josef Stalin retorted, “Then Devil is with us, and
together we will win.”
That’s why our founders
created a Constitution -- to keep in check what they knew was man’s propensity
to do evil for his own self-aggrandizement and the benefit of his chosen
constituents.
“There is,” in the words
of James Madison, a “degree of depravity in mankind which requires a certain
degree of circumspection and distrust.” Madison speaks of the “caprice and
wickedness of man,” and of the “infirmities and depravities of the human
character.”
All tyrants believe their
policies are the best. They all claim they’re doing the right thing. What
politician ever ran on these types of campaign slogans?
§
“Vote for me and I’ll do the wrong thing
for the nation.”
§
“I’ll do what I believe is worst for
America.”
The Constitution was
designed to limit the power of government not empower elected officials to do
what they believe is right or best. They were elected to uphold the
Constitution; it states that in the oath.
Obama and Company might
believe it’s best to make community college “free,” but the Constitution does
not allow it.
We can see the problem as
far back as Magna Carta (1215), and like Obama and presidents before him,
“neither side stood behind their commitments” Magna Carta never reached its
promised ideals because, like Obama, rulers wanted to do what they believed was
best, ultimately for themselves.
“In questions of power,”
Benjamin Franklin wrote, “let no more be heard of confidence in man but bind
him down from mischief by the chains of the constitution.” Of course, when
rulers ignore the Constitution, they are no longer chained. And when Congress
refuses to hold the President accountable, the chains are put on us.
Great mischief has been
done by presidents and the people who elected them because they refuse to be
bound by a constitution that limits their powers.
Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/19930/biggest-lie-obama-told-state-union-address/#jLaiOalL68tDH3pf.99
Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/19930/biggest-lie-obama-told-state-union-address/#jLaiOalL68tDH3pf.99
Amenper: ¿A dónde fue el
Dinero que Ganamos?
No soy anarquista, ni siquiera libertario, comprendo la necesidad de que
tengamos que pagar impuestos para los servicios públicos, mejorar las infraestructuras y los servicios sociales a
los más necesitados.
Comprendo que tiene que haber un gobierno electo por el pueblo para que
administre nuestras contribuciones para mantener el orden y los servicios en el
país.
Dicho esto, por una evicencia presente en la historia de la humanidad, no
hay gobierno bueno, el gobierno se convierte en un nido de burócratas que no
produce nada, solamenta más y más burocracia.
Así que lo que pedimos los conservadores no es no pagar impuestos ni
eliminar el gobierno, simplemente que ese gobierno sea lo más pequeño posible,
que tenga transparencia en su administración, que recuerde que es un servidor
del pueblo, no actuar como si fuera a la inversa.
Que los impuestos sean los esenciales para las funciones necesarias, no
para que se usen para avanzar agendas políticas.
Desde los albores de la civilización, la imposición del gobierno al pueblo
y los impuestos han ha sido los mayores problemas de las naciones.
Cuando el sistema político jerárquico que floreció en Europa
entre los siglos VIII y XIV, en el que el rey ocupaba el lugar de poder más
alto, pero en que habían barones y obispos que manejaban parcelas de tierra
llamadas feudos, que eran arrendadas a ellos por sus reyes.
Cada propietario tenía entonces su propio ejército de caballeros y de
siervos que trabajan la tierra. El señor feudal manejaba su feudo como un
gobierno y grabava con impuestos onerosos a los arrendadores.
Robin Hood no fue un ladrón que robaba a los ricos para dárselo a los
pobres, como simplísticamente no los presentan en las películas, era un
caballero al que el señor feudal había incautado sus tierras por los
impuestos. Robin Hood era un protestante de los impuestos, podíamos
compararlo con un miembro del Tea Party de la protesta de Boston.
En nuestro países, Los Estados Unidos y Cuba, los impuestos onerosos fueron
la causa de los primeros levantamientos contra los conolizadores. En
los Estados Unidos con la protesta del impuesto del te de la corona inglesa, el
llamado Tea Party cuando lanzaron el te a la bahía de Boston. En
Cuba, la protesta de los tabaqueros por el impuesto de la corona a través del
llamado estanco del tabaco. Nuestro tabaco party.
Cuando el gobierno crece, cuando el gobierno se hace poderoso, el pueblo se
convierte en un esclavo del gobierno, esto es lo que pasa en los países
comunistas que son el gobierno a la máxima expresión.
El socialismo del siglo XXI lo que está haciendo es hacer crecer el
gobierno por debajo de la mesa, sin que nos demos cuenta. Poco a
poco con más y más impuesto nuestro trabajo es para llenar las arcas de un
gobierno paternalista.
Los burócratas del gobierno no trabajan para producir bienes, trabajan para
ver cómo pueden sacar más dinero de los que producen los
bienes. Últimamente su trabajo es ver cómo nos pueden poner impuestos
sobre impuestos.
O sea que tenemos que pagar dos veces impuestos por el dinero que hemos
ganado. ¿Con qué nos quedamos?
Y lo hacen con una retórica y una demagogia que hay personas que le parece
que es algo bueno.
Los planes 529, que son los planes que hacemos para la educación de
nuestros hijos ahora tendrán que pagar impuestos cuando se usen. El plan de
Obama es tratar a retiros de estos planes de ahorro, que son financiados con el
dinero que ya se ha tributado — como ingreso regular para el beneficiario. Por
lo tanto este dinero será gravado otra vez antes de que pueda ser utilizado
para pagar por educación superior.
Lo mismo con las herencias, si ya yo pagué impuestos por ese dinero cuando
lo gané, ¿Por qué mis hijos tienen que volver a pagar un impuesto que es casi
la mitad de la herencia?
El otro impuesto a los “ricos”, porque para Obama y su gobierno todo el
mundo es rico a la hora de pagar impuesto, es el impuesto al capital.
La deferencia del impuesto al capital, o sea cuando una persona recibe una
utilidad surplus o vende un negocio, no es beneficioso para la economía en
general que deje ese dinero sin movimiento en un banco o en el colchón de la
cama. Lo que conviene es que lo invierta y así se incrementa la
economía y se crean nuevos trabajos.
Así que si lo vuelve a invertir, tiene una deferencia de una rebaja de
impuesto en las ganancias en ese capital. Lo mismo sucede cuando vendemos
la casa en que vivimos, si compramos otra casa, no tendremos que pagar impuesto
por lo que ganamos en la venta de la primera casa.
Pero al poderoso gobierno no le gusta estas cosas, son privilegios que hay
que eliminar para ayudar a lo que él denomina la “clase media”, pero lo que a
mí me parece que a lo que se refiere, y a los que esto beneficia, es
a la CLASE gobernante que es MEDIA hija de puta.
O quizás no sea media pero completa.
Rick Santorum: 'Very Difficult to Listen to' Pope Francis
Potential Republican presidential
candidate Rick Santorum said he often finds it "very difficult" to
listen to Pope Francis, particularly when he makes "off the cuff" and
impromptu comments, such as he did when he commented to reporters on a Monday
flight from the Philippines that the ban on contraception does not mean Catholics
should breed "like rabbits."
"Sometimes very difficult to listen to the Pope and some of the things he says off the cuff, and this is one of them," Santorum, a devout Catholic, said Tuesday during an appearance on "The Hugh Hewitt" radio program.
"When he speaks as the leader of the Catholic Church, I’ll certainly pay attention. But when he speaks in interviews, he’s giving his own opinions, which I certainly will listen to, but from my perspective, that doesn’t reflect the idea that people shouldn’t be fruitful and multiply, and that people should be open to life as something that is a core value of the faith and of the Catholic Church," said the former Pennsylvania senator.
"Sometimes very difficult to listen to the Pope and some of the things he says off the cuff, and this is one of them," Santorum, a devout Catholic, said Tuesday during an appearance on "The Hugh Hewitt" radio program.
"When he speaks as the leader of the Catholic Church, I’ll certainly pay attention. But when he speaks in interviews, he’s giving his own opinions, which I certainly will listen to, but from my perspective, that doesn’t reflect the idea that people shouldn’t be fruitful and multiply, and that people should be open to life as something that is a core value of the faith and of the Catholic Church," said the former Pennsylvania senator.
When asked by Hewitt, who also is a
practicing Catholic, whether Pope Francis' comments might lead to confusion and
provide ammunition to the opponents of the Church's position on birth control,
Santorum dismissed any chance the Church would alter its stance.
"No, well look, the bottom line is that’s not going to happen. I don’t think anyone who seriously looks at this believes that it’s not possible to happen. I mean, the Pope is the Pope, but the Pope has a lot of other people around him who advise him. And you know, the most important thing is that as a Catholic, I believe he has the Holy Spirit, and the Holy Spirit isn’t going to let him make that kind of mistake," he contended.
Wednesday, Pope Francis, who was back in Rome, appeared to clarify his remarks, saying "it gives consolation and hope to see so many numerous families who receive children as a real gift of God. They know that every child is a benediction," according to CBS News.
"No, well look, the bottom line is that’s not going to happen. I don’t think anyone who seriously looks at this believes that it’s not possible to happen. I mean, the Pope is the Pope, but the Pope has a lot of other people around him who advise him. And you know, the most important thing is that as a Catholic, I believe he has the Holy Spirit, and the Holy Spirit isn’t going to let him make that kind of mistake," he contended.
Wednesday, Pope Francis, who was back in Rome, appeared to clarify his remarks, saying "it gives consolation and hope to see so many numerous families who receive children as a real gift of God. They know that every child is a benediction," according to CBS News.
Pope Francis has frequently ruffled the
feathers of some Catholics with his conversational comments on matters of
church doctrine, such as when the pontiff suggested on another plane ride that
the Church should be more welcoming to gays, reports the Los Angeles Times.
At the time, Santorum argued that Francis' comments had been taken out of context.
"I've read the whole transcript, and what he said early on was that 'I don’t know anybody who puts gay on their identification card.' He said it in that context. I think all believers need to understand that we need to respect and love everybody and treat everybody with dignity and respect. There's no room for harshness in respect to this issue — but that doesn’t mean the church doesn't have the right to believe what is right and wrong," he asserted in an interview with Buzzfeed.
Santorum has previously expressed excitement about Pope Francis' approach to leadership.
In a March 2014 appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press," Santorum told host Chuck Todd that he thought he is "a humble man" and that "he lives the faith out in his own personal life. ... He's here to be a shepherd; he isn't here to be a scold. I think that's a good thing for the Church and for the world, frankly," according to Huffington Post.Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/US/Rick-Santorum-Pope-Francis-Catholic-Church-Hugh-Hewitt/2015/01/21/id/619872/#ixzz3Pei1oWa5
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
At the time, Santorum argued that Francis' comments had been taken out of context.
"I've read the whole transcript, and what he said early on was that 'I don’t know anybody who puts gay on their identification card.' He said it in that context. I think all believers need to understand that we need to respect and love everybody and treat everybody with dignity and respect. There's no room for harshness in respect to this issue — but that doesn’t mean the church doesn't have the right to believe what is right and wrong," he asserted in an interview with Buzzfeed.
Santorum has previously expressed excitement about Pope Francis' approach to leadership.
In a March 2014 appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press," Santorum told host Chuck Todd that he thought he is "a humble man" and that "he lives the faith out in his own personal life. ... He's here to be a shepherd; he isn't here to be a scold. I think that's a good thing for the Church and for the world, frankly," according to Huffington Post.Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/US/Rick-Santorum-Pope-Francis-Catholic-Church-Hugh-Hewitt/2015/01/21/id/619872/#ixzz3Pei1oWa5
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Obama Will Not Meet with Netanyahu During Trip to Washington
President Barack Obama will not meet with Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu when he travels to Washington in March, the White House said
Thursday, one day after being caught off-guard by Republicans' invitation for
the Israeli leader to address a joint session of Congress.
Spokeswoman Bernadette Meehan said that in keeping with
"long-standing practice and principle," the president does not meet
with heads of state or candidates in close proximity to their elections.
"Accordingly, the president will not be meeting with Prime
Minister Netanyahu because of the proximity to the Israeli election, which is
just two weeks after his planned address to the U.S. Congress," Meehan
said.
Netanyahu is scheduled to speak to Congress on March 3 and will
push for additional sanctions on Iran. He was initially scheduled to address
lawmakers in February, but the date was changed so that it could coincide with
Netanyahu's trip to Washington to address an annual conference held by AIPAC,
the pro-Israel lobby group, in early March.
The invitation was a coordinated effort by House Speaker John
Boehner, R-Ohio, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., with staff
discussions beginning last year, according to a senior Republican aide, who
spoke only on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to publicly
discuss the private talks.
Boehner contacted the Israeli ambassador on Jan. 8 to assess
Netanyahu's interest and received a positive response. The GOP leaders reached
out to the Israelis without consulting with the White House or State
Department, a move that appeared likely to deepen the White House's already tense
relations with congressional Republicans as well as the Israeli leader.
Obama has been urging Republicans, as well as some members of his
own party, to hold off on passing new Iran sanctions legislation while the U.S.
and international partners are in the midst of nuclear negotiations with the
Islamic republic. Last week, British Prime Minister David Cameron said he had
been making a similar case to U.S. lawmakers.
White House chief of staff Denis McDonough said Thursday that the
nuclear negotiations were at a delicate phase.
"We ought to give some time and space for that to work,"
he said.
Netanyahu stands to gain politically at home from the U.S. visit.
He is in a tough fight to win re-election in Israel's upcoming March vote.
Netanyahu's Likud Party is running behind the main opposition group headed by
Yitzhak Herzog's Labor Party, which has been highlighting rancor in the
country's critical relationship with the United States.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said it was inappropriate for
Boehner to invite Netanyahu to address Congress in the shadow of the election
and give the appearance of endorsing the prime minister.
"If that's the purpose of Prime Minister Netanyahu's visit
two weeks before his own election, right in the midst of our negotiations, I
just don't think it's appropriate and helpful," Pelosi said.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Headline/Obama-not-meeting-Netanyahu/2015/01/22/id/620089/#ixzz3PehEWXM8
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Headline/Obama-not-meeting-Netanyahu/2015/01/22/id/620089/#ixzz3PehEWXM8
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Bill Would Allow
Immigrant Voting Without Citizenship
image:
http://conservbyte.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Ballot-300x200.jpeg
How do liberals even
propose this kind of thing? Do they care nothing about the integrity of the
elections?
Check it out:
Check it out:
A bill introduced by D.C.
lawmakers would grant some immigrants lacking U.S. citizenship the ability to
vote in municipal elections.
The Local Resident Voting Rights Act of 2015 would allow D.C.
residents who are not U.S. citizens but meet the federal definition of having
permanent residency status to cast ballots in local elections, including races
for mayor and the D.C. Council as well as initiatives and charter referendums.
D.C. Council member David Grosso, at-large independent, introduced the
legislation Tuesday.
In a statement announcing the introduction of the bill, Mr. Grosso
cited statistics from the U.S. Census Bureau that indicate the District is home
to nearly 54,000 foreign-born residents who are not naturalized U.S.
Amenper: Obama tuvo un
sueño
Obama tuvo un sueño, sintonizó a Fox News, y vio al locutor leyendo las
noticias:
Posiblemente ya han leído las noticias, el Presidente Obama advirtió al
Congreso el martes que el utilizaría su nueva pluma de oro para vetar cualquier
legislación para aplicar nuevas sanciones a Irán. Entonces el congreso ha
respondido ilegalmente, sin permiso del ejecutivo, invitando al Primer Ministro
de Israel Benjamín Netanyahu para que venga a los Estados Unidos con la idea de
que Netanyahu apoye al congreso para aplicar sanciones a Irán.
Pero Obama no se quedó sin hacer nada, inmediatamente tuvo una conversación
telefónica con Netanyahu y como resultado el primer ministro de Israel ha
accedido a cambiar su posición en cuanto a la política del Medio Oriente
siguiendo las indicaciones de Obama.
Estas son las declaraciones que Obama le ha indicado a Netanyahu y que el
dirá en su discurso en el Congreso:
Finalmente nos hemos convencido que el estado de Israel no tiene un derecho
moral de existir. "Eso es todo", explicó el primer ministro Netanyahu
en una conferencia de prensa preliminar sobre su discurso al Congreso.
"Nosotros estamos desmantelando la nación de Israel. Me voy a vivir en el
retiro a un resort en Irán."
"Después de mi conversación con el presidente de Estados Unidos,
Barack Hussein Obama, mi gabinete y yo tuvimos largas discusiones sobre
problemas del mundo, y llegamos a la conclusión que nuestros críticos tienen
razón - todos los problemas del mundo se deben a nosotros. Así, con el fin de
resolver estos problemas, nos sentimos que sería mejor extender nuestro retiro
más allá de Gaza para incluir la Cisjordania para que exista una Israel
correcta," dijo Netanyahu.. "La retirada de Gaza es sólo el
principio, tendremos posteriores olas de paz y hermandad con el reconocimiento
del estado de Palestina y más allá, el Presidente nos animó a disolver el
actual gobierno en conjunto”.
“Formaremos antes de retirarnos un nuevo gabinete compuesto en su totalidad
de personas de la fe Islámica que este en acuerdo con la mayoría de la región.
Sin nosotros, la gente del mundo finalmente podrán, una vez más, vivir en
permanente armonía y entendimiento, como hicieron antes de que se fundó Israel
hace casi sesenta años."
Colonos judíos recibirán instrucciones para hacer sus maletas y
mudarse a los países de sus padres y abuelos.
El Presidente Obama ha recibido con complacencia este cambio de política de
Israel, lo cual según ha dicho a fuentes no identificadas, hará que nuestras
negociaciones con Irán progresen.
“Con la entidad sionista fuera del camino, los mulás iraníes atenuarán su
retórica violenta, desmantelarán su programa nuclear y detendrán el
financiamiento de grupos terroristas.
ISIS entregará los territorios ocupados" “Esto es un triunfo de
nuestra política internacional”
Al Quaeda, también ha hecho una declaración en el internet: "Israel
era la única razón por qué estábamos planeando bombardear Nueva York, París,
Londres, Bali, Riyadh, Tailandia, Cachemira, Rusia, Marruecos, Nigeria, India,
Filipinas, Playa del Carmen, Yucatán, Punta Cana y las Bahamas. "Pero
ahora dejaremos atrás todas nuestras operaciones".
El Presidente palestino hizo declaraciones: "Creemos que con la
desaparición de Israel nuestro futuro está ahora libre para su desarrollo.
Llevaremos a buen término que todos los programas comenzaron en los campos de
refugiados nuestros científicos, como los avances en medicina, educación,
aplicada y ciencias teóricas, la nanotecnología y exploración del
espacio."
Damos las gracias a nuestro hermano en la fe, el presidente de los Estados
Unidos de América, Barack Hussein Obama.
Los únicos que no han recibido bien la noticia son los miembros del
personal de las Naciones Unidas. "Puesto que los conflictos del mundo
terminarán, y que no tendremos que aplicar sanciones a Israel, estamos
preocupados de que no nos necesitan más". Un delegado de la ONU Anónimo
comparte su preocupación: "Oí que consideraban la conversión de la ONU en
condominios
Pero de pronto Obama se despertó y no le
quedará más remedio que oír el verdadero discurso de Netanyahu.
Holder Has Made It Harder
for Federal Government to Legally Seize Your Property
Andrew
R. Kloster is a legal fellow in the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and
Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation, focusing on civil rights, the role
of the federal courts and other constitutional issues.Read his research.
Before today’s
announcement, federal agencies could take over, or “adopt,” forfeiture cases
from local or state law enforcement agencies. In other words, state or local
law enforcement personnel would seize property and then turn it over to the
federal government to process.
Pursuant to
agreements with the federal government, once the property was successfully
forfeited in federal court, the originating state or local agency got a portion
of the proceeds, potentially as high as 80 percent. That money had to be used
for law enforcement operations, placing it beyond the control of local
governments and state legislators.
The program
became the subject of controversy for effectively allowing local agencies to
circumvent restrictive state laws in favor of the potentially more lucrative
federal route, raising serious federalism and good government concerns. Even
where states had strong procedural safeguards for property owners or
limitations on the use of forfeiture funds, law enforcement could partner with
the federal government and use federal rules to seize property and make use of
the profits.
“En mi opinión”
No 856 Enero 23, 2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST”
Lázaro R González Miño EDITOR
